Anderson Cooper welcomed several guests onto 360 last night to discuss many of the issues that we've been discussing on the blog here for the past few days. Did race play a factor? Did Obama not do enough to persuade voters to vote no? And what happens to those couples who were married before the proposition was passed?
Submitted by
on Fri, 2008-11-07 08:45.
In Answer To Your Questions...
Props to CNN
Last night's segment on ''Anderson Cooper 360'' was the longest one I've seen on TV, so kudos, too, for a thoughtful roundtable that covered a lot of ground. I've also seen shorter segments on Fox TV's ''O'Reilly Factor'' and ''Hannity & Colmes.'' But what gives with MSNBC? I've seen nothing about Prop. 8's fallout on Keith Olbermann or Chris Matthews. And Rachel Maddow's mentioned a protest in the Castro the other night, but has yet to devote a regular segment to Prop. 8 and its ramifications.
That said, all of this is POST-election. Where was any of this media coverage BEFORE the vote? There's a lot of anger directed at the Mormons who funneled millions into California to defeat Prop. 8, but why was the anti-Prop. 8 campaign apparently so poorly run? I've read that TV ads for anti-Prop. 8 didn't even mention the word ''gay,'' let alone feature gay couples. I'm also disappointed in Barack Obama, who basically chose to sidestep Prop. 8; the irony being that 70% of blacks voted Yes on Prop. 8. While all of us were celebrating the equality that Obama's election signaled, sadly our community was being denied that same equality, often by minorities. Our community needs to get smarter about using the media and getting our message out there if we want to be more than second-class citizens.
Agreed
But credit may be due to the protesters who stormed CNNs LA bureu all morning long, which Im sure that really got their atention. Id like to think they would have reported anyway, but they reported all day about it because of it.
Also, CBS did a story on wednesday about the iniciatives but really centered on Prop 8, it was the first story I saw about it.
Keith Olbermann
Hello,
There is acutally a huge "special word" from Keith Olbermann about anti-prop 8. It is really well done. Probably just google Keith Olbermann Prop 8 or go to msnbc.com to watch it, it is actually one of the more passionate responses that I've seen about the passing of prop 8.
Thanks,
Will
Here's The Thing...
We talk about responsibilities a lot - what about those members of the gay community who still think its shameful to be out in public? How much has their silence contributed?
Yes, I'm looking at you, Anderson. Yes, I'm looking at you all you multi-million Dollar pop stars who buy the lie that you records wouldn't sell any more. Yes, I'm looking at you movie stars who have enough money to make it through the rest of your lives and support a small country for years to come but are still full of fear and shame.
Last week, this site opined that John Barrowman is annoying by being too out. Well, here's the thing: Would a proposition like this even be considered in the UK (and I take comfort in the fact that this would be an impossibility anywhere in Europe), the likes of John Barrowman, Sir Ian McKellen and Graham Norton would not stop talking about it. They would use every possibility they have to speak out against this atrocity. TOWLEROAD had to BEG folks like Neil Patrick Harris to FINALLY donate against Prop 8. It took WEEKS and WEEKS to convince our fabulous Ellen to do her part and stand up for her rights. My heart broke when I saw the YouTube clip of people BEGGING Lance Bass to get out of his van to march with them on Wednesday night and he waves at them and drives on.
Also, I get sick to my stomach when I hear and read those vicious attacks against the African-American community. We have to finally stand back and admit that this was SOLELY and ONLY our fault and that the African American members of our community are hurt by this just as much as everyone else. We allowed that horrible, pointless and utter fail that was NO ON 8 to happen. Don't get me wrong - I appreciate all the people who volunteered, who put yard signs up and who stood in the pouring rain until the better end. But here in the Bay Area, for example, NO was mostly visible in San Francisco and Berkeley - that's a Wikipedia entry for 'Preaching to the choir'. I had to drive to Livermore for business and was greeted by a virtual sea of YES signs.
And finally, as a one time supporter of him it saddens me to say this, but if we ever want to prevail, we must unfortunately make sure that when the issue comes up again there's a gag order imposed on Gavin Newsom.
--
The Gays Of Daytime
ellen.....
I've had a few people telling me that ellen really screwed up since it took her so long to get involved. it's really interesting to me, because ellen's done more for gay rights than lance bass and NPH put together. i mean, that's how i see it. and even before she put money in, she was speaking out on it.
some are saying these people deserved their rights to be taken away because they didn't take it seriously to begin with by not donating, etc.
