Luke, Noah, Mason, and Who's Going to Carve the Pepparkakor
This post contains massive spoilers about the Luke/Noah/Mason storyline. Only proceed if you want to know what to expect. We also ask that you do not put storyline spoilers in the headlines for your comments. In what may be the most frank and honest interview a soap actor has ever given upon leaving a show, Forbes March reveals that he's already taped his last scarf-wrapped scene in Oakdale. The soap and sci-fi vet set down with TV Guide and dished on his latest project, and his history in the business. While showing an obvious frustration to the way his character was used, March tells a story of changing writers, confusion, and a lack of passion for the product on set. Before you get ahead of yourselves: No, he doesn't get strangled by his scarf in a bicycling accident. In fact he doesn't die at all, so the character is free to come back. But he doesn't think that's likely:
It seems the economics of CBS buying their soaps from a products company has a bigger editorial impact than they like to let on. Forbes feels Chris Goutman, the Executive Producer, is committed to telling Luke and Noah's story, but Telenext, which consumer giant Proctor & Gamble owns, just wants to sell laundry soap.
So we're back to a twosome at 2pm on one channel. Nelson asked him about the fact that ATWT seems so much more timid in their characterization of their trailblazing couple, Forbes had quite a bit to say:
After reading that, I took a moment to picture the Pride 2008 episode of ATWT, except instead of Cyndi Lauper stopping by Oakdale, we had Adam Lambert. The storyline got a lot more interesting in my head. No offense to Cyndi, who I worship. So we know that Mason will wrap his scarf one last time during November sweeps, and ride off into the sunset before the pepparkakor is carved for Thanksgiving at the Snyder farm. Missed opportunity for the show? Certainly, but should they have tried to fix it, or was putting it down the kindest solution to the problem? The full interview, including Forbes talking about his new role in the Degrassi movie, can be found at TV Guide. Submitted by on Wed, 2009-10-28 16:07. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|





Want to know what else Luke had to say? Click on past the spoiler break.

Sounds like
Noah is just gonna finish the film and Mason will leave the city. Didn't someone say that this whole storyline had been hastily rewritten?
I'll say that Forbes didn't seem to like his ATWT experience.
Oh well... (Spoilers)
I think the biggest problem was that Noah and Mason had no chemistry. Even if the writers gave them more scenes, it would still not work, so it was a good decision for them to write Mason out. I think the actors tried but there was nothing.
"World Turns needs an extroverted, effeminate gay man on that show. Give Mason eyeshadow!"
There was the Zac & Zoe storyline. Come to think of it, Zac had pretty good chemistry with Noah. Of course, Zac turned out to be Zoe's bf.
i don't buy this...
I honestly don’t think America is ready for a gay storyline on a soap. It’s just too hot button of a topic.
^ I have hardly heard any controversy surrounding the oliver/kyle romance. If there has been some, please someone, let me know and i will take it back.
I think America is ready for a
gaystoryline that involves gay men, women, or whatever. I think ATWT screwed up big time with the kissing ban and now with their horrible writing. I feel if you tell a story well, it will be received well.of course, there will be people who don't like it, but overall? i don't know, i think the majority of people wouldn't really give a crap.
PGP/TeleNext May Not Be Ready
From the little I know, OTALIA at GUIDING LIGHT faced the same problems NUKE are facing at AS THE WORLD TURNS.
The problem is PGP/TeleNext capitulates to the vocal, hating, homophobic viewers rather than the supporters.
What a waste. Nuke will never be more than your saintly, chaste gay boys on ATWT if all of what March says is true.
And that would really be sad
I've been waiting for over a year now for Noah and Luke to have a true love triangle (not a kiss, not a look, not a "maybe"), a real, "I think I'm in love with someone else" or "OMG, can you forgive me b/c I slept with someone else", like true SOAP OPERA fashion!
