Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

Mores for Gays video blog (Ep. 21): Gay School

You may know about Harvey Milk and you may have seen the amazing film about his life, but what do you know about the Harvey Milk School?

In this week's episode of our ever-informative gay culture and etiquette vlog, Daniel asks the question, "What if we had all gone to gay school?"

Check it out after the break!

Nate's picture

Oh Daniel

Another great VLOG. You are 100% correct, this is segration all over again. I am suprised they're  taking such a big step backwards. Again I have to add you are so DREAMY.....swoon.
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
quadro2000's picture

There's no other word for that than...

WONDERFUL
David Ehrenstein's picture

You're absolutely right

The existence of these schools testifies to the failure of the educational system to keep bullies from attacking gay kids. As is obvious from the horrendous Lawrence King murder, King had a lot of straight allies and the school was aware of the situation between King and his murderer. But any actions that were taken were insufficient -- so there are no guarantees. What the school systems must learn is that there are gay kids in class, they're going to be attacked by blullies and the bullies must pay. Separate schools are a last-ditch non-solution to this problem.
Sergio I.'s picture

yes

Absolutely agreed. To put those kids in a cage (that others will probably call "la cage aux folles") is certainly not helping them.

Times have changed a lot since I was in high school but it's better, as you say, to look for integration.

db's picture

Harvey Milk School

While I understand the concerns I think we're misrepresenting the kids who wind up at Harvey Milk. They're not just "gay" kids who get teased. They are mostly kids who are abused, homeless, often transgendered who are targets of the other students--and sometimes the faculties of the schools, as well as at home. These aren't just gay middle class kids who get called "fag" in the locker room. I agree that we should solve the problem at the root--and we've made a lot of progress--but it too often only comes after one of these kids is brutalized so badly it can't be ignored, commits suicide or is murdered. It would be great if every child could go to school and be safe, but what these kids face is more than "teasing", and untill the Age of Aquarius comes and everyone lives in peace and understanding Harvey Milk is the only option some of these kids have.
Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Brent Hartinger's picture

This whole "debate" depresses me...

because there aren't really two sides. No one, including no one at Harvey Milk, is saying that "gay kids" should be segregated. These are very literally a unique group of kids--almost all drop-outs, homeless, a very, very high risk group that has literally no chance at graduating a "traditional" high school. Many, if not most, are transgendered. This is more like a "school for the arts"--a school for very specific needs kids--than it is a "gay" school. So this is something of a "Bill O'Reilly" debate--a lot of unnecessary sound and fury against something no one is advocating. I'm not sure when this meme started--I think it might have been Bill O'Reilly, in fact. But it's not real--again, no one wants to segregate gay kids--and I wish it would stop.

 

 

 

Read my books! Explore "Brent's Brain" at http://www.brenthartinger.com Average (4 votes):

see individual ratings
db's picture

Well said.

There seems to be a real misunderstanding of what the purpose of this school is.
Patrickometry's picture

What's the point of this video?

I hear the 'cool' soundtrack. I see the caddy commentator making little jokes. I notice a lot of editing of the video.. I guess to only include the most informative I mean 'cutest' schtick.

What did I learn? There are schools which cater to tormented kids and people disagree about its value. That's it. Did the commentator take a stand or add value to thie discussion? Nope. But he surely knew how to use this serious subject as a vehicle for his own aggrandizement. Please, AfterElton.com, less of this. This is really no more than narcissistic entertainment in the style of "Leave Brittany Alone".

Sorry to be a party pooper but I think the Gay Civil Rights Movement is entering a new important phase in which we need more intelligent strong spokesmen and less of this "oh ain't it all silly and ain't I cute wink wink" empty blather.

 

 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Oracle's picture

Really?

Did you honestly expect to find the heart and soul of the next Stonewall movement beating on blog about pop culture? In terms of being off the mark, it might behoove you to have a look around at your own glass house before you go throwing stones at Daniel.

If the sociopolitical relevance of this site's content doesn't meet with your lofty expectations, I suggest you try CNN.com next time.

Patrickometry's picture

What's the point of your reply?

