Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

South Park Tackles "The F Word," Calls Everyone Over 20 Lame


I live in the country, so I know about motorcycles shattering the peace.

Before I start this, I feel I should mention that every time I try and provide commentary on a Comedy Central program, you guys tell me I have no sense of humor. You’re probably about to do it again. Keyboards ready? Good.

Last night South Park attempted to take on, in their own way, changing connotations for words like "faggot" and "gay." I agree their intent was noble. Execution, well, at least we can agree that Harley riders are annoying.

The general premise is a group of Harley riders goes around the town ruining everyone’s moments with their loud bikes. It comes out that the riders are really more into being the center of attention than anything else, to the point they start making the throbbing sounds, much like “motorboating” when they’re not riding in order to maintain the focus on them.

Excessively loud exhaust, either on bikes or cars, is a personal pet peeve.

The boys make it their personal mission to stop the bikers by repeatedly calling them fags in public to demean them. They mocking them as attention whores. And the word they choose to use for "attention whore" is “faggots.”

Cartman crapping on their seats was typical. Adding the flags was inspired.

The come up to the bikers wherever they are and call them fags. They paint “FAGS GET OUT” across buildings downtown. The gay population, led by Big Gay Al and Slave, are mortified. But the boys own up to the graffiti, and make a case that “fags” isn’t demeaning to homosexuals, bu demeaning to the people it’s directed at. In fact, it now has a meaning all its own according to them and they’re actually horrified that anybody thinks that they could be homophobic.

A world where this isn't homophobic is an interesting concept.

Eventually, the whole town signs on to the new use of the word, even the gays, but national gay groups say that since the dictionary doesn’t agree with the new use, it’s still offensive. So the boys get the keepers of the dictionary, led by Emmanuel Lewis in a monocle, to come to town so they can present a case for changing the formal meaning. After some violence, things are suitably resolved.

Why the dictionary editor is Emmanuel Lewis in a monocle, I have no idea. But it's inspired.

It’s really, truly impressive how many times they manage to fit “fag” and "faggot” into the script. Indeed, it harkens back to the uncensored “sh*t” episode they did in Season Five with the onscreen counter reaching 162 times. And this is in the same vein. Once I was over the shock factor, I realized there was nothing offensive at all about the episode and that they were making a point.

The point actually was punctuated everywhere in the episode.

Words evolve. Their usage evolves. I don’t actually agree that we’re at that point with gay slurs like “fag” or “that’s so gay,” but I can recognize that it’s coming. If you talk to the average 15-year-old using those terms to denote something “lame”, they’re most likely very gay supportive. They’d actually be offended that you think they were homophobic. The word just doesn’t mean the same to them as it does to many adults.

We have to realize that “faggot” only loosely connects in my generation to the times when it was about burning us alive, like bundles of wood, or “faggots.”

I’m not onboard with where we are on the evolution of the language. I’ve had “F**king Faggot!” screamed at me while I walked down the street holding hands with a boyfriend and felt physically threatened by it. Those words are still used to wound, but by the time the eternally 8-years-old boys of South Park have grown up, that may not be the case.

They played "Identify the faggot" with children on the street who got it, even when adults didn't.

The whole episode is viewable online here, which is much better than me trying recap satire. What did you guys think?

 

  • Ed Kennedy's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Jay's picture

    OMG, I loved it! I should

    OMG, I loved it! I should watch South Park more often jeje. Now, I am the type of person who hates to use any slur, regardless of their change of meaning. But I do agree that they were only trying to make a point. And sometimes making a point like this can be very funny! :D

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    Disturbed1ne's picture

    lol

    Emmanuelle Lewis used to be Webster

     

    Webster's Dictionary

     

    get it??

     

    "Fate won't compromise"

    Kitty's picture

    Thanks for making me feel stupid

    I didn't get that at all, but I guess it's b/c I'm under the age of 30.

    Kitty

    My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard, and they're like it's better than yours. ~Kelis

    Prescolt's picture

    Making a point isn't the issue

    Since when do 14 year-olds determine the proper usage of a word? Whether it is derogatory or irrelevant?

    Yes, the South Park boys and their creators, as usual, weren't trying to defame anyone and the episode isn't worth getting upset about, but I disagree with their conclusion.

    If teeny-boppers used a derogatory term for black people, say, the N-word, to describe someone they think is lame, would that mean the word is no longer offensive to black people? Could we call a black person by the N-word because we think they're lame and then claim that we meant it is a judgement of character and not as a derogatory term?

    South Park's moral high ground is a mole hill once again.

    Average (11 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Dave Doty's picture

    Proper Usage of Words

    Prescolt wrote:

    Since when do 14 year-olds determine the proper usage of a word? Whether it is derogatory or irrelevant?