What kills me is that the same thing is happening at OLTL. Everything is so rushed, and Kyle obviously doesn't love Nick, and vice versa. I would have loved to see Nick and Kyle actually fall in love before they "get married", but no. BOOM....two months from "Hello" and we're getting married. You already know the ending to the wedding day, way before it happens! That's not drama! The drama is in Kyle loving another man, not dating some random guy....but I digress!!
Back to ATWT: Not having a loving triangle is not what I want to see. Two people in love with no drama is not interesting! I'm with Anthony on this that "[NUKE fans] should be very upset, not only because he's leaving, but more importantly why". If Forbes, with his faint-emotional self---so as not to upset the grandma's in the audience---can't make it work, what are the chances of us ever seeing that love triangle we so desperately want? Practically nil! Between Brian, Zac/Zoe, and now Mason, they are going to keep dangling a POSSIBLE love triangle for the boys, but they are NEVER going to act on it! So much for juicy soap opera drama for our boys. It truly is a shame.
One more thing for the OLTL fans to mock us for. I tell you, I offically think these writers are trying to make us ashamed to be NUKE fans. Why else are they trying so hard to make it nearly impossible to defend these storylines?!?!!!
You know, I've always hated politics (P&G), and I just hope that politics isn't what finally kills them and their extremely loyal fanbase.
Kitty
kitty it seems that politics has already
kitty it seems that politics has already killed the fanbase. a lot of fans have left and why? because the politics are dominating the show, the writing, etc etc
a true shame
Boycott
It amazes me that two minimally gay characters, who rarely have sex and in a monogamous relationship gets soo many people upset, while a one night drunken pregnant high school girl storyline barely raises a brow, or for that matter underage marriages.
According to ABC...
... there hasn't been any controversy or backlash regarding their gay characters. I know the network has done a lot of internal research regarding the couple and they've been well recieved by the audience. And since as Forbes pointed out, they own their soaps, they have more freedom to do what they wish. Clearly given the success of Kyle and Oliver and how the show has handled it so far, some of America is ready. This is more about P&G living in fear than the audience.
When I interviewed Forbes earlier this year, I'd been told by some of the people I'd spoken to that the TPTB was very skittish about doing the triangle so this is no surprise to me. I'm sure that Luke/Noah fans are cheering Mason's exit, but they should be very upset, not only because he's leaving, but more importantly why.
can't the TPTB...
can't the TPTB at ATWT just end the relationship with P&G? I guess it's easy for me to criticize, and i obviously don't know much about how contracts work and sponsors and whatever
I'm just trying to figure out if there is a way for the show to be able to do what it wants. also, is it just a CBS thing that has this problem with P&G?
so ABC basically can do whatever it wants because a company does not own them? i'm slow, yes, so you might have to explain this process to me as if i am a 6 year old.
:-P
No, ATWT Cannot
Because it is owned by PGP/TeleNext, and CBS has no desire to own any of the soaps it airs. Both YOUNG AND THE RESTLESS and THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL are owned by Sony/Bell Productions.
CBS would rather put on game shows and talk shows on its daytime lineup rather than soaps.
ABC/Disney IS the company that owns its soaps - ALL MY CHILDREN, ONE LIFE TO LIVE and GENERAL HOSPITAL - so it has control over content and is the one that earns the revenues from advertisers that hawk their products when their soaps are aired. So, yes, ABC can do what it wants with its shows. If ABC wanted to pull the rug on OLTL and KISH and put the kibosh on both, no one can stop them.
well, whatever then...
God, if that's the case, why don't they just do away with Luke and Noah? why tell a damn story if you can't even tell it at all, ya know?
might as well give me a puppy and order me not to feed it. baffles the mind
I agree with you completely.
ugh, i feel really bad for...
i feel really bad for van and jake. It's kind of like the issue i had with torchwood being created for john barrowman, and how that didn't go the way it should've.
van and jake are suppose to be this couple in love, a couple with issues, yadda yadda....but once again, the show decides "actually, no. we're gonna tell it in a whole different way, but market it just the opposite!"
i have this urge to just tell all Nuke fans to stop watching the show. NOBODY is being served justice here. not the actors, not the fans. nobody is profiting i think. it's why the fandom is at war with each other and now, why actors are speaking out. Maybe if more people spoke out, someone up high would wake the hell up and do something about it.
what's the AFA? aMERICAN Family...affairs? or something like that? anyways, i assume they are some christian, family values group who can't handle two men kissing, but seeing a man/woman cheat on their spouse is ok.
man, i need a strong drink.
