|
|||||||||
|
Thumbs Down: Roger Ebert Takes on
the Brokeback Mountain Controversy (page 2) by Michael Jensen, March 16, 2006 AE: I think many gay people would feel better if Crash had been running closer to Brokeback. Its win wouldn't seem so suspect. Even the Las Vegas odds-makers had Brokeback as a sure thing. To then have it lose has been hard for a lot of people to accept. AE: Not to repeat myself, but for gay people knowledgeable about the Oscars, what came as such a sucker punch— AE: Yes. Again, looking at all the historical precedents the Academy had used over the years as the guideline. AE: Even that doesn't explain how Crash could have won. AE: Based on all of that, is it not possible that homophobia played a larger role? And I'm not talking the kind of I-hate-all-gay-people homophobia, but-- AE: Exactly! Let's back up a second. Of course, the Academy is not exactly the same people who are the Writers, Producers, [and] Directors guild, but they'll vote for it [Brokeback] for Best Director, Best Screenplay, Best Score but they won't vote for it for Pest Picture. Why won't they? Is it because they're afraid people will think Hollywood is now catering to or supports gay people? I suppose that there were some votes cast on that basis. The Oscars are not a very perfect process. AE: So because Brokeback Mountain won most everything but the Oscar for Best Picture, it proves that Hollywood isn't homophobic? AE: I guess for a lot of gay people, giving Brokeback Mountain the other awards, but not Best Picture is just what Kenneth Turan said, that it feels like a very safe choice to do. |
|||||||||||||||||
NOTE:
AfterElton.com is not affiliated with Elton John Thoughts? Feedback? comments@afterelton.com Copyright © 2006 AfterElton.com |
||||||||||||||||||