    Since they use them.  'Proper Usage' is a myth.  Sometimes I wish it was real, sometimes I support change, but dictionaries reflect the way people use words, they don't control them.  And when large groups of people use a word differently, that word changes it's meaning.

    Average (4 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Zach's picture

    But South Park isnt a

    But South Park isnt a dictionary. They should have made social commentary on how using fag is inappropriate no matter how children are using it. If the whole country started using the N*Word for bad like the comment above you said, it would still be discriminatory. Im 21 and find that word used by anyone outside of the queer community offensive.
    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    GayTVluver's picture

    South Park...

    I personally think that South Park is just an outlet for it's creators. Their message, as deeply as it's often buried, will fall flat and all that will be remembered is that they said or did a certain thing that was "shocking. The show is not going to change minds because it's core audience (13-year-old boys who like fart jokes and men in their 30's who like fart jokes meant for 13 year olds) isn't interested in learning something.
    *****
    Average (3 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Dave Doty's picture

    Both Insulting and Incorrect

    I regularly find their messages thoughtful and challenging.  At least one one occasion, they've completely changed my mind on a subject, and even when they don't, they often force me to form new arguments because they present critiques that are different than the ones I'm used to fending off.

    Of course, that probably won't mean much to you, since you will have already written me off as a man in my 30's who likes fart jokes meant for 13 year olds.

    As for South Park "just being an outlet for its creators," well, who'd have thunk it?  An intellectual property serving as an outlet for the views of its creators?  Shocking! 

    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    GayTVluver's picture

    I stand corrected...

    I've seen almost every episode and not once did I encounter something I hadn't already thought through or experienced for myself. I've always viewed the show as discussions people have already had.
     
    If this cartoon challenges you, then great. If the show saying Shit every 8 seconds is what you need to help you form an opinion about empty swear words and tv standards...then I'm glad it's there.
    *****
    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Dave Doty's picture

    SP's Swearing Episode

    First of all, the swearing episode wasn't one that had a particularly challenging message.

    But repeating the word "shit" wasn't the message of that episode, it was the plot and the running joke.  The actual message of that episode was about the way that overuse of swear words makes them less effective and powerful.

    I never thought it was particularly hard to separate out the creators' message from the episode.  After all, it's usually signposted when one of the characters steps forward and says "You know, I learned something today."  But maybe it's trickier than I thought. 

    Average (3 votes):
    see individual ratings
    dback's picture

    I gave up on "South Park" years ago

    The show was always a combination of the brilliantly satirical and inspired (see: the episode where the Native Americans try to build a casino and get rid of the South Park residents via blankets infected with SARS), vs. the purile and idiotic (Mr. Hanky, Mr. Slave, and way too much else to mention).  Eventually, I decided that Parker and Stone are just two overgrown kids who never really progressed beyond Age 12, and everything they do is basically for shock value--they'll be seemingly "gay friendly" one episode, then jaw-droppingly homophobic and asinine the next if it'll get them attention.

    So frankly, I couldn't care less what "South Park" says anymore--the ship has sailed.  The reason that Parker and Stone are so vehemently pissed off by "Family Guy" is not just because "Family Guy" is often much funnier than "South Park" (if not as daring), it's because Seth McFarland is an unapologetic Democrat who regularly crucifies the Republicans and George Bush for their hyprocrisy and idiocy, and Parker and Stone are Republicans.  (Notice how many of "South Park's" potshots are at outspoken Hollywood liberals?)

    Kids (yes, there are moronic parents who let their kids watch "South Park") are not going to grasp the supposed "satire" of this episode.  All they're going to see is that it's OK to us the words "fag" and "faggot" towards people in public.

    Average (10 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Kitty's picture

    Agreed....I am not amused

    About the kids and the name calling: It's the same way you can't watch a Kanye West vid on YouTube without every 10th comment being "You're a gay fish". How annoying!

    Kitty

    My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard, and they're like it's better than yours. ~Kelis

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    Ladymacbeth's picture

    Like the show in general,

    Like the show in general, still hate that word. Maybe one day the meaning will truly change, but we're not there yet and I actually don't really see the point in changing the meaning of words: let's just make certain words obsolete.

    I dunno, I do like South Park, but some of their episodes aimed at society completely miss the point for me and then I just crave an episode of Cartman being a little bastard and Butters taking his revenge and the kids just being mean little bastards in general without trying to make a greater point.

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    Aximill's picture

    I'm for it

    Granted I love South Park. My nickname in college was Big Gay Dan since I watched it all the time and also treated everyone like Big Gay Al did on the show. Some people still only refer to me by that name.