....and i've heard a bit of unhappiness with Gavin Newsom...but why?
What this means is Anderson Cooper is NEVER coming out
OVER the "Blame the blacks" game
"I'm also disappointed in Barack Obama, who basically chose to sidestep Prop. 8; the irony being that 70% of blacks voted Yes on Prop. 8. While all of us were celebrating the equality that Obama's election signaled, sadly our community was being denied that same equality, often by minorities."
This is a popular meme since Prop 8 passed, and it is also lazy, offensive, and counter-productive. Instead of realizing the shortcomings of the No on 8 movement (i.e. them being COMPLETELY dwarfed in both money and volunteers), the gay community jumps on the "blame the blacks" bandwagon that accomplishes nothing and leaves those of us who are both gay and black in the middle. In my opinion, this was the perfect time for the entire community to mobilize around a cause, and what did we get? A few openly gay celebrities make some donations and half-hearted statements, people with real power like Anderson Cooper and Jodie Foster cower in the closet as usual, and people within the community cannot be bothered to volunteer for something other than a circuit party.
Blame it on lack of organization, fear of being out, fear of making a statement, apathy, and lack of volunteers, but don't blame it on the blacks. I'd like to point you to this little nugget from Daily Kos: white republicans comprised 24% of the voters and came out 82% for and 15% against.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/11/6/194522/168/773/656211
It's time for us to focus on the real enemy, which is conservative republicans who continuously try to strip us of our rights. One would think that 24% of the voters may hold a little more pull than 10%.
"The Middle"?
THose of us who are black and gay are in the toilet, always have been -- and you know perfectly well who put us there: our "brothers."
Just TRY bringing up Bayard Rustin, James Baldwin, Zora Neale Hurston, Billy Strayhorn, et. al. Not to mention Langston Hughes. They'll sue your black ass for mentioning the fact that he was gay so fast it'll make your head spin.
This 61 year-old gay African-American (please note that "Gay" comes first for reasons that are all too obvious) i'm FED UP!!!!
<img src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_e3BsDt7_O88/RuvVGvdc4JI/AAAAAAAAJLU/qsovnXBiDaE/s1600-h/davidehrenstein.jpg"/>
"the gay community"
"the gay community" doesn't exist, or if it does it doesn't include all gay people. I hate anything being blamed on "the gay community." Your post above is case and point.
Many people, even in angry, disappointed posts rejected the idea that black straight people were to blame. I know I did. Am I not a part of the "the gay community?"
If you're pissed off that some gay people in angry posts that they probably did not think rationally about blamed some black people - based on polling data, take it up with those specific gay people.
Plus... if gay people have far to go on race relations, straight people of all races have even further to go on gay rights. It's one thing to make insensitive remarks and another to hold power to pass legislation against people. Gay people have no such power. And some 75% of us did vote for Barrack Obama.
Apart from that, I liked your posting and agree with everything else you said.
Ms. Rosen
No on 8 WASN'T dwarfed in money..
No on 8 actually ended up with considerably more money than Yes on 8.
It wasn't a lack of money that doomed No on 8. It was a lack of qualified and effective leadership.
OMG!! Really?!
Yes.
I can’t believe it
On the topic of anti-discrimination laws
I, too, was shocked that so many states didn't have anti-discrimination laws attempting to stop people for being fired due to sexual orientation. I'm pretty sure that's never the case up here in Canada.
But when it comes to gays and blood or organ donation, I stand on the conservative side. I know that in Canada and the UK gays can be screened from donating blood or organs. If there is a significantly higher risk of infection from disease in gay men, then that is a health hazard and you wouldn't want ANY risk to be taken if you needed blood or an organ donation. Marriage and employment, on the other hand, are not "risky" as there are no serious adverse effects from gays marrying or working for someone.
Simple enough
Risk
You're right, anyone can have unsafe donor material. Just like anyone who drives can wind up in a car crash. But the reality is that young males between the ages of 16-24 (or whatever the actual range is) are statistically much more risky than females of the same age in terms of car accidents.
I highly doubt the risk factor difference between gays and straights for blood/organ donation is as significant, but it's still RISK. And the reality of it is that statistics strongly suggest that gays are riskier when it comes to disease infection through blood & organ donation.
It's not the African Americans
The African Americans are not to blame for the defeat of Prop 8, it is Religion.
As long as there is Religion there will never be gay rights. Get rid of Religion and Gay Rights will flourish.
