Ask the Flying Monkey! (November 09, 2009)Q: I have to admit, being a Heroes fan, that I have a celebrity crush on Milo Ventimiglia. I was doing some digging and discovered that he played a gay teen in a collection of short films called Boys Life 2. However, just because an actor plays a character doesn't mean that the actor is supportive of said character. As such, I was wondering as to whether or not Milo has ever spoken openly about gay issues? Is he a friend or foe to the gay community? – Teddy, State College, PA A: Another softball question! Maybe I won’t commit suicide after all. Ventimiglia, who also played gay in the 2005 movie Cursed, is definitely a friend, at least if you believe him in his 2008 interview with The Advocate.
Milo Ventimiglia As for me, I still haven’t quite forgiven the actor for the incredibly stereotypical gay character in one episode of the 2007 web series he directed, It’s a Mall World:
Let’s do this again next week, shall we? A Note from the Monkey: Last week, I wrote that The Big Bang Theory’s Jim Parsons was straight. In the comments following that column, a person posted pictures of Jim attending a ceremony and on a red carpet with the same man they believed was his boyfriend. We asked Jim’s publicist if the actor was, in fact, straight and, if not, would he do an interview with us. The publicist said, “We don’t comment on our client’s private lives,” and Jim declined to do an interview at this time. Have a question about gay male entertainment? Send it to aftereltonflyingmonkey@yahoo.com! (Please include your city and state and/or country.) Submitted by on Mon, 2009-11-09 01:15. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|





by

The
The conservative is the
The conservative is the anti-gay vote. The hypocrisy is the anti-gay vote. But they are not allies?
If you are gay
And work in politics Con or otherwise and you actively vote down reforms that would help gay people then you are the enemy and need to be outed, The only reasons a gay politico would voted down a bill to help homos would be if he was self hating or he was trying to appeal to the voters purely to keep his job.
You would be suprised at how many vote purely on that reason and not for the greater good of a country.
I personally have little to worry about in that respect as all the three major partys in the British parliment have openly gay MPs and are pro gay rights.
About Matthew
Gossip
Really Could Care Less
Rubbed the wrong way
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
Oh Madeleine please....
Most of us know people who have committed suicide or who have tried--and if I couldn't laugh about it I would kill myself.
Well sorry for being sensitive!
One of my students recently tried to kill himself, and it really shook me up, so I just can't get why someone would make a joke about it.
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
I'm not making a joke about your friend's suicide
But you're grieving. I get that. It's absolutely okay to be sensitive about these things. You have nothing to be sorry for.Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
Thank you.
Yes, I got your private message, thank you for responding, as you are really the only person I wanted to hear from.
Yes, I realize that you weren't making a joke at my friend's expense, or that you weren't trying to be insensitive. I'm not even really trying to accuse you of that, as I understand it was meant lightly. I was articulating how I felt in response, so that you would know how some people (or maybe just me it seems) reacted. I meant no disrespect.
I realize that I'm more sensitive about this than others, and that everyone has their own boundaries. That's OK. But (like you said) I'm not sorry for how I reacted.
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
Sorry if I sounded insensitive
When Mr. Closet dates Mr. Out...
Just to be clear...
Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
To be fair
He's not making light of the pain you feel, Its just something people say. I say it, lots of people say it. We cannot censor and pussy foot around people and ourselfs for the sake of hoping never to hurt someone.
Sorry for your pain but nothing should ever be off limits to humor, that path can only lead to a people in fear of offending others and other people using it to control what we all say, and thats no way to live.
Not sure this was addressed at me...
...but if it is, I think that there needs to be limits to humour. Certainly some topics, including sexual orientation and suicide are too personal to make jokes about?
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
That's great for you
I don't believe there should be boundaries to what you can say in an article on this website or any other. There is a cultural ethos we have here on A.E. about how we deal with nudity and profanity but beyond that it seems to be anything goes.
I appreciate that you might not want to make jokes about certain topics vis a vis your own experience but myself and many other humans actually see humor as a way to deal with those topics that are tragic and depressing in our lives.
As someone who has struggled with depression since 2nd grade and more than once considered suicide (though happily never attempted) it is in fact the ability to laugh about it, make fun of it, tell "slitting my wrist" jokes that helps me deal.
I don't think I'm an anomaly in that regard.
Everyone is different but one of the most amazing qualities of human beings, I think, is to find comedy in tragedy and to joke our way out of the depths of despair. Holocaust survivors joke about it because it's proof they are alive, they survived. Women who have survived rape joke about it because it takes the power away from the rapist.
Again, if it's offensive to you then you definitely should not tell such jokes but you can't prescribe what is right or good or useful or appropriate or even funny to/for others.
