Liveblogging "As the World Turns": So Noah Married an Axe Murderer
Oh, fine, fine ... Ameera's not technically wielding any sharp objects and to our knowledge she hasn't actually killed anyone. Yet. But is there anyone out there who doesn't think that she's up to no good? There mustn't be, because if even the characters on the show have gotten wise to the situation (they're not always the quickest on the uptake, if you remember), then that means it must be pretty much written on her face. Yes, in today's episode, noted rocket scientist Casey is the first person to realize that Ameera has designs on Noah that go beyond simply marrying and living with him. (Crazy, right?) The real question now is whether resident Queen of Denial Luke will finally get hip to the situation and stand up for himself and his ever-dense boyfriend, or end up being boiled on the stovetop like Mister Hopsalot. How will it all go down? Click on through the jump and refresh to find out as it happens, and join in the bitchfest in the comments! Ameera, is that a machete in your pocket or are you just happy to see us? 2:55PM EDT: Preview time! A fully-scarfless (and smokin' hot!) Ameera grabs Noah by the face and plants a full one on him. Wow -- that's your two kisses, lovebirds. Now get ready for 6 months of drymouth. 2:50PM EST: Casey stresses that Ameera isn't into him because she's sniffing up Noah's hydrant. Luke replies that she can open up to him because he's "safe" and Casey says, "whatever, dude." I kind of like that he called Luke "dude". Casey's late for work, so he leaves, and through the window Luke sees Noah put his arm around Ameera. And Casey is late, and he gets fired! Aw, poor kid. Evil Emily shows up and asks him for a drink and he says he doesn't work there because the girl he likes rejected him for a gay guy and he was five minutes late. He hands her a bottle and leaves. Back at the love shack, Noah can't figure out why Casey "flew off the handle" and quit the project. Luke tells him that Casey liked Ameera and she's clearly into Noah. He says that he didn't want to see it, but that Casey opened his eyes to the fact that they don't know anything about her and she's far too into him. Luke says, "every day you spend with her, I lose." Noah tells Luke that he's in love with him, and just then Ameera comes around the corner with two plates of food and the stink-eye for Luke. Luke leaves abruptly and on the way out looks at Noah and Ameera sitting down to dinner together, and shakes his head in that "how could I have been so stuuuuupid?!" way. 2:46PM EDT: Casey storms off and Luke follows him. Casey yells, "I quit you, Luke!" and asks Luke if that was loud enough for ICE to hear. Brokeback reference? Eh, not bad. Casey tells Luke that Ameera is in love with her gay husband and the Luke blubbers on about how no, when you save someone's life they want to kiss you in a totally platonic way, or some such nonsense. Luke tries to convince Casey that Ameera is really into him. Um, why, exactly? She's clearly not, and he clearly suspects that Ameera is Noah-blocking. Luke, give me the zipcode from the state of DENIAL and I'll send you a postcard. 2:42PM EDT: Casey basically lays down the law, that what they're doing isn't worth it. Ameera's all "keep your voice down!" and Luke apologizes if his gay teasings went too far, but Casey responds that that's not it, it's that he doesn't want to live a lie (again). He asks Ameera what she thinks they should do. 2:37PM EDT: Blah, blah blah. Lots of other crap. Oh - Emily just got into kind of a hot standoff with her male assistant, who quits on her for being such a bayotch. Bring that guy back - he's good! Okay, back at the diner, Ameera is telling Noah that nothing's going on, that she's just nervous being out in public. Liar! To convince her that things are fine, Luke puts his arm around Casey, who finally reaches his Gay Panic tipping point and throws his arm off, saying that he's not gay and not a cameraman (uh, we noticed!) and since there's clearly no chance of his getting into St Olaf's flowing pants, he's not putting up with all this nonsense anymore. Okay, he's smarter than I thought. 2:26PM EDT: Ameera's all "Noah's not into women, he's with Luke". Casey's all, "Yeah, but you're totally mooning over him and you should cool it" and she's all "POP OFF, CASEY!!" She seriously does get this crazy dark-and-stormy look in her eye and she warns him to mind his own business, and Noah and Luke come over to find out what's going on. HOT! This is better than Rock of Love! Meanwhile, Ice Truck Killer gets into a spat with Emily and asks if she could put her broomstick in the closet every once in a while, and she snaps, "Don't tell me where to put my broomstick!" Back at Snyder Farm, a hilariously bad day-player tries to deliver a hot air balloon to Meg and The Blonde Obstacle's Obstacle. This is gonna be good - I hope they wind up in the lion sanctuary like in Footballer's Wives! 