I Agree.....
wonder what the fans who have....
wonder what the fans who have stuck around are saying about all this. you know?
This is truly depressing. I
AFA stands for THE AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION
http://action.afa.net/
Their website speaks for itself. 'Nuff said.
Van and Jake
Jake's been in L.A.
For what it's worth, Jake's been hanging out Los Angeles some lately. I found it vaguely odd that the NYC based soaper was hanging out with his L.A. based counterparts. Same network, granted, different production companies.
(yeah, I brightened the super dark pic Brandon tweeted)
Maybe...
No Surprise.....
lmao, dang anthony...
They'd have him shirtless constantly and he wouldn't have to worry about knowing how to act.
^ haha, you sure don't hide how you feel about jake's acting. that's hilarious
Like Brandon?
I mean, Brandon is just a good-hearted piece of meat on B&B. They just find one ridiculous reason after another to get his shirt off, in a slave collar.
Michael Muhney tweeted a pic of a nude speedo with fig leaf on the front and asked people to guess who it was for. I tweeted it was Brandon, and got a response from both of them. I think even Brandon was horrified at that piece.
I told him he was playing and Adam & Eve piece, but I wished it was Adam & Steve. He didn't answer.
Can we at least make his evil twin brother on the show gay?
Brandon Beemer Supports Equality and says No to Hate
I know some folks don't like the No H8 campaign but I still think it's a fantastic visual way to state your support for gay and lesbian equality and the impact of a famous face should never be underestimated.
Anyway, thought I'd share the above.
The Advocate.com says "Kim Kardashian, Jared Leto, and Adam Lambert are all expected to pose for pictures in the coming weeks.
He did two shots...
To be fair...
...the current crop of DAYS hunks can actually act, for a change, unlike the Austin Peck era. (Though I admit AP proved me wrong when he popped up on ATWT. Too bad he just got killed off).
Galen Gering and Eric Marsolf were two of the few actors who had talent and looks in PASSIONS and they're doing a good job on DAYS as Rafe and nuBrady, respectively. That Mark Hapka kid (Nathan) is pretty good too.
I don't think Jake is a good fit for DAYS though...
Actually....
Cannot stand her.
She is complete FF material.
Switching bact to "Days"
I've watched DOOL since the late 80's and gave it up last year for ATWT. I'm thinking of switching back. The return of the amazing Louise Sorel and Crystal Chappell has me intrigued. I will never forget when Vivian buried Dr. Carly Manning alive!
My problem with DAYS is that it tends to drag its stories on forever. Tune in once a week and you can keep up...
Have to agree
Anthony, if you think Jake
Anthony, if you think Jake is such a big nothing, why have I had the misfortune of seeing your mug on his facebook friends page? Also, now that he most likely knows the nasty things you say about him here, at SOC, DC and all of the other sites you relentlessly bash him on, if you see him again at Soapfest or some other event will you continue to smile in his face and have your picture taken with him?
I can't imagine why exactly it is you've embarked on what seems to be an almost personal crusade to mock him publicly, or why you have all but campaigned to get him fired, but he is such a great guy, and he's never been anything but good to fans, supportive of the gay community and it's causes, and proud to play a gay character.
At the fan event in Paris a couple of weeks ago, Van said that people who bash Jake can go to hell. I concur.
What massive spoilers?
Sorry to be cranky, but I opened this up expecting to find a detailed account of what happens to Luke, Noah and Mason in upcoming episodes and all I find is that...Mason leaves Oakdale still alive...that's a massive spoiler?
Again, sorry for the sarcasm.