This site is obviously not meant to be purely superficial commentary about entertainers, thus the post on Harvey Milk and the school named after him. My point remains. Not sure what yours is except to lose your cool that someone dared critique shallowness. Stand up for something why dont' you? Put on a shirt why you're at it. Welcome to the big wide world of reality where gay youth are committing suicide in record numbers and hate crimes are on the rise. Sorry if that intrudes on your comfortable segregated bubble of innane blather. Anything else?

 

 

db's picture

I've been driven insane by this whole debate.

I need to change my medication.
Nukely's picture

What kind of point?

What kind of point must there be?

I agree that his vlog can be vapid at times, the only reason I never felt a need to point that out is because I know that Leary strives for accuracy. He collects opinions and views on a topic, as in this case, and relates them in an entertaining manner. It's up to the viewer to make conclusions or form opinions. I never thought he was trying to write an editorial. Believe me, people do read the comment sections at AfterElton, and I'd be more interested to know what your opinions are on this topic rather than it's presentation.

The editors of AfterElton have taken and made strong editorial opinions concerning gay representation in the media and related gay issues. The response to Matthew Mitcham's sports coverage is a great example of how this site has broadened how we see gays sports portrayed in the media, but also has brought that topic to light for others working in sports coverage as well.

I am just not so convinced that every vlog here (like the 'Top Design' vlogs) really need to have any deeper of an opinion beyond, "that wallpaper is killing me."

 

Patrickometry's picture

Harvey Milk and a school for preyed upon teens ain't Top Design.

This specific vlog episode deals with a weighty subject. Isn't it sad that we can't just agree that kids who get preyed upon absolutely need to have a safe place to learn. Integration fundamentalism is as irrational and unhelpful as all other fundamentalisms. The bizarre thing is that if the subject were a Top Design or Project Runway episode, somehow I think there'd be more willingness to express a strong passionate viewpoint. Why is that?

 Isn't this a site for the gay community? What conclusions need to be made by the viewer in this case? If gay people are natural normal human variations who are currently being scapegoated and targeted because our efforts to gain equality under the law are intensifying in the public eye, what conclusions other than unconditional supportive ones need to be made on a popular mainstream gay oriented site? We don't need more debate about our lives. We get enough of that from the straight community. We need more support, affirmation and encouragement.

This really is a new more dangerous time for gay people in America. As more of us speak up, more of us will be targeted. Vlogging about victimized queer teens and the debate around safe schools for them can be useful if it's treated with the respect and importance it deserves.

db's picture

The point?

I usually quite like this vlog when it just deals with issues of dating, manners etc... But in this case I think Daniel's not completely informed on what the Harvey Milk school does and who the students going there are. I think the sort of flip tone he takes makes the school sound silly.

I agree that schools "should" make it safe for all students--I also think that kids shouldn't be kicked out of their houses, shouldn't be abused, shouldn't be homeless, shouldn't be addicted to drugs or resort to prostitution. We need to keep working on these goals but we're not there yet.

Most of us viewing these vlogs are in good situations and came from somewhat privileged backgrounds, we need to understand that this school is the only thing keeping these kids from truly desperate straits.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Jake's picture

I agree with you to a certain extent

Brent I understand the debate between our culture and others, but what I don't understand is why a need for a school for gays and transgender kids. I went to a school where we were mixed all into one class room and I grew up just fine. I came out got married and had 3 great kids. Now they are in school and yet I have nothing but prasie for them growing up with 2 dads and a mom that does really do anything for them. They seem to be doing alright. When I came out I was horrifed, but my parents helped me through all that and I don't understand why friends and people you work with can look at you any different. Cause you went to a gay school does that look good on a resume-- no it does it just means you went to a school for people like you. In my Opinion that is what it means.
Brent Hartinger's picture

