Backstage Shake-Up at "Brothers & Sisters"
It is ironic that Baitz would go from first infuriating his fellow writers to then infuriating his studio bosses. He no doubt burned bridges with comments such as, “It must be awful to live with that much chaos in your head and that much rot in your heart. How do they [the studio heads] look in the mirror, how do they look at their kids?” That little rhetorical question appears to have cost Baitz dearly. Hollywood development contracts like the one Baitz has with ABC often have “force majeure” clauses, which give the studio the unilateral option to cancel the contract if there’s a work stoppage for more than six weeks. Hence, one side benefit of a protracted writers’ strike for the studios is that it allows them to get out of development deals that they no longer see as advantageous. And that is exactly what appears to have happened to Baitz. In his December 12th post entitled a “A Very Good Dog Who Taught Me Some New Tricks,” Baitz obliquely references being force-majeured out of his production deal with ABC after asking in print how studio heads – the head of ABC included – “can look themselves in the mirror.” As it now appears, Baitz will either have very little or no involvement with network television. Fortunately, it also appears that most of Brothers & Sisters’ gay content is safe. But for gay viewers interested in complex, well-developed gay characters, the loss of any gay writer willing to use his influence to bring three-dimensional gay characters to our television screens is a sad day. Submitted by on Tue, 2008-01-01 23:35. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|






Shell Game
I disagree, Evan
I agree. Most tv critics
You've Been Discriminated Against and You Don't Even Know It
Baitz sounds like a guy that expected to be welcomed instead was attacked by everyone and now is resigned to his fate of going back to Broadway. Gay people either willing ignore discrimination against themselves or unknowingly don't know they are being discriminated against. A recent study of gay couples in Maryland and Washington D.C. found that they earn significantly less than straight couples even though they are better educated. I read a study last year comparing earnings of single gay people to single straight people with similar results. I'm sure every one of the gay participants in both studies would be shocked that they are being discriminated against.
http://www.washblade.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=15737
This situation reminds me of past anti-gay situations. You have two straight people who can't handle being led by a gay person (Baitz) and do everything they can to undermine him including spreading a false rumor that he wrote a bad script which he didn't.
I have no reason to trust Hollywood when dealing with gay people or gay issues.
Studio Executives are Evil though
I just read the entire
I'm sorry to see him go. If
Re: Baitz
Your Right With That One
A well-balanced article taking trying to read between the lines
This stuff happens all the time and it's really important that we don't all jump the gun and assume that Baitz' sexual orientation somehow sealed his fate. The creators of several shows, have been eased out for a plethora of reasons, but since we dont't to follow shows like NCIS, we might incorrectly assume that B&S is the exception and not one of many that take place almost every season. Some are easier to get a grasp on if it's a "star" versus "creator" turfwar, which does not appear to be the case based on what I read here.
Writing for television is a hard thing, esp. for a show like B&S, which requires so much more than say a procedural or a traditional comedy. Looking back at the relative recent history of television, you'll likely find that the writer-driven adult family drama does not pop up with frequency. I can only think of Family, thirtisomething, Once and Again, and My So-Called Life, and would have a hard time naming others that fit the bill. These shows tend to have an audience that adores them and asks much of them. I know I do.
I don't know much about the show except that it improved a great deal as the first season progressed and I've liked what I've seen this season. The political component of it still serves as the only hurdle that I still see but think that it's a great show that I don't miss. There are almost no other shows that I can say that about. My thinking is that it's just like any other job involving so many people. Different stakeholders hold different cards at different times and for better or worse, the engine kept moving without someone who may have played a key role in bringing it to life. Sometimes it is best to find the best role for a professional and have that person stick to it. Maybe being a showrunner or EP is not good for the creator as it would appear to be the case here.
Thanks again for bringing attention to this story as I had no idea that there was all their turmoil behind the scenes. Someone call Betty Buckley for an exclusive.... But in all seriousness look at the recent challenges experienced by Marc Cherry (who seems to have found a working formula) or Shonda Rimes, who I hope will thrive. There have been less hands in those kitchens and look at the chaos. Maybe we should be more surprised that the show is doing as well as its doing creatively and in the ratings.
As is the case with these things, this time next year Baitz will have written his next play, enjoying more success than ever or may even be back on TV....... Let's just keep supporting different visions as I ca't bear to have another adult family show die and have CSI: Los Angeles or Law and Order: Laguna Beach.......
JRB is an idealist...All of
JRB is an idealist...All of his postings about the writers' strike or life in LA, or even about his show, demonstrate his desire to work and live in a world that just doesn't exist--certainly not in Hollywood. He is not cut out for the rigors, the politics, the dynamics that are network television.
The original pilot for B&S was completely scrapped, so was the third episode. Berlanti saved the show. It's why Berlanti has 2 more shows on the network.Now I very much appreciate the amount of time and interest B&S has given to not just gay characters, but older characters, working mothers, etc...people we all know and relate to. But yes, it's as much the vision of Berlanti as it is Baitz.
JRB's departure was pure and simple about TV politics, about continuing to grow a show that still has a shot to get a broader audience. His development deal is still intact according to his own post, so there's no worry about that. This happens in TV all the time. Sometimes the person who creates the thing isn't the best guy to actually run the thing.
Putting aside whether there
Putting aside whether there is anti-gay bias I'm sorry to read JRB won't have much participation with Brothers and Sisters. Even if the show had been revamped there are still touches I can see of his vision. Most of all I was looking forward to Saul's storyline.
I have a friend who's 54 and just came out to his parents over this past holidays. Although he'd been living as openly for 27 years he's never told most of his family members and he's rather circumspect in his profession. People don't understand how this could be because my friend is liberal and into such causes but it's means something different for someone of his generation and background (Chicago Irish Catholic)to say out loud he's gay as opposed to someone in his/ her twenties. Saul was dealing with similar issues and wanted to see this played out.
As much as I like Ugly Betty and other shows that feature gay characters (Grey's Anatomy) the emphasis is on the commonality with straights and any delving into real social differences seem impolite. Brothers and Sisters does demonstrate in an unpendantic way gays do face unique challenges from societal homophobia and therefore can't be just like everybody else. That's JRB's strong point and I hope that perspective can be perserved.
None of it matters a whit if
JRB's Blog about this issue.
Which cast member....
I agree, Dennis...
Your hunch may be a good one, Dennis
I think your hunch may be right, Dennis. You are right that this storyline seemed disjointed (and in Robbie's defense, he said he did not write it).
I read the side scripts for 203 when they were first released (but I did not save them). If I remember correctly, there was at least one additional scene with Courtney (and Kitty, I believe) that was completely cut and the character seemed to evaporate after this one episode.
This is by no means definitive proof of anything, but if memory serves it was the one major change from the release of the casting sides to the actual episode.
Dennis, you clever clogs
I've also suspected Rob
I've also suspected Rob Lowe as being the culprit. His character practically walks on water and his "acting" flourishes render him condescending and insufferable. I also thought of him because he's the only prominent cast member whose politics are decidedly to the right of JRB. He had campaign vigorously for Schwarzennegger.
I doubted highly the cast member would be Sally since her Emmy speech and her overall demeanor suggests she's the liberal JRB would approve of. On a side note my niece was a background player for a film Sally directed called Beautiful. In one scene in set in a school another actor bumped into my niece causing her tumble down a small flight of stairs. Sally stopped the proceedings and actually held her. With that in mind I always thought Nora was more of a reflection of the real Sally and if that's the case she'd probably get along with JRB.
Sarah Walker was written specifically for Rachel Griffiths and her outlook is definitely progressive.
get rid of this rob lowe person!