Clearly we know enough about Brent to know that he wouldn't take ACTUAL suicide lightly but we also know that he has a bit of a snarky sense of humor so given the context and the messenger (as it were) I don't see why he'd need to be admonished or censored.
I respect your right to state your discomfort with his comment I just felt the need to offer a different view point
Suicide jokes
These are just my own boundaries, I was just letting Brent know how I felt about the joke. Obviously I know he didn't intend it to be offensive, but I don't think intent makes up for consequences. If it did then I would have to stop telling people to shut up when they say "that's so gay" because they aren't intending it to be hurtful.
I find it interesting that I'm getting flack about censoring humour from readers on a site that takes gay jokes, or gay people being the punchline of jokes very seriously. Should we tell all those straight dudes who joke about their buddies being "fags" that it's OK because we can joke about ourselves? What about all those prison rape jokes? Guess we can't tell people those aren't funny since it's just a joke.
If you don't want to take offense to something, that's your perogative, but some people are hurt by jokes, and I don't think comedians have free right to insult people under the guise of humour. Racist jokes aren't funny, neither are homophobic ones and I would put suicide jokes in the same category.
I joke about serious situations too to relieve tension, but I have to draw the line somewhere. I think making a joke about suicide makes light of it, and having known friends who've tried to kill themselves I just don't think that's funny.
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
Limits on humor
I think we
Golden Girls
Shocking Rumor!
------------------------------------------------------------
If I bring out the devil in you, he was there all along!
Legally married Sept 18, 2009. Wedded Oct 10,2009.
Show me the photo!
Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
Proof
I'll do you one better on this! A private source pointed me toward this link which has a lot of videos adding fuel the fire. Check it out!
http://www.afterelton.com/taxonomy/term/1205
------------------------------------------------------------
If I bring out the devil in you, he was there all along!
Legally married Sept 18, 2009. Wedded Oct 10,2009.
Truthfully
we don't have the right to know most if not all of the things tabloids and on-line gossip sites post about celebrities. But, if they speculate about (presumed) straight celebrities and not about (presumed) gay ones then that not only screams hypocrisy, it says that being gay is such a terrible thing that even gossips won't talk about it. If Jennifer Aniston and Joe Blow are seen having coffee together, or hanging out at the pool or where ever, there is instant speculation about their relationship. One outing between two straight celebs and mags everywhere scream they're in love/eloping/having quints/whathaveyou.
Helicopters followed Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie around when they were filming Mr. and Mrs. Smith trying to catch something just on rumors they were attracted to each other, even though Brad was still married. Yet how often did Lindsey Lohan and Samantha Ronson go out together, hold hands, snuggle, frickin move in together and it was all 'shhh, don't say that'. You had Lance Bass, going out and to gay bars with an openly gay man and still, 'we'll wait until he says he's gay'. Any of those instances could just be friends hanging out but only the same sex ones are taboo to speculation by the media. By acting like it's a horrible, shameful thing that will ruin an actors career and even their life it anyone even suggests it, then that's exactly what it remains.
Brent, does PBS count as a network?
PBS is definitely a network...
But mostly, I find this endlessly fascinating that just when I think I've pinpointed the "first," someone says, "No, wait!" It really IS a complicated question! Thanks for sharing.... :-)Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
American Playhouse
It was part of the American Playhouse series, which showcased a lot of gay-themed play adaptations, such as "Andre's Mother," "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" (the Jessica Lange/Tommy Lee Jones version), and "Tru," so my guess is that it played on a fairly wide range of affiliates. It even played on Alabama Public Television, where as a scared lonely 17 year old kid in rural Alabama I learned for the first time that I wasn't the only boy in the world who wanted to kiss another boy. That teleplay is one of those "means the world to me" things, right up there with "Brokeback Mountain" "Leaves of Grass," and afterelton.com.
I know it wasn't the first
but it was the best - for me at least.
Tales of the City, also on (some braver) PBS stations. It was the first time I saw two men "really kiss" or at least really kiss the way I knew men would and could. It was so sweet then I thought "Oh my God, this is TV!" I guess you could argue that it was so WOW that it took me out of the story but not really. It was remembering that this was TV and not a night at the club that made me take pause.
I ran to the phone as soon as the episode was over, called my local (DC) station, and thanked them for showing it.
Who among us have not gone through some personal tragedies?
"some of my best friends are
Ditto! I thought the same
Ditto! I thought the same thing.
outing, outing, outing.....
oh man. outing, outing, outing. i have come to realize that actors act for a living and thats why they are famous. PERIOD. people see their movies/shows for them, not for who they are dating in real life, or whatever ...
but as i have said before, it's very tricky. I am out and would be happy if closeted actors didn't exist, but...they do. mainly for the reason of their career being ruined. then again, it's like "oh if they came out, they could change the industry, change minds, yadda yadda, be more happy with themselves..."