Yeah, we debated that
We debated that. But we get so many people upset when we don't put huge flashing strobe lights and police tape up, we figured we'd go with safe rather than sorry.
And to some, Mason leaving, rather than the rewrite they'd been talking about, was a major spoiler.
Dude must have a had a very lousy time on ATWT
March has been pretty successful in the acting biz for nearly a decade. He's no amateur. He knows that talking this candidly with an interviewer is bad idea if you want to go with the flow and get rehired by the production company, casting directors -- or in the case of ATWT -- major corporate sponsors like Proctor & Gamble.
Though I don't agree with his assertion that US viewers might not be "ready for a gay storyline on a soap," Forbes has really put himself out there with this interview. I applaud him for his frankness and his concern. ATWT is struggling (like all soaps are) -- plus it has to deal with P&G's influence, which totally kills creativity.
Forbes, We Hardly Knew Ya!
"Any time I wanted to put my hand on Noah’s shoulder, several serious discussions ensued whether or not it would pass the mustard. Any body contact had to be cleared from higher-ups. Nothing kills a show faster than a boycott!" (Forbes March)
I think that sentance tells you everything you need to know about what's wrong with the writing for NUKE.
In a show where we are watching characters like Damian have sex multiple times with multiple women in the span of two weeks and he's shirtless more than men half his age (which is a great thing) the fact that Forbes and Jake and Van had to tip to around even just touching each other is SCANDALOUS!!!!
P&G should get slammed with boycott by every gay human being in the US.
GLAAD needs to condemn them up one side and down the other.
It is so overly heterosexist and heteronormative that it doesn't seem possible that "THE GAYS" haven't boycotted P&G before now.
I'm just saying, we buy stuff, gay folks buy stuff, if there is anything business folks get it's that we apparently have more disposable income so why aren't we using that to our advantage and boycotting the FRACK out of P&G?
I feel sorry
for Van and Jake. The take all the crap about their storylines, they had to bear with all the unconfortable questions, only to be used as publicity, without any reward (good storylines or airtime).
I think it's a shame that two years later they don't have the guts to tell the storyline properly without fears. OLTL storyline has it flaws, but at least there's a commitment about telling the story, not only by the actors (obviously Van and Jake are more than devoted to their characters) but the writers and producers.
It's obvious that without all the Nuke success they'd be written off long time ago (at least Noah for sure). I only hope Van and Jake find another job and leave the show because all they'll recieve will be crappy storylines and no airtime (i'll be very glad if i'll get wrong)
It is sad but who didn't see it coming...
considering the speed with which they usually do things on that show if it was going to happen would it have happened six months ago? OLTL might spread one day into a week but they keep everybody in the same time while ATWT shoves a week into a day but everybody is in their own timelines - you can get to New York in 5 minutes but it takes Noah 2 weeks in LA. If they were going to have a triangle that would have been when it happened they lost their window.
Hell, Emily has gone through 3 men in the same time. Every story they have tried to tell with NUKE has been a misfire because they can't commit. The only one that was remotely interesting was the closeted step-grampa story thanks to Lawerence, Van and the over the top Elizabeth Hubbard.
OLTL is getting some flack for not showing Kyle and Nick in bed together but I've seen them show more physical affection for each other in one episode then NUKE has in 2 years.
I think CBS, PG, and ATWT knows it is in the death throes of its final year and all they want to do is collect as much money as possible from ad revenue. I expect actors to start being dismissed as their contracts end.
I confess I haven't watch ATWT lately because when I've tried on the days when no gays were on OLTL it was so wretched I turn over to what OLTL anyway. When I'll take Rex and Gigi over your steaming pile of "stories" then you know they are lousy.
Is the boycott really still on?
I read a lot of blog coverage on the various gays in soaps. I read all the soap stuff posted to this site, every day, and I have several other blogs on my feed reader that tend to give a fair amount of coverage to NUKE, KNISH and even thumb-up-their-butt Y&R. This is the very first mention of the AFA boycott I've seen since it was first launched . . . what? A year? Two years ago?