Live Long and Prosper
It is not necessarily
It is not necessarily Relgion. There are several religious bases that are inclusive and non-judgmenta. It is, however, Belief (as Ursula LeGuin might put it, in this case in a form of generally, fundementalists and evangelicals. It is a certain, unwaivering belief that what they have been told is right and will always be right.
The Eugenics movement that lead to great oppression of minorities in the US and the Holocaust in Germany was based in an absolute certainty that their "scientific facts" were right without question.
The real enemy is closemindeness and intolerance and a belief in which people become irrational. It can use religion, politics, science or anything in which you may need to believe in. The scary moments come when you are so devoted to that belief you refuse to ask the important questions. Religion is a conduit, not the source of the problem - the problem lies in the need to have a certain structure that you believe in to protect yourself - which is a human flaw we will be fighting for quite awhile.
Quote:Religion is a
That may be true, but if we were forced to wait for the human race to sort out that particular problem in their collective psyches, none of us would be alive by the time our rights are restored. Practically speaking, the problem that needs addressing now is the ability of religious organizations to pour millions of dollars into political campaigns without impunity, in their bids to legislate morality.
And, to be honest, I'm tired of hearing "But MY church isn't like that" and "The christians I know don't feel that way." The bottom line is, the loudest anti-gay voices are coming from these religious communities. That tells me that there are not enough members of these Mormon, Catholic and Evangelical churches (to name three groups out of many) standing up within their ranks and challenging the hateful words and actions of their leaders.
Instead of chastising gay folks who, in refusing to cower, are working to prevent these church-based bigoted actions, I'd like to see a movement within those churches, with these enlightened members asking their leaders to replace their anti-gay crusades with better uses of funds and energy - helping the poor, feeding the hungry, assisting the ill and the elderly, etc. You know, the kinds of things Christ actually encouraged. What a concept.
Separation of Church and State
That is the issue. Religion can exist, but churches should not be able to give money to political campaigns, especially considering they are tax free intities. What needs to be done is legal action to prevent churches from influencing elections. I have drafted a law to make it so that any tax free initiy (churches) would lose thier tax free status if they give money to a political capaign or encourage votes a certain way in a campaign. I plan to work to make it a bill. If a federal messure was passed then the religious right would lose a lot of it's power because churches wouldn't have the funds to back political campaigns if they lost thier tax free status, if they'd risk loosing it at all.
I also want to point out, not all religious organisations are bad.
Read what my church says about prop 8
http://www.ucc.org/newsletter/called-out/a-pastoral-letter.htmlI was by no means
I am not a member of any of the denominations that you pointed out and my denomination is focused on all of those things including spreading awareness for GLBT issues and discriminatory policies and politicians. There are over 90 denominations of christianity within the US borders and the vast majority of them are not so harsh. As well as a host of other religions that to run along varing degress of social perspectives. The Mormons and the Evangelicals and the Baptist organizations are far more rigid and fundementally based and tend to run on fear and "conservativsm." They happen to be more visable because their message grabs far more attention than the millions of churches that have spent their time rebuilding New Orleans.
I do not forgive churches that get involved with state affairs nor those that preach messages of hate or intolerance. I'm just saying that getting rid of religion is not something accomplishable nor a goal we should be aiming for. Nor is it any way to get the more moderate religious individuals who may be on the fence to seeing our side of things. It just gives validity to the argument that we are here to tear down religion that the fundementalists toss around. We're here to be equals - that's all. That's where our focus needs to remain, not on tearing other people down.
I'm not sure where this came from
I'm not sure where this came from - in no way do I (or anyone else whose messages I've read here) advocate getting rid of all religion. I'm a firm believer that "Freedom Of Religion" is a cornerstone of America, with everyone having a right to choose their beliefs. That must also include "Freedom From Religion" if being an atheist or agnostic is their personal choice, as well as freedom from having someone else's religion inflicted upon them.
My view is simple - everyone has the right to lead their lives as they see fit, but they don't have the right to insist that others live by their moral beliefs. The Mormons picked a multi-million dollar ballot-box fight with us, and other religious leaders happily joined them. We have the absolute right to fight back and object to their lies and scare tactics. Boycotts and petitions and pressure to remove tax-exempt status are the tools I've seen advocated - not the elimination of religion.
Personally, I believe that religious organizations would be well served by redirecting their time and money into supporting their congregants and organizing good works in their communities.
I can understand why Obama
I can understand why Obama did not do enough for prop 8. He does have 4 years to make up for it, though.