2:18PM EDT: At the diner, Luke and Noah leave Casey and Ameera at the booth and go sit with one another at the counter. Casey sees Ameera's wistful look and asks her flat-out: "You're in love with Noah, aren't you?" Someone get Captain Obvious a bone, please. 2:14PM EDT: Luke tells his actors that they blew it, and Casey says that he didn't have the lens cap off or hadn't pressed RECORD or something similarly brilliant. I'm hoping at this point Luke gets all Lars Von Trier on these guys and starts engaging in serious emotional warfare with his talent. Ameera of course suggests doing another take (maybe this time they'll get to third base!) and Luke says no, they should stop and pick it up tomorrow. Noah is either stunned or drunk and says nothing. 2:08PM EDT: We start with Ice Truck Killer and Sophie. Oh my - there's a ticker at the bottom of the screen telling me that due to the live broadcast of the Pope's visit, "Guiding Light will be seen at 2:07AM". Denied! Guess the Pope likes the gay boys of Oakdale too much to interrupt their story? Back at the love shack. Cake and Nameera are working on their "movie", and they explain the tradition of carrying one's sham bride over the threshold. Ameera is of course tickled to be in Noah's arms, and after she delivers her subsequent line with all the personality of oversteamed asparagus, she suggests they try again. Noah carries her through the door again, and out of nowhere she plants a kiss on his lips. Luke looks at them like that particular interaction is vaguely familiar and perhaps something he himself has experienced, oh, say ... over six months ago? 1:55PM EDT: OMG - two of the bottle blondes on The Bold and the Botoxed just had a full-on fight over one of the woman's dead dog, with her accusing the other lady of killing the pooch with poisoned lemon bars. Drama! Submitted by on Fri, 2008-04-18 13:53. |






Actually.....
Really?
When Luke and Noah were
The intro is almost always better than the show!
*Tasteless comment alert*
a balloon ride?
Ummm.....
Yes, and I loved the I quit you Luke, line!
FINALLY!!!!
Yup, yup, yup...
He is comming around.
Hello there. I think there is a big knock-down-drag-out boy/girl fight over a boy comming up== or someone may die?
www.arthurinthegarden.com
www.downtownraleigh.com
Ameera must go right now!!!
And I am not even watching this crap anymore. At least Luke may have grown one ball in today's episode. Only time and hormones will tell.
Let's all give one big cheer to the rightwing-nuts at the AFA for bringing us AMEERA, SHE WHO MUST BE OBEYED.
I am switching all my attention (except this blog of course) to Verbotene Liebe, Brothers and Sisters any other gay-themed drama that support gay men and gay women in love in a realistic way.
damn....
I think Casey is the smartest one of the whole group
I am furious!!!!!!!!!
Could this ridiculous Puke storyline get any dumber? I asked the same question at least once a week and you know what? It does get dumber every damn episode! I am so pissed at Luke for being so ball-less! Jeez. smack Noah a couple of times across that ignorant head of his. I thought Noah was wooden in some of his scenes before, but today it was as if he was wound up like the true dummy he is. Casey was the ONLY redeeming character in today's asinine episode. He is also the hottest of that sorry group in my book. Am I the only one that noticed that the Puke segments were miniscule at best? The only screen time they had to amount to anything was the opening and the ending. If I would have blinked during the other segments, I would have missed them. With the looks that Ameera Bitch was giving Casey, I would bet money that she is a plant with every intention of doing harm to stupid Noah and/or Luke. She better watch out because most of the queens that I have been friends with, you don't back them in a corner. You will come out with bodily harm. I wanna see Luke smack Noah and her both right upside their chops. Next week, I'll be damned if she doesn't kiss his dumbass AGAIN! What's CBS and ATWT telling all of us gays? Only a woman can satisfy a gay man? HELL NO! It's past time for Luke to dump this loser boyfriend of his. Way past time!