Are they sure some trigger-happy pencil pusher at P&G isn't looking at their declining revenue which is in all likelihood attributable to . . . oh, let me think . . . how 'bout conscientious shoppers opting to spend their money on bargain brands during a RECESSION ECONOMY to be frugal and jumping to the unfounded conclusion that it's all those damned, trouble-making gays' fault?
And their little dog, too!
Any exec with so much as two properly functioning neurons to rub together should realize that making eunuchs out of Luke & Noah isn't the way to weather a fundie boycott. If they'd just give us characters that are worth caring about, I'd buy enough TAMPAX tampons to dam the mighty Mississippi just on principle.
was anyone offended by this?
It’s just too hot button of a topic. They're criticized by the gays for not making Nuke gay enough....
^ i am sitting here reading comments at the vanhansis.net board and some fans are actually offended by the underlined quote, so i'm curious....is anyone here offended by it?
Yup
Whatever.....
I think what forbes meant...
I think what forbes meant was that some fans want luke and noah all over each other and some people obviously don't. i would've maybe worded it like "luke and noah aren't being written like two men in love..." - hell, they seem like 2 amish gay men from what i am hearing. ANYWAY....
that aside, some think forbes is saying this simply because he is no longer on the show and this is somehow 'revenge' -- please, if he wanted to get back at the show, i am sure he could've said something much more damning
DENIAL. poor fans. denial, denial, deeeenial. the show is drowning and they don't have a big enough raft to save it.
No he meant "flaming 'mo"
If you read his "ideas" for his character they are very much what a gay stereotype would be and wear. I mean looking to a glam rocker for inspiration when playing a college professor and wanting Mason to wear eye shadow is his idea of being "more gay".
I like Forbes and I don't think he meant offense but I'm glad that the TPTB didn't take any of his suggestion considering his one fashion suggestion has been to supply Mason with those hideous scarves.
The posters there are
The posters there are delusional, worshipful fangirls who react with rabid fury at any perceived slight of their worshipped darlings Van and Jake. They entirely miss the point that that Forbes is making, that due to the producers, Nuke and any "gay" in their orbit are portrayed as entirely desexed fratboys, thereby making every s/l completely boring and pointless.
If anything, Forbes was trying to maintain a humorous tone in the interview, but he must be seething with anger at the way he has been used. As an actor of some soap reputation (at least the equal of Julie Pinson, Lynn Herring, et al) to be put in such a worthless, barely there s/l (in which he must have earned next to nothing for his few appearances) I am surprised that he wasn't even more accusatory, but I guess he didn't feel like an angry rant would do him any good. I, for one, appreciated his candor, which is very rare from soap opera actors (Farrah Fath is the only other exception I can think of) He owes no allegience, respect, or admiration to anyone at ATWT, after having been so badly misused over the past 4 months.
Not me.
I don't find that offensive in the least, because he's right.
I've done gayer things with straight guys (that I didn't even really like) than we've seen from Luke & Noah, the "super couple." These two aren't so much lovers as roommates that nag each other, incessantly.
Bombshell interview
I think they meant we want it to be OK for them to touch, kiss, have sex (or at least acknowledge they have sex) like every other couple (together or cheating!) in Oakdale does. I am glad Forbes March went there with this interview. He obviously was disgusted with how he, his character, and the storyline was handled. I hope this sparks much debate (other than here) and gets media attention. What the hell does P&G want? Have everyone sit around reading the bible at the Snyder farm, giddy over how fresh Downey makes their cloths smell? Discussions about Mason putting his hand on Noah's shoulder? I wonder if the AFA has issues with Craig sleeping with his wife's sister? I imagine Forbes saying "America is not ready for a gay storyline on a soap" comes from bitterness. Rightly so. I do disagree with him there, as OLTL is proving. This story makes me sick. I HATE the AFA and P&G. Poor Van and Jake. I look forward to hear what they, along with Chris Goutman, have to say in response to this article (not to mention TPTB at One Life to Live?).
I HATE the AFA and P&G. Poor Van and Jake.
I totally agree with you Nate. I don't actually know if the AFA is actually boycotting P&G products or P&G is just afraid it might be doing it. In a recession a company can't afford to lose but a single customer. Still, it's so unfair!
I agree the storylines have declined, but shouldn't we do something to show our support to the characters, to show that the AFA isn't more powerful than us (gays and their friends) or are they?!
If there is someone to point our fingers at, it's the AFA and I think that if P&G knew we got their backs, that it is not the majority who don't want to see Nuke have a "normal" soap opera relationship, which is portrayed in a realistic way (I mean, who's ever had a boyfriend that hot and not had sex with him 2 times per day?), then they would let the storyline develop as it should.
I think it's time for another "kiss campaign" just to show that bigottry is not supported by the majority of viewers.
_______________________________________
We are the lucky ones. Don't forget that.
I agree that
They should have a extroverted gay men on the show but not all gay men are over the top and like that and thats where I personally identify with the likes ATWT and OLTL, They have guys on like me just blue collar workers or students with broader interests than just fashion.
But the way Luke and Noah touch always seems forced, never natural and that is why you would not know they were gay not because they do not wear eyeliner.
Gay Nuke
I think Forbes was saying that Mason should wear eyeliner, not Luke and Noah.
His point was you already have two very straight laced gay characters so why couldn't Mason (who's supposed to be a hollywood independent gay film director) have a little bit of flare to shake things up.
I don't think Forbes was saying Luke and Noah's appearance should be changed but more that the writers could have used Mason as a way to bring in a different kind of gay character to add a different flavor to the mix.
Not every gay man is flamboyant but not every gay man is polo shirt frat guy either.
Of all the gay characters on tv right now, I can't think of even one that doesn't fall into the "plain cotton, polo shirt" type of guy.
There's nothing wrong with that but that's not all there is.
It also would have added a bit of tension to the storyline to have this totally sexually overt kind of character up against Noah who is very straight laced and serious.
That was the only redeeming feature of Zac. Watching him flirt and come on to Noah and watching Noah squirm. There were genuine moments when Zac was actually very sexy and it was sexy to watch him interact with Noah.
That kind of vibe would have made the Mason situation a lot more interesting to watch.
Anyway, I think Forbes wasn't saying Luke and Noah aren't gay enough because of their appearance, I think his point was that if they weren't boyfriends, you'd never know they were gay because they rarely kiss or hug or hold hands or do anything "gay" in that respect. They don't overtly flirt (or at least they rarely act sexual around each other and everyg sexual situation happens off screen)
They don't even make out as much as some of the straight characters including the underaged teens.
It just seems like the character Forbes signed up to play is not what actually happened and it become a lot less "gay" as the storyline when on vis a vis Noah and Mason's interactions.
Telling the Luke and Noah story took a lot of courage
I understand how Forbes March would be upset with the folks at At the World Turns. After all, they did fire him. The fact is, he had no chemistry with Noah and gave a lackluster performance at best. The Luke and Noah storyline has been a courageous undertaking for ATWT. This is the soap opera with the oldest demographic that has been on for over 50 years and we have seen a young male couple kiss, fall in love, have sex, move into together, kiss two other men and remain committed to one another for over two years. There is a Kyle and Fish only because there was a Luke and Noah. While there has been some conservative backlash (though I don't believe there was an organized boycott), the harshest critics of the Nuke storyline have been gay viewers. Despite over 40 kisses, we still complain that they don't kiss enough. As the producers of True Blood and One Life to Live are finding out, we are a very difficult audience to please. Even if the Nuke storyline should end tomorrow, it will be remembered as trailblazing and courageous. I know a 18 year old young man from the Midwest who told me that watching Luke and Noah convinced him for the first time that falling in love with another man was possible. So thank you ATWT and Jake and Van for going where no one else dared to go. I, for one, will always be grateful,