    And overall, South Park has shown great acceptance to the LGBT community. Those who are annoying, hypocritical, or ignorant, are made fun of. Stan accepted his gay god Sparky, the boys loved having Big Gay Al as their boy scout leader, and while they did shove a gerbil up Mr. Slave's butt, that show was to show the difference between tolerance and acceptance.

    Would I have liked that they did not use Fag? Hell no. The Harley Bikers were in the library, reading how the word changed definition many times over the years. It seems only natural that it can again change. This time by the boys saying a fag is an annoying douchebag. They go out of their way to say they didn't mean a gay fag, but an annoying fag.

    And Mr. Slave and Big Gay Al (loved seeing them after so long) were also at first taken aback. But then they too thought it out and agreed with the kids. They were adapting to the youth and how they use the term.

    I'm still gonna correct people when they say "That's so gay". But maybe we can adapt to letting go of the power fag has over us.

    Remeber, the children are the future.

    Average (3 votes):
    see individual ratings
    GayTVluver's picture

    The root is understood...

    I grew up with "That's so gay" on the playground. We all understood where it was rooted from even though it wasn't meant to refer to homosexuality when we used it. We all knew that being gay was "bad". It's one of the worst things you could be called was gay. So, to really point out that something was stupid or wasn't liked..."that's so gay". We all understood that...I think kids today have the same understanding... especially when they are constantly warned about it in their gaming life, at school and on TV.
     
    Fag. I think it's so interesting when people say the power should be taken from the word or that we should adapt it. I think Jack Price in NYC, Jack Raynard, James Parkes, Michael Causer and other victims of gay bashing whose assault began with being called a "faggot" and "fag" disagree. I'm sure the bar patrons in Ft. Worth who were called "fags" as they were thrown to the floor and had knees pressed into their necks would not be a fan of the word being used so casually.
    *****
    Average (12 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Carter's picture

    God bless South Park ...

    Frankly, they make fun of EVERYTHING so there's no reason to ever be offended.
    Average (7 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Metabaron's picture

    South Park is wrong on this one.

     

    "Faggot" is an anti-gay slur. And this episode was offensive.

    South Park hasn't been funny for many years. It's time for them to annoy someone else.

    Like posters above have said, if they tried the same with the N-word the show would be canceled. 

    Average (5 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Dave Doty's picture

    South Park and the N-Word

    Obviously, you and posters above don't actually watch the show, or you would have seen the episode where they tackled the n-word.  In fact, it revolved around Stan's father being upset at being labeled "the nigger guy," so it even dealt with the word shifting to new people.  It may startle you to learn that the show wasn't canceled.

    Average (4 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Nick's picture

    the N-word

    Sure they have used the N-word, but they used it in a totally different way then how the tackled the F-word.  If they did it in the same sense of the F-word episode Blacks would have a shit storm over it it.  The Naggers episode was dealing with more of the social stigma of using the word and not how the word has changed over time; while this episode was trying to say it's ok to use a word because a bunch of kids are using now to describe things which aren't inherently gay.  But I believe that they missed the point that the F-word still, and probably for a long time have a connection with homosexual and I honestly don't believe any kid at most past the age of 12 don't connect that word with gay.  That's the whole reason why teenage boys use the word, it's to distance themselves from gay or fem.  You don't see teenage girls use it as casually.  It's more believable that "that's gay" will more casual then fag will ever be.  
    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    RC94's picture

    Anti-Gay Slurs

    South Park wasn't trying to be offensive, they made an accurate representation of kids using this word. I'm in high school and i hear kids calling other people fags probably about 1000 times a day (not directed at me, im in the closet). About half of the time, it doesn't even mean homosexual to them. Same thing with the word gay.  The reason that it's offensive is that it always means a bad thing.  When kids are associating a word that really means homosexual with only bad things all the time, they are associating homosexual with being bad, even if the word fag doesn't mean homosexual to them.  People think that it isn't offensive it they don't mean homosexual but since it really does, it's extremely offensive. It's offensive any time the words gay or fag are used in a bad way.

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    seanID22's picture

    1000 times a day

    This is part of the absolute obsession of straight people with calling out gays, consciously or unconsciously. I hear it from kids too, though thank god I'm not in school. And often it is in a very homosexual context. Can't straight men have other arbiter of self-definition than their constant, stupid use of gay in all its forms?

     Forget insulting, it's wholly unoriginal.

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    Bobbyjoe's picture

    I Wrote Two Long Responses to This, But...

    ...gave up and deleted both of them.

    And, yeah, yeah, because I despise this sh*t, I just have no sense of humor whatsoever, but...

    All I'll say is f*ck this coming on the day after our loss in Maine.

    And f*ck those pr**ks Trey Parker and Matt Stone and their lazy, pretend-to-take-a-stand-while really-never-taking-a-stand, easy target "satire."

