The Cartoon ClosetThe end result is that comic strips seem to be drawn so as to not offend the most conservative readers and newspaper editors in the nation’s most conservative communities. Not so, says Universal Press Syndicate’s Lee Salem, who, in addition to For Better or For Worse, oversees Doonesbury. He says he would be open to gay comic strip characters, going so far as to say, “If controversial strips have taught us anything, it’s that circulations grow, that they increase with controversy.”
But then he proceeds to list all the reasons why gay characters wouldn’t fit into most strips. Doonesbury and For Better or For Worse, for example, are “set in a time that’s now. In other strips, it’s vaguer, less characters that live in the real world.” Why couldn’t gay characters exist in a world with more fantasy elements? When pressed, Salem admits they could. But then he’s quick to point to the reluctant newspaper editors he has to consider — the folks who buy the strip from the syndicates on a daily or weekly basis, and who can drop it at any time. “It’s a conservative business,” Salem says. “At this time, we may not be able to sell [a ‘gay’ strip]. I can’t say you can read on the comics page what you see on television. It’s a different art form, a more conservative medium.” Salem says that gay characters and storylines have Universal Press Syndicate’s full support — but the reality seems to be that only applies when they’re coming from established, lucrative cartoonists like Gary Trudeau and Lynn Johnston, who they’d be absolutely crazy to alienate. Meanwhile, over at the Washington Post Writers Group, Lago admits, “When I get a strip [for consideration], one of the first things I look at is why might a [daily newspaper] editor turn this down.” A gay character would be a red flag, she says, though, “I wouldn’t reject it out of hand. But would it be funny enough to carry in enough newspapers [to make it financially viable]?” It’s not the sort of talk that lends itself to creative risk-taking on the part of cartoonists. On the contrary, it’s a subtle form of censorship. And cartoonists are getting the message loud and clear. “And so the conservatism goes on,” says Luann’s Greg Evans. “For Better Or For Worse is a huge strip with tremendous popularity and power. Most of us tenuously hang onto our meager client list, ever fearful of drops. This tends to drive the boldness from our writing. I hate to admit it, but in the end it simply comes down to paying the bills.” The Future of the Cartoon Closet? The good news is that Lawrence will be returning for a final appearance on For Better Or For Worse, before Johnston goes into partial retirement on September 29th, turning the strip into a “hybrid” of new strips and reworked older ones. “Lawrence has to do the flowers” for Elizabeth’s wedding, Johnston says, noting that he and his partner Nick run a landscaping business. Meanwhile, McEldowney considers his gay characters an integral part of 9 Chickweed Lane. An upcoming strip has Seth, one of the gay characters, inquiring to the uncle of one of the comic’s main characters, “How long have you known you’re gay?” When this provokes a furious response from the uncle, Seth says, “I guess you haven’t known very long.” According to McEldowney, “If they ever said don’t bring [the gay characters] up anymore, I’d say, ‘Well, let’s just call it quits.’ I’m not interested in being censored just because one person might complain.”
But as progressive (and funny) as 9 Chickweed Lane is, it only appears in about 60 newspapers, almost entirely urban or suburban markets. The really bad news is that we shouldn’t be expecting any new gay characters on the comics pages any time soon. The syndicates say they get few, if any, submissions with gay characters – probably in part because the industry has seemed so timid and non-receptive. Meanwhile, the syndicates have apparently made little attempt to seek such strips out, either from alternative or college newspapers—often a breeding group for new strips—or from webcomic artists. This is in sharp contrast to the industry’s efforts to bring racial and gender diversity to the comics pages. In discussing The Boondocks in a 2007 interview, Salem acknowledged, “For a long time we had been looking for a strip by an African-American cartoonist.” Back in the 1970s, Cathy’s Cathy Guisewite and even For Better Or For Worse’s Johnston were similarly encouraged by their syndicates to put together strips from a female perspective. But that isn’t happening for gay artists or gay-related comics. In other words, the cartoon closet won’t be opening any wider anytime soon.
AfterElton.com is currently writing an article on gay-related webcomics. Email the author with your favorite webcomic. Submitted by on Sun, 2008-05-18 21:42. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|








The next step of evolution
is I think the webcomics. There's just an endless supply of them on the internet, and with no restrictions on what they can and cannot do, there's plenty of gay content all over. And with the society hopping onto the information highway as well, I suppose webcomics can be considered mainstream, though its popularity I suppose can only be measured by hits and similar stuff.
As I said, plenty of gay themed webcomics out there, but none I regularly follow. One relevant one that I bookmark is 'Shortpacked!': http://www.shortpacked.com/index.html It doesn't revolve around gay themes, but the main character Ethan is gay and a lot of funny strips about it (my personal favourite: http://www.shortpacked.com/d/20060705.html).
Good luck with the search for more gay friendly webcomics :D
Wow thank you so much for
You're Right...
