How can a Vice-Presidential candidate with a gay-unfriendly history look like so many gay faves?
Ever since John McCain announced his V-P pick of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, a fair share of the talk of the candidate has focused on her looks. That's not entirely surprising, with so little political history being runner-up for Miss Alaska stands out. However, it's also been hard not to discuss Palin's appearance because she resembles various TV stars. The first comparison I heard brought up Lynda Carter playing Wonder Woman's secret identity, Diana Prince. I can see where that's coming from, it's not just the glasses and the bun, they both have that 'Shh, can't you tell I'm hiding my looks behind a stylish version of things that are supposed to make me look un-stylish?' dynamic going on.
The next comparison I heard was Tina Fey. Which, I must admit, has me wondering if Lorne Michaels spent the weekend begging Fey to appear on the politically-focused Thursday night edition of Saturday Night Live.
And then I heard someone else make a comparison to Will & Grace scene stealer Megan Mullally.
One more comparison came to mind this morning when I first saw a picture from Palin's college days, one that immediately made me think of Amanda Bearse from the early days of Married... with Children.
Of course, all this is more than a little bit ironic since that's a list full of gay icons, including two queer women, and what from we can gather of Palin's short history, she isn't a friend to the gays. In 1998, she supported amending the State Constitution to ban same-sex marriage and still opposed equal rights for gay couples when the State Supreme Court ruled that the state couldn't deny benefits to same sex couples. In December of 2006, she vetoed a bill that would have tried to stop same-sex couples from receiving state benefits but only because of constitutional concerns. Despite her veto, she made it clear that she still opposed equal benefits for same-sex couples but felt forced by those constitutional concerns to veto the bill. (Don't look for the Associated Press or right wing pundits like Glenn Beck and Debra Saunders to cover the story accurately, though as they overlooked Palin's statements of opposition and used Palin's veto to claim she supports equal benefits for state employees and is therefore a moderate maverick who'll oppose the extreme wing of her party.) Sigh. I foresee my forehead smacking into my desk quite often in the next couple months. I'm going to be depending on seeing Tina Fey mine this election for all its satire-worth notes. Submitted by on Tue, 2008-09-02 13:58. Two gay women?Submitted by
Lee (568 points) (130 posts) on Tue, 2008-09-02 15:28.
Of course, all this is more than a little bit ironic since that's a list full of gay icons, including two queer women,
I know Amanda Bearse is gay, who is the second one?
Don't forget Lily TomlinSubmitted by
David Ehrenstein (6310 points) (1402 posts) on Tue, 2008-09-02 15:53.who turned 69 yesterday.
Or brainy Andrea Zuckerman on...Submitted by
boyd (386 points) (94 posts) on Tue, 2008-09-02 16:28.90210 (the original series, yo). Gabrielle Carteris better be watching her back -- and Brandon Walsh/Jason Priestley's. There's a new "bookish" babe pretending to a be a fun-loving teen in town! Square GOPsSubmitted by
YankeeMate (45 points) (13 posts) on Tue, 2008-09-02 21:30.Yeah, I can definitely see the Tina Fey resemblence physically but Sarah's personality reminds me the most of Muffy B. Tepperman.
I bow to any "Square Pegs"Submitted by
Knickie (3315 points) (675 posts) on Wed, 2008-09-03 00:47.I bow to any "Square Pegs" references!
you said 2 queer women but iSubmitted by
geekluve (105 points) (22 posts) on Sun, 2008-09-07 17:36.you said 2 queer women but i only know of amanda bearse being a lesbian as far as i know everyone else is straight.
|
User login![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|



















Fright Night
Ironically...
Palin is more qualified to be president than Barack "Community Organizer" O'bama ;)
Not that I would EVER vote Republican. I think that we shot ourselves in the foot by not nominating Hilliary Clinton. Hilliary would have annihilated McCain. With O'bama and O'biden, there's a 50/50 chance that we'll lose the Presidency.
<insert Hilliary laugh here>
There's a 60/40 chance you're losing you marbles
I predict a LANDSLIDE for Obama. BabyMommaGate is the least of Palin's problems. She's got two ongoing investigations of her past conduct. She had a local librarian fired for refusing to take Darwin off the bookshlves. She and her equally noxious hubster belong to a group that wants Alaska to secede from the U.S. And that's just for openers.
Lorne Michaels should hire Tina Fey for the next SNL, put her up at the top of the show with "Sarah Palin" supered undernath her face and there would be twenty solid minutes of hysterical laughter without Fey even having to open her mouth.
Better still he could hire Megan Mullahly as well for "Duelling Sarahs."
You don't seriously belive this, do you?
Read my books! Explore "Brent's Brain" at http://www.brenthartinger.com Average (5 votes):
Something's not right...
I think there is something amiss with her as the VP choice, and by that I mean something underhanded. Can she hand ANWR to Big Oil on a platter? Is that why she was chosen? It's such an odd choice that does nothing for McCain, but I wonder if that even matters. The Republicans have stolen the last two elections. Maybe they already have this one in the bag, and they know it makes no difference who the VP is.
It just smells fishy to me.
Be careful of a 'fishy smell' reference...
I think there is something amiss with her as the VP choice, and by that I mean something underhanded. Can she hand ANWR to Big Oil on a platter? Is that why she was chosen? It's such an odd choice that does nothing for McCain, but I wonder if that even matters. The Republicans have stolen the last two elections. Maybe they already have this one in the bag, and they know it makes no difference who the VP is.
It just smells fishy to me.
<DOH!!>
...but I agree with you on all of your points as well as what Brent points out regarding her very meager credentials.
Brent also (very scarily) makes an indirect reference to her as "president of the U.S." That would be the result should anything serious befall a (currently) 71-year-old man with a recurrent history of skin cancer - should he be elected...
Something is definately not right. We should all be very afraid.
__________________________________________
-Sibelius
"It's curtains for you, Dr. Horrible. Lacy, wafting curtains..."
By making comments like
By making comments like this, you may as well vote republican. She has a pregnant daughter, most likely because she's an abstinence only idiot who failed to properly educate her child about sex, but we're not supposed to mention that because it's sexist. She's "wholeheartedly" adopted the Republican platform, despite the fact that she's a supporter of an Alaskan separatist group, but we're not supposed to mention that because it's, um, sexist maybe? She's "built" her career on fighting against big government corruption, but it may well be(and probably is) the case that she used her own position of authority to fire a man who didn't bend to her will. Would mentioning that be sexist? I'm not sure. Then there's the potential of the affair. I may have chalked this up to blatant sexism, but the man with whom she was accused of having an affair, ran to the courts to have his divorce proceedings sealed on the very day the Enquirer was set to run the article detailing the affair. I won't even get into the discussion of the new baby, whose conception is frighteningly close to the cuckolder's divorce finalization.
Yep, I'd say Palin is a much better option than Barack.
This country is no more racist than it is sexist. Hillary would have been facing the same struggles. And I don't think that this pathetic boy's club of America would have let a woman take over the reigns.