If sci-fi is a metaphor for society, then where are the gays?
So. In a column titled The "The New Sci-Fi", the Guardian's Gareth McLean looks at the current crop of politically aware science fiction and fantasy on TV, with a long look at Battlestar Galatcia, Doctor Who, Lost and Heroes. As McLean notes, our current crop of sci-fi isn't about the marvels of technology, but about finding allegorical ways to talk about who we are now: This is science fiction for the 21st century. What's more, it's sci-fi about the 21st century. Fans of the genre have long known that quality sci-fi and its sister genre fantasy hold up a mirror to the times in which they were created, but never before have the TV shows involved seemed so resonant or indeed so influential. Science fiction has never been more now, fantasy never more real. That got me thinking how strange it is that there has been so little gay content in these "new sci-fi" shows. On Battlestar Galactica, we saw gender roles subverted from the very beginning with characters like Kara "Starbuck" Thrace and President Laura Roslyn. However, it wasn't until after a mini-series and three seasons aired before the show had any queer characters -- and in this case, we're looking into the past to see this relationship, as both characters are dead in the series' present.
Science fiction is a genre that can really grab the attention of gay fans. A common theme to sci-fi is characters who are separated from their families by circumstances and form a family with those who share their struggle, a theme that resonates with LGBT audiences. That dynamic can be found in outcasts from society like The X-Men, the Doctor's companion or the last survivors of humanity seeking earth. While science fiction has matured in recent time and has done a better job talking with its audience about who we are as a society, LGBT people don't seem to be a full part of that dialog. Any sci-fi fans out there care to weigh in? Submitted by on Mon, 2007-07-02 11:42. |
User login![]() Recent comments
Recent blog posts
New forum topics |





Later in the article, McLean calls Lost's multi-ethnic cast a "metaphor-for-America" which might be an apt way to see the drama, except the metaphor apparently lacks any LGBT representatives. While Doctor Who may have given us the omni-sexual Jack Harkness, they decided not to follow through 
BG en Dr Who
I've only recently discovered Battlestar Galactica (nearly at the end of season 2 now) and I keep shouting at lt Gaeta to come out already! The man hardly does anything, but he screams "gay" to me. Surely it would take little effort to have anyone, even a minor character, comment about missing their boy/girlfriend who's dead on whatever planet. There. You don't even have to include a real relationship.
As for Dr Who, (SPOILERS for season 2)
The gay character was in a parallel universe, in love with Ricky, *that* universe's version of Rose's on/off-boyfriend Mickey. Ricky then dies and I think Mickey decides to stay behind in that universe. The hints were very, very clear, but I think they might have judged it too confusing to suddenly have Mickey -who always pined after Rose like a lovesick puppy- lock lips with another guy.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree about Rickey...
When I saw it I didn't pick up on the relationship at all until I read about it in recaps of that episode. I found that pretty disappointing because there'd be a lot of tension to the end of that episode if we knew about Ricky's relationship since both men were dealing with the end of a relationship (even if Mickey had time to slowly realize it was over).
In one report I read said there were only a few lines that made the relationship clear, which makes it even more frustrating to me because it didn't add a lot of complication to making the scene but it would have added a lot of complexity with very few words.
It was just one 30 second
It was just one 30 second scene at the end (and was indeed filmed, and is on the s2 boxset). here it is on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3MzNvT5q6E
I have slash-dar. I see gay
I have slash-dar. I see gay relationships even if they're not necessarily there, so :-)
Gay Friendly Without Gay Characters?
Because a lot of sci fi like Star Trek, Stargate, Battlestar Galactica etc. don't have quite the numbers that some of them do (like Lost and Heroes), they may be worried about alienating what audience they have. That of course does not explain Lost and Heroes (although the latter is adding a lesbian cheerleader next season).
But I have always found it interesting that despite this lack of gay characters in sci fi, it is in this genre that "slash" fiction (for the unaware, fanfiction depicting straight characters as gay or in gay relationships), is the most popular. I have found that science fiction fans seem to be very gay-friendly. The most interesting aspect of this is that a lot of science fiction shows actually play up the implicatory side of the relationships seemingly in order to fuel this kind of speculation. For example, on Stargate Atlantis, one of the most popular slash couples was told to "just make out already and get it over with". The show seems gay friendly at other times, such as when the main male protagonist asked another character if he had anyone special. When the second man asked "you mean like a woman?", the first man said "or a man..." They seem willing to throw in implication and acknowledgement of gay relationships, but there have still been no (out) gay characters. It is a phenomenon that occurs a lot more in sci fi than in other genres. Any opinions as to why this is?
Not yet...
I haven't watched Dr.Who or the new Battlestar, but I'm an avid fantasy/ sci-fi fan and still feel that in a broad general sense that the genres have grown more sympathetic to GLBT audiences, but has yet to be "out and proud".
Thinking back... I can only come up with a few characters that I know specifically in sci-fi and fantasy that had LGBT relationships, but they are all women.
I know that Xena flirted with a lesbian relationship for a while (with her traveling companion, Gabrielle), but don't know all my facts. I think that they were more "soul mates" and therefore had some "higher level" of love for one another. I don't think the show ever suggested or showed the two in a mature, sexual relationship. I think of her more as a bi-sexual character... and I think at the end of the series she was killed? OUCH! She ended up sacrificing herself to "save the world"! (but with the suggestion that this is only one of many lives her spirit will live out.) I suppose that's not too bad?
One of my favorite sci-fi caracters, Susan Ivanova (played by the lovely and talanted Claudia Christian) on the 90's TV show Babylon 5 was shown having a lesbian lover, Talia Winters (although this is open to some debate as it's not explicitly stated anywhere). Ivanova also had relationships with men, but regardless if it was with a man or with a woman, every one of them ended terribly.