BTW... Awesome live blog!
My new favorite character
My new favorite character is Emily's assistant. Too bad he got fired. It would have been nice to have someone around with some sense and a spine.
Casey did pretty well, though. He wised up and got out of that mess.
So, as of next week, Ameera and Noah will have kissed as often as Luke and Noah. Is anyone affiliated with this show still insisting that there's no double standard? And if so, do their noses grow every time they open their mouths?
Lighten Up
I think some of us proudly out queer folk have been too hard on ATWT. Yes, there's a double standard, and yes, it's an indication of how far we haven't come. But despite that, I consider it a significant development, as deficient as it is. When the first kiss occurred I got on the ATWT message boards to see the reaction. There is a HUGE segment of the viewing audience (and of the country in general) that feels like throwing up when Nuke even talk about being boyfriends, to say nothing of actual physical contact. And there's another large group that is perfectly fine with gay people, but on a theoretical level. There were lots of comments from people like that who said they were cool with gay people, but they weren't ready to see something like kissing. And read the recent front page story on this site about the difficulties of getting gay characters on nighttime American TV. Then there are the right wing groups who want to boycott P&G and the network for allowing even this cleaned up version of a gay story.
Despite all the double standards and shortcomings I salute ATWT for putting this out there, and persisting with it. A gay teen romance with physical contact is a huge thing for daytime TV. As insufficient as it is, it will only lead to more down the road. And in the meantime, the part of middle America that is watching will be exposed to this for perhaps the first time, and be forced to think about it. And it will become more than theoretical to those who have seen us in those terms. And the goofiness and unintentional hilarity provides us with this fantastic live-blogging experience!
Another thing about the quality of the show. It can be truly awful (and used to be significantly better), but they put out a full hour show five days a week, every week of the year. They also don't pay well to writers or directors. I'm a bit of a writer myself, and it would probably take me two weeks to write a one hour show that didn't suck.
For what it's worth, I'm predicting that the Ameera storyline will play out and she'll leave or get together with Casey, and Nuke will ultimately get into bed. Of course, the question is exactly what "ultimately" means in this case...
I think ATWT is trying to sweep the awards.
They got the GLAAD award for last year, and this year, they're going for the AFA award!
Seriously though, I've stopped watching this show as I don't particularly like being repeatedly insulted. I've also stopped watching anything on CBS, as that is how incredibly insulting the show has become. I've let them know about it, too, and I suggest that anyone who feels the same do so as well.
To the people who still insist they are doing something wonderful just by having this on the show, my personal opinion is that they have more than squandered any goodwill that they should get for that.
http://establisheddisestablishmentarian.blogspot.com/
Insulted
If you're insulted by ATWT then obviously you shouldn't be watching. We all have our own standards for what insults us. I'm insulted that other daytime shows don't even try to have gay relationships, or even gay characters. I'm insulted that prime time shows (with VERY few exceptions) don't have gay relationships, or major gay characters. And that most gay characters have been incidental or acquainances, without truly gay lives or gay relationships.
AfterElton has a current story posted about South Park. I love the show, but I've always been insulted by the constant use of the word "gay" to mean "lame". The writer of the article was not insulted by that at all. It's the old "eye of the beholder" thing I guess.
I don't lose sight of the fact that ATWT is portraying something that totally doesn't exist in daytime TV or in prime time TV (a gay teen male relationship that has included physical contact). I also don't forget that they are not creating the show for the gay community, and their goal is not to provide us with vicarious sexual satisfaction. And I don't forget the positive impact the storyline is undoubtedly having on many formerly sheltered straight people in middle America.
