"Design Star" 3 recaplet (Ep. 4): Half of Team Gay goes down
This is where designers are made and broken: the infamous "white wall" challenge. David Bromstad set the bar high in the first season of HGTV's Design Star, designing a rug out of hamster cage bedding and using fish bowls as decorative accents. For this challenge, the designers were assigned countries that were meant to serve as their inspiration, and limited to materials they could purchase in a craft store and a set of covered cushions. Unfortunately, instead of following in David's footsteps, one member of Team Gay met his Waterloo between those three white walls. Michael Stribling, the youngest contestant in Design Star history, created a room the judges called "generic," when he was supposed to be designing a hot Barcelona nightclub.
Michael's losing design
The problem I have with this decision isn't that I disagreed with the judges about his room. Michael alone of all the designers was allowed to choose the country he wanted to use as his inspiration, and there was not one element of this design that invoked the slightest hint of Spain. But it was a nice enough design, certainly competitive with the other designs the judges liked, and a lot better than those of designers who survived. Like, say, this monstrosity from Tracee:
Tracee's losing design
I mean, seriously. She's been in the bottom three every week, she's got a nasty personality and obviously will never win (hello, has anyone noticed that both previous Design Stars, David Bromstad and Kim Myles, were incredibly nice and well-liked by their fellow competitors?), and she submits this hideous crap. Explain to me like I'm stupid why she's here and Michael is gone? Oh, right. Drama over design. I keep forgetting. Although Michael dished some drama himself this week, praising Tracee to her face then rolling his eyes and calling her design "tee-ragic" behind her back. Not classy and definitely not nice, Michael. Still, you shouldn't have been aufed. I'm glad Matt gave you a nice goodbye hug.
Michael and Matt hug goodbye after the judges cancel Michael's show.
The surviving half of Team Gay, the formidable Matt Locke, took a wrong turn this week -- although his "wrong turns" are better than most people's life's masterwork. Or as Kim Myles said in her vlog commentary, "Matt? Shocking. Who expected to see him in the bottom three, ever?" Not me, and certainly not anyone posting on the HGTV forums or blogs, either, since Matt is currently the top rated designer among viewers. But his Thailand-inspired Buddhist temple didn't impress anyone, including Matt, who told the cameras that he was disappointed in his effort.
Matt Locke stands up and takes it like a man.
Judge Vern Yip told him, "I appreciate your abstraction of Thailand, but you abstracted it so much that Thailand got up and left the room."
Matt's losing design
Now, I ask you: Is that design really that bad? And even if it is, who could hate a man who makes a face like this while using a power tool? A man and his drill
The first time I recapped this season of Design Star, my darling editor Michael Jensen sent it back to me, saying I had used too many photos of the girls and not enough boys, so I'm trying to keep my audience in mind, and do better. Thus I give you this montage of Mikey V, cop-by-day and designer-by-night: Mikey V with Clive, (l); Mikey V hugging Matt after Matt survives the final judging (r)
I only wish Mikey's design was as pretty as his arms:
Mikey V's losing design
The judges said it reminded them of an Asian fast food restaurant. Ouch. Enough of the losers. One of the two winners was Stephanie, who gave us a Mexican moonlit cabana that in my opinion was every bit as generic as Michael's nightclub, however lovely it was -- and it was. But Mexico? Not so much. See for yourself:
Stephanie's Mexican cabana
The other winner was Jennifer, the clear stand-out in a sea of mediocrity with her Vietri pottery-themed Italian room:
Jennifer's winning design
The walls are brilliant, but I could have lived without the 80s denim sofa look. Still, considering they had to shop at a craft store, it could have been a lot worse. Before I wrote this up, I went over to HGTV to see what the viewers were saying about the season so far. Like me, most were upset that once again, drama was playing more of a role than design. I read one comment pitting Matt and Mikey V against each other, acknowleding Matt was the best designer but hoping for Mikey to win because they were sick of "cinderfellas" winning. We get one out gay designer in the history of the universe and it's too much? Gee, thanks. They also asked if they couldn't have a "masculine hottie" for once. Does the fact that I'm a dyke somehow affect my eyesight, or do Mikey V and David Bromstad look like they could pass for brothers? And is there something "unmasculine" about Matt Locke? Please educate me, I'm confused. So, to sum up. In the first week we lost Scottie, who we barely knew and hurt my eyes with a 70s dorm room done in orange and brown. Last week we lost D. Paul, who everyone liked and was guilty of nothing but poor time management. And now Michael, who was a bit catty to Tracee but whose design really didn't earn him the auf. If you're looking for design, this season's not so great. If you're looking for tears and hugs, we got 'em.
