Interview with Matthew Goode and Julian Jarrold about the newer, gayer "Brideshead Revisited"
As you may have heard, an all-new, gay-injected adaptation of Evelyn Waugh's classic 1945 novel Brideshead Revisited is currently opening across the country. Our good friend John Polly had a chance to sit down with the film's young star Matthew Goode (Charles Ryder) as well as director Julian Jarrold (Kinky Boots) to ask them about the film's making the character of Sebastian Flyte explicitly gay and his relationship with Charles more overtly romantic. AfterElton.com: In this Brideshead Revisited, the Sebastian character is presented as more overtly gay. So, did you have think about how you approach the relationship between he and Charles? Were you concerned about Charles just coming off as a sexual opportunist, that he may just be taking advantage of Sebastian? Charles’ Cousin Jasper does say [of Sebastian and his flamboyant friends at Oxford], “Sodomites — steer well clear of them!” So there’s obviously something much more than just youthful exuberance going on there, which sets them apart. So to have something definitive to play against is great. For Charles, it’s more a question of platonic love, and then you bring Julia in and ... Charles does bang on about how [she and Sebastian] are so alike, in manner and look, that it would be an easy transference for someone to go, “Well ... as much as I love you and as much as I love this extraordinary living out our childhood now at the age of 18...” as he and Sebastian do during their long summer together ... It made sense for me for Charles to have that switch... AE: And if Charles had met Julia first, would he have later been attracted to Sebastian? I think the main love of his life was Sebastian, but in that way that they were linked. AE: Making Sebastian’s character more explicitly gay this time around ... How did you approach that —and why make him more directly gay? AE: And now is an easier time to tell that story? There’s a certain ambiguity because I think it’s more of a “love” really between Sebastian and Charles — from Charles’ point of view anyway, and maybe Sebastian would like it to go further. Be sure to check back later this week for our full review of Brideshead. Submitted by on Tue, 2008-07-29 10:42. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|








Decked out with lush sets and costumes, gay love seems
downright "acceptable." Especially if it's "just a phase" as Waugh makes clear. Yes Charles "loved" Sebastian, but that "love" was over once he met Julia. Needless to say he feels guilty about how Sebastian ended up, but he wouldn't had to have had an affiar with him for that.
Placing gay relationships among the English upper classes of the past and selling it as a deluxe carriage trade package is no new thing. But one should remembr that Chistopher Isherwood found men of his own age and class inlerable -- and thus got the hell out of Dodge and headed for Berlin, and then America where he found true love in a teeny tiny Santa monica Canyon cottage -- rather than a stately British manse.
journalist?
haha - is John (Polly) actually a journalist? once i got past the first inquiry:
"In
this Brideshead Revisited, the Sebastian character is presented as more
overtly gay. So, did you have think about how you (to?) approach
the relationship between he him and Charles? Were you concerned about
Charles just coming off as a sexual opportunist, that he may just be taking
advantage of Sebastian?"
and figured out - i think - what he was asking, it was rather interesting to read Matthew and Julian's responses :)
totally loved the series with Irons and Andrews and can hardly wait to see the new film version. I'm sure it will be fantastic and i'll eventually watch it dozens of times - but i fear if i expect too much i'll be disappointed.
:) here's hoping for the best - Julian and the actors seem to have a good approach.
cheers :)