Bottom line: while disappointed in the double standard and the often lousy writing and plot development, the show has not squandered its goodwill with me.
Insulted?
I have to disagree Dennis. It sounds like a battered spouse when you say this is the only show on daytime with a gay character. Like a battered spouse who's afraid to leave and be left all alone. So, for better or worse we should embrace ATWT? Like the battered spouse who feels too lowly to deserve an honest relationship?
P&G are not porviding an inclusive or fair representation of gay people. I don't accept that as good enough or better. I'm glad you see the double standard. The difference between me and most ATWT fans is that while you are disappointed at the double standard, I am outraged. I demand a seat at the front of the bus, because that's the only way people like P&G will give me one.
.
I'm not watching. Didn't
I'm not watching. Didn't I mention that? The reason that ATWT is so insulting isn't really anything storywise (well, unless you consider the current storyline insulting to one's intelligence, which is VERY easy to do). It's that fact that there is a kissing ban in place for Luke and Noah, yet Ameera is now apparently making a habit of kissing Noah. That's a HUGE smack in the face. They know that many of us aren't happy with the situation, and then they go and do that. It's more than a smack in the face, really. It's more like spitting in our faces. If Luke and Noah were kissing, I wouldn't give a damn if Ameera laid one on him. As it is, it's COMPLETELY unacceptable.
As for South Park, I LOVE it! I don't mind the gay jabs for two reasons:
1) In the case of your example, it's genuine, UNLIKE ATWT.
2) It takes jabs at EVERYONE. In that sense, we get exactly what we want (or at least what I want), to be treated like everyone else.
As for the goodwill issue, some of us aren't happy with just being on the bus anymore. We want to sit wherever we damn well please!
http://establisheddisestablishmentarian.blogspot.com/
writers are in a corner
Unfortunately, it seems the writers have got themselves in a corner. In order to make us root for Luke and Noah, they have to be likeable, but Noah's lack of intelligence makes that difficult. Even Luke's lack of consistancy in terms of being able to detect Ameera's BS is odd.
With other characters, even when they're being stupid about their love lives, they can be redeemed with other relationships. When Henry was an idiot and ended up gambling his livelihood, he was still a great friend to Jack Snyder and tried to help with the Parker/Kit problem. When Holden was "Holden' a grudge" against Lily, he was still a great, sensitive father to Luke. Those kinds of things make us care for the characters.
But Noah, unfortunately, doesn't get that opportunity, because his main link in this town is Luke. He really needs to not be dumbed down. They could have done a similar story without making him stupid, but that would require more subtlety. Ameera would have to be less obvious of a manipulator. The conflict would have to come from Noah's own internal struggle over wanting to be proud of his father vs. hating his father. Right now the conflict is from Noah not realising that Ameera likes him, which is pretty silly .
FINALLY!!!
Noah is allowed to kiss someone! Are we sufficiently titillated. Well, you should be. And you should be sitting on the edge of our seats waiting for sweeps week when P&G will allow Noah to actually kiss Luke for a ratings bonanza that will kick off their reality program. I hope everyone is ready to help them out and Blitz the media with the good news!!!!!!!
But don't fret, there will be another sweeps week next fall. When Luke and Noah will be allowed to act like normal gay men for a few seconds and all of us can get together and let the media know about that, too. Too, much fun and love. Too, much fun!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
.
That.Was.Horrific.
And it looks like the worst is yet to come.
Nuke is now Puke, and Martha Byrne is out next week as ATWT's resident heroine. I swear, PGP should just pull the plug and end everyone's misery pronto.
Back Of The Bus
Ack! I knew if I defended ATWT in any way I'd get the "back of the bus" analogy. And I got it twice! And I got the battered spouse analogy too. I feel like Barack Obama, who can't make a nuanced observation about anything without people over-simplying and attacking him for not being one dimensional.
