News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

Flaming Politics video blog (Episode 9)

This week on Flaming Politics, Japhy Grant takes on the big stories of the week. First up: wedding bells for Bishop Gene Robinson. The first openly gay Episcopalian bishop has announced plans to marry his longtime partner in June. Will this latest development cause a schism in the Episcopalian church?

Next up, Japhy talks about recent cases where the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) has not supported certain openly gay candidates in political races.

Finally, Japhy asks this week's most pressing question: What the hell is that Reverend Wright guy doing, and whatever it is, will Barack Obama's campaign survive it?

Enjoy the Flaming Politics video blog after the break!

.

  • dennis's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • afhickman's picture

    It's a puzzlement

    afhickman

    "It takes a village (to make Village People)"

    Don't judge Obama on what Reverend Wright has to say; judge him on his own words.  After attending Wright's church for twenty years, after being married there, and after having his children baptized there, he is now "outraged" by what his pastor prfesses to believe.  I think it just goes to show that we don't really know Mr. Obama very well.  He doesn't even know himself.

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    GayTV's picture

    Rev. Wright comes home to roost

    When Rev. Wright tried to pin the blame for 9/11 on America he said "America's chickens are coming home to roost". Well...Sen. Obama's chickens have come home to roost. Sen. Obama is the person who made Rev. Wright a key figure in his life. Rev. Wright was instrumental in his conversion to xianity, he married the Obamas, he baptized their kids, he was their pastor for just under 20 years and e was one of the inspiratons for Sen. Obama's book.

    How dare Rev. Wright inject religion into this race?? Rev. Wright?? Sen. Obama has injected religion all along. Be it Rev. Wright and his prayer session that launched the campaign or including ex-gays that think God can cure us homosexuals...it's there.

    I think it's interesting that Rev. Wright said nothing new at the National Press Club except one thing...he called into question Sen. Obama's position on his comments. He's spouted all that crazy talk before and Sen. Obama stood by him...but now that he has damaged Sen. Obama's campaign he has spoken out against him. It's not the racial stuff. It's not the HIV/AIDS craziness. It's not the anti-American comments. It's the fact that he said Sen. Obama actually agreed with him. That is what prompted Sen. Obama to get angry.

    Japhy, I have a question for your upcoming "Question show" you mentioned recently: When you start your v-blog you say "independent voice". Can you define what you mean by independent?

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    staples's picture

    I cannot beleive the amout of

    misquotes I'm reading about Rev. Wright around the internet. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

    It's a simple concept. How can Americans or any country for that matter when they government does uspeakable things without provacation over and over again not expect it to come back into there back yard. "the chickens coming home to roost" That is what Rev. Wright meant. A simple concept that everyone knows is true, but simply refuse to acknowledge. That is somethng I learned as a child.

    Rev. Wright said some serious truths, and because the media tried to create some non-exitant crap, everyone is regurgitatiing the same nonsense.

    The media took sound bites (out of context)from years ago (I guess they couldn't find anything else) and created controversy.

    Now eveyrone is calling him a wacko and racist. A man who started educational programs for young children, made it a point to be inclusive in his church with people  with Aids. WTH.

    The media is a nasty piece of machinary. we all know that. I saw Fox show Rev. Wright dancing at the NAACP, implying with again their stupid sounbite, that "look how wacko this man is", but they refuse to show IT IN THE CONTEXT OF HIS SPEECH.

    i'm actually  surprised at the comments here.

    GayTV's picture

    Actually HE wasn't saying anything.

    In the context of his sermon he was quoting what an ambassador said...he stressed several times that a "white" official said those words and it was not a black point of view. I've read the whole sermon and listened to the entire audio clip of it. He then used those words to painfully demonstrate that he feels 9/11 is something our nation brought on itself.

    Sorry...I can't agree. I don't care how liberal I am. We've done a lot of boneheaded things in the name of our national interest and patriotism...none of these things...not one...justified what happened to us on 9/11.

