Confusion Over Whether Chris Colfer is Gay or Not
Last October, The Advocate posted an interview with Chris Colfer in which they said Colfer was gay and out. This was the email they sent to me and presumably other media outlets: This is Chris Colfer's first interview with the gay press. He's gay, talks about how he couldn't come out in high school because people in his town get killed for that. Really smart, fun interview. It wasn't actually Chris' first interview with the gay press (we had already briefly chatted with him) but the interview included the following exchange:
Personally, my next question would've been to clarify that Colfer was indeed saying he was gay, but Goldberg and The Advocate seemed certain enough of what Chris was saying that they not only ran the interview that way, but pitched it as Chris talking about being gay. Maybe. Maybe not. Today USA Today has an interview up with the following passage:
This prompted a number of blogs to wonder if Colfer was now back in the closet and even The Advocate posted a follow-up. They also cite an interview Colfer gave to Access Hollywood a while ago where he seems to be comparing his own coming out to that of Kurt's on Glee. So is Colfer in or out? Gay or straight? I don't know and I don't intend to ask. As I recently explained in my column on outing, I don't ask actors under age twenty one about their sexuality because putting that much pressure on someone so young — someone who might very well not have yet dealt with their sexuality — is out-of-bounds for me. That's why I didn't ask Chris when I chatted with him at the TCA, and the only reason I'm writing about it here is because we previously reported he was out due to The Advocate's interview. If Chris is in fact gay, I'm sure he'll let us know when he's ready. And if I talk to him after he turns twenty-one, I'll see if he's willing to talk about it then. Until that time, I hope those folks who have posted some very unpleasant comments on other sites, will zip it and cut the kid some slack. Submitted by on Wed, 2009-11-11 18:03. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|







I long for the day...
I'm sorry, but do you REALLY not see how it's different?
It would be fantastic if we lived in a world without anti-gay prejudice, but unfortunately, we don't. What's a little surprising to me is that it's often gay people who imply that we don't. I don't get this: don't we all understand how hard it can be to come out, and that, first and foremost, every young person should be allowed to do this on his own terms?
Maybe I'm missing your point, and you're not criticizing the stand Michael is taking...Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
Hear, hear
We all want to know who is and isn't gay I guess, but once we're out we tend to forget what a process it was.
It took me 25 years to work my way from "Oh s**t I'm gay", through "It's noone's business but mine" and "Let people think whatever they like they will anway" to "Okay okay already yes I am, and screw you if you can't handle it cause I don't want to pretend anymore".
At 18? Let him work his own way through it and decide when he's ready to share what is an incredibly personal revelation with long-reaching consequences.
Yes, we're greedy for role models, and visibility truly *does* matter -- but only when you're ready to take the step yourself, because you can't go back into your closet (Ted Haggard not-withstanding)
I agree...
When I was working as a Guidance Counselor in a small town high school I had a number of kids come to me. The always said "I think I might be gay." and only one ever told me "I'm queer and they can kiss my @$$ if they don't like it."
The one that knew he was gay was a popular kid whose family had community influence so he largely passed through high school under his own terms. The ones that were uncertain I always told to be patient that it wasn't a decision they had to make in the next 24 hours and that it would eventually make sense. I saw enough same sex crushes that turned sour that I would never encourage a high school student to place themselves in harm's way especially not in a school with a population of that average 500 and a graduating class that average 100. I made sure they understood that homosexuality wasn't anything to be ashamed of but that it also wasn't a "look" to try out like a new hair style.
I also know from experience that some people do in fact try on homosexuality to see if it fits. I was dated not one but two straight guys while I was in college. One told me that it was me that he was attracted to and not men in general. He developed an annoying habit of getting drunk and making out with our female friends. The second told me that he loved me but that he wanted a wife and children. I wished him luck. When I meet his wife a few years later she later told a friend that she knew instantly that he still loved me. She was fishing to see it the friend thought I would ever make a play for her husband. No. He made is choice. The point is that neither of those men ended up a closeted men sneaking off to have gay sex in bathrooms. They found someone of the same sex they were attracted to and felt they could trust to test there bounds.
However, their lives may have been different if they had to declare their sexuality to their families and the world when they weren't sure themselves.
Your questions answered
"Should every teenager be asked that by his or her teacher in front of the class? Should ever 18 year-old soldier be asked that, point-blank, by his sergeant? Every employee for every job?"
We're not talking about students or soldiers or [unspcified] job applicants. We're talking about show business.
"But he's only 19!"
I came out at 15. And I wasn't in show business. Was it hard? In some ways yes -- in most ways no. I have no regrets about it whatsoever.
I am now 62.
Well, gee, if YOU did it...
