Find Articles On:
 TV Shows:
 Extras:

Search:

Stephen King Calls--Should Gay Men Answer? (page 3)
by Thomas Tronolone, February 9, 2006

Page 1 / 2 / 3 - Home

By creating Tom as alone and loveless, King seems to ignore the fact that many gay men lead vibrant, rich lives hallmarked by great friendships and enduring love. This is unfortunately underscored by King's description of Tom's attachment to Rafe, his cat. Anyone who's ever had a beloved pet can feel for a man forced by circumstance to leave it behind forever. But Tom reads as borderline pathetic. Even his new friend Clay thinks so.

When Tom comes out to Clay, it's no big deal: Clay doesn't care. But by then, neither did I as there is so little to care about in his character. Tom is presented as completely and utterly alone, with nothing but feline companionship.

It would have been more humanizing, perhaps, if Tom had a missing husband, or an ex, or an adopted child. After all, the novel begins in Boston, where such things are fairly commonplace. Perhaps King felt it would be too time-consuming to include it, or maybe it's foreign territory for him, and he didn't feel confident writing about it. But I assert that King could easily have remedied this situation by finding a gay man to talk to. Frankly, it was a bit of a letdown and a flaw in the book.

It's not all bad though. King does do something positive by showing that not all gay men are defined by homosexuality–Tom is simply a man who happens to be gay. Moreover, he's portrayed as a good man who is strong when he needs to be, kind to others, and a loyal, true friend to his new acquaintances.

As a bit of satire, we learn that Tom 's mother and aunts were evangelical Christians and that he has little patience for their ilk. When Clay asks where Tom's mother is, he replies: “Heaven. Unless they managed to cheat her out of that too.”

Nonetheless, Tom is not drawn as clearly as the other characters. He does indulge in one bit of campy humor, but it isn't well received. Other than that, King doesn't let us in on much of what Tom is thinking or feeling.

An article on queerhorror.com has this to say on the subject of King's inclusion of gay characters in his vast body of work:

“…homosexuality is not always associated with 'evil' in his books. While queer characters have not ranked the role of central hero, they still are found in supportive heroic roles, generally as the wise ones that the true heroes turn to. Occasionally the main characters are even completely dependent on them….Despite the wide variety of character types that queers have played in his novels, and the tribute found in It, one thing that stands out in his books is that GLBT characters are not at the same level as his majority and other minority characters when it comes to the hero role."

My reading of Tom's character supports this assertion.

Despite shortcomings, Tom McCourt is a welcome addition to Cell as a positive portrayal of a gay character. Nonetheless, it is a missed opportunity, regrettably consistent with his earlier work. I recommend that Mr. King make a gay friend. I'm still glad that one of my gay brothers made it to the pages of a book that will surely be a bestseller. I just wish King had made him less of a cipher.

Get Stephen King's Cell

Page 1 / 2 / 3 - Home

NOTE: AfterElton.com is not affiliated with Elton John
Thoughts? Feedback?
comments@afterelton.com
Copyright © 2006 AfterElton.com