Let me be blunt. I'm not satisfied in any way with the back of the bus. We deserve nothing less than completely equal marriage rights. We deserve nothing less than full fledged gay relationships on television shows, with kissing and rolling around in bed and character imperfections. We deserve to be able to openly join the military. We deserve...blah, blah, blah. Of course we deserve all those things, and I shouldn't have to prove my bonafides by saying those things.
We also live in a real country that is far from what we deserve. Where in many states you can be fired simply for being gay. Where a majority of our fellow citizens DON'T believe we should marry. Where a kid got shot by a schoolmate about two months ago simply for being gay. Where our enlightened friends in the TV industry find it difficult to get gay characters on prime time TV at all (see the in depth AfterElton article from a couple of days ago), where most gay kids growing up still feel the need to hide their identifies from their classmates and families for fear of being rejected or even kicked out of the house, where about half of the country thinks we're immoral simply for what we are, where people point and gawk and snicker when they see two guys holding hands. And on and on and on.
It's in that environment that I choose to not be insulted when ATWT breaks through a signficant barrier (the barrier shouldn't be there, but it is) and exposes sheltered America to somthing new, allowing millions of them to grow in the process. I choose to see the positive intentions of the people creating that breakthrough, rather than feeling like they're spitting in my face. Is the double standard proper in any way? Of course not. Am I satisfied? F*ck no. But to recognize good intentions, and to appreciate the wall being broken through, and to give them some time and space to grow and develop and gradually overcome the resistance of middle America, is in NO way settling for the back of the bus.
It's a multi-dimensional nuanced outlook. You certainly need not share it, but you should at least try to see past the surface. I certainly think we should raise a stink about it, and point out the double standards, and "demand" more representation throughout the media. But also recognize the world in which we live, and don't reject friends and allies because they're not perfect.
What's a multi-dimensional nuanced outlook?
P&G are playing into peoples fears. They're putting a gay couple on display and making it painfully obvious that it is too disgusting to see them kiss or relate like any other couple on the show. This is the reason why kids hide their feelings. Shows like ATWT lure them in with the promise of inclusion, then throw them the AFA party line. You can love the sinners but nobody should have to actually watch them sin.
I don't accept it. P&G's intentions are shabby. The only reason they have Luke and Noah is to increase ratings. That worked. Nuke aren't going anywhere as long as P&G can exploit the "gay angle."
It's a multi-dimensional nuanced outlook? I'm sorry, I don't even know what that's suppose to mean. But I'm seeing a one-dimensional, fear-based portrayal of gay love. I don't respect a friend or ally who doesn't respect me. Respect is the basis of a friendship, not something you do when it's convenient. It was commendable for ATWT to show a gay kid coming out. It was a ratings bonanza to have Luke fall in love but inconvenient to allow him to show his love.
I feel like P&G are the type of 'friend' who tells fag jokes as soon as I'm out of the room. I'm just not that desperate for friends.
GO YOU. :-D
everything you said....right on! :-D
The answer
The multi-dimensional nuanced outlook mentioned has less to do with the story and more to do with his "superior" abiltiy to view things as us mere mortals are incapable of doing. Nevermind that, in reality, the outlook is as one-dimensional and un-nuanced as can be. And I'm not continuing any further, because frankly, I'm not comfortable with sinking to that level.
http://establisheddisestablishmentarian.blogspot.com/
How desperate are we, again?
This is soooo not a case of 'something is better than nothing'.
A gay storyline done wrong is worse than no storyline at all.
I agree with TWA2 about ATWT having squandered any goodwill they might have once deserved for showing a gay character.
They may have started off good, but it's beyond pathetic now.
Watch Verbotene Liebe instead. The subtitles won't kill you.
You hit the nail on the head
You stating that "a gay storyline done wrong is worse than no storyline at all" hits the nail right on the head.