    Rev. Wright created his own controversy here. He did it at the pulpit after 9/11 and he did it at the podium a few days ago.

    justaloe's picture

    Guilt by association

    Let's hope we are not held to the same standard that it appears Barrack is being held to. We all know people and I'm quite sure that some of these people have done or said things that we might not agree with but that doesn't change the fact that we know them.

    It all boils down to either you believe Barrack Obama agrees with what Rev. Wright says or you don't. Barrack Obama hasn't shown anywhere in his career that he shares Wrights opinions but I guess that's not good enough for many of you.  Personally I don't care whether he heard those sermons or not. I've been in church plenty of times and heard the preacher say things I didn't agree with and I didn't leave.

    What about all of the gay christians who sit in church every Sunday and listen to minister afte minister say that being gay is a sin. They don't agree with that but they don't leave the church.  MCCC isn't for everybody. For some reason catholic polititians aren't asked to disown the Catholic church because of the pedophilia scandals. Scandals this current Pope helped cover up.

    It's funny. White conservative preachers have been saying anti-american things for decades but no one seemed to care until the black guy said some crazy stuff. Francis Schaeffer the father of conservative christian modern thought let forth a few of these gems. "

    If there is a legitimate reason for the use of force [against the US government]... then at a certain point force is justifiable.


    and also this

    "In the United States the materialistic, humanistic world view is being taught exclusively in most state schools... There is an obvious parallel between this and the situation in Russia [the USSR]. And we really must not be blind to the fact that indeed in the public schools in the United States all religious influence is as forcibly forbidden as in the Soviet Union...."

    and this dozy.

    "In the United States the materialistic, humanistic world view is being taught exclusively in most state schools... There is an obvious parallel between this and the situation in Russia [the USSR]. And we really must not be blind to the fact that indeed in the public schools in the United States all religious influence is as forcibly forbidden as in the Soviet Union...."

    After he said these things he was invited to Reagan's white house.  So in let me say again. If you don't like Obama don't vote for him. If you believe he secretly agrees with Rev. Wright dispite all evidence to the contrary then by all means don't vote for him. But if you agree with him and his policies but don't know if you want to vote for him because of what his former pastor said then you are doing yourself an injustice.

    GayTV's picture

    Feel free to judge me...

    People can feel free to judge me based on 20 year personal relationships.

    I totally think Sen. McCain should be questioned about his association with Pastor Hagee. However, Sen. McCain does not have a personal long standing relationship with Mr. Hagee.

    And try as you might to make this a racial issue it has nothing to do with race (except for the portion Rev. Wright is drawing in himself). This has to do with the personal association of a presidential candidate with a vain lunatic.

    And gays are crazy if they attend an anti-gay church. I already consider them suspect because they fell for the whole fairytale to begin with.

    Joey N's picture

    Double Standards

    justaloe wrote:

    It's funny. White conservative preachers have been saying anti-american things for decades but no one seemed to care until the black guy said some crazy stuff.

    American politics is well-versed in the double standard, especially when it comes to matters of race.

    Unfortunately, the gay community is familiar with it as well.

     

    rschlem's picture

    Clinton could still be the first and only


    I don't know that I've studied many reports on Wright's opinions, right or wrong. But I haven't disagreed with anything I've heard so far. I'd be compelled to believe that Obama is aligned to his opinions as well. I can see how those opinions would inflame many of Obama's white supporters.

    "We all know people and I'm quite sure that some of these people have done or said things that we might not agree with but that doesn't change the fact that we know them." That's the 'crazy uncle" analogy. But does your crazy uncle baptize your kids. Is your crazy uncle your mentor and spiritual advisor while at the same time a vocal political commentator?

