"Brothers & Sisters" Episode 302 Recap: “Book Burning”McCallister Ranch. Kitty tells Robert she knows he’s still mad at her for not telling him about the book. But she just got off the phone with the Social Worker and Good News! They passed the rigorous pre-adoption safety inspection! Kitty then apologizes, in no particular order, for her family, the chicken, and the book. Robert says she doesn’t need to apologize for her family, but she does need to apologize for not telling him about the book. However, as far as the book itself, he’s actually read it. Twice, in fact! And of course he thinks it’s brilliant, calling it “incredibly relevant in a post partisan debate.” Blerg. She’s thrilled, but then Robert tells her that she’ll have to resign if she goes ahead and publishes it, since he can’t have members of his staff writing tell-all books. Ha hah! In your face Kitty!
We cut to some depressing hotel cocktail lounge type place. Holly appears to be re-enacting one of her many late-night Skinemax movies, the one involving the bald paunchy traveling salesman and the lonely female business executive.
Working that old Holly-whorey charm, she thanks baldy for helping Ojai expedite its distribution license. She must be seriously turning on the pheromones, because he starts getting all “Aw shucks, ma’am” and asking if there’s anything else he might do for her. As a matter of fact, there is! She mentions how he has access to public records, and wonders if maybe he could help her track down an old friend that her daughter’s been trying to reconnect with. He says sure, he just needs a name.
End of episode. I honestly wasn’t a huge fan of this one, which felt like a place-holder where we covered a lot of old, well-treaded Walker terrain and none of the stories really moved forward. Or, at least, none of the stories I care about. I’m eager to see what’s doing on the Kevin-Scotty front, especially given the troubles brewing at Kevin’s law firm we heard about last week. Next week’s clip includes a shot of Mitch Pileggi, so I’m guessing that will figure prominently then. But for this week’s grade I’m giving a C. Do you guys agree?
Submitted by on Tue, 2008-10-07 21:23. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|






This week's B&S was a "D"
Steven, by the way, your little imagined excerpt from Kitty's book was one of the funniest things I've read this year!
I pretty much hated this episode. Usually with any decent episode of Brothers & Sisters I feel the urge to watch it a second time just to absorb it better. Not this one! No desire to ever watch this stinker ever again!
Can I also say that Robert's self-righteousness is really revolting? Before he goes issuing any criticism of the Walkers he should maybe take a look at that deranged pack of hooligans he calls a family! I can only imagine what this little social worker suck up party would have been like if the hard-partying, artichoke-loving crowd had been there instead!
BTW: Kitty secured all the electrical outlets, but the house appears to still be packed with what appear to be poisonous plants and potentially deadly chotchkes.
I've been griping elsewhere that this show has become way too Kitty & Robert centric. They more or less dominated last season with their relationship, the presidential campaign and her fertility problems. If I were patient enough to sit and time it all I'd wager that at least 50% of the show is Kitty and/or Robert, or something supporting their storyline. It's like this is their show and the rest of the cast are playing supporting characters.
Sarah's tragic decline is depressing, because after Kevin and Scotty she's my favorite character. We just seem to get little fragments of her looking frumpy and acting morose. I want the sassy Sarah with the great shoes back!
Scotty was a no-show and I am soooooooo not happy about that. Even Julia got to put in 30 seconds worth of appearance. Kevin didn't get to do anything except be bitchy as well.
Meanwhile, Justin and Rebecca were just plain annoying. If they want the 18-25 demographic they're going to have to do better than those two. Since the younger crowd will have gotten their fix off of Gossip Girl earlier in the evening, the impossibly dull Justin and Rebecca are going to look even more lame. Why did they even try to create this romance?
I'm also sick of hearing about Ryan and he damn well better be smoking hot or I am going to be irate.
Holly is deteriorating to being just an irritant and I hope she proves interesting soon. Because she's just a bitch now. And as you point out, it's highly improbable that she could be the one in charge at Ojai given that she was a professional whore for 20+ years.
Hopefully the writing will get better, because this episode was a stinker!
I did not like this episode either. Also gets a "D' from me
It's disappointing to have back to back episodes at the start of a new season be so weak. Even with the writers' strike last season, one would think that the scribes would open a new season with their best material, but they are going to the Robert and Kitty well yet again. Robert needs a beating. He's no different than the people that he's criticizing and the show seems to be using his arrogance as some kind of "manning" up for his wife and relationship. Bring back his gay brother and ditch the tired politico as his "character" would have been more pissed than all the Walkers combined at Kitty's "betrayal."