The current Puke storyline is truly beyond pathethic and CBS needs to scuttle this mess like yesterday. Van supposedly has signed a multi-year contract, but Jake and Tala haven't. It's time to drop this travesty and show them the door. This current storyline is going to do nothing but turn the viewing audience against Jake and his character to the point that no one will care if and when he and Luke get back together.
Various comments on this particular broadcast are all in favor of that.
ATWT does NOT deserve
I've got the solution!
The Nuke/Ameera triangle ends in a three-way murder-suicide. That would free ATAT up to tell a much more interesting story -- how Casey discovers the True Gay Self he's been hiding all these years when he falls in love with Parker.
Now don't go telling me it wouldn't be FABULOUS!
No Mention of Hotprechaun?
Glutton For Punishment
Jeez, I don't check the website over the weekend, and then today I discover that everyone is not merely disagreeing with the points I tried to make, but they feel the need to disparage and attack. What happened to amicable exchange of ideas? Nonetheless I'll hop back in for more abuse.
Nukely, I wasn't dismissing you for using an analogy. Analogies are a great tool. But not so great if they're inaccurate, or if they're used to simply dismiss an argument without actually addressing the argument. It's a Karl Rove maneuver to attack the person making the argument and dismiss him with an analogy like "back of the bus" or "battered spouse", rather than addressing the points actually being made.
Intentionally mis-reading the argument and assuming the worst about the poster is also not helpful. Calling me "desperate" because of the points I made isn't helpful. Or saying I'm acting "superior" to "mere mortals". That implies an inflexible outlook not willing to consider other views. I don't get that.
I won't make all my points again, except to say that the storyline is obviously representative of a double standard, and from a gay perspective is woefully inadequate. I thought I made that clear. All I'll add is to speculate about what happens if the storyline is killed. Who wins then? For one, Focus On the Family and all the other homophobic groups pressuring P&G and the networks to kill it simply because the characters are gay. For another, all those middle Americans (and they were all over the message boards) who said "please CBS, make Luke straight again, he's such a nice boy", or those who said "I'm never watching again until they get rid of the queers", or those who said "I'm just not ready for that, please don't make me watch". For a third, the people at CBS or ATWT or P&G who championed the idea, but who find it's just not worth it when they're being attacked from all sides. And who will think twice before going down that road again. And lastly, bigots and homophobes everywhere who want gays to be totally marginalized, and who certainly don't want them to be seen in any sort of positive light.
Lastly, I certainly hope that everyone who is so enraged about lack of perfection in the show and compromise are themselves 100% out at work, 100% out to their families, 100% out at their school and church (if they go to school or church), and 100% open about showing affection to their partner in public. Anything less is hypocrisy, representing a compromise made for some level of self protection. I've been out for years, including 100% at work, even though it's a conservative financial company. I've never sat in the back of ANY buses.
okay dennis....
I won't attack you, but I am curious about something...you have clearly stated that you notice the double standard....you also ask us to wonder what would happen if the storyline is killed? you ask "who wins then?"
the focus on the family groups, etc have already won, don't you think? having a gay couple (if you can call them a couple) is not enough. the same would go if these were two straight people. luke and noah have only kissed twice. twice. they've also taken their shirts off with each other only to have been interrupted. add to the fact that their past kissing attempts have been met with the camera panning upwards, sidewards or...oh...a hug instead of a kiss.
A lot of us are upset because it's just so freaking obvious why this is happening. if this was happening to the straight couples, i'd gladly shut the hell up.
it's also upsetting to me, because the producers or whatnot stated "we're going to treat them equally" -- oops, a mistake, don't you think? if they had said "we're going to have to limit the affection" then none of us would be expecting anything more.
Lots of people have said that the show did right by having luke be gay and giving him a boyfriend....but when the show slaps us in the face with pan aways and interruptions galore....that's where the credit stops i think. they are no longer giving us a positive look on luke or his relationship. panning away and the interruptions are insulting, because if you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen. I think the majority of the reaction for luke/noah was positive, but noooo......their higher ups sadly have the last word. something needs to change. this is 2008, gay people are more accepted by others, more people are coming out successfully, blah blah you get what i am saying?