    Obama would have distanced himself from Wright from day one of his campaign If Wright is the crazy uncle. Most politicians don't bring their Misters or their pope into their campaigns (African American Religious Leadership Committee). I can't shake the feeling that his association with Wright has more to do with Obama being mixed-race and needing 'Black" cred to get elected in Illinois. Wright has 'black Liberation' cred, something Obama doesn't want to associate with as a Presidential candidate. I just feel like if Obama gets elected, he still won't be as black as Pres. Clinton.

    justaloe's picture

    Wright or wrong

    A vain lunatic who has a 20,000 member congregation. So are they all vain lunatics or is it perhaps as i've read that many members of his old congregation never heard these latest theory's of his.  Rev. Wright himself said he and Obama never discussed politics. So do you believe him or not?

    I don't vote for or against people based on who they know. If you do that's your thing.  

     

    John McCain said recently that he welcomes Pastor Hagees endorsement. Obama disagrees with his old Pastor. There is a big difference. Oh and if you think race is not a factor in this then your naive.

     

    Joey N's picture

    Don't mind him.  Some

    Don't mind him.  Some people are just hell bent at hating Obama.  Have you read previous threads re: Obama & Clinton?  Some of the "rationale" some posters have used to justify their dislike of Obama & support for Clinton are f'ing nuts.

     

    GayTV's picture

    Brilliant Joey...disregard anything you don't agree with

    It's a shame really that people cannot have a discussion about the two candidates without it coming to this. It's not a matter of "dislike"...it's a first and second choice.

    Sen. Obama is not my first choice...but I will vote for him if he has the nomination. There's nothing "hell bent at hating Obama" in anything I say. I am just amazed at how when the Rev. Wright stuff first became news worthy Sen. Obama and his supporters were right there to defend him...but now that he has tainted Sen. Obama it's a whole different story.

    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Joey N's picture

    What a revelation!

    GayTV wrote:

    It's not a matter of "dislike"...it's a first and second choice.

    Sen. Obama is not my first choice...but I will vote for him if he has the nomination. There's nothing "hell bent at hating Obama" in anything I say. I am just amazed at how when the Rev. Wright stuff first became news worthy Sen. Obama and his supporters were right there to defend him...but now that he has tainted Sen. Obama it's a whole different story.

    From where I'm sitting, I find it surprising that you could ever vote for someone as terrible as Obama.  You have been 1 of, if not the most, vociferous of Obama opponents.  People will disagree on their choice of candidates, but you constantly & consistently go into attack mode.

    As far as why his supporters aren't here to defend him, maybe they find the flock of vultures tearing at his carcass repulsive.

    GayTV's picture

    Bullshit...

    I think I've taken part in less than 4 Sen. Obama/Sen. Clinton threads...most the time I read and ignore. My issues have been with the unbalanced coverage and one-sided commentary from the staff of AE. And the style of discussion so many anti-Clinton AE members exhibit.

    Sen. Obama is not stupid. Sen. Clinton is not a monster. I don't feel the need to rip either one of them down to build the other one up. I just think both candidates should be looked at with the same scrutiny. Sen. Obama's supporters have done him no great service by pretending that he's up on a pedestal...he's on the same level as the rest of the players...all his supporters have done is dug out the ground around him...God help him when he makes that first step.

     

    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    GayTV's picture

    Re: Wright or wrong

    justaloe wrote:
    Rev. Wright himself said he and Obama never discussed politics. So do you believe him or not?

    The answer is no...I don't believe they never talked politics. When you are considering a run for the highest office in the land I'm sure you seek guidance from the important people in your life. I don't believe that Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama never discussed politics.

    justaloe wrote:
    I don't vote for or against people based on who they know. If you do that's your thing.

    I do consider it important to know who a candidate associates with. I wouldn't vote for a person who is a member of the KKK or associates with the organization. I wouldn't vote for a person who supports or associates with Fred Phelps. I wouldn't vote for a person who is a current/former employee of the oil industry.

    justaloe wrote:
    John McCain said recently that he welcomes Pastor Hagee's endorsement. Obama disagrees with his old Pastor. There is a big difference.