And to have Nora get all gooey just because of the dedication does not address that there is no way that anything was read was so grossly taken out of context that they just needed to read it twice to appreciate its brilliance and whatever else the writers put in Rob Lowe's mouth to describe these diary entries.
The show has such a winning cast that it's a shame that it's turned into the argument of the week over food. I used to like the unlikablity of the Holly character, but her show ending shtick only needed a close-up freeze frame to finish off the Dallas-like over the top snarkiness of whoever wrote and directed that scene.
The little that I enjoyed was the Rebbecca-Justin bit as at least it had Justin in a situation that did not feel like a re-run. I get why so many are not into them at all, but I like their chemistry. I also miss the old Sarah and wanted to see more of Sal as his scene with Holly reminded me that there is so much to explore there.
Kitty/Robert/baby? Yawn.... This was only the 2nd show of the 3rd season yet in so many ways felt like a show that has told all that it had to say. I hope that I am wrong as there are no other adult family dramas around and it's a genre that I think offers endless possibilities. The focus on the second of who knows how many Cousin Oliver's daddy Walker sired is not a good sign, esp. if this Ryan starts to get too close to Justin when he rears his head.
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
this episode...SUCKED
i said it elsewhere, but i'll say it here.... this episode just plain sucked. I am so sick of robert and kitty constantly being painted as angels. Kitty wrote about her family without letting them know....fine, maybe kevin shouldn't have gone through her bag...but they read it, and either way...what she said in it was not gonna change whether they read it that night or another night.
I think the family had a right to be upset and i didn't get robert's need to defend her. plus, the way he defended her was so lame. "she's opinionated and that's why i love her" (or something like that) i think the family was mad because she wrote about them pretty rudely without their consent robert, but sure, ok dude. whatever.
of course at the end of the episode, Nora happened to be okay with what kitty said simply because what....kitty dedicated it to her? WHATEVER.
everything else was a bore too about this episode....i am sick of rebecca and justin...i don't care whether they have sex or not....but when they do finally do it, i shall turn the channel...they're still brother and sister in my eyes. ICK.
...and Holly is annoying. i don't understand her weird obsession with Ryan. if she contacts him or whatever, what? "tell me about your mom. was she hotter than...me? Do you think that's why william was all over her?"
ok, my negative review is over. i'm out
And lame-o was his name-o...
Years from now, when we talk about this...
...and we will, we will not be kind! Heck, we're not going to be kind now! I had thought the show's "Jump the Shark" moment was when they discovered that Rebecca really wasn't a Walker, after all; turns out, the real "Jump the Shark" moment was earlier, when Rob Lowe joined the cast and it became The Robert and Kitty Show.
I almost turned the TV off, I was so disgusted with this episode. Instead, after I was so appalled with Robert's unnecessary and demeaning tirade against Nora (why didn't Kevin or Tommy or Justin or Sarah punch him in the face as he deserved?), I immediately emailed ABC, begging them to get rid of this smug, unpleasant character.
And no Scotty? Bah! I'd give the episode an F, but I'm raising it to a D, thanks to Holly's channelling of Alexis Colby in the final scene--that was fabu!
Check out my blog: http://radicalsexy.blogspot.com/
No, It Wasn't The Best....
..... and I wonder what the point was of making Scotty a regular if he isn't going to appear in the episode or basically do nothing in the ones he is. Then again, look at the other Walker spouses (Julia, who has been an non-entity for the entire series) and Joe (who got the ax after the first year). Though, unlike a lot of people, I was never keen on the Scotty/Kevin marriage to begin with.
You do realize we have new people running the show... I don't like what I'm seeing so far.
I HATE what has been done to Sarah. What happened to that strong, independent, tough woman? I don't like seeing her so weak and helpless and unable to take care of business. It's terrible.
And yes, there's too much emphasis on Kitty and Robert, but I fear there always will be as they are the 'stars' of the show. But their storyline is boring and I am not looking forward to a season long adoption drama. Blech.
The whole book thing was ridiculous. I found it hard to believe Kitty would put her family and her husband out there like that. It seemed out of character for a politician's wife to do something that could hurt her husband's career. Even if the book was 'great', what she did was wrong and out of line.
I'm bored with the Rebecca/Justin romance. The actors have chemistry, that's true, but I just don't care. It simply isn't very interesting.