Michael and D. Paul hugging in better days.
Submitted by on Wed, 2008-07-02 07:54. |
User login![]() Recent comments
Recent blog posts
New forum topics |







Good call on Stephanie's
But I wonder about the behavior of Tracee and Michael. The prize, here, is a show on HGTV, so why play the Design Star villain? Who'd tune in for the Design by Snidely Whiplash Show? Would Tracee's show feature her crying every time the client didn't like something? Would Michael's show involve him complementing people's homes and then laughing about how bad they look to the camera?
I start to understand why
I start to understand why people say these things are fixed when I contemplate the behavior of some of the contestants. I can't decide if it's a casting thing -- they deliberately cast people who don't have good impulse control so they'll harm themselves in the competition but make good "drama" -- since NO ONE will ever win this thing who doesn't have a nice, friendly personality, why would anyone give in to their catty side? It makes no sense.
I was surprised this week to see Michael be so snippy about Tracee. He's actually a really sweet guy. I admit she grates on my nerves too, and several of the other contestants have told her so to her face -- the high road way to handle it IMO. But Michael is young. I like to think he knows better now, because win or lose, that kind of thing leaves viewers with a bad taste in their mouth.
I remember Christian on Project Runway would sometimes criticize the other designers to the cameras, but with Christian, what you saw was almost always what you got. I can handle that.
How about no winner?
This season of ''Design Star'' has been a disaster. I don't think ANY of them deserve to win. That said, I thought Mike's lime-green room was fine. Sadly, it had NOTHING to do with Spain. Couldn't he at least have used red and yellow, two of the colors from the Spanish flag? Then again, is there anything about Stephanie's blue-gray room that reflected Mexico? I would NEVER associate those colors with South of the Border. The yellow walls of Jennifer's room did make me think of Tuscan Italy, but that ugly blue furniture didn't. And Tracee's room was a catastrophe.
Sorry, but Michael's bitchy, backstabbing asides to the camera have been a turnoff, and so has Tracee's abrasive personality. Please bring back a really imaginative creative designer like David Bromstad or Todd Davis, who last season rocked it (and, to my mind, mistakenly lost the title to Kim Myles). ... Thanks, too, for the note about the message boards on this show at HGTV.com. I used to read them, but the homophobia (implied and overt) made me cringe.
HGTV boards homophobia
There is an interesting mix of attitudes on the HGTV boards and in the comments section on their blogs. I'd say overall it's more gay-friendly than gay-hostile, but some of the things I read there this week upset me quite a bit. I also noticed a few deleted and edited comments, and given the context, I had a bad feeling about those as well.
At this moment, I can see liking several of the designers as hosts of a show -- Jennifer, Stephanie (who I actually didn't like at first), Trish. I like Matt best as a designer, I like his professionalism, I like his approach to things, but I'm not sure he "sparkles" enough to have his own show. He has a very calming, centered energy that would make me hire him to design my house, but might not come alive on camera. I don't think we've seen enough of him to know for sure, but in my mind it's an open question.
I'm also crazy about Mikey V, but he seems so similar to David Bromstad that I question that he would win. I'm not saying they are similar desginers; they aren't. I mean their "telegenic" qualities are very similar. They look alike, they dress alike, they have muscular tattooed arms and super short hair. And while Mikey V impressed me early on, this "white wall" challenge was a huge disappointment. Still, I really like him.
As for Tracee, two weeks ago, when D. Paul was aufed instead of her, I swore I was done with this show. She's everything I dislike about reality competition and clearly, I'm not alone in that, if you look at the polls on the HGTV website. Maybe the producers think generating that kind of hostility about a contestant is "good for ratings." Maybe it even is. But I wish they'd try fielding a group of contestants who are good designers and nice people, and give us one season of nothing but design, and see how that did in the ratings.
I suspect they'd be surprised.
never mind
If we're picking hosts ...
Top Chef...
That said, I'm still eager to see what Matt can do with his own show, I think his high-concept tendencies will work better with more real life challenges than the ones put together by the show.
team gay has a secret member
Christie, it seems there were more than two gay men in the final cast of "Design Star"
Mikey V. seems to be playing a kinda ask/maybe tell game.