I don't know of any current fiction, but I do know that there was a character named Lieutenant Hawk who had a boyfriend named Ranul Keru in the Star Trek novel titled, Section 31: Rogue (1996) ,written with by Andy Mangels and Michael A. Martin. As for GLBT characters on the Star Trek TV show or in movies... again, not sure, but I do know there was a character on Deep Space Nine named Jadzia Dax. Jadzia was a TRILL, a race that was essentially comprised of a current host body inhabited by the personalities of all past hosts... both male and female. So there was a huge deal made when Jadzia met an old flame from her previous host body and made out with another female. But that was all I remember and I think it ended after that episode because it was forbidden in Trill society to re-establish past host relationships. **Humph!**
Let's hope that in the near future as the genre continues to grow, that movies and television get the guts to have a full-on, mature, lasting. and well written fantasy or Sci-Fi character(s)!!
The main thing about the Dax
Yeah.... but
I never bought the Trill as a metaphor
To defend Doctor Who here...
They were in a parallel universe which was very heavy on storyline. The parallel universe Mickey's relationship with another man would have been only a throwaway line, and since Russell T. Davies felt the relationship was not being given enough respect, he junked it.
In the third season, there was a very clear reference to an elderly lesbian couple (this was in the "Gridlock") episode, and both his shows are generally heavy with gay characters or bisexual interaction.
I have no idea why this was put in a category with a show like "Lost", which runs far and away from gays, or BS(G), where the overrated hack who writes that show says he has no room for gays, but has no problem with ugly Baltar having 3ways with two women.
Sci-fi is run by nerdy, repressed straight men, and most of the viewers are the same demographic. Many of them hate gays just as much as James Dobson does.
yeah, Doctor Who has done a
yeah, Doctor Who has done a pretty good job of featuring people of all sexualities. It's spinoff Torchwood should also be mentioned, given that every main character (with one exception) is bisexual, and this features on screen with plenty of man/man & woman/woman action shown and implied.
And on a much more tongue in cheek note, Doctor Who will get a bit more gay this christmas when Kylie joins the show for the xmas special
http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/news/cult/news/drwho/2007/07/02/46771.shtml
On Who
Actually, Dr Who has been criticised in some quarters for being too queer-friendly. It's certainly camp at times but current producer feels it should be a show for kids, so I guess that makes sense.
*SPOILERS*
-
-
-
-
As well as the elderly lesbian couple in "Gridlock" that Jon pointed out, the guest hero for "The Idiot's Lantern", an unassuming adolescent boy was portrayed as queer whereas one of the indicators that his father was a villain was that he was portrayed as homophobic.
Also, in the recent "Human Nature/Family of Blood" episodes, which were set in a 1913 English boarding school, relationships between some of the students could have been read as queer by modern audiences (though not necessarily in the context of the era the episode was set in)
And of course, The Doctor himself has kissed Jack in "The Parting of the Ways" (albeit non-romantically) and also commented that, in the future, sexuality will be considered pretty fluid (in the "The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances" episodes)
And, as Jakob points out, spin-off Torchwood is rife with same-sex attraction and activity. Notably, the early season suggestions of a romance between Jack and Gwen got seemingly waylaid into a Jack/Ianto pairing - which was admittedly incredibly clumsily handled (as a mere four episodes prior Ianto was hating Jack).
Rumour has it that the Doctor's new companion for Series Four may be a male - which will inevitably give rise to lots of slash. Personally, I doubt it - but you never know...
-
-
-
*END SPOILERS*
Dr Who needs a man!
*SPOILERS*
-
-
-
-
I dont know if this needs spoilers or not, but best to play it safe! I think that the doctor needs a male assistant just to break from tradition. He did have a semi male assistant in season 1, but unfortunatly he got an evil clappy thing in his head.
I just hope that by giving him a male assistant they don't get to male heavy and just have them blowing things up all the time (the women tend to keep him grounded and definately make him tap into his emotions!)
I read somewhere that Martha is going to join torwood for three episodes later on in season 2 and I hope that they really give her the room to grown because I always felt that she was a little bit shadowed on Dr Who by Rose's shadow *even the master mentions that she doesn't live upto roses memory as an assistant*
-
-
-
end spoilers
But as a gay guy who loves sci-fi and fantasy I think that Jon is right, most of it's written by str8 nerds who don't quite know what to do with gay characters or storylines, the only exception I can think of being Joss Whedon who gave us Willow and Tara, which was great but theres always been the speculation that Angel and Spike had a thing together. (Would LOVED to have seen that in a flashback episode) which just falls back on the steriotype that when it comes to nerds lesbians are ok, but gays are just a touch too scary to do more than hint at.
James
xxx
SPOILERSNo male assistent
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S
No male assistent next year (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6267680.stm).
I agree, I'd love to see a male companion, but I think it might be a bit too much of a boy's club then. (and the innuendo would be through the roof, not that I mind really)
Joss did say in an interview or a commentary track that Spike and Angel did have a thing back in the day. Unfortunately, as you say, he did nothing with it on screen. There was the rather nice moment in Season 5? 6? where someone asks "who here hasn't slept with each other" and you see a very embarrassed looking Spike and Xander glancing at each other.
(Dear god, how sad am I to remember that...)
devil you beat me to it!! I
James
(note how my spoilerspace
Now I find that funny...
I probably would be annoyed at being spoiled but I've already been spoiled by a friend's LiveJournal entry... he put his comments about the season finale behind a cut but my feed reader ignored that and gave me the entire post.
Same problem different tech. :P
Someday, I'll get to watch a season of Doctor Who with my partner without having to spend three months biting my tongue because I know where the season's heading.