I still can't shake the feeling that even mentioning the African American Community and proposition 8 makes one look like a racist. I have read some comments that were out of hand and I am sure that some of my own were perceived that way.
Black voters did not tip the election, but that doesn't negate the irony, which is just a talking point. I agree that for some it has been blown out of proportion. But I belive this debate may have a silver lining if it forces some black religious leaders into thinking differently in the future.
I was surprised to find out that African American voters were softer on the issue of gay adoption. Very surprised. In europe, the deal-braker for gay marriage (over civil union) has been adoption. It suggests to me that much of the fight is a battle of semantics, at least for many of the religious minded.
Gays have yet to win the same support in the African American community as we have in other minority groups. But I expect that to change, too. Truth be told, it seems like the gay community hasn't done enough to convince black religious nuts (as opposed to the merely religious) that ours is a civil rights issue and not a choice.
The supporters of Prop 8, the Mormons, Catholics, Evangelicals, and others, who contributed large sums of money, stooped to the lowest types of fear mongering available to them in their advertisements. This type of propaganda has been successful for centuries in oppressing minorities because it has always been difficult to confront and address in an ad campaign. They lied, played on peoples anxieties and basically did what bigots have been doing for a long, long time. We lost the proposition to ignorance and fear. That is a bitter pill to swallow, but one we have been swallowing since the beginning. It should make us better prepared for the next round.
I'd like to see an amendment proposition to the California constitution that defines: "Civil Union" as a union between two same sex individuals, a legal union which shares all the same rights and privileges as marriage. It would smell just as pretty.
On another note, I saw videos of the protests of the Mormon Temple in L.A., I wish there was more singing rather than chanting. And group prayer (lead by a black minister?). We should be asking God (Goddess) to forgive these ignorant bigots. They say prayer can heal. Maybe if their hearts were healed they wouldn't be so mean.
In case you missed it, a link to youtube: Wanda on Ellen, being Wandaful, as usual.
Circle Firing Squad
I think before fingers start being pointed, perhaps a mirror would come in handy. The simple truth is that the opposition to Prop 8 leadership was ineffective, splintered, lacked organization, and failed to clarify what the issue really was. Opponents got in the game too late, relied way too heavily on celebrities to urge people to vote no (including gay celebs who have stated they had no intention of marrying anytime in the near future), did not do any kind of outreach into the minority communities (including blacks and Latinos), did not do enough to put everyday people and their families in campaigns to show people what they would be destroying if voting yes on Pop8, relied too heavily on the tag of Cali being a "liberal" state therefore not susceptible to interference from the far-right, assumed people would vote their way, and simply didn't do enough to clarify what people would really be voting on.
We cannot reach out into other communities if our own is broken. The glass house of gay leadership in Cali (and everywhere else for that matter) needs to be fixed before everyone starts throwing stones.
loTr1985
I think you got a point. :-)
no offense to any celebs...but it's kind of sad, in my opinion, that any group would think they have to rely on celebrities for a cause.
I'm all for power and whatever, but i remember mainly reading and hearing about "oh, we need hollywood! ellen!"
I guess what i am trying to say is....maybe supporters in the future shouldn't try and rely on celebrity power...and i know i've defended Ellen, but i recognize she did get in the game pretty late (pretty sad that she had to be called out) and i think these big money making celebs just think "well, i'm okay...my partner will be okay either way.." - - so in a strange twisted sense, i sort of am like "well, screw you guys....we obviously can't count on you..."
ok, i know i just rambled on for like 5 years. anyway, celebs are useless...which is obvious..
maybe prop 8 supporters can look back in history at other causes (whether women's rights or racial equality) and take a few pages from those...and maybe we can ALL start over.
Not being there
I couldn't say what the problems were with the No on 8 campaign, because I live elsewhere and missed the ads.
Usually these groups are created ad hoc, even if often consisting of the same individuals who work on other campaigns. You're not the first to say that the campaign relied too much on celebs and didn't explain how the proposition would hurt individuals. I mean, that does seem like a no brainer, now. (and it sort of reminds me of GLAAD). In this case clearly the GLAAD model didn't work and the no on 8 campaign didn't motivate enough voters -because they lost a vote they should have had.
It sounds like they assumed that they had the vote, and the celebs were suppose to remind folks of how cool that was. That doesn't really work. It's also possible that the group was having a hard time managing and deciding what to do with the money. Hopefully other initiatives will learn from this.
.
Limited Focus