    Parker and Stone have patted themselves on the back so many times about what "equal opportunity offenders" they are, they've probably both dislocated their shoulders.  But there's no such thing as "equal opportunity offenders" in the real world.  The real world has power structures and gays are being forced to go hat in hand to the whole freakin' country begging for our rights, while homophobes sit around on their fat, bigoted *sses taking their rights for granted and eating Cheetos.

    So if you throw out a jibe on your show against a homophobe, the homophobes maybe grunt and eats another Cheeto, 'cause they have their rights and have nothing real at stake.  But you throw out a jibe at gays, even if you only accidentally convince just one more person that gays are jokes or that their rights are trivial, you begin to make things even more difficult for a group with enough of a hard road already.

    It's a big difference when you attack something with tremendous power, like, say, a presidential administration or a globally powerful church, and when you attack a group that lacks power or that's already in a tentative or risky position in society.  Classic satirists, and genuinely smart satirists today, have always recognized that distinction.  "Equal opportunity offender" is a meaningless, self-serving term. Are there pompous gays deserving of ridicule?  Sure, but if you're looking at all the many, many deserving targets of harsh satire in the world today, I'd think ridiculous gay folks would be about # 123,765 down on that list.  Funny how they come up so often.

    There's no such thing in our social and political reality as a level playing field. You say the word "fag" to probably at least 90% of the country and they're still instantly going to think some combination of "gay" and "negative," not "vague and harmless insult."

    So seeing Parker and Stone diddling around at this particular point in time with stupid, lazy word games about whether or not people ought to be able to throw around a term historically used to dehumanize and terrorize gays (and in the meantime, getting to pat themselves on the back once again with 'oh look how deliciously subversive we're being using the word 'faggot' over and over again on national televison, just like we did with the word "sh*t''), and maybe pretending they're somehow helping reclaim that word (something, just as with how the N-word can only be reclaimed by African-Americans, not by whites, that straights can never do), when what this episode is really about at heart is that Parker and Stone had a lot of fun with the word "fag" in Team America and somebody in their own lives probably finally called 'em on it in a way that made them vaguely uncomfortable... 

    Well, it makes me just want to...

    ...delete another post.

    Average (10 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Elise's picture

    Wow.

    I want to gay marry this post and make sweet, sweet love to it.
    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    seanID22's picture

    thank you

    ... don't delete this, pay it forward to those who aren't in our choir, like the show's creators for instance.
    gaylib's picture

    I'm glad two straight men

    decided it was time to retire the term "fag".  Are we supposed to be grateful?  especially when we read stories like this every day:  Bellamy is accused of punching one of the victims in the face and then, along with the two other suspects, punched the second victim in the head, knocking him to the ground and calling him a 'faggot' during the assault, police said. No, I'm sorry, you don't get to decide when that word isn't offensive anymore.  What jackasses.  I was also appalled by the scene in which Emmanuel Lewis is dragged by a chain behind a motorcycle.  That is how James Byrd (of the Matthew Shepard/James Byrd Hate Crimes Act) was tortured and decapitated by his white supremicist murderers.  Ha, ha...so funny. 
    Average (5 votes):
    see individual ratings
    tase87's picture

    I think South Park always

    I think South Park always works to offend people, it doesn't matter who it is, but, there's usually always some point involved. I would never use a gay or racial slur period, but, maybe there will be a time where certain words aren't affiliated with certain things anymore. Who knows? I think South Park is funny though and I like that it doesn't matter how controversial the subject matter, they're going to try and find a way to make an episode about it. With that said, there was an episode where they used the 'N' word multiple times. It was called 'With Apologies to Jesse Jackson'. It brought up a lot of different views and points in the episode with using the same humor and it's still on the air a couple seasons later.
    Dave Doty's picture

    South Park

    Reposted from yesterday's Queerview:

    Even when they don't convince me, they always show that they've really thought about the issue, not just parroted convenient politics.

    (Although I think tackling the "that's gay" issue would have been more topical than "fag.")

    The gist of the argument I got from last night, taking away the various jokes, is that A) people are going to call each other bad names, B) stopping the next generation from viewing "fag" (or, assumably, gay) as a generic insult instead of a sexuality issue is a lost cause, especially because "fag" has always been a fluid word), so C) gay people should accept the inevitability and move our efforts to emphasizing the distinction.

    It's not one of their stronger arguments.  I don't think the other usages are as separate from anti-gay sentiment as they believe, any more than telling a man to "stop acting like a bitch" is free of misogyny.  And certainly, you can't just abruptly decide that a word isn't going to have emotional sting any more.  (Although I suppose deciding that it SHOULDN'T have emotional sting is the first step in that direction.)

