Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

GLAAD Report Ranks TV Networks: Praises ABC, Dings Fox

Romine thinks that both creative talent and network executives play an important role in GLBT inclusion. “The networks have a responsibility to create an environment where showrunners are allowed to be inclusive and creative,” he said. “You have to open yourself up to that, show that you’re a network that’s interested in gay characters.”

Damon Romine, GLAAD’s Entertainment Media Director

Fox’s Kevin Reilly pointed out that GLAAD’s ratings are often strongly impacted by the presence, or cancellation of a single show. “Sometimes you've actually got great representation and then for commercial or creative reasons, something gets canceled and your numbers go down,” he said.

GLAAD admits in the report that their ratings were often strongly impacted by a single show with a reoccurring gay character. FX’s high rating came, in large part, due to Nip/Tuck which included a gay, lesbian, or bisexual character in almost every episode. Meanwhile, NBC’s rating slipped from last year, in part, because a lesbian character left ER.

But in determining their rankings, GLAAD took the quality of a network’s GLBT representation into account, not just quantity. “By the numbers, it looks like Spike had all this gay content,” Romine said. “They had a miniseries with a minor gay character. Even though they had a high number [in our ranking system], this was their only representation, so we’re failing the network.”

According to the report, GLBT characters on many networks still tend to be gay white men. GLAAD praises HBO for featuring television’s most racially diverse GLBT programming. Another annual GLAAD report, breaking down the specific number of GLBT characters on television, as well as the racial and gender percentages, will be released this fall.

AfterElton.com produces its own annual rating of the networks. In our last rating in 2007, we gave ABC our highest rating of an A-; we gave the CW a B-; we gave both CBS and Fox a C+; and we gave NBC a C.

For more information on GLAAD’s latest report, go here. See GLAAD’s entire report here.

Terry's picture

Big deal

Come on, is anyone really surprised at the lack of visibility of Fox? They couldn't even cast that show North Shore properly.
Psionycx's picture

The Volatility Highlights the Problem

That a network's rating on the list can be so easily shifted by the loss of a single character or a single show indicates just how little actual representation GLBT people really have on TV.  How far would ABC drop if Brothers & Sisters or Ugly Betty were cancelled?  Or if Matthew Rhys or Michael Urie left?

NBC's position is ironic given that they were considered a flagship for so long with Will & Grace.  But as we've seen since the show's finale, the end of a single half-hour sitcom can have a tremendous impact on gay visibility on TV.  The removal of just one show from the lineup changed things considerably.

Part of the problem I think is that producers and writers haven't quite gotten it into their heads yet that GLBT characters don't need to entail coming out storylines or extended musings about the characters' sexual orientations.  Kevin was established as gay and out from the very beginning of Brothers & Sisters for example and thus he fit very neatly into the character lineup without the need for tired storylines.

Fox coming in low is no surprise.  Murdoch plays a complex game with his spread of networks, but his overall attitude is generally anti-gay.

All-in-all progress has been minimal, if indeed any progress has been made at all.

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Mia's picture

Bravo?

What about Bravo? It's, like, the gayest channel of them all this year, with shows like Make Me A Supermodel and Project Runway!
netogeno's picture

I was wondering myself.

I was wondering myself.
Brent Hartinger's picture

Damn good question

I wish I'd asked that. But Damon did tell me they're ranked the ten "highest rated" cable networks. Bravo must be lower rated...

 

 

 

Read my books! Explore "Brent's Brain" at http://www.brenthartinger.com no votes

see individual ratings
Andros's picture

Indeed. It is indicated in

Indeed. It is indicated in the full report that I read. It did however mentionned that it was a very gay friendly channel.
dgchgo's picture

"adequate"?

I object to the term "adequate" to signify a less than good or excellent rating. The word "adequate" denotes (and certainly connotes) that GLAAD felt the network was doing okay, a satisfactory job. A better term might be "needs improvement."
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings