T.R. Knight and Mark Cornelson Part Ways
T.R. Knight and Mark Cornelson. They were the very first couple we included in our first gay celebrity boyfriends feature, but sadly as a couple they are no more. At least that's what is being reported by New York Daily News' gossip blog Gatecrasher.
The way the item was worded it sounds like Knight might have been the one to break things off. At any rate it is sad news.
In happier times. Submitted by on Wed, 2009-10-21 10:05. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|







I`m sad... :(
So the news is...
true that they already split up.(sigh).It kind sad for me cause they really such a adorable couple .Btw,what truly happen between them?(it's a sad October.)
It is sad, but....
Who's gonna pay for...
Who's gonna pay for Mark's 21st Birthday party?
This is filed under my WHO CARES folder. They were always creepy together.
If Mark was 30 and TR was
Amazingly enough
From what I found
They first met in October 2007, when Mark was 18. And TR was seeing someone else at that time. They didn`t start dating until a few months later.
Age of Consent
The age of concent in most states for males is 17 (16 in some and younger if your parents approve)
So how does that make Mark underage? It's a pretty serious claim to make (even in passing).
To suggest something illegal if you have nothing concrete to base it on just seems kind of mean.
18 in CA
The age of concent in most states for males is 17 (16 in some and younger if your parents approve)
So how does that make Mark underage? It's a pretty serious claim to make (even in passing).
To suggest something illegal if you have nothing concrete to base it on just seems kind of mean.
The age of consent in CA is 18. And because there is over 3 years between the two TR could have been charged with a felony had something come of it.
BUT! I'm not saying they started anything before he was 18. I'm just stating the age of consent in CA.
*-----------*
It really doesn't get any more adorkable than this: Video
So sad
This is so sad. They were like my favorite gay couple. They always seemed so happy together too, guess not..
Harvey Milk: You gotta give 'em hope.
this is really sad you guys.
It IS sad
I saw them smooching once in front of the Arclight here in L.A.
But the only people who know why a relationship didn't work out are the ones who were in it.
I think that TR made right thing.
I think that TR made right decision.
Dennis said...
I thought for sure TR would have shared a room with Mark...why did Mark need his own room?
I keed, I keed!! lol
*-----------*
It really doesn't get any more adorkable than this: Video
Can't say I didn't see it coming
Now Papa's gonna find a new toy(boy)!!! Or a baby... Well, hopefully another ready-to-be Papa...
Mark's last name is spelled
Mark's last name is spelled Cornelsen. He's reached 21 in early Sept.
http://tvguidemagazine.com/kecks-exclusives/tr-knights-beau-turns-the-big-2-1-2205.html#
That means he was 19 when they met in Oct 2007 and started dating that Dec. That's far past the age of consent.
I knew something was amiss when he the LA Times asked him about his private life and he only said he was still close to his former GA castmates and was bonding with Parade ensemble. The split seems amicable and no need to add undue drama. Most likely Mark wasn't ready to move to NYC in the upcoming months while TR really wants to return to that theatre scene.
Why Sad?
I know this will not sit well with some people, but I have a real problem with the declaration by the author of this piece (and the comments) that this is "sad" news.
First of all, we don't know if it's sad. If their relationship wasn't working, it may be happy news for them to be moving on. Most of us don't know these two men, and we're not in any position to say whether it's sad.
Second, and maybe more important, I am really troubled by this notion that it's sad that their relationship ended because "all breakups are sad" and because "the gay community" was getting so much joy out of their public status as an out gay couple -- in other words, as if they were meant to be a couple for life ("4EVAH"?) or even worse not for their benefit, but because their relationship existed to make us all happy. It's one thing to have fairy tales and romantic ideals that two people can mate for life, from their 30s into their 90s. But it's not realistic, and not always sad when it doesn't turn out to be so. People grow and change. Sometimes it's not only worse to stay together and make each other unhappy when lives become incompatible, but sometimes these fantasies cause more breakups in adult relationships when people expect "happily ever after." Is that what's sad? That this is a "painful reminder" that relationships end? We can blame fables, romance novels, and Hollywood for only so much.
I've spent the last few years telling homophobes that gay relationships can't harm anyone else's marriage, life, or happiness -- or the fabric and joy of society in the "instiution of marriage" -- as if everyone else's marriage is anyone's business. I've said over and over that the way we live our lives has nothing to do with anyone else's life or relationships, much less their expectations about how other people should couple up. I don't see how I can make that argument over and over and then not be frustrated with these "expectations" and" joys" people seem to be getting out of other people's relationships. "Favorite gay couple"? People you don't even know?
The relationship is and was theirs. We have no idea if they're unhappy about it, and until I hear that they're sad and dejected over the breakup, I see no reason to be sad about it.
They can move on now, and so should everyone else.