ATWT's Luke and Noah capture the Internet zeitgest
Now here's a story that became a little happier the more I looked into it. Thanks to a tip on our forums, I learned that a YouTube clip of the kiss between Luke and Noah from Friday's As the World Turns was flagged as inappropriate. When a clip is flagged, it is restricted to registered YouTube users who give their birth date to verify that they are 18 or older. My interest was further raised when I read on a message board that "Nuke" fans were re-uploading the clip on their accounts, leaving new versions that would have to be flagged all over again making it so that anyone searching the site for a clip of Luke and Noah's first kiss would certainly be able to find it without having to register to the site to get past the flag. The double-standard of what counts as "inappropriate" on YouTube isn't a new discovery. In January, AfterEllen wrote about how mild depictions of lesbian affection tends to get flagged on YouTube while similar scenes of heterosexual love get left alone. Meanwhile, in May, we noted a a clip with a particularly hateful anti-gay message that had gone unflagged for six months. While the earliest clip to feature Luke and Noah's kiss remains flagged (meaning a user felt it was inappropriate and called the site's attention to it), you can find ten more clips that are currently unflagged. So far, only one duplicates the clip that was originally flagged, meaning that several different users went through the effort of converting the scene into a digital format and uploading it to be shared. However, the flagged video remains the most popular one, having over two hundred thousand views (as of this moment, at least). I have to admit, I came into this story feeling a little cynical but seeing so much fan support for Luke and Noah, as well as a good amount of interest, has made me feel a little less negative. It's important to remember that YouTube is for the most part user-driven, and while that leads to most of its problems (the uploading of copyrighted content like this, hateful messages) it also represents an upside: our voice in these matters does not go unheard. So check out the clips, add more, and add positive comments 'til your fingers bleed. Because you know the haters are doing the same. Submitted by on Mon, 2007-08-20 12:34. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|








don't understand?
I don't understand how it can be considered "inappropriate" when it was orriginally shown on television? yes? If anyone under 18 can see it there why not in reprise? Or am I not understanding something?
about understanding...
It's determined by users
To put it another way, it was probably flagged by the kind of person who'd complain to the FCC about the episode if they could do so with just one click.
thank you!
thank you,
But i still don't understand then how a video with a homophobic message can stay unflaged for six months (as in the article) while these other flagged so very fast
Det är inte svensk tv
Tack
jag vet, men svårt att följa!
(hard to follow the logic in flagging something as offensive, but not others)
That's where you were mistaken..
Twilight Zone Time
This is really a bizarre situation. Cyberspace is more restrictive then daytime TV (maybe they think kids don't watch Soap Operas only the internet). As for your question about how far acceptance of gays has come? Two steps forward, 1 step sideways, and 1 1/2 steps backwards! At the rate we are going I will have to live to an age only seen in the Old Testament to feel totally accepted.
no rhyme or reason.
there's no rhyme and reason to YouTube's flagging and TECHNICALLY it could have been anyone from ANYWHERE in the world who disapproved of the content. funny enough, if you EMBED the video in your blog, it can just be played back as normal.
--
"Why are you such an unpleasant person?" - "Why do you care?"