I'm honestly hoping you don't mean to sound this heartless.Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
Not heartless -- just pissed
After spending the better part of my ife as a gay journalist watching this sort of nonsense I'm down to my last nerve.
You don't have to be in your 60's...
Since when is he accountable
Since when is he accountable for what they think? Doesn't he have as much right to be confused as they do.
If you wouldn't tell a regular 19 year old to be out, then don't tell Cris Colfer. Celebrities shouldn't be held to a different standard.
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
He's accountable...
So maybe he's going back on
So maybe he's going back on what he said. Whatever, I'm not going to judge that, considering how hard it is to come out, let alone if you're a celebrity. He's young, he has the right to say things and make mistakes.
Celebrities are role models, but we shouldn't put them on a pedestal. Those kids need to find real role models in their lives.
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
Because....
Not Chris's problem
if he wants to be a role model, great. If not, that's his choice. We put too much emphasis on these celebrity role models. There are certainly celebrities I respect, but if they do something I don't respect, it doesn't shatter my world.
I agree that it's important for gay kids to have role models in their lives, but Chris is not the only possible candidate. And these kids have people in their own lives they can look up to.
And re-reading what he said in USA today, he's not lying, or going back on what he said. He's choosing not to discuss his sexuality with USA Today. He discussed it with the Advocate (maybe because it's so important to the community) but that doesn't mean he has to make the same statement in every interview.
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
My Role Model
Oh, Madeleine...
Gee, if only you had been there to tell me that there were people in my own life I could have looked up to when I was coming out. I guess that would have made it so.
Seriously
Your life is so empty - or was so empty at one stage - that you could find absolutely no-one around you to look up to? You needed Hollywood to give you role models?
That is both the saddest and the craziest thing I've heard in a long time. I'm so sorry that you were that alone in your life. It must have been horrific growing up - and I'm not joking or being insincere when I say that. I mean it. I'm just glad you've got through it.
But anyone turning to a Hollywood actor to find a gay role model is nuts. Seriously crazy. It's like those dopey fundamentalists using a televangelist as a role model. Sure, you can be a fan of an actor - but it's lunatic to use them as role models. Just ask David Ehrenstein for some stories about what goes on in Hollywood if you can't see the wisdom of why I'm saying this.
Again, I'm sorry that you had such a terrible time when you were younger, but you should always take your role models from someone in your life and never from a screen - be it big or small.
I Don't See Why You're So Surprised
Ahem
About being gay...
Role Models
But don't you think that young people (just like grown people) look to role models for all the different ways there is to be gay, not just one particular way of being gay?
Teens aren't stupid. Yes their brains are different, but all teens learn to think for themselves eventually and gay teens have been coming out of the closet and growing up to be successful happy adults since the beginning of gay (without famous people to tell them how to do it or what it should look like).
I look at NPH, Adam Lambert, Sir Ian McKellen, Alan Cummings, Christian Siriano, and John Barrowman and I see very distinct and individual representations of gay/bi men.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point but it feels like you're saying that because young people might look up to them, gay male celebrities have to be or act a certain way or have one particular way of being out and gay.
Most young people look up to people they admire because of who they are. Period. They look to people who they feel a connection to and a kinship with it's not just every random gay celebrity is every gay teen's idol.
One kid's role model with be another kid's "Seriously, him??"
I came out as a pre-teen and I'm 41 now. I had role models when I was a teen who were famous and gay and role models in my community who were gay but not famous and then there were all the role models I had who were neither famous nor gay but just good, strong progressive people of all stripes.
Particularly in the world we live now with constant streaming information on the Internet and tv about celebrities, there's always someone in the news who is a role model to someone somewhere.
I don't think teens are as cut and dried as folks are making them out to be.
Yes, as gay people (even as adults) we need to see ourselves reflected in the larger society, in popular culture, in the media. Yes, we all need someone to look up to.
But the assumption that teenagers will now NOT look up to Chris Colfer now is just conjecture with no basis in fact.
In fact, all the negative stuff people are saying about him here and on the other gay blogs would probably have more of a detrimental affect on what others think about him amongst gays, then anything he said to USA Today.
Most teens may not have even responded to the quote in USA Today the way some of the older folks on this thread have because I don't find gay teens to be nearly as reactionary and knee-jerk when it comes to the sexuality of celebrities.
I would consider all of the men I listed to be my role models (even though I'm older than some of them) for very different reasons.
They are all out and gay and doing their thing their own way and making change in the world by being visible, speaking their mind and giving their time to charitable causes.