See, this is where the confusion comes in

Somehow Harvey Milk got known as "the gay school"--a school for gay kids. And it's true that 80% or so identify as queer or something like it. But it's absolutely not for the "typical" gay kid (if there is such a thing). As I understand it, it was created to meet the needs of an extremely high-risk population that was basically homeless and on the streets. Many (most?) of the kids had been kicked out of their houses (or left home) and just didn't have the capacity to attend a traditional high school. So this school, along with the Audrey Lourde Group Home, was created to give these kids a place to learn. The point was, they wouldn't have gone back to traditional high school; this is a completely different learning environment--sort of "full life" program, giving them learning AND living skills. I suppose you could say that it's not the job of government to do this sort of intense schooling (but I'd disagree, because otherwise these kids would literally mostly be street hustlers with HIV). But somewhere along the line, someone--and I think it was Bill O'Reilly--created this idea that someone somewhere wants to create a separate, segregated system of "gay schools," putting all the gay kids in one place. That's not what HM is at all. I've worked with gay teens for many years, and I've worked separately with foster/homeless kids. These are not the same populations at all, but needless to say, there are a lot of gay kids in the foster/homeless group, because these are often the kids who are rejected by their families. HM was set up to deal (in part) with the problem of gay or queer kids (who are teased and bullied in addition to being homeless) who are ALSO homeless or dealing with other major life issues. It's a very special needs school for a very specific popular in the big messy city of New York--definitely not just "gay kids who are teased." But the point is, no one at HM or anywhere else is saying that we should segregate gay kids. Instead, the point is just to try to give this specific population a chance at life--a chance that would probably be lost if they were thrown into the New York public schools. (Btw, these kids are GREAT--I don't mean to imply in any way that they're not, because I've always really enjoyed my visits to HM. The kids really make me laugh! And like at any school, some are really, really smart. They've just been dealt a really crappy hand in life--some of which does involve their being gay.)

 

 

 

Read my books! Explore "Brent's Brain" at http://www.brenthartinger.com Average (4 votes):

see individual ratings
db's picture

You're very lucky

And your kids are very lucky. The kids that wind up at Harvey Milk aren't. These kids are in extremely dire straits and as far as a resume--having Harvey Milk on their resume would be better than not going to school at all or being forced into prostitution--which is what would happen to most of these kids.
jago87's picture

Another killer vlog

Excellent vlog once again, Daniel... I particularly appreciated how you took your approach to what can be quite a divided topic even amongst "the gay community". I like how you considered both sides of the debate and that you made good use of that amazing politically correct tone that you have.

I personally agree with pretty much everything you said. Sure, a separate school can do wonders for those who are abused and tormented, but I also think that segregation is not the answer. I also agree that if things are so bad for any individual, the school should be looking into the abuse and trying to solve it in another way (although thats obviously easier said than done). I especially liked that you highlighted the implicit mentality of accepting the notion of a "gay school": "See kids... if you're mean enough, the different kids go away!" <-- p.s... HILARIOUS the way you put it, rock on Daniel Leary!

isoron's picture

So then....

Why is the Harvey Milk school primarily for the transgendered? I totally agree that if the majority in the school are oppressed then they shouldn't be tortured. But Daniel is totally correct that we can't have specific schools for all the nerds, bullied, bullys or else, no one when they become an adult, will be able to integrate into the rest of society. How long do we wait until the kids splat against the majority? Any studies on what age you adapt by being protected?
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
db's picture

So then...

Where did you get the idea that the school is "primarily for the transgendered"? I believe the point was made that some of the kids are transgendered. Your other issues have been dealt with in other posts.
nordic balance's picture

Hetrick-Martin Is located in Manhattan and is not isolated

  somewhere where the students sequestered from the rest of society.

It's not like it's hidden away in upstate New York somewhere were the kids only interact with other gay, lesbian and transgendered people.

It's right in the middle of the West and East Village in downtown Manhattan which are both pretty gay and very youtuful and a couple blocks from the main campus of NYU and the New School University and  Cooper Union School for the Arts. 

The kids aren't isolated into some all gay world where the don't interact with straight folks.  They all live in New York City.  They interact with straight people of all ages every day of their lives.  At home, on the subway, at the library on the streets of New York City.