I DO like the Holly scenes. That's the only time there's been some real life. However, she is tad over the top at times. I expect her to slink into a room with shoulder pads gloating that she has all the shares to Denver-Carrington at any minute. And I am interested the Ryan storyline.
Saul? Kill him along with Tommy. I'd miss neither of them.
I have no inside information but I think that.....
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
Actually
The show suffers from too many cast members. Sending Kitty back to DC (which won't happen since ABC views Calista as some sort of draw) with Rob Lowe for six months would be nice, having Sarah tell Holly to FO and shove her reports and take her kids to go travel (or back to college or whatever she wants) for say 4 or 5 episodes, have someone die permanently (I'd ad Holly to the Tommy and Saul list -- perhaps there can be an earthquake at Walker Landing -- they all die and the life insurance ends up being $20 million, then they can bring Sarah back, get rid of Julia and her baby we never see, and trim the story lines.
I also agree - I don't think the new show runners are doing a very good job so far.
What I'd Like To See...
You are not alone as I very much like Tommy
With regard to Tommy, I read that either do to the actor's real love life woes or other interests by the writers, the character will not be on very often in the first part of the season, which bums me out. B.G is also quite a stunning man. That eyebrow cut..... ;-) I would like to see Saul use his experience to team up with Sarah to bring more balance to the internal battles with Holly. This assumes that the show can stand up to Rob Lowe as his character is in need of some humble pie so that he can be more than a bumper-sticker "good man." From what I've read Lowe is very much a player in the show and I hope that he can be objective enough to contemplate that the Kitty and Robert show must do more than find a kid and talk about how great they are and how terrible everyone else is. Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
Steven, I may be in the minority
But I liked that Robert slammed the family and defended Kitty. That's what a husband should do! Marriage is thicker than blood.
As well, Steven, I gotta say thanks for your intense efforts! -- but -- this recap seems too long and too late. The idea is to recap and rehash, like at the water cooler the next day -- a 10-page recap on Wednesday is just too late to keep the momentum. If you had to do only 5 pages but get it out on Monday or Tuesday it would make more sense, no?
Steven, I may be in the minority
But I liked that Robert slammed the family and defended Kitty. That's what a husband should do! Marriage is thicker than blood.
As well, Steven, I gotta say thanks for your intense efforts! -- but -- this recap seems too long and too late. The idea is to recap and rehash, like at the water cooler the next day -- a 10-page recap on Wednesday is just too late to keep the momentum. If you had to do only 5 pages but get it out on Monday or Tuesday it would make more sense, no?
Ryan Lafferty
Was it just me, or did
Was it just me, or did Kevin throw Kitty a very pointed look when she was complaining about all the hoops she has to jump through to adopt?
Holly has now passed from irritating know-it-all to potential actual cruelty. There is absolutely no reason for her to contact Ryan except to make herself feel better. He already has a family, and likely doesn't know about William being his father. It's just going to hurt a lot of people and cause no benefits.
Like Holly cares
Argh, this episode made me
Argh, this episode made me so mad!
First off, I'm pleased to see I wasn't the only one who was seriously annoyed with Robert's self-righteous speech at dinner. There's a decidedly subtle (or maybe not so subtle) shift in the tone of the series this season. It began after the writer's strike last year, and it's spilling over into this season: the Fairy Tale Republican viewpoint is starting to dominate.
For a show that started off unabashedly political, with VERY heated discussions, there was always a sense of balance. You had Nora and Kevin making very passionate and compelling arguments about their viewpoints, and there was Kitty and Tommy making passionate and compelling arguments about theirs. Not anymore. Nora, Kevin and anyone else with a liberal viewpoint has been shunted into angry whiner mode, while the conservatives are presented as innately correct and misunderstood.
I call bullshit.
And don't get me started on the lack of Scotty. Seriously... and they didn't even show his name in the credits, even though Paige and Cooper were both listed and also did not appear. Is he a contract player or not?
I agree, the Robert/Kitty story is overwhelming this show, and I don't know why. I have very little understanding or sympathy for their situation. "People think that just because of who we are, we can just go out and get whatever we want." Um, because you CAN. Seriously, are we expected to believe that a man with Robert's connections CAN'T pull strings to adopt a baby? Yes, it might not be fair, but life rarely is. Again, I call bullshit. This is a fantasy, and not a very good one.
And, please, please, PLEASE can we stop with the nonsensical "let's get the Walkers together and create chaos" scenes? SURELY there's a richer dynamic that can be played out in smaller groups?
I worry for the future of this show, and it bugs me because I really do love these characters. (Well, except for Robert... he's NEVER fit in.)
Luke MacFarlane's name WAS shown
Luke MacFarlane's name WAS shown in the opening credits, right after Rob Lowe's.
Anyway, I may be in the minority, but I did enjoy this episode. Yes, the Sanator's speechifying was kind of pompous and overbearing, yet at the same time, the Walkers WERE all acting like children, so a verbal smackdown was justified. Not sure if McAllister should have been the one to deliver it though. I guess the writers thought they had to give Rob Lowe some more screen time since this was a Kitty-centric episode.
I was disappointed at the lack of Scotty; there was no real explanation about his absence. All the other Walkers who are currently partnered had their significant others present at the big dinner, so the omission of Scotty was especially glaring.
I'll take your word about
I'll take your word about Luke's name... I was looking for it, but was also folding clothes at the time, so I must have just missed it.
Re: Robert's speechifying... I just felt it was horribly disrespectful for him to sit there and lecture Nora. If it were one of the kids, sure, but for him to condescend to her... it just rubbed me the wrong way. And it also rubbed me the wrong way that none of her children stepped up to tell him to back off.
Yes, he had a point, but in order for that point to be bought into, you have to also buy into the idea that they had all taken these statements so WILDLY out of context that they were, when put IN context, somehow more palatable. Really? I can't imagine how that could be.
It comes down to this: Kitty went behind her family's back, wrote a tell-all novel wherein she took everyone to task except for herself and Robert and we're all supposed to believe the family should be happy about that, because, after all, they overreacted and took it all "out of context." Nah, not buying it.
She KNEW they were going to be upset, which is exactly WHY she didn't WANT them reading it. So she can't be exempt from intent.
I just can't stomach the idea that Robert and Kitty are presented as this great, misunderstood couple with SO MANY obstacles in their way, and everyone else is just so insensitive to their plight. Gimme a break.
Republican Righteousness
It is annoying because Robert is enormously hypocritical. Aside from the fact that his own family is no great prize either, how dare complain about the Walker's not having a "filter" when Kitty is preparing to publish a book using them as archetypes illustrating (somewhat unflattering) images of American voters?!
Robert recovers the most quickly from the book issue. But then, it doesn't seem to be about him. It never occurs to him, in his sense of imperious ownership of the people around him, that the Walker's might not appreciate being used as case studies in Kitty's book without their permission?
The whole debacle was really Kitty's fault for keeping this secret after all. Despite his praise of her outspokeness this actually happened because of her secrecy. When were they all going to find out about this, when the book hit print? Robert, no saint himself, seems to have taken it upon himself to be the moral arbiter of the family. Very Republican of him.
Speaking of moral arbiters, where was his saintly brother Jason for this meet-the-social-worker dinner? Back in Malaysia? Maybe they could have invited Major Weiner instead?
The writer's do seem to have a tendency to cast Kitty and Robert as angelic, while the rest of the characters are immature. Of course, this is also reflective of growing repetition in the writing. Hasn't the "disastrous emotional outbreak at the dinner table" already been done several times? Given that every Walker dinner party seems to deteriorate into a slugfest it seems to stretch credibility that having the family at the dinner would make a "good impression" (remember "Feast of Epiphany" last season?). Since we just started off the season with Kitty having a spat with Sarah (which was left unresolved) and Tommy betraying Kevin (no improvement on things there either) there's no logic to the idea of having the family over for this. Rather it just seems like yet another way to use the rest of the cast as supporting characters in the Kitty & Robert story.
Next up, after two seasons of avoiding overused plot ideas, Kevin is finally going to encounter anti-gay discrimination from the look of things. I was under the impression that while on the picket line the writers had time to develop fresh ideas. Instead it seems like they're regurgitating already-used stuff. Even worse, now it looks like they're going to start dredging up industry standard plot lines that have been done to death.
I'm really worried that this show is going downhill.
Filters
The fact of the matter is that these people don't have filters. While Drama Queens might love to write other DQs and DQs might want to view them, it's getting tiresome and annoying. I fast forwarded through much of this show (pretty much anything with Justin and Rebecca for starters) and after reading the entire recap word for word, doubt I missed much.