A couple of years ago, he seems to have encountered some homophobia in the Hollywood, FL Police Dept. To the extant of filing lawsuits about sexual harassment.
http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/2007-10-18/news/badge-ered/
The story even includes a link to his home-staging business, which, of course mentions his appearance on "Design Star"
So, no one seems to want to admit it, but the evidence is:
Mikey V. is a fag (or gay, or homosexual, or bisexual, or questioning, or confused, or a unicorn, or a werewolf)
Hat tip to David Dust at http://daviddust.blogspot.com
http://daviddust.blogspot.com/2008/06/design-star-breaking-news.html
Secretly gay or not...
or very not so secretly...
Oh come on! He's been quoted in a mainstream paper in relation to a sexual orientation harassment lawsuit that he filed himself against the police dept.
Is there a more comprehensive way to come out?
I have no knowledge of the mutually renumerative arrangements that "Mikey V" and HGTV may have agreeed to, but the publicly available facts seem to be that Det. Michael Verdugo has publicly stated that he's a gay man.
For a gay site like AfterElton to collaborate in this kind of after-the-fact closeting is outrageous. Really, I expect better from the voices that I've gotten to know through their writings on this site. I'm feeling a real disconnect here.
Are "the out ones" only the ones whose publicists will confirm the "G" word, or also the ones who have been publicly out before the publicists got their claws on them? Are you a journalist or a PR flack?
and after a deep breath...
Sorry to reply to my own post, Christie, but I wanted to emphasize that this wasn't a personal attack. I really appreciate the work you do. I especially enjoy your recaps.
It's just that there's something funny going on at HGTV. They're hiding Mikey V's previously publically acknowledged homo-ness. What's up with that? That's a question I depend on you (eg, AfterElton) to ask.
Especially when there are two other unapologetically gay guys in the cast. And, in particular, one especially talented, sexy, bearded, muscled, cute, adorable, hopefully more frequently shirtless, gay guy.
In or out
Listen, I'm a journalist, not a PR hack. But in addition to my own journalistic ethics, which I've developed over many years, this site has its own guidelines on how we discuss the sexual orientation of public figures.
This is my personal view; my editors might have another. Mikey Verdugo is a reality TV show contestant. If he were an aide to George W. Bush, I'd be on this like white on rice, but I'm not going to turn one man's hesitation to identify himself as an out gay man to the publicists at HGTV into a moral outrage when it isn't.
All the out gay DS contestants I've interviewed -- which is all of them, from all three seasons -- told me that no one at HGTV ever asked them if they were gay or not. They offered it. I don't have a problem with letting each gay person make up his or her own mind as to who and when they share that information about themselves, I really don't.
But yes, I'm following up on this and don't intend to ignore it.
Or somewhere in between
Fair enough. My apologies for my earlier, unwarranted fire-breathing...especially the PR hack crack which, on further reflection, came from some encounters in my own background and really had nothing to do with you. Again, sorry.
I suspect our attitudes toward "outing" may be more similar than not. I'm all for respecting the "privacy" of anyone other than actively anti-gay politicians or politically-involved public figures. Actors and celebrities, famous or otherwise, are free to come out at their own speed.
I think reality show contestants can be a little different, especially the ones on shows with public voting. These people are really playing characters based on their real lives and are competing for public favor. I can understand the desire (on both the contestants' and producers' parts) to edit these "characters" to appeal to the audience. That's where "de-gaying" really annoys me: it insults the audience by assuming they wouldn't accept a glbt character and also insults all glbt people by treating that intrinsic, identifying part of ourselves as something that can be ignored and dismissed whenever convenient.
But Mikey Verdugo's In or Outness is not a big deal on the large scale. Who knows, maybe there's just a great-aunt that he didn't want to have to tell when she watched the show.
design stars
Tracee's design was the worst. One corner of her cardboard bed is flopping. She hot glued a couple crystals to the wall. A very bad high school stage set. At least Michael's design was cohesive and you could see somebody using it. But the challenge wasn't to design a fabulous room, it was to design a theme room. They must be keeping Tracee for the drama, it wouldn't be the first reality show to do that.
Mikey's room is over done. The bamboo trimmed wainscoting is cheep and disturbing. The paper lanterns remind me of balloons at a carnival that haven't been shot yet. His designs are either fussy, like this or the opposite, half baked. I don't think he has a chance.
Stephanie's idea was safe. I would have liked to see navy blue rather than black walls or a dark blue mixed with Phosphorescent Pigment. I'd rather have seen something, anything done with the white canvases.
Jennifer surprised me. She's goofy, but she takes risks and can make something of it. She has the best chance of winning.
Matt's design was lost, completely lost and then he lost it. He caved. Anything could have saved his room. A big fat paintbrush, a gallon of red paint and some chinese characters.
.