....I think the web is really where the hotbed of activity with gay comics is happening. As someone who happens to know quite a bit about this subject, (full disclosure, I am the writer/artist of a gay comic strip, Kyle's Bed & Breakfast), the internet has been extremely insturmental in getting my work out there. I never actually considered submitting my comic strip to the syndicates.... not because of the gay content, though, but because of size issues, (oh God, not another gay man ranting about size issues!). Seriously, newspapers have shrunken comic strips down to postage stamp sizes in recent years, making "soap-opera" style comics, or any comic strip with detailed illustrations, quite difficult to reproduce. And for me, personally, I like writing 9 or 10 panel strips, which would never fit into a daily newspaper format. Thankfully, the various GLBT magazines & newspapers that my comic strip is syndicated to don't have any issue with the size, (no more size jokes, please!), and of course, I can run it any size I want at my own website. (Which is www.kylecomics.com in case you're wondering!)
It does strike me as a bit nonsensical that the syndicates, and the newspapers, would play it so safe with featuring gay characters in their strip offerings. I would think they'd welcome the controversy, (and subsequent massive news coverage), any gay strip would provide. In any case, I really appreciate this article, as you've delved into an area of great interest to me!
Shortpacked!
Thanks! That comic is hilarious. I used to work in a toy store, and still belong to quite a geeky, action figure collecting-type of crowd, ao much of Shortpacked hits close to home.
Diesel Sweeties has had gay and lesbian characters as long as I can remember, although the humor can be lowbrow and people shift around quite a bit (I'm trying to remember if one lesbian character dated both the former porn actress and her sister, or if she didn't date the sister but did date Red Robot...it's complicated.)
"Wash him up and get him ready"
afhickman
"It takes a village (to make Village People)"
Apart from Koko the Klown, the earliest "gay" cartoon character I can remember is the Mask Man from Lenny Bruce's famous "Thank You Mask Man." The townspeople want to thank the Mask Man, so he asks them for Tonto, the Indian, with whom he plans to commit an "unnatural act." Tonto doesn't seem to mind, but Silver may have reason to be concerned. Here it is on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tjWYEMQ70w&feature=relatedWhy haven't you heard of
This article, while
Something people tend to
Something people tend to forget with the Lawrence storyline is that he wasn't "introduced" as the token gay character. Lawrence had been on and off the strip from the very beginning. He was Michael's childhood friend, so the audience literally grew up with him.
I think that had a lot to do with why the storyline was so well received. Open-minded audiences got to experience the coming out of a loved one vicariously.
Blondie
Actually, I'm pretty sure that Blondie started her own business fairly recently---perhaps in 2001, rather than in 1991, as your article states? If that is the case, of course, the comics are even more firmly anchored in the 1950's than suggested! (I seem to remember that Dagwood had some big fit about it; kind of a stupid storyline, I thought, until he settled down...)
I'm like a superhero, with no powers or motivation...
Adam and Andy by James Asal
Future epitaph: "It seemed like a good idea at the time."
An incredibly sweet strip, beautifully drawn. Not as gut-bustingly funny or satirical as other strips like "Curbside" or "Dykes to Watch Out For," but the leads are hunky and adore each other, and the tone is consistently genial and wry. Beautiful line drawings. It's also occasionally sexy without ever being tawdry. I keep meaning to buy a T-shirt with the lead couple on it. (Andy is just too delicious.)Donelan
When I think of gay-themed comics, Donelan is the first name that pops into my mind. His work is usually in the one-panel format, and was regularly run in many of the gay papers and magazines in the past. The subject matter ranged from mild to rather graphic (including nudity and sexual activity), so it's obvious why no major newspapers ran his work. But he still deserves a mention in any discussion of the inclusion of gay sensibilites in comics.
The reality is that the
I can't say I totally disagree
They should think of the
They should think of the teens. When I was in high school, which was about a year ago, my cousin and I read the comics every day. It was what we did over breakfast, or after school. A lot of the comics are geared towards teens, like Zits, Luann, and Get Fuzzy, and teenagers are the ones the news paper should want to get hooked. Because we are the ones who are most likely to shell out for the Get Fuzzy calender, and buy a news paper for the comics. Because we're still a bit immature. Teenagers are generally the more liberal age group.
As someone mentioned though, web comics are the way of the future, and the present. Maybe news papers should get with it, and realize that one of the reason people choose web comics over newspaper ones is because they aren't censored. Here's an example from head trip, which doesn't focus on gay characters, but doesn't shy away from gay issues. The whole thing about comics being stuck in the 1950s reminded me of this.
http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/d/20070326.html
Though the humor in the comic could be offensive and inapropriate for children, so I see why its not in news papers. ex)
http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/d/20061127.html
Territory not worth fighting over
I admit that I'm rather ambivalent about newspaper comics pages. Personally I already read the comics on Yahoo, not out of a newspaper. Hence the scarece circulation of 9 Chickweed Lane for example doesn't really impact me.
The same is, I suspect, true of younger people. I'd be very curious as to how many people under 30 really get their news on print media, or read comics that way either. We live in a time when people are accustomed to seeking entertainment online and willing to seek sources online.
That kind of leaves the comics pages to the folks that are content reading decades old reprints of Peanuts and waxing nostalgic about "simpler" times. I say let them have it.
The Religious Right and Comics
Hints