I get a lot of the kids from there coming for tours at the Lesbian Herstory Archives where I am one of the Coordinators/Archivists and through my volunteer work with GMHC and The LGBT Center.  Yes, there are lots of transgendered kids but I think that has just been a defacto thing resulting from the fact that so many transgendered kids are abused and kicked out of their homes or run away.   Loads of transgendered kids are also Gay and Lesbian so i makes sense that they would make their way to Harvey Milk School.

But I also think folks need to understand that NYC  has a ton of specialty high-schools so it is not that uncommon for kids to go to a special school built around either a vocation or some kind of identity.

There is even High Schools in each borough for kids who have "aged out" of regular high schools without graduating or who have been incarcerated or for some other reason had dropped out or left regular high schools.    City As School is one of the more well known schools.

The point of Harvey Milk is to protect kids and allow them to get a good education without having to worry everyday about their safety.

People always talk about "all integration all the time" as if that's the end all be all but it really depends upon who's being integrated into whom.

The end goal should not be integration for integration's sake.  The end goal should be for every kid to have the same shot for getting a solid, good education that is equal in value and can prepare them for adulthood and to become a productive and happy member of the general society.

As a former black kid in Mississippi who was bused to white high schools as part of the Integration at all costs movement of the 70s'/80's I can say that not all integration is created equal.  

We can't expect  or ask kids to suffer repeated abuse in schools that are incapable of or unwilling to protect them just to prove some kind of point about  how beautiful integration is . 

None of us have had to walk in their shoes.  I say safety first.

UNTIL every single public school can be made safe (and I don't mean free of mere teasing) for every kind of teen  we need to have "pressue valve" places like City As and Harvey Milk to give teens  with a target on their back a fighting chance without all the fighting.

 

I think folks have the wrong idea of this school.

 

"Heterosexuality is not normal, it's just common." (Dorothy Parker)

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
Hideaki's picture

Milk

I totally agreed with Daniel! Segregation is bad and we need to force schools to start noticing and enforcing bullying. This was another good VBlog
Oracle's picture

No Nudity?

Locker room nudity is the whole point of belonging to a gym! If privacy is of paramount importance to you, save yourself the membership fees, buy a Bowflex and stay home. ;Þ

If gay kids were taken out of their respective schools and banished to Harvey Milk simply for being LGBT without any choice in the matter, then that would be segregation and worth opposing, but that isn't the case.

I agree that integration is a goal worth working toward, but I would never ask someone to be a martyr to principle to get there - least of all, underprivileged teenagers. Also, despite the fact that it is obviously what they "should" do, it is a tad unreasonable to expect public schools to crack the whip and foster tolerance and acceptance in our nation's youth at this point in time when their adult counterparts in industry and government have such a poor grasp of the concept, themselves.

That said, the fact that there is even a need for such schools pains my heart every bit as much as anyone else.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Curtis's picture

Torn

From my only personal experience in school and them dealing with me was tough because I knew I was gay but I wasn't sure if I was ready to let everyone around me know, especially the teachers.  However, it seems that most of teaching and counselings staffs had their suspicions about my sexuality but didn't have the proper techinques and proper training of dealing with me and my so-called unique and fragile situation.

Once a counselor told me that I needed to have more positive male remodels in my life because I was lacking male identity.  I was in a public school and this was coming from a counselor in junior high.  I was raised by a single beautiful woman and she didn't do a bad job, she actually raised me pretty well.  It seems that my effemininate mannerisms left several counselors and even teachers bewildered, puzzled and confused even at a young age. 

I remember my family moved from one public school area to another and I quickly made some friends and ran into some kids that would end up being curious about their own sexuality but wanted to take out their frustration on me because I was an easy target.  It seems one of those boys and I would have a bit of history but before our history he started some rumors and gossip and on my first day of going to 5th grade, I had to endure having my head banged against a sink in the bathroom and name calling like you wouldn't believe.  I was attending this school because it seems that my step-father just passed away and moved in with an Aunt.  I had a great deal of my own stuff to deal with but now I had kids who just heard that I might be gay and I'm only 5th grader.  It seem my new neighbor, had a little thing for me because until him and I ended up, experiementing, he would cause so much trouble for me and I realized that it was the facts that maybe someone was molesting him because he was a few years older and secondly he liked me. 

He would be my 1st everything but before him and I would engage in a good game of touch, nudity magazines and a great deal of confusion, it seems he would make up some wild stories about me to classmates and other peers that had people just ready to sock me.  It seems that for close to two years, I would endure some serious unnecessary beat downs and all because of me being gay-acting, queer or a 'little fag'.  I just remember running home daily, until I got to junior high but still those mental scars never left and on occasion haunted me.  I have to say that I got over them but it took some time and even now talking about them brings back the pain that was associated with all the hitting and bullying.  You have to remember during most of these events, there was teachers staff and other adults standing by and actually chuckling under their breaths because by saving me from being harassed, is like sticking up for the underdog.  It's easier to send me to the fryers and watching me burn.

Do I think I would have had a better childhood at an all gay school?  I have to say  maybe because even most of the bad events took place in elementary and junior high,  I made through.  I would end up being semi-popular but most of the time I had to be this light-hearted guy that took abuse because as not only the token black kid but now I'm the token alleged gay kid too, it was hard.  High school I ended up going to two proms with female date and I ended up being this dating machine but with many girls.  Most of these special and very loved girls would end up telling me the same thing, "I think your gay but you just don't know it yet".  On the flipside, I watched in sheer horror several openly gay people in my school struggle and especially when it came down to the big events like bringing their significant others to dances or the biggy, THE PROM.  It seems they would have to take all the steps, to bring their dates but most of the time they were shot down.  The really sad part was most of these gay kids were super intelligent, with good grade averages.  Most were in college prep classes and were mainstays on Honor roll.  Even though they were learning a great deal, they still had so much mental BS going on. 

What I'm not torn about is the fact that you are as cute a button and I will check you out from time to time.  Happy Holidays.           

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Carl's picture

I've never heard

of the Harvey Milk school, but it sounds great. As far as segregating gays, I don't see an issue. Now, if every gay kid was rounded up and forced to go to "the gay school" so they could be out of sight and mind, okay, now we're talking segregation. In Seattle, there are different high schools that focus on different things, such as the arts, science, etc. At least there were back in my day, not sure now. Anyway, my point is students could choose to go to a school that was in line with their interests. Kind of like choosing a major in college. So if it's a choice, I say, hooray such a choice exists. I don't know about anyone else here, but my junior high and high school years sucked. I would have loved to go to a "gay" school, and not have been harrassed. I think it's great these schools exist.
FieldMedic's picture

P.A.B. -- People are

P.A.B. -- People are broken. Lets face it, arguing from a point of integration to "well balance" kids is wonderful and might work in a perfect world, but this world is far from perfect. In the meantime you have homophobic parents raising their homophobic kids and no amount of integration is going to change that, at least not over night. So what do you do in the meantime where these children must be edumacated in an environment that is safe and conducive to their learning. This School does not solve the problem for the bullyers but it solves the problem of the bullyees, mainly getting to a future free of a suicide that many of these bullies drive them too.

--

"A woman never runs away, a woman never hides away in order to survive." - from her song 'Real Me' by Ayumi Hamasaki

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Maxwell k's picture

i think its a good idea its

i think its a good idea its not like they are forced to go to such schools against their own will. (well other than being harassed into doing so).

 

Personally i think it's always good to have an extra option whenever possible! 

Tony's picture

Great discussion

Thank you, Daniel, for highlighting the really interesting questions about this issue - and thank you to all the bright, articulate posters above that have really helped me learn more about the school.

gabriel oak's picture

I Appreciated This

I'm glad this video about a gay school was posted. It raised some issues I hadn't considered.

I'm was a bit distracted by the music playing in the background throughout the talk. Not needed at all.

Chuckles's picture

Wow...

A lot of discussion here... All I want to point out is how some members of the LGBT community calling 'segragation' on the Harvey Milk School are probably doing so from their own self-segragated villages (i.e. West Hollywood, Lower East Side of Manhattan, etc.)  When they're willing to move next to Billy Bob in rural Alabama, then I suppose they can talk about segragation.

 

db's picture

Gay School--Hey Daniel how about a follow-up?

There have been a lot of points raised in the discussion you should address.