    I think the part of the argument that carried the most weight for me is the inevitability of the new ways the words are used.  I've been in a number of battles over word usage, sometimes liking the new word or usage, sometimes not.  But *every single time*, the new usage won out.  I suspect trying to convince the younger generation that "gay" and "fag" don't mean what every single person their age that they know uses it to mean may be a lost cause.  At least until the terms go the way of Phat and gnarly.

     

    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Nick's picture

    When I saw the episode

    When I saw the episode I was with 3 other gay guys (my best friend, hisboyfriend and one of his friends) and we all laughed at it, and we all got thehumor of the episode.  Heck we even joked about it after words, but Istill came off feeling offended by it because I feel like Stone and Parkerforgot about how the majority of people, specially kids still use the word torefer to anything that could be viewed as gay.  Even in South Park theyhave episodes in South Park where they use things like "that's gay"and stuff to each other to make fun of each other because it's still viewed asan insult for someone to be gay.  So I think for them to turn around thentry to "take back" a word that they just like to use a lot is astupid idea.  Let the word run it's own curse and see if with time theword changes with the rest of the language instead of trying to change it soyou can still use for your own fun. 

     

    It also makes me think of a funny stupid moment in my life, which kindashows the stupidity of how straight guys view the word.  I was with my college roommates (in SanFrancisco) who were throwing a party in our apartment and the courtesy patrolbroke it up.  One of my roommates getspretty up set and yells out “those fags”, but then sees me and then tried toapologize by saying, “I didn’t mean your type of fag, I meant the cock suckingkind of fag.”  The same thing withthe South Park episode I believe.

    Average (5 votes):
    see individual ratings
    BikerBoy224's picture

    When I Saw This Episode :(

    ok lemme say this i love south park but i gotta say this episode man, i wuz rele dissapointed after watching this i didnt laf once i just hated how they ripped on harleys, harleys are awsome there the best motorcycle in the world and the enthusiast are rele nice their not annoying or attention grabbing, your wrong ed. any time a harley drives by they dont think "fag" they think "man i cant wait to get one" you cant turn your head fast enough wen you hear one of those beautiful machines roaring by. this episode wuz completly wrong except Butters had every thing right Freedom and the open road is what these guys are looking for, nothing else. Harleys rule!   
    Average (3 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Dave Doty's picture

    5 Stars!

    I don't know WHAT to make of this post, especially coming from a first time poster, but it actually made me laugh out loud, which is rare for me.  I honestly can't tell if I'm laughing with or at you, but thanks for making my evening either way.
    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    GayTVluver's picture

    Parody posts are difficult to pull off...

    Rele they r.
    *****
    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    Knightgee's picture

    They Just Don't Get It

    I understand at times that the creators of South Park aren't coming from a bad place with their messages and they don't intend to be hurtful in their messages, but they often miss the mark. For instance, there was an episode where the boys were tasked with changing the flag of the town to something less offensive(it depicted a lynching of a black man). Long story short, the boys showed that they were blind to color and didn't see what was wrong with the flag and this was held up as a virtue. I was baffled as to how it's a good thing that the children are so unaware of the racial tensions in this country's history that they didn't see what was problematic about the town flag depicting the lynching of a black man. Color Blindness is just another way to ignore racial issues, not actually diffuse them or make them less harmful. The issue you aren't aware of is the issue you aren't addressing.

    Another episode derided people with addictions wo used faith as a way to recover. The obvious intent was to say that they shouldn't put their faith solely into a higher power to cure their addictions because that means they are just dependent on something else, but the message came out as "Just stop drinking. It's that easy." As someone who has a parent that has struggled with substance abuse, this seemed like an extremely shallow handling of a severe issue. I found this episode's problem similar to the above two, where they certainly have a well-intentioned message, but they seem to view the world as more evolved than it is.

    Racism and racial issues still exist, people are still called fags, sometimes prior to being assaulted and killed for being openly gay or suspected of being gay. We don't live in a society where these words are innocuous and the sentiments that typically have accompanied them are no longer relevant. The fact that the kids are too ignorant of reality to notice needs to stop being touted as a virtue. All it means is that in our world where these issues still exist(and not just because we're too sensitive about them), they won't be properly equipped to handle them, because they won't see why they're a big deal.

    This is the third time South Park has done this on a level that I personally felt offended. I'm black, I'm gay, and I have dealt with my parent's substance abuse issues and I've felt like each time South Park has tried to make a point on these issues, I've had these straight white men who probably haven't had to deal with racism, discrimination and ill-treatment based on sexuality, or any severe, life-damaging addictions, (though I don't want to presume too much, just going by what i know and has been shown) themselves, tell me how I should feel and be handling these issues. For a straight white male, their suggestions are great as they give you a way to ignore these issues that you may never personally experience in a humorous half-hour block. But as a black gay man, I would prefer South Park just stick to having Cartman trick people into eating their parents.