    For the record John McCain has said he disagrees with Pastor Hagee's comments on gays. Comments that Hagee has since retracted...an action that is also nothing more than political maneuvering.

    justaloe wrote:
    Oh and if you think race is not a factor in this then you are naive

    Then I'm naive. Because if it's all about race then I wonder why the black church community is rallying around Sen. Obama and not protecting their own.

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    ATVFAN's picture

    Just The Facts

    It is not a matter of who Obama knows...but who he closely associates with for 20 years, and calls friend, and is called friend by.  Racists of Wright's/Farrakhan's sort do not befriend non-racists.  That they call Obama friend is proof that Obama is as racist as they are.  I know David Duke-former KKK Grand Dragon.  I do not associate with him closely, or go to church with him, or call him friend, or take my children to see him speak.  He does not call me friend.  I also do not befriend, or listen to, Hagee, or McCain, or Pat Robertson.  Anyone who does should not be President, just as Obama should not be President.  No one but vain lunatics would congregate with a vain lunatic pastor.  I'd rather not have a vain, racist, lunatic so near The Big Red Button, thanks.  If you want a black man as President, talk Colin Powell into running.  He is not insane, vain, a lunatic, or a racist, and he has the experience to do the job.  As a non-racist white, I would be willing to vote for Powell...but never for Obama.  Obama never disagreed with his pastor.  He merely said-a day, or two ago-that he did; big difference there.  If Obama ever disagreed with what Wright said, Obama would never have belonged to Wright's church, and listened to him say it to his family, for 20 years.
    Joey N's picture

    Your definition of "facts" is laughable

    ATVFAN wrote:

    As a non-racist white, I would be willing to vote for Powell...but never for Obama.  Obama never disagreed with his pastor.  He merely said-a day, or two ago-that he did; big difference there.  If Obama ever disagreed with what Wright said, Obama would never have belonged to Wright's church, and listened to him say it to his family, for 20 years.

    Obama has REPEATEDLY repudiated his FORMER pastor.  What more do you want?! 

    Do you disagree with how things have been run in this country?  Are you happy with the war?  How about the inequality w/ regards to gays?

    If you answered yes to any of the previous questions, then BY YOUR LOGIC, why don't you move to a different country?!

    Is it b/c it's not that simple?  That things are a little more nuanced than that?

    Judging by the tone & content of your post, I don't think you're as "non-racist" as you would like to believe, despite your support of a man who is NOT running & who appears more white than black.

     

    ATVFAN's picture

    Catholics

    Aloe...you aint quite as omniscient as you think.  I disowned The Catholic Church for being pedophillic...when I was 8 years old, and a victim of same.  I let my parents know that if they sent me back to a Catholic Church, or parochial school, there would be a lot of dead priests, and nuns, in the neighborhood.  I have never supported, associated with, attended church with, endorsed the views of, taken my kids to hear, etc, Catholics since that day.  Of course, I'm neither vain, or a lunatic...though Obama must be.  If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas...so associations do matter.  Would you be as anxious to overlook the associations of a white Presidential candidate who was endorsed by, and closely associated with,  the KKK, and NSWPP?  I bet not.
    justaloe's picture

    Guilt by association will get you everytime

    http://religionblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/03/hillary-clintons-criticism-of.html

     

    Hillary's long time pastor seems to admire Adolf Hitler.

     

    http://www.harpers.org/archive/2003/03/0079525

     

    At least according to the Dallas Morning news and Harpers magazine. Now, do I think Hillary admires Der Fuhrer? No I don't but by your standards she can't be President. Other news outlets and blogs have reported this but because everyone is so worried about Barrack and Rev. Wright it's not making much news.

     

    I had a best friend growing up. If he were to hold a press conference today and say that he believed that Hitler was good and that Bush was responsible for the Kennedy assacination I would be quite surprised because he never expressed those thoughts to me but how do I know really? How do I know what he really thinks? Trinity was a mainstream church. Rev. Wright didn't preach America and AIDS every Sunday. He preached the regular stuff.