Frankly, I think Robert was spot on. All these dinners are starting to blur into one another, and they aren't all that comical. As the recapper pointed out, there was no real or legit purpose to have ALL the Walkers over (much less Rebecca) to meet the social worker. It only moved a plot point and these are tired, repetitive plot points at that.
Tommy
Not Very Good
Brothers & Sisters
Robert and Kitty must be using the Oakdale time-travel tunnel
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
Will Saul get a good relation with someone?
Rifkin fan losing patience
Can't the writers think of anything for the character of Saul to do than sit behind a desk and have only slightly more function in the company than the window-unit A/C which was broken last ep? Yes, he did give Holly a good verbal joust about the Ryan debacle, but what happened to his coming-out process, his private life, even having a life at all? Kevin and Scotty are great when they're on screen and being given interesting conflicts to resolve or simply enjoying being a married couple, but Saul seems to be there for mere window dressing. And add me to the list of viewers who will walk if B&S doesn't turn away from the Robert and Kitty show and get back to its roots: the Walker family. Get Sarah out of the office and up from the pits of emotional and fashion frumpery, take Nora beyond the safety of her kitchen, and just plain get rid of Tommy and Julia.
I was really questioning
I was really questioning for the longest time if I wanted to get involved with watching Brothers and Sisters. The whole arguement about watching something just because it has gay characters has been debated elsewhere on this site. However, Saul's coming out to Kevin and Kevin's proposal to Scotty convinced me to give it a try and start watching. It was my intention to watch the first and second seasons over the summer, but if the road to hell is paved with good intentions then I'm certain to burn. Now after two recaps I'm starting to believe that Brothers & Sisters is something I can live without watching (or at least just watch the Kevin and Scotty bits) and that it worked out for the best that I did not waste my time with the previous seasons.
I've never been a fan of the actress playing Kitty and character of Robert is just too unbelievable. A republican with an openly gay brother (who's a priest no less) to even consider running for any elected position (let alone president or being considered for VP) without being crucified by the religous right ? ? I have a better time believing in the science fiction fantasy worlds of Doctor Who / Torchwood than I do this bizarre reality of Robert still being in office.
Hopefully something will be done with Saul, and soon. After all he accidentally outed himself at Kevin and Scotty's wedding to the rest of the siblings. Where's the reaction / developements from that ? I worry that the writers will give Saul the start of a relationship and really start to open up and explore this character only to kill him off leaving us to grieve over the lost potential this character had.
Steven, great job as usual with the recapping. Love your sense of humour and I'm always guaranteed at the very least at least one LOL moment per page of recap. Hopefully ABC will be kind and get screeners to you ahead of time so we can get our dose of snark fresh on Sundays. Extra pressure on you for now as the jury is still out on watching B&S and recaps will have to do for now until we get more Kevin and Scotty, the old Sarah back and less of Kitty and Robert.
Newt Gringrich Has a Lesbian Sister
Dick Cheney has a lesbian daughter
Cheney, Gingrich, Keyes and their gay relatives
In the case of Gingrich and Keyes--Candace is Newt's half-sister and they have been estranged for a long time. She also didn't go public untill years after Newt was elected. Keyes is also estranged from his daughter and his political career was pretty much over when she came out. McCain's chief of staff is pretty closeted--I'm not sure he's even responded to his outing.
On the issue of Cheney--only extreme hypocrisy by both he and Mary and the rest of their family can explain that situation. Also, she was pretty much kept out of sight through most of the campaign.
The issue with the Rob Lowe character is that they are now presenting him as the wise in all matters character--and they are making him less "Republican" as time goes on. They seem to be Liberalising him to make him more palatable. It would be interesting if they would let he and Kitty be REPUBLICANS rather than whatever it is they are supposed to be. In the real Republican party, if a Senator's wife officiated a gay commitment ceremony that Senator's career would be in serious jeopardy.
Points taken
OK points taken.
I had forgotten Newt' sister and Cheney's daughter. So I guess the idea is that you can still be considered a "good and proper" Republican if your politics are neo-con / right of centre enough and you either distance yourself from or completely hide your gay relatives. Which would still place Robert in trouble as he has not distance himself from either his brother or from brother-in-law Kevin (that radio show with the Rush-like host), and his & Kitty's politics seem mildly right of centre at best. Agree with db that Kitty's conducting a same-sex commitment ceremony surely would have been cause for concern on Robert's part, and been a major source of backlash, more so than any book she could write. So Robert is still going to remain a little too unreal for my taste.
No, Mark Buse hasn't responded at all