News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

"Medium" and "Saturday Night Live": The gay serial killer is alive and well on NBC

Hey, guys! Grab your little dog Precious, pop some popcorn, and settle in: It's creepy gay killer week on NBC!

If you tuned into Saturday Night Live this past week, you're obviously not just a serial killer, but a masochist, to boot. Nothing else explains why anyone would suffer through 90 minutes of watching Christopher Walken read cue cards to a cast that seems openly terrified of him. Yes, I do kind of love the guy, but this was painful.

Aside from the general unevenness of the episode overall, one skit in particular stood out as legitimately creepy: the office party skit. In the scene, Jason Sudeikis is leaving his job and his office throws a party for him. One co-worker, Eric (Walken), seems to be a little too fond of the departing colleague despite the fact that they've never officially met, and in the end (after giving him a mix CD and a painted portrait) goes out to choke the man to death in the parking lot ... out of "love".

 

Christopher Walken in a different, though equally painful, skit from SNL

Best-case reading: That creepy guy in your office is probably secretly in love with you, bro. Worst-case reading: Gay guys aren't capable of understanding love if it doesn't involve throttling a straight man to death after giving him gifts. Um, can we have Target Lady back, or something?

Maybe on its own it wasn't that bad. Uninspired? Sure. Predictable? Yeah. But come on, we're talking about SNL here, the same show that later aired the THIRD agonizing installment of "Laser Cats". It's not like we're expecting miracles.

But last night's Medium offered the second gay predator of the week for the network, this time a publisher who used one of his author's books on seducing hot young men to lure unsuspecting hunks to their increasingly violent deaths.

Never mind that the plot twist (we're supposed to think it's the author herself, guest star Rosanna Arquette) makes absolutely no sense whatseover given the setup. What, were all of these victims gay? Otherwise, how were they seduced by a man? And if they were gay, why were the cops holding a female possible perp under suspicion in the first place? But even more ridiculous is the fact that the gay character shows up literally in the last 5 minutes of the episode to hit on a straight detective, unwittingly reveal his leering, gay-flavored guilt (in the longest elevator ride in history), and be put away.

 

Rosanna Arquette totally didn't kill that gay guy

To their credit, there's no big deal made out of the fact that the killer is gay within the world of the show, meaning that the detective doesn't kick into gay panic mode when he gets hit on by the leering gay executive. But come on ... why did there need to be a gay twist in the first place? We learn the identity of the killer literally seconds after the detective finishes saying,  "well, all the women at the publishing company have alibis, so...", so it's not like there's any real suspense here. The fact that the killer was gay was utterly inorganic to the story and the arc of the episode, and seemed to be added for completely exploitative purposes.

You might read the above and think I'm nuts for getting upset about a skit in a show nobody watches anymore and a three-minute scene at the tail-end of a wildly ridiculous supernatural cop show. But when you compare it to the number of positive gay representations on NBC in the past week (none), these two killer queers are worth noting. If we're to believe NBC chief Ben Silverman's claims that gay visibility will be improving under his watch, we need to see some proof.

If you want to watch the Medium episode (to see the former Susan-Seeker do some pretty hot vamping, more than anything), you can check it out in its entirety here. Interestingly, the office party skit is not available on NBC's video streaming site, Hulu, although several other skits from this week's episode are. Maybe they liked it as much as we did.

(Big thanks to reader Ed for posting about the Medium ep!) 

Ed's picture

Thanks

Thanks you for the thank you about Medium but I have no idea how the name "Gossip Guy" got on my posting. Sorry to the the real "Gossip Guy" .. I'm not stealing your idenity ..or maybe I am... after all I might be a crazy gay stalker killer kind of NBC guy.
Angelmonster's picture

I can't comment on SNL, the

I can't comment on SNL, the show has gone down hill since Tina Fey left I don't even bother turning it on anymore plus most of the time I am just coming home and never think about it.

As for Medium it is one of my favorite shows and I do feel like I need to defend it. I won't compare its "megative outlook" on gay people compared to positive one. There was nothing negative about it, about him being gay. It was a gay serial killer. I thought it was thrilling to see he was just gay, no big deal was made of it. It was handled in a very comftorable way.

The reason she saw Rosanna Arquette was because the killer was using her book to pick guys up. Honestly I liked that they didn't make a big deal out of it. Every other showneeds to make gay men so dramatic or make it dramatic that there is even a gay character on the show. "Look at us, we have a gay on the show! Watch us because we have a gay on the show!" It was really refreshing that they had the attitude that, "yeah he is gay so what?" You want equality int elevision there it is!

Pantzini's picture

SNL

And what about the impression of the pregnant transgender man during Weekend update?

Just as pointless and oddly offensive as everything else, imho. I'm sorry for Amy Poehler, the only cast member I still appreciate.

F'losrix's picture

Much ado about nothing...

...at least where the episode of Medium is concerned.  Yes, there was a plot twist that involved a serial killer turning out to be a man who was also gay - in a way that served to point out law enforcement's blind spot.  I didn't see anything that suggested orientation and developing a penchant for serial murder were linked in any way.

 Let's be truthful - most of the networks could stand to improve the way they handle orientation and storylines relating to it - if they show it at all.  And yes - the gay serial killer thing is pretty tired - but not this show's handling of it.

I just can't see spending our energy on feeling offended over this. 

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Michaelangelo's picture

For every gay killer on

For every gay killer on Medium, there have been dozens of straight ones.  Why all the fuss?

I found the plot twist to be clever and the misdirection to be perfectly feasible in the realm of Allison's dream world. 

What's the deal with all of this hypersensitivity?

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
Psionycx's picture

I Have to Agree

The price of visibility is that not every gay character that shows up on TV will be a good guy. TV shows s routinely show heterosexual murderers with all kinds of deviant behaviors. I know that there's a double-standard out there that people don't equate the actions of individual heterosexuals with heterosexuals as a group. But that's a whole other issue.
Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Brian Juergens's picture

Well, look at it this way...

For every straight killer on Medium, there's a central cast of upstanding and well-adjusted straight characters to balance them out. Is there a non-serial-killer gay character hanging around that we're missing? I don't think it's being hypersensitive to point out when there is a clear imbalance in visibility skewing toward gayness as a pathology or a punchline.
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
afhickman's picture

Free to kill again

afhickman

"It takes a village (to make Village People)"

Writers seem to think that all they have to do is pull a queer murderer out of the box and that audiences will be duly shocked.  Paging Alfred Hitchcock: it's been done already!  And to death.  Trannie killers especially, from Norman Bates to "Dressed to Kill" to "Silence of the Lambs."  Yawn.  And they always seem to think you won't notice when they pull a "Crying Game" number (think "Color of Night").  It's as if the writers back themselves into a corner, it's getting late, everybody wants to go home, and suddenly a lightbulb goes on over somebody's head: "Hey, let's make the killer a fag, cuz, like, that's never been done before!"  Everybody nods wisely and the script's in the can.  All I ask is that they surprise me, just once!  Don't insult my intelligence with the same copout ending.  I love "Medium," and I'll no doubt keep watching it, but not for the clever writing.  They've pulled that "introducing the killer in the last five minutes" routine too many times.  Maybe Allison should get a clue.  Or consult a medium.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings