"Out" reeeeeeeally wants Anderson Cooper to come out, don't they?
Out magazine has released their second annual "Power 50", their rankings of the 50 most powerful gays and lesbians in the country. It's pretty much a by-the-numbers list as far as those things go, but one name close to the top of the list is not like the others:
3. Anderson Cooper
This is nothing new, considering the mag tried to nudge (shove? bum-rush?) the foxy newsman out last year in the first annual list. (Last year's controversial issue also featured pics of Cooper and Jodie Foster - who appears on the list again this year - on the cover. Foster has notably inched out a smidge in the year since.) Again the question of whether a publication called Out should be placing a public figure who is NOT "out" on a list of influential gays and lesbians, much less at #3. If an assumedly gay anchor shouts "fire" in a crowded theatre and no one knows that he's gay, is there still a fire? Or something like that? Ellen DeGeneres takes the top spot, and it's hard to argue there. And Brothers & Sisters creator Greg Berlanti makes the list and rates a feature on the queer-inclusive shows he's gotten on the air.
Full list after the jump ... any thoughts? 50. Kelly Bush Submitted by on Mon, 2008-04-07 10:32. |
User login![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|









anderson cooper....
alright, I like anderson cooper, but the whole deal regarding his sexuality...are there people with inside knowledge that he is gay or this mainly a speculation that has been running for so long that people just now think of it as a fact?
I don't pay that much attention to him as i would a tv or movie star, so eh...that's why i am asking.
Dude.
50 Powerful gays...3 to 1, straight to gay on the cover.
Out you do us proud! A list of 50 powerful gays but you put straight guys on the cover. If ever there was a time for a gay exclusive cover...this would be it.
I wonder if Ebony would feel comfortable having a list of the 50 most powerful AfAms and then put Oprah and her associates Nate Berkus, Dr. Phil and Rachel Ray on the cover.
Anderson....
I'll probably get into trouble for saying this but, why does everyone still think it's a big deal when Anderson is referred to as gay? OF COURSE he's gay. He continually makes sly references to it, has never been seen with a woman, HAS been seen with a man, has never denied being gay even when mags like Out say he is, and even thanked AE for putting him on the sexiest guy list. Why does everyone have to hear him say "I am Gay" for it to be legitimate? I'm not defending his way of dealing with this. At least he isn't hyprocritical, and if you watch his show enough, you come to realize that he tries very hard to present fair reporting on gay issues.
And for pete's sake. If Jodie thanking her wife publically during an acceptance speech isn't being out, then what the heck is? I think that is a litte more than a smidgeon out. Again, when everyone says you are something, and you don't deny it- if it walks like a duck....
I say we take the warning labels off everything and let nature take it's course.
Because it's like being "slightly pregnant"
The bottom line is that Out is desperately trying to call attnetion to itself with this stunt, but it's not going to work. "Gay" is the "Mainstream" media's third rail.
Yes, one would have to be blind, death, dumb and dead for a decade not to know that Anderson Cooper is gay. But that fact isn't talked about because it "isn't nice" to say a celebrity is gay when said celebrity declines to "talk about their private lives."
Them's the rules. Cooper knows it. So to bloddy hell with him, and let's talk about Ellen instead. Not only has she rebounded from a near-death career experience she's the most popular person on the tube. AND she's dealt with important gay issues when they coem up in the news with considerable wit and insight.
People...Anderson has to stay in the closet for his safety.
No, seriously...roll with me here...this is the argument people make. Anderson Cooper goes into areas of the world where it's still dangerous being a 'mo. He meets with people who would not meet face to face if they knew he was a gay. I've heard this argument made all the time..that and the old "if he discusses his sexuality then people will think he's biased in favor of the "agenda".
So...in this same logic then an AfAm reporter couldn't cover a race story because obviously they will be biased. A woman couldn't do a story on islamic fundies because they won't meet with a woman....so she should just pack it in.
Someone needs to tell Mr. Celebrity Mole to get over himself.
Boycott Gay Magazines
Out's message to gay people is that you are worth less than straight people. They are the magazine of self-hatred along with The Advocate, Out Traveler, reFresh, DNA, Attitude, Genre, Tetu, AXM, and most other gay magazines. These magazines have been a lead weight around the neck of progress for LGBT people.
While I agree with most of your comments about Anderson needing to get over himself. Being suspected of being gay and actually being openly gay are two very different experiences. Once it is known you are gay all the prejudices are placed on you.
My two little issues with this list
First...I personally would have included the out and oh so handsome and sexy Thomas Roberts on this list simply because of all the sexual abuse he suffered at the hands of the church. I consider him to be powerful simply because he overcame such an awful experience AND he bravely told his story to "silver fox" Anderson Cooper on CNN last year. I think that takes a lot of courage and I say kudos to him!
Second...I personally would have placed Nate Berkus HIGHER up on the list than Perez Hilton for gosh sakes. Perhaps reverse the two positions? Our cutie patootie Nate is part of the Oprah "family", both on the Oprah show and Oprah and Friends XM satellite radio. Perez Hilton? He just reports on hollywood gossip and that's about it. Even though he's gay, I find him annoying and he doesn't do a thing for me. IMHO, I don't think there's any comparison here people. Peace :)
Regards,
dgd417
Before calling for a general boycott of all gay magazines....
I think that Out is generally is a big fat mess, but had an amazing April product that brought a guest editor to focus exclusively on transgender themes. I'll write more on this later as it may have had more to say than any magazine I've read this year. Shocking I know!
Genre is a joke, but some is Instict, which I know Evan does not include. While I like their focus on only putting out gay people on their cover, it needs to focus finding an identity beyond it's cover policies. It's not fun enough for me, provides little to challenge the mind, but at times I see a little something that peaks my curiosity and I am not talking about yet another article on J.P. Calderon.
Just like I need my newspaper fix, I need my magazine fix and I am trying to contribute to both via what I hope is constructive critique and direct contribution. I do agree with Evan's point that many gay-centric products (not only magazines) can send some lousy messages that being gay is so much less worthy than being straight, and it really pisses me off.
I am in favor of documenting their failures to give them a chance to make some changes. The Advocate got slammed for what I think was a shameful article on Larry King, but I was even more shocked to see that some thought that the article was not so bad.
Coming attractions: Guillermo's Cultural Guillotine
http://springintoaction.typepad.com/cultural_guillotine/