     

    Just because you know someone or are even friends with someone doesn't mean you know everything they are or believe. If we can't get that simple fact of life straight then we as a society are done for.

     

    Oh one more thing ATVFAN. Obama is not now nor had he ever been a friend of Louis Farrackhan. I know plenty of black christians who went to the million man march who don't like or agree with LF. They went because of what they thought it represented.

    GayTV's picture

    Hillary's pastor is Rev. Dean Snyder

    You should research your info a little better.

    The "fellowship" is a conservative prayer group that Hillary attends so she can network with the Republicans on their turf.

    BTW...Sen. Obama is also a member of "the Fellowship".

    And you guys can't have it both ways...before he was known for his outspoken and brash style of preaching...it's "how they do it" in black churches.

    Now all this stuff is a total shock.

    Right...okay.

    justaloe's picture

    The Fellowship

    Hey i'm not the guy who thinks that people should be disqualified because of their associations as opposed to what they believe and what they have actually done in there lives. That's your thing.

     

    The man likes Hitler. Hillary is a member of the Fellowship. By your standard she should go.

     

    I've been to black and white churches and they are quite different for the most part in the ways in which they worship. That's a good thing I think. We don't all need to be the same but we should try to understand each other.

     

    I think it's silly not to vote for Barack because of Wright but to each his own.

    GayTV's picture

    Few things...

    First, Sen. Obama is not my first choice...but I will vote for him. I never said I wouldn't vote for him.

    Second, Sen. Clinton's pastor is not pro-Hitler.

    Third, Association, by my definition, is a relationship with the person. Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton attending a prayer meeting for the purposes of doing business means nothing to me. At the end of the day they have to deal with all sorts of people who I don't agree with. However...the people that they choose to associate themselves with in their personal lives directly reflects who they are as people.

    One of the main reasons that it's good to know these things, especially about Sen. Obama, is that he's a big unknown. Sen. McCain and Sen. Clinton have a long history in the public eye. More than anything the Rev. Wright situation has shown that Sen. Obama is really just a typical politician. He played the political damage control script to the letter the past few days. Just like any other politican would.

    justaloe's picture

    Robert Byrd

    Robert Byrd was a member of the leadership of the Klu Klux Klan for years. He went on to become a revered democratic member of the US senate for about 372 years or some crazy number like that.


    He's been given a clean bill of political health by most people because he disowned shall we say his past. Robert Byrd, Robert freaking Byrd gets a pass for what he did but Barack Obama doesn't because of something his pastor said. Oh by the way. Robert Byrd used the term White Nigger just a few years ago and he was given an almost complete pass on that one as well. Yeah I'm sure race has nothing to do with this situation.

    lostinmiami's picture

    Robert Byrd

    Let me start off by saying I don't dispute anything you said - Byrd's KKK membership, leadership, or the fact he seems to get away with a lot of things I find deplorable. I find it truly amazing that with his history, he is regarded as the distinguished elder statesman in the Senate. I even find it stunning that he stands on the floor of the U.S. Senate and reads the Bible at times to make his point - I don't really think Bible passages belong in the congressional record, I think it violates the Constitution.

    I also grew up in West Virginia, Byrd's state. Moreso, I grew up 2 miles from his hometown of Sophia. This is a small town, coal country, blue collar. Race still divides there. I can't imagine how it divided 80+ years ago when he grew up there, it was...awkward for me growing up there, hearing some of the racial things.

    We're talking about an area that even when my parents grew up, was oddly structured and controlled: 5 miles further from Sophia, is Slab Fork, where my mom grew up - named for the Slab Fork Coal Company, which owned the town. Sole employer. Owned the schools, one for whites, one for blacks. Paid the employees 80% in company script, spendable only in the company store. Mine Superintendant ruled the mine and the town as a super-mayor. Mine workers were all-but-owned - you didn't quit, because then you lost your house, since the company owned it. You didn't complain about the appalling safety in the mines, the hours, anything, because being labelled as a troublemaker got you fired, and kicked out of your home.

