Doctor Who "You're so gay" controversy
Update: Yes, this did happen a few years back. I was tipped off by someone to it (coughMICHAEL!cough) and assumed that the ep had aired here in the States recently, which isn't even the case. So yeah, it's old and I air-balled this one -- sorry! But it's still an interesting topic that had never been discussed here on the site and one that is still an issue (with Knocked Up, etc). A minor controversy According to Nicklas Johnson, who has been charting both sides of the fan response to the word's use, this is how things started: About 5 minutes and 25 seconds into Aliens of London, we were presented with this exchange between the Doctor and Rose atop an apartment building in London:
This kind of reminds me of when The Maltese Falcon was adapted for the screen and the way that they decided to communicate to the audience that Peter Lorre's character was gay was to have him slapped by another man (apparently, you slap a woman or a gay guy and punch a man -- write this down, folks, it will be on the test). But I don't think that's the point here. Fan response has been across the board, from those who feel it's offensive to those who feel that it's simply the way people talk, and everything in between. Davies himself has said that the word gay is constantly evolving, arguing, "It seems to me that we're becoming people who complain about the use of the word gay, much as people *used* to complain about the word gay, because it no longer meant 'happy'. No words stay static." Interesting, though not entirely convincing or relevant, argument. What do you think? Is "gay" an insult? Or is it more insulting when negative reactions imply that it should be? Submitted by on Fri, 2007-06-01 11:40. |
User login![]() Recent comments
Recent blog posts
New forum topics |








Oh Rose.
I love Dr Who, so I'm not objective in this. But I didn't take offence. Rose didn't mean it as an insult, it was a friendly jab.
And I got to scream '"see, even Rose acknowledges he's gay!"
Beating the bushes for controversy? Or material?
Brian, hun... This episode was over two seasons--and one full Doctor--ago. Someone wrote a blog editorial about it in 2005, and you decide today that it's a new controversy?
I agree there's much to discuss about the unfortunate way that "gay" has been coopted as a generic insult by the slang-makers of the 1990s and beyond... If anything, the term was popularized and made ubiquitous by South Park in its debut and cultural heyday.
I'm not sure how anyone can deny that it's hurtful. Even if it isn't immediately recognized as an anti-homosexual slur, it is a purposeful broadening of the term to describe something as worthy of mockery, stupid, etc. It's a new and culturally pervasive way to police young men into denegrating gayness and maintaining compulsory heterosexuality.
nailed
Sigh.....
Not only this is an old 'issue', it's a silly one. At the time you heard nothing about it, but two years later folks are trying to stir up some drama? Calm down, girls. I'm a huge Dr. Who fan and I was hardly offended. Besides, this show has always been gay friendly (it introduced John Barrowman, an openly gay actor, to the canon as a bi-sexual character and went on to give him his own show) and the Doctor sexuality is fluid at times given his interaction with Captain Jack and a recent episode where he invites a kiss from a man he just rescued. In that same episode, the Doctor is assumed to be gay by one of the other characters and it's not an issue for the Doctor at all. I guess my point is to accuse this show of homophobia is ridiculous when it has been anything but.
Anthony