    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Androjai's picture

    Personally

     

     I feel it must be nice to sit up tehre where Matt and Trey sit as two straight men and decide what the proper usage or connotation of a word that has been so hurtful and demeaning for so long. It must be nice to make social satire but never actually do anything about it. There are people out there being MURDERED and beaten to death while be called a fag. Is taht the correct usage? You mean to tell me they were calling them bikers as they bashed their heads in on the ground? Was it friendly banter when the insult was hurled at the police officer trainee in the UK by a roving gang of feral tennegers as they merciless beat him nearly to death? Or how about closer to home in NYC when they kicked and punched that man on the street corner? Was it cool or fun then? No. Not funny. never has been, never will be.

     

    O Liberté, que de crimes on commet en ton nom!

    Average (3 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Dave Doty's picture

    South Park

    Androjai wrote:
    There are people out there being MURDERED and beaten to death while be called a fag. Is taht the correct usage?

    Yes, yes, that's it exactly.  The message of this show was that it's okay to murder people for being gay.  You hit the nail on the head.  

    Average (3 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Androjai's picture

    No need

     

     for sarcasm. What I am really trying to say in the simplest way possible, is that if it were not hurled at people as a preface to a beat-down it would be a different story. Real people, not 8 year old cartoon characters, determine what the meanings or connotations of words are. When someone yells faggot at me while I walk down the street I do not think they are being cool or bantering with me. Quite the opposite in fact. I am not going to stop and ask them if they thought my clothes or hair or whatever was "lame" because i already know what they mean--- and they did not speak it with any good intention whatsoever.

    O Liberté, que de crimes on commet en ton nom!

    Nanite's picture

    South Park: Always Hypocracy at it's Best

    Cartman is wrong in many previous seasons for using the word "dirty jew" to describe things he thinks are lame, but it's wrong because Matt Stone is a jew.

     

    Matt Stone and Trey Parker aren't gay, so it's OK to use the word fag negatively.

     


    Got it.

    Dave Doty's picture

    Cartman IS an anti-semite

    As he's shown on many occasions.  The vast majority of the times he uses the words "dirty Jew," he's attacking Kyle for being Jewish, or throwing around Jewish stereotypes.  And South Park regularly mocks oversensitive Jews.
    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    Campion's picture

    Oh my Gawd

    OH MY GAWD, YOU SLAMMED ED KENNEDY!

     

    YOU BASTARDS!

     

     

     

     

    Sorry, Sorry, but it just had to be done. 

    K!r!lleXXI's picture

    Your opinions are so bipolar... So, who's right? Simple facts...

    1. Faggot obviously means "a male homosexual, who should be torched in a bonfire For Our Entertainment, because we are so right, God bless us" (no offense to religious folks, take it as a sarcasm, because lots of people who agree with this definition are not that full of faith in God Almighty, but pretend they are).
    2. It is the current meaning, though gay men sometimes use it to tease each other inside their homosexual group(s), which makes it not so much derogatory.
    3. But when a straight person uses it, doesn't matter towards whom, it is still pretty offensive.
    4. What's better: redefining words or simply giving up on using them at all?
      • If you try to redefine some derogatory word, it's because you're offended by this word and want people to stop using it towards some group of people as soon as possible & it's hard to make them stop using this word, so by redefining this word you have to find another group of people to offend (bikers in South Park). Does it worth it? Should we fight insults by victimizing other people instead of us? I say, "No way!"
      • If you try to make people give up on using some derogatory word, you have to fight a lot harder, and it would probably take a lot of time (decades or even centuries), but this would be a fair victory, which won't hurt anyone else.
    5. So. The attempt, shown in South Park, to redefine the word faggot was lame and offensive (I'm not going to discuss the very usage of this word in the episode at all, I'll just analyze the idea they offered):
      • It was offensive to gay people for they were depicted as those who actually came up with the idea of redefining this word nation-wide just to throw it away from themselves, de-victimize themselves at the expense of other unpopular group of people.
      • It was offensive to bikers whose activities were depicted as childish & meaningless, and who deserved to become a new minority, hated by outsiders (though we know there is the whole philosophy behind the biker movement).
      • It was offensive to all the other people who were depicted as those who would be fine with redefining this word towards bikers, because they all oh-so-hate them on the roads.
    6. So. South Park should have dealt with people and their anger, their overwhelming need to hate someone, to offend someone with words and deeds. And that is the underlying reason of all of it. And just like doctors don't cut your left arm off when your right arm's tissue becomes necrotic, we should never transfer our problems by moving pieces around... We should deal with the underlying cause, cutting the nercotized arm off, giving up on using slur that offends people for no reason whatsoever.
    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    GayTVluver's picture

    5-stars just for your use of formatting :)

    Oh...and the fact that is was an interesting read.
     
