The Top Story: LGBT groups and Obama drift apart
LGBT groups have been growing increasingly frustrated with how President Obama has handled his campaign promises to them. That frustration peaked when the Department of Justice defended the Defense of Marriage Act with language that came too close to homophobic arguments against gay marriage for many, leading to prominent withdrawals from a gay fundraiser. In a move that was characterized as an olive branch to his frustrated gay supporters, Obama signed a presidential memo yesterday granting some rights to the partners of Federal employees. Overall, this was a complicated story and easily misunderstood, especially for those who haven't paid attention to the small steps that got us here. So yesterday I filled the DVR with news shows to get an idea of how the story was being handled. I'm not surprised that a lot of the TV news ignored the story, but there were a few noteworthy moments. The Ed Show Honestly, I've felt pretty mixed about Ed Schultz's new show. His working class liberal perspective should be a solid addition to the MSNBC lineup, but that point of view disappears when he talks with a guest. Shultz discussed the issue with Mike Rogers of BlogActive and Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council separately and while he asked some interesting questions to Rogers (like asking what alternatives gays had at the ballot box), he didn't challenge Perkins' attempt to present a kinder face to his anti-gay views. Perkins tried to frame the issue as being unfair to unmarried straight couples and I would have liked to see Perkins, at least, reconcile that argument with how impulsive straight couples who've just met are able to get rights denied to gay couples who have been together for years. Fox News Okay, I watched Fox News so you don't have to... or, at least, I skimmed as much of Fox News as I could take in order to try to figure out how they were covering this story. (Does Glenn Beck always yell when he's reading viewer e-mails?) Good news everybody, they mostly ignored the issue, which means I was spared any gleeful coverage of internal discord among Obama's supporters that I was expecting. So cheers to Fox ignoring a story that, based on its history, it probably would have mishandled. Countdown with Keith Olbermann Keith Olbermann opened his show with some harsh criticism of all the shortcomings of Obama's presidential memo, naming the rights not being extended to employees and the fact that gay military members wouldn't dare to try to enjoy these benefits. The HRC's Joe Solomonese provided the moderating voice to Olbermann's irate Mr. Darcy. Keith then took a calmer tone when discussing the politics with Richard Wolffe, who nicely presented the complexities of the issue. I liked Wolffe's point that this very well might not be about the fundraiser but the protest pulling on the administration's conscious. Anderson Cooper 360 You've already seen the clip, but I wanted to comment on how much I like the way Dustin Lance Black reframed the issue as not a political football but as a human issue. He certainly learned from the life of Harvey Milk about focusing on the people affected by these policies. By talking how the message of these policies tell LGBT people that they're deserving of less than other people, he undermines the idea that this story is merely a matter of keeping a "special interest group" satisfied. MSNBC I was easily most impressed by MSNBC's daytime coverage of the story. MSNBC sometimes frustrates me for its inflexibility and abuse of the "breaking news" banner, but yesterday the network gave gays solid coverage. Though the day a wide variety of gay advocates were given a chance to articulate the issue -- including Lambda Legal's Leslie Gabel-Bret, Mike Rogers and Lara Schwartz of the HRC -- which managed to convey the internal debate among gay rights groups. The best coverage probably came at a roundtable discussion between the Washington Post's Jonathan Capehart, Michelangelo Signorile (who managed to create a "Oh no he didn't moment" when he called Rahm Emmanuel a "dinosaur" on gay issues) and Katrina vanden Heuvel. It was a refreshing change to not to see the panel's two gays "balanced" by an anti-gay advocate and the debate focused on the conflicted feelings felt within the gay community, instead of discussing if gays deserved any rights. Here's Mike Rogers' appearance from earlier in the day. Those were my noteworthy moments, but for all the news shows I watched, there was plenty I missed. Was there other noteworthy coverage? Submitted by on Thu, 2009-06-18 17:31. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|








Baby steps..ok maybe a crawl
Good!
Maybe now the Democrats will get the message! In a capitalist world, money is the only thing that matters to a party with no humanity! Hopefully, pulling funding will send a strong message to the Democrats!
They better change (for the better)!
As for the media, American news shows on tv are way too sensationalized and graphic-y for my taste (not everyone has a 5 second attention span you know)! I prefer more facts, more investigative reporting (if you just take the word of PR people then you have failed as a creditable reporter) and much less show-business when it comes to news stories please!...umm...Maybe I want too far! Sorry for my rant!
ah, dammit...
my computer volume thing has disappeared and now i have no volume at all. thats just great. UGGGH
since i cant hear those clips, i need to know one thing.....ok, i saw AC360 and i don't remember them talking about the incest thing...i feel like that is why so many of us got upset at DOJ defending it....saying our relationships were in that category....
did anyone mention that? not everyone is gonna read the lines in DOMA for whatever reason, so i do get upset when i feel like the media says "oh, gays are mad at DOMA" and they pretty much stop there. yes, we want marriage rights and all, but from what i've seen, the incest thing is what had everyone mad as hell.
i'll keep saying it, but me wanting to be married to someone of the same sex is not equivalent to incest. unless i marry my sister, fine...but i'm pretty sure i'm not going to.
Do lesbians not count? ;-)
Maddow counts.
The thing that struck my husband and I, watching this story unfold as a straight couple, was not of an uncoordinated gay community but an uncoordinated Obama Administration. It's early June, they should have their team on-message by now. And if that message isn't entirely pro-gay marriage, it's supposed to be a lot less hostile than this nonsense. The scary thing for my family is this: if they're screwing up on the big, obviously newsworthy issues like this one, what other screw-ups are slipping under the radar? That's frightening to consider.
We're the only group Obama seems so disorganized about
Bowing to the threat from the Latino community that they would either vote Republican (unlikely) or simply not vote at all Obama has made sure to reach out prominently to them. Most notably with multiple Cabinet appointments and a Supreme Court nomination.
Of course, Latino groups, far less prone to being happy with table scraps, have been very sure to make their wishes very clearly known to Obama.
In our case Obama seems very far from having his act together. If, as he claims, his goal is the repeal of DADT and DOMA then why hasn't he been pushing harder to get it onto Congress's agenda? God knows he has time for countless other legislative initiatives it seems.
However, the media response is a very useful tool. There are two major weapons that Obama and the Democrats are vulnerable to:
1) Money. Even as the party in power they need donations. Threatening their fundraising is a great way to get some attention. If some actual dollar signs can be associated with their neglect then they have some more incentive to take use seriously.
2) Obama's public image. Taking the shine off of his messianic persona and making him look like just another cynical, manipulative, lying politician is all around bad for him. He was elected on a wave of mystique surrounding his supposed reformist zeal. Reducing him to a common two-faced politician hurts him immensely. So he needs to understand that we can, as a community, act with spite and deconstruct his public image and threaten his 2012 campaign.
The Latinos have been smart and playing hardball. We've been playing softball. They're doing a lot better than we are. Lessons should be learned.
There are *far* more latinos than gays
I saw Anderson Cooper and
I saw Anderson Cooper and Rachel Maddow's coverage. Ummm, yeah so it was informative. She's more opinationated and he kinda suggests arguments which aren't so nice but probably as a devil's advocate to make his show more respected.. plus I guess it is good to coutner the arguments. theirs shows are pretty different, I like them both
________________________________
"there's always time for a burrow..."
"We're getting fired, fired, fired, firedddd"
*** meep meep! ***
The "Mainstream" media doesn't understand our issues
and doesn't want to.
Spradically competent cable coverage, almost always framed in the "two sides" format when there is only one side.
The bottom line: Anderson Cooper is still not out.
No big loss