    I'm hardly defending his past - but his was a unique world to grow up in. He is a product of his environment. He's also changed over time, grown, repudiated some highly distasteful, hateful things in his past. He's loved in the state of WV because he's King of Pork, he earmarks more federal money for the state than anyone he could be replaced with, he's the senior Senator, he gets the choicest committee charimanships. He's a master of every procedure and rule the Senate has to move or derail legistlation. He'll never leave office for anything his said or did because he's too valuable to the people of the state as an advocate.

    I met him several times when I was in school - He brought school group I was in a book on Russia the day after returning from delivering the approved SART treaty for Reagan to sign. I do know him to be intelligent and thoughtful, and a fundamentally good person.

    All that said, I'm not convinced that Wright isn't a good person - his actions with outreach programs and his church speak to that. I think the media has run amuck, and I don't think it's really relevant to Obama's candidacy. People belong to church for a lot of different reasons, fellowship, community, outreach programs, family, music. Sermons may, in fact, be the least interesting thing (to me, anyhow) about Church. An I think lately, maybe he's striving for, well, for lack of a better word, a bigger pulpit, or maybe he's being manipulated by other political forces. I doubt it's all as simple as the talking heads want to make it for us, or as sensational.

    GayTV's picture

    I would never have voted for Byrd

    People can feel free to give Robert Byrd a pass...I don't.
    afhickman's picture

    "Everybody's Got to Relax on all this Gay Stuff"

    afhickman

    "It takes a village (to make Village People)"

    I don't know where else to take this, so I'm filing it under "Flaming Politics."  Okay, so O'Reilly's not a politician, but he's not a journalist either.  In fact, he is not a smart man.   But the Media Matters people have been compiling an inventory of his homophobic comments, and you can read it at

    mediamatters.org/action_center/oreilly_lgbt  

    Don't forget the video!

    afhickman's picture

    Sorry about the link

    afhickman

    "It takes a village (to make Village People)"

    I used up several of my points trying to correct this, so I guess it's uncorrectable.  If you're interested, you may want to google "media matters."  Click on O'Reilly's picture.  In the meantime, I'll try cutting and pasting the link once more:

    http://mediamatters.org/action_center/oreilly_lgbt/

    ATVFAN's picture

    Not Quite

    I have not heard any proof that Hillary's pastor admires Hitler, but even if he did it would not mean she did.  Hillary-as far as I know-has NOT listened to her pastor admire Hitler from the pulpit weekly for 20 years, and she has not called her pastor "Uncle", and has not claimed that he is as dear to her as her own grandma is.  Obama is a pal of Farrakhan, as well as of Wright.  Obama NEVER denounced Wright, or his beliefs...even now.  He denounced Wright voicing his opinions at this time.  Obama is now being pastored by a guy who is as much Wrightish as Wright is, and who repeats the things Wright always said.  To denounce Wright would be to denounce what he preaches, which would be to denounce the church he was in for letting him preach such.  Obama is still in the same church.  He still practices Black Liberation Theology, which even damns God if He dares to love whites.  How can Obama denounce such teachings, and remain in the church which teaches them?  I never voted for Byrd, and never would.  I also opposed David Duke when he ran.  Let me tell you, so you can pass it on to Wright...if the government were going to create a disease to kill blacks, it would not be AIDS which infects whites as well as blacks, hispanics, etc.  It would be an infectious form of something blacks can get that whites can't..like sickle cell anemia.   What The Million Man March represented was full approval, and suupport, of Louis Farrakhan and his racist ways.  Would you say otherwise if I tried to say that a million whites marching with David Duke represented something other than support for white supremecy?  If I say that even a few thousand sheet wearing Klansmen parading through Harlem is just a PR plot to whip up support for The President's Council On Physical Fitness by promoting walking as an exercise, would you say that makes sense?

    User login

    Recent comments

    Put AfterElton.com headlines on your site/blog:

    After Elton home page on logo online