    *****
    Average (2 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Marauder's picture

    Though I didn't see this

    Though I didn't see this episode, I think it's worth noting that "queer" used to be considered hugely offensive until it was "reclaimed" by the gay community and put at the "it's okay when WE say it" status. Having been a teenager when "Queer As Folk" and "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" became popular, sometimes I forget that "queer" was ever taboo. I wouldn't call someone a queer because I don't even think of it as something you'd call someone. Yeah, if someone yells "You're a queer!" it's insulting, but only because they're using it to be insulting.

    "Lame" used to be about disabled people, "dumb" used to be about mute people, and "moron" used to be about moderately retarded people. (I believe "idiots" were the more severely retarded ones.) Then people started using them in ways that weren't meant as insulting to certain groups and nowadays I think most people would say "that movie was really lame" in front of somebody in a wheelchair and not think twice about it. Some Christians used to be offended by people saying "geez" because it probably started as an abbreviation for "Jesus" when used as an exclamation ("geez, what a jerk!"). I used to run across them on a semi-regular basis, but I haven't in years. Saying something "sucks" used to be considered way more offensive too.

    Average (3 votes):
    see individual ratings
    Knightgee's picture

    This is True

    But those words were re-appropriated over time, and usually because they were either taken back by those groups or just fell out of common usage in that way. The N word is still somewhat taboo despite being in the American vernacular for a VERY long time. The word fag is still associated with gays negatively, it's still a slur commonly used to assault them verbally and even has been used in situations where it was then followed by some form of physical violence. The word has not reached the point where it's innocuous and gays are just being overly sensitive by getting uppity about it.

    Furthermore, in previous episodes of South Park, the boys have called each other gay in a clearly derogatory manner and Cartman even spent an episode trying to prevent a photo from leaking because it made him look gay. This episode wants us to believe the boys are simply too young to understand why it's offensive to gays, but that requires us to pretend that they have somehow grown up in a world where being gay is clearly something they find to be gross or negative but they somehow haven't made the connection between gay and fag, which is ludicrous. This episode would have made a stronger point if the creators hadn't spent 13 seasons having the boys spout out gay and fag as insults against each other with the meaning very clear in their usage.

    I think the creators just wanted to have their cake and eat it too, by being able to freely throw around words like fag because it so easily fits with their adolescent toilet humor, but at the same time not feel as if they're contributing to a bigger social problem by pretending that the word doesn't mean what we all know it does and has meant and still will mean even after this episode airs. It helps them, not us.

    Mischa's picture

    Stooooooooooooooooooooop

    Any word can be offensive..............or not.

    The only thing is who use it, in witch circumstances, with witch tone etc...

    Often Homo or Homosexual can be more offensive than fag or faggot,

    I remember in France when I was younger some people use:"comme ça" (like this)

    for me it was one hundred worse than "péde" ou"tapette" (fag, queer...)

    I'm not a f*g, a qu**r, une tap**te, un p*dé, un ma**con...

    I'm a fag, a queer, une tapette, un pédé, un maricon... and I'm ok with it without st*rs.
    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    Intheye's picture

    My Pants!

    Are almost soiled after seeing this episode!

    "Everyone realizes that people who are so needy for attention, they need to dress up and be as loud as possible, are you guys and 16 year old girls! Just want to let you know, You're F%$*ing Fags!"

    Priceless! 

    afhickman's picture

    Lady Gag(a) Reflex

    I wanted to watch this episode, so I went to a site that purported to have it and ended up watching the South Park kids sing "Poker Face" instead.  It was pretty hiliarious, but it reminded me of a sad truth: no matter how funny I find a cartoon, I just can't take it seriously.  Whatever the South Park kids have to say about the "F" word, I refuse to be offended.  There are enough real world problems to engage my anger.  If Cartman and the guys want to milk laughs out of my life, I say, more power to the animators!  Meanwhile, I'm too busy following Dean Winchester's man-crush on Dr. Sexy to care. 

    "The mountain has wings."

    Loving Every Minute's picture

    I can't help but feel that

    I can't help but feel that that the title of the article includes the phrase "call everyone over 20 lame" rather illustrates the major point to consider here - people understand that when kids call something lame, they mean rubbish, they don't mean disabled. Lame is far more accepted currently than "retard" which I have seen people be shocked over, but the same thing is happening there. Casual use of a word in a new context leads to different use. Its not really a good thing or a bad thing, its just the way language evolves and changes.

