|
|||||||||
|
Interview with Dr. Who's John Barrowman (page 3)
by Locksley Hall, May 4, 2006 Page 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 - Next AE: [laughing] It's OK. I was just asking, in your own experience, whether you had known men that were bisexual. I do believe that there are people who can like men and women, because, although I wouldn't choose to sleep with a woman, I still find women attractive. And when I say ‘choose to sleep with a woman', it's not a choice that I have made [to be gay], it's just not in me to sleep with women. I wasn't created this way to sleep with women. And with men who like both men and women, that's fine, but there's a lot of confusion goes on in that instance, because men sometimes do use bisexuality as an excuse not to admit to their families, their friends, and publicly that they really are gay. And what that does in the long run--you have a lot of men who marry women, have children, but are living a secret gay life. AE: Brokeback Mountain. The whole thing about gay marriage. I particularly don't like to associate a civil partnership, which is what I call it, with a marriage. Because--and I have arguments with people in the gay community about this a lot--why do we want a word that is synonymous with a religious ideal [belonging to] a group of people that hates us? Why do we want to be part of that? Why do we want to have that word attached to us, why can't we create our own word? And you know what else has happened, the conservatives have turned it into a political battle, so every time they want something done, they just say “Oh, gay people will be married, and marriage is a sacred thing”. Well then--excuse my French-- let's f*** it, let's just get rid of the word. Let us use ‘partnerships', it's still the same thing. The thing that we need the benefit from is-- AE: The legal rights. AE: Yup. Well I wanted to ask you about that, because I think it's quite an interesting debate, the whole question of civil unions versus marriage. There is partly the religious aspect. But also it seems that some gay people are quite keen on the idea of having a different phrase, and in a sense a different system for gay partnerships. Because they see them as having something that's inherently slightly different to a heterosexual relationship. I was wondering what... AE: Yeah. But the essential relationship, don't you think, is... I don't know, I have mixed feelings... AE: In terms of what you feel and what you go through when you're in love with someone, and... The fact that you have people who are married men and women who are saying that gay men are promiscuous--well, you know what, there are a lot of straight people who are promiscuous. There are a lot of straight people who have affairs and don't tell their wives or husbands. As do gay men and women. There are gay men and women who have committed relationships, who [only] have sex with their partners, and there are straight people who do that. There are gay people who swing, there are straight people who swing. So, [in that sense] we are the same. And for people to try and say that gay people are different [in a negative way]--we're not. We're the same. |
|||||||||||||||||
NOTE:
AfterElton.com is not affiliated with Elton John Thoughts? Feedback? comments@afterelton.com Copyright © 2006 AfterElton.com |
||||||||||||||||||