I sometimes have to take a step back and put myself in their shoes...sort of.
I'm not a public figure, but i also am not out to every person i come across. there will be people who will never know i am gay and i have my reasons, like anyone, for not telling them.
that makes me sound like a hypocrite then when i go on about how proud i am of being who i am, right? then why don't i just come out to everyone i cross paths with?
not as simple as people think it should be. it's very tricky. therefore, i've realized i can no longer be upset when someone is closeted or decides not to comment.
I have no room to damn these people
There's a huge difference
I would like to see every gay doctor come out, every gay lawyer,
every gay architect come out, stand up and let that world know. That would do more to end prejudice overnight than anybody would imagine. I urge them to do that, urge them to come out. Only that way will we start to achieve our rights." - Harvey Milk (1977)
And in our celebrity-obsessed culture, I think it's reasonable to add gay celebrities to that list.
I don't agree with forcing someone out of the closet, unless they're actively anti-gay, but I can't help but think of the the phrase: "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem", especially after watching this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuWJ6LQ9R4U
double post
one more thing about outing
The argument that being in a high-profile career means that one surrenders any right to privacy commits the naturalistic fallacy -- that is, it concludes "ought" from "is." We can indeed correctly say that someone in the public eye will have his private life made public, but that says nothing about how things should be. If invading someone's privacy is wrong, then it's wrong, regardless of our current state of affairs.
I think it's fair to say that it's a shitty time to be alive. From Glenn Beck at the extreme to the more common experience of a society that's a little too cold and corporate. I can't imagine saying that society's disregard for a celebrity's privacy carries any moral value, or sets any worthwhile precedent for how we should treat gay celebrities, once you think about how bad the rest of society is.
Holy crud, Ernest Hemingway was adorable!!
Matt Bomer
I feel bad for him. I'm sure he just wants to have a successful acting career, and now this has come up, and it could de-rail his career.
However, how widely talked about are these pictures? I mean, are we just a tempest in a teapot here? Are we only talking about this on gay-dominated websites? Provided this never makes the mainstream press, he could just continue to ignore it with little impact on his career.
I like to think that if I were to become famous, I would be out from Day 1, proudly stating who I am. But then I think, wow, you are right there, ready to grab the brass ring, starring on a tv show, about to potentially rake in millions and millions of dollars, but that could all die this instant if I come out. Will it kill me to wait a few years, so that I can secure my fortune first? I can see why they don't want anything to disrupt their plans.
Now, if this becomes tabloid fodder, his best bet would be to immediately confirm it and say that he doesn't want it to be the only thing that defines him (the TR Knight defense). Trying to hide it once it goes mainstream will only make things worse for him.
Rumor
This...
About those Bomer pictures...
Matthew Bomer
I dont see why Matthew Bomer is considered ''closeted''. Being in the closet to me is -- blatantly lying about your sexuality, keep denying that you're gay, having a fake relationship with a beard, etc. He has done NONE of those things. He just chose not to talk about his sexual orientation. It's his business and I respect his choice. Plus, considering that if an actor is out in his personal life, why is he considered ''closeted'' by the general public? Do all gay actors owe us an ''I'm Gay'' headline on the cover of People magazine?
British TV Gay Kiss
As a 40something gay man I can clearly remember gay kissing in The Naked Civil Servant (about the life of Quentin Crisp) which was shown in 1975 (The follow-up An Englishman In New York is due to be aired soon)
I also remember a TV serial called Penmarric shown in 1979 that featured lots of gay kissing.
I don't remember it causing too much fuss at the time either? I'd imagine British people older than I can recall shows from the 1960's?
Hmmm
I think the first gay kiss on TV was in a Play for Today back in 1971. But I can't remember the name of it. Very vaguely, I think it was about the love that dare not speak its name set in a gritty Northern town. The odd thing for a Play for Today, from that time, is that it might have had a happy or an oblique/might-be-happy ending. I keep on thinking it starred John Salthouse or John Duttine, but I'm probably getting my Plays for Today all mixed up.
On a tangent, the first actor to do full-frontal male nudity on the BBC was the incredibly beautiful Christopher Neame in 1973/74. Again, it was a Play for Today and I think it was called something like The Spider's Web. Unfortunately, I never saw it. Which is a great pity, because I met him several year later and damn I would have loved to have seen him naked! An entirely pleasant, generous and genuinely kind (straight) man - but sheesh he rocked sex appeal to its foundations. (Sorry about that, I was just lost in my own dream there for a second.)