    And, I find it strange how possessive the lgbt community are over the words faggot and fag. Words change; if this one is so offensive, why not change it so that it isn't? I dunno, I was brought up in a society where fags are cigarrettes and faggots are small wooden things you build fires from, so the determinism of some that they always will allow themselves to be offended by it is somewhat baffling.

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    r_m_s's picture

    Two Things

    First of all, I don't think it's fair to decry South Park as homophobic. I can't access that site (college network managers are bastards when it comes to filtered sites) so I can't watch the episode in question, but South Park has always treated homophobia (like racism or any other kind of bigotry) as being wrong. That said, they've frequently lampooned the tendency of minority groups to over-react and take offense where offense isn't intended, and the idiocy of being too PC. (A good example is "The Death Camp of Tolerance", mentioned upthread)  I'll be in a better position to judge after I've seen the episode, but I don't think it's unfair to attempt to separate the word "fag" meant in a derogatory context from the word "fag" as an anti-gay epithet. How many people on this thread have ever used the word "bastard" without giving due consideration to the hurt and stigma you put upon the children of unmarried parents when you do so? How many people read my use of the word "bastards" in the second sentence of this post and thought "man, now there's a guy who hates kids born out of marriage!"? My guess is "lots" and "none", respectively. And why is that? Because the meaning of the word "bastard" has evolved, so while it can still be used as a specific insult for kids born out of wedlock (and should be duly decried when used in that context), its use no longer automatically means that the user hates or is trying to hurt those kids. 

    Secondly, I'd like to start a great big slow clap for users like Nanite for demonstrating once again why the ratings system is utterly flawed. I like the idea of having a way to mark when you completely agree with posts because they're eloquent or well-written, but going through a thread and giving automatic "0"s to posts that express a viewpoint contrary to your own irrespective of how well or badly the point is made is just childish, and really doesn't make your side of the argument any more convincing. 

    *Sits back and waits for the "0" votes to start rolling in*

    Average (1 vote):
    see individual ratings
    erimir's picture

    You bastard

    The reason why bastard is not very offensive anymore is not simply that the meaning has changed - it's that there's little stigma attached to being born out of wedlock. Do I think that someone who says that really despises children who were born out of wedlock? No, because I quite simply don't know anyone who does. The offensive and oppressive connotations of the word went away when (I would suggest because) the oppressive context went away. There are no legal rights you lose as a bastard and most people don't know if you are one, and don't particularly care. And if I heard someone who was seriously prejudiced against them it would read more as "quaint" than upsetting, precisely because there's no power behind that bigotry.

    And yes, rich straight men telling us how to feel about the word is kinda offensive. It's the opposite of the message that Stan gets at the end of "The Nigger Guy" episode - that white people can't understand how a black person feels when they hear that word, and they can't use it casually. Meanwhile, the message of this episode is that "fag" isn't offensive to gays because they don't mean literally homosexual, and so it's not connected to them, and we can ignore the feelings of gays towards the word because they're simply fighting the inevitable changing meaning of words. They don't even need to consider whether as straight people, they can understand how gay people feel when they hear the word "faggot" or whether it has a visceral emotional impact that isn't necessarily mitigated by the intentions of the speaker. Blacks can be offended by "nigger" and they can understand that, but it's silly for gays to be offended by "faggot."

    The main issue of this episode was that Parker and Stone like to say "faggot" (it is, after all, "just too much fun to say!") and they felt a need to make a preachy episode about it to justify it. But they clearly missed the irony of having characters who have often used gay as an insult explain that being a fag isn't about being gay. And they totally ignored that derogatory usage of "gay" as if "fag" is an isolated usage.

    It's like that guy earlier in the thread was saying: "When I said fag, I didn't mean you guys, I just meant like, you know, he was being really gay. Uhhh, okay, I didn't mean that he was gay like you guys, I just meant like, you know, he was you know, an annoying cocksucker. OH, I didn't mean he sucks cock like you guys, I meant that he was acting like a total homo. Well, not a homo as in homosexual, but..." Yeah, I'll believe there's no connection between "fag" and being homosexual when "fag" and other terms and slurs for gays aren't essentially interchangeable as insults.

    Bikersarefags's picture

    WTF?

    This episode once and for all clarifies something that has been going on for the last decade. Fag has morphed to mean someone who is a total AHole who doesn't get it and never will. I have several friends who are under 25 and NONE of them mean it as a homosexual slur. Besides it's about time bikers were called out on their obvious attention whore issues. If everyone took their muffler of their car today imagine how F'ed up our world would be like. Bikers "claim" it's for safety but if you really question them they admit it's for attention. Mucho FAGS!!
    dudntmatta's picture

    really?

    quit gettin butt hurt over the episode its a great wake up call 4 society I think