Thanks Liz
Liz - Thanks for the thoughtful response. It's hard to learn anything or open our minds to alternate viewpoints if we're disparaging each other, To answer your first question, whether Focus On the Family, etc. have already won, my answer is an emphatic "NO". They don't want any queer visibility on television at all, especially a sympathetic likable gay teenager with an equally likable boyfriend, supportive friends and family, etc. They remain as outraged as you are by the storyline.
To address your point about the producers and other PTB, they certainly were not being truthful when they initially tried to say there were no differences in how the straight and gay couples were being portrayed. Since then, though, I've read several comments that essentially admit they're responding to pressure - comments about "the broad spectrum of the audience". Obviously they don't want to come out and overtly say "yes, we're holding Nuke back because of our conservative audience", but they've said as much in backhanded ways.
Related to that, I don't think it's fair when we castigate everyone involved with the production. P&G has the last word, and if they order things be done a certain way then they're done that way. Does that mean we should blame Van and Jake? Or writers who would like to go farther but can't? Or show producers or directors who also would like to go farther but can't? From what I've read I'm not even sure we can blame CBS, which doesn't own the show and has little or no creative control. I remember at least twice when Luke and Noah were close to kissing and there was a knock at the door. Luke grinned slyly and cocked his head, as if he were in on the joke. (The joke being that P&G are chickenshit overseers not allowing what the people on the show actually want to do.)
Looked at in that light, my earlier points can be boiled down to two: first, don't overreact and blame the actors, the writers, the producers, etc., when they have no control. Give them credit for perhaps WANTING to do the right thing. Blame P&G, but don't even just blame them. Blame instead the society that makes this even thinkable, blame the republicans (don't ever capitalize that word) for feeding on and fanning the public's prejudices, blame religion for closing people's minds, etc.
I have a prediction: if this storyline does go forward, the double standard we now see will gradually be eroded. I'd like to see the show (or any show) just say "f*ck it, we're doing it even if it kills the show", but that's not a realistic expectation. For God's sake, Will and Grace - an extremely popular night time show - didn't really show gay people fully as they are, and give the characters sex lives like they do straight people. But ATWT will inexorably move in that direction. I'm willing to be patient with them. If you're not, fine. But I don't see where "nothing" is better than a well-intentioned "something" that has the potential to grow. Don't play into the hands of Focus On the Family and the republicans, who are trying their best to kill even this imperfect animal.
hmm...
I am sure the producers want to do the right thing and i know they can't because of P&G...and i won't blame society, because our society (from what i have experienced) is pretty much to the "I don't a damn" viewpoint about homosexuality....as for republicans....i won't blame them either...i blame P&G...*THEY* are the sole reason this is all happening.
I personally wish van, the writers, anyone would just say "screw this" and take a stand. It really confuses me as to why they won't. I use to watch GH and I remember reading interviews where the actors would say "I hated when they did this....i went to the writers and said no more..." or "the fans really got angry at my character and let me know. So i decided something needed to be done" - - But maybe that's GH....The show has gone downhill lately, but the point is....i feel like the stars of the show should have a say in their characters....van, the writers all know how upset the fans are. it made all the news headlines and P&G especially know how we all feel.
I know you think we have something, but i really disagree. something to me equals full out equality in every sense of the word. having gay characters isn't enough to feed certain people's needs for a positive look into themselves.
You may be right though...we may end up seeing a change....but until then...I'm still pretty ticked...but I'll keep track at the same time to see if and when changes do indeed take place.
