Watch and Discuss: "Why Terminators Transport Naked"Hot on the heels of yesterday's discussion of the "Family Gay" episode of Family Guy, here's a little number from the College Humor comedy site that postulates as to why all the Terminator cyborgs in the movies had to transport through time without any clothes. The answer? Naturally, the guy who designed the transporter makes Marc St. James from Ugly Betty look like Lou Ferrigno. Seriously, I haven't seen something so simultaneously homoerotic and gay-panicky since I saw 300. Or last week's American Idol. A bit one-note for me overall, although I did chuckle at the joke about the "cute little biker bar in West Hollywood." Thoughts? Submitted by on Tue, 2009-03-10 07:59. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|







yeah...
Neutral +5
HYSTERICAL!!!
I LOVED it! That was just too funny!
And seriously, was the guy any more flamboyant than the reality TV gays on all those design shows? I don't think so.
My point was...
I wouldn't be funny
Queeny Gays
You're absolutely right here! If they'd used a "straight-acting gay" character the skit wouldn't have made much sense.
For the most part it seems like it's okay that Marc St Whoever on Ugly Betty is a flaming queen. Marc's swishy image is even used a rating system elsewhere on this site. Yet fact, if you look closely you'll realize that the portrayal in this "Terminator" clip is rather visibly based on Marc, right down to the eyes, gestures and voice.
Likewise, reality TV shows, especially the home and personal makeover shows, and pretty much all of the fashion-oriented ones, include real-life queeny gays. Why is it not offensive when it's a real gay guy on a reality TV show, but it suddenly becomes offensive in a clip like this?
Sure, it would
Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
Yeah that was funny
Butch, Femme and In-Between
Clearly someone at A.E. needs to write an article about masculinity and femininity and the representation of gay men because every single post seems to bring out comments that are blatantly mean towards any sign that a gay man in a movie/tv show isn't hyper masculine.
Yes, I understand that there is a history of portraying gay men as ONLY queenie (with lots of negative reprecussions) but I think that practice as the norm is "history" The backlash hatred against not-traditionally masculine depictons of gay men just seems so freeflowing and unchecked that it approaches homophobic and is completely insensitive to the broad range of gender expression that exists for gay men across the spectrum.
There are loads and loads of images of gay men in film and tv NOW who aren't even remotely queenie. There is definitely more balance shown in visual media than in any other time in history.
Yet, I recall a very nasty post about the lovely gay couple presented on "The Secret Life of Teenagers" that to this day confuses and depresses me.
Are we really so worried about conformity and assimilation that we (as gay people) have convinced ourselves that anything that strays from traditional ideas of masculine/feminine behavior must be rooted out of gay communities and ridiculed?
I find it strange that no one seems to think the persistent verbal bashing by gay men about other gay men who aren't butch as the day is long is wrong or problematic or an issue for us as a community?
Yes, it is hard to see yourself as "gay" if you think being gay means you HAVE to be flamboyant and you don't happen to see yourself that way. But the same is true if you think being "gay" means you HAVE to be musclebound, beautiful and making 6 figures (and you happen not to be).
There will always be stereotypes but the extent to which "outsiders" of a particular community "believe" the stereotype isn't stagnant.
We all struggle with stereotypes (which change from decade to decade) about who we are and how we should be as gay people. But it shouldn't give us license to eat our own.
I work with a lot of young gay men and they are just a likely to be queenie as they are not and no one under 30 seems to think one way of being is better than the other unless they happen to live in a community where they feel the need to be closeted
I just don't get the overt hated. Just because "you" (whomever "you" may be) don't happen to be particularly "femme" doesn't mean you get to wipe everyone who doesn't fit within your framework off the gay map.
"Heterosexuality is not normal, it's just common." (Dorothy Parker)
Darclover
I have to say I agree completely. I often feel the same thing reading some of the blogs here but have been to wary to say so fearing serious flaming. I applaud you for putting my feelings into your heartfelt words (and this comes from someone who almost never agrees to your Nuke posts).
IT'S OK TO BE A QUEEN!!! RuPaul's Drag Race has a bunch of guys who are outrageous and they seem pretty damn proud about it. No one here is complaining they are too gay, because they are real people. They exist. I don't get why every depiction of gayness has to be the same. Marc on Ugly Betty and the DIY designers seem to get respect, but one-shot characters get a lot of flak here.
That said, I do think the video might have been funny if the scientist appeared "straight-acting" too. The joke would have been slower to reveal until you realized this guy's true agenda. But it is what it is, and I laughed out loud, so it worked.
My biggest complaint would be the pixellation. Building a joke entirely about nudity and then being too shy to show it seems really lame. If they'd shot around it, I wouldn't have minded, but blurring it out seemed like they were too ashamed or timid to go for it.
Great comment!
Sure we have stereotypes but we also have a diversity of how we as gay men act and are really. Sure we snicker at what Harvey Firestein called the "sissy" in The Celluloid Closet and in private we all cringe when we see it or worry we are too effeminate ourselves. I think what is important is being yourself.
I know I "queen" it up now and again when I am with certain friends or use effeminate actions to get a laugh, but in the end we have to be strong in who we are and the character we play at times is just that. On the other side of the coin our community slams the butch gay male for liking sports to much or even revealing they experimented sexually with girls too.
I think our community needs to be more aware of its divesity of shapes, sizes, colors, and attitudes and accept them all as normal. We have a tendency of expecting behaviors, appearances, and opinions all be in line and forget that we are individuals first then gay.
Positive feedback!
I think there IS a clear line
In Will & Grace, Ugly Betty, and the "queeny" guys on the various reality shows, we're laughing WITH them, not at them. They may be swishy, but there's a knowingness and depth to their swishyness. We recognize them and they are not portrayed, really, in a negative way.
This skit, however, has its roots in frat-boy homophobia. The swishy queen is seen not as human being of depth and feeling, but as a scheming, slightly villianous gay guy, who delights in getting men naked for his own lustful desires. The cyborgs are cognizant enough to recognize this and draw away from him in terror and the other straight guys are appalled and disgusted.
I think it's very offensive.
Tim Teeman, in the UK's TimesOnline, discusses the rise in homophobic humor in British programing, and it's a wonderful commentary in the line between what is funny and what is offensive:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article5841504.ece
I agree there's a difference
Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
It isn't offensive
Heck, I'm sure that every gay guy wishes he could be in the same situation this guy is. The authority over a bunch of hot cyborgs? If you didn't think that idea is appealing I think you'd be the one that needs to turn in your gay card. It's nearly opposite of the gay dog video last time, because that is one scene where you wouldn't want to be part of.
It's funny because it's an exaggeration of the truth. We all secretly would love to look at hot naked men every day, but our social norms prevent us from doing so (yet!).
Exactly.
I am not laughing at the scientist, I am wishing I was so lucky.
And sometimes a joke is just a joke. Some of you guys seem to go through life being offended by anything and everything. How sad that must be.
Do you ever laugh?