But they are all very, very different (even with some of the crossover)
NONE of them have indicated that they want to be role models or conduct themselves in a certain way so as to be a "good" role model for gay youth. You can't manufacture what teens will admire (though god knows folks try)
In fact, there are probably tons of people who are more conservative who don't think some of the men above are positive role models and plenty of teens who do.
But I still stand but their right to act however they want, to be individuals and to live their lives in the way that makes them happy and if there are young people who find a connection with them or see them as admirable, that's great, if not, that's fine too.
It seems to me that the only thing any celebrity owes to his fans is to be himself and be honest and I don't see any indication that Chris Colfer isn't being himself or being honest.
SOME people read that statement and assumed Chris Colfer wants to be closeted (in part because we are so suspicious about gay celebrities anyway that we are constantly looking for ways in which they are not gay enough or not out enough.
SOME folks read the quote in USA Today and never thought anything of the like. If the only thing you're basing his being closeted on is that one statement, then I don't think that's fair or accurate (particularly in light of what he just recently said in The Advocate and on Access Hollywood)
If someone is your role model it should be because of how they are, not who we think they should be or what meaning and motives we project onto them.
I would certainly hope that no gay celebrity feels compelled to behave a certain way solely because gay youth might be looking up to them.
They should be themselves, however that manifests.
Otherwise, what kind of role model are they?
First be a man
I never intended any derision to you in my post. If you read it in there, I apologise straight away. I read your post as you having no role models - gay or straight - growing up. Hence why I was so appalled when I thought of you growing up so lonely.
But back to role models. When you're growing up, it's the people around you who are your role models. You measure yourself against the people around you. You see the ones you like and the ones who impress you less. You take the building blocks that create you as an individual from the people around you. It's people you grow up with who are the role models you need.
And this is important because to decide to be an open gay man, first you have to be truthful to yourself. It's only when you can be truthful to yourself that you can decide - whenever you want - to reveal that truth to other people. And learning to be truthful to yourself is dependent on the people who've made you, not anyone else.
You're a mentor in a gay youth project and that is fantastic. You're actually being a role model. What you do every day with young gay people is infinitely more important to their self-worth than Chris Colfer, Adam Lambert or anyone else.
I am a lot older than you and I grew up first in a rural part of Ireland and then in an even more rural part of England. Believe me, I know all about the loneliness of being a gay boy. To be a gay man, first you have to be a man.
We're all fallible human beings. The lasting strengths we have as people come from the warts-and-all people who brought us up. Comparing yourself to the artificial constructs of PR-spun public personae of open actors and singers is fatal. You're letting a real young man compare himself to a false construct. That's horrific - if you allow that to happen you're letting a normal human being fail miserably at trying to be a plastic creature created by committee.
So once again, if you're suggesting that Chris Colfer is a better role model than you, you're nuts.
2 questions
First, how old are you? Second, where did you grow up? Maybe you're experience was different because you are younger or grew up in a tolerant environment.
I was a teenager living in a small town in the bible belt of Florida in the 1980s. I didn't know ANY gay people at all. The ones I saw on TV were clownish jokes or victims of abuse. This is how I discovered my passion for history--by seeking stories of gay men and women in the history books in the library, where I discovered great, complex and gay/bisexual men like Alexander the Great, Hadrian, Richard the Lion-Hearted, Michelangelo, Walt Whitman, Pyotr Tchaikovsky, Marshal Lyautey, etc. None of these men were perfect, and some of them could be brutal, but they achieved great things, and the fact that they loved other men had a profound impact on me. And many of these men were unashamedly gay/bisexual.
Childhood
I don't know if you were asking me but I lived in rural Mississippi til I was a teen then moved to The Bronx.
My childhood/adolescence spanned the 1970s - 1980s
Until I moved to NYC it was a typical Southern Baptist childhood.
I came out when I was 8 and never went back in (despite the difficulties).
My role models varied over the years but I know who the gay folks in my community were (even if I didn't know them enough to speak to them) and when I moved to NYC I made a conscious effort as a teen to find the queers (trust me, they weren't hanging out in my high school).
But it's not like I would have ceased to be gay or not survived adolescence without gays to look up to. People do it all the time.
But my larger point was that people don't establish themselves as role models, people are chosen by others as role models and there is no telling who will be chosen or for what reason or by whom.
You can't manufacture that. Lots of folks here think NPH hung the gay moon but I know tons of gays young and old who just think "Meh!" and don't see hims as a role model at all or even someone to be admired.
So this idea that gay celebrities some how owe it to society to behave a certain way because young people need role models seems to me to defy how the whole choosing of role models actually happens for most people.
I'm sure there are tons of kids who admire Chris Colfer and no amount of trashing him by people here or The Advocate or other gay media sites will change that.
In fact, it might even galvanize their appreciation of him.
Most young