Society
Liz - I should probably shut up soon so I don't seem like I'm trying to dominate the discussion (maybe it's too late for that!). I totally respect your viewpoints. I do want to say one thing, though, about republicans and society. I can't agree at all that we're to the "don't give a damn" stage. Look at the polls about whether gay marriage should be allowed, or whether being gay is immoral. Look at all the states trying to pass anti-marriage amendments. And only ONE state has voted that sort of thing down. Read the ATWT message boards. Talk to gay kids in high schools about their experiences. Talk to gay people in the workforce and see how many don't dare come out on the job. Listen to right wing commentators and evangelical christians railing against gay people. Society really IS to blame ultimately for all of this. If society wasn't a problem, then P&G wouldn't care themselves. They're not homophobic, they're just protective of the bottom line and terrified of controversy.
And republicans have been feeding off the evangelical and conservative disdain for homosexuality for years. Karl Rove overtly used fear and hatred of gays in his effort to get "values voters" to the polls. And if we even have a concept of "values" that means anti-gay to a vast cross-section of Americans then we truly do have a societal problem.
well....
don't shut up. we're not arguing. we're simply having a discussion. you can shut up if i start calling you names or something. ;-)
....i know NOT ALL of society accepts homosexuality....but i feel like....no. ok, i don't know anymore. I just sit here and wonder why ellen degeneres has been able to make a comeback. why is it that the characters of kevin and scotty are treated equally on the show B&S?
does P&G only "rule" on cbs and their shows? I am just trying to figure out why this is so different and the "this is daytime" arguement will not fly with me.
It's an annoying topic for me to think about...it's obviously very political and i hate politics. Yet at the same time, I enjoyed this show because of luke and all that...and now i don't..just like other people don't. *sigh* there's no business like showbusiness, eh? whew.
you did make one very interesting comment though....you asked how many of us are 100% out to our jobs, etc.....me personally? i am out, but i'm not out in the sense that i announce it to the world. I don't meet a person and tell them i am gay on the first meeting...or the 2nd...or the 3rd. if the topic comes up and someone asks me...then yes, i will gladly tell them i am gay.
the same goes with a job....I don't sit down for an interview and say "look....I'm gay...will this be a problem?" but i will say it if my boss asks me and if it is a problem...then i will walk out...because i don't need that.
discrimination is still out there, of course.....so i am out to friends, family....some people at work (those i can trust) - - but as for being 100% out....i can honestly say i am not...because 100% out to me means i am out to everyone...and i'm not...nor will i ever be....because of assholes out there. I don't have the time nor the energy to deal with them...
straight people don't go around having to tell people "oh, um....yeah, sorry...i'm straight" (only if a gay person hits on them) so i personally do not feel i need to go around proclaiming my sexuality unless someone honestly asks me.
Liz - I think your
Liz - I think your Ellen comment is interesting. It's my view that people accept her because a lot of people accept gay people in principle - just like those ATWT message board people who said they were all for Luke being gay, they just didn't want to have to see it expressed in any way. If Ellen were kissing women with any frequency it would be a different story. Though even then, people seem to accept women kissing more readily than men kissing. And B&S has a small audience, and an audience of a certain type that is likely predisposed to be a bit more "indie" thinking. ATWT has an audience of middle Americans and older people that have been watching for years. Two boys kissing is obviously going to impact them a lot more.
I'm to the point now in my job where I interview people when they apply to our group. One time we had a woman who very overtly made it clear that she was a lesbian with a partner. She just mentioned it in passing, but she obviously wanted to make it clear that she wasn't going to be hiding her identity. (We hired her.) I don't go out of my way either to "announce" I'm gay. But if people say something like "so, are you married", I just say, "no, I'm gay" as opposed to simply saying no. So I'm not asking people to broadcast it. But if you're not talking about it when circumstances would seem to dictate that, then you're covering up. I'm not one to judge about that - each person has his own path and his own journey. But I will judge if someone gets enraged because corporate people are compromising to save ratings or save jobs or save shows, but the enraged person is also compromising in his own life to save a job, or save a friend, or save a comfort level or prevent diesapproval. That's hypocrisy.
P&G is holding us back
P&G took a 7th rate, as in 7th place, soap and made it into the 3 rated soap in a matter of months with the Nuke Story line. Something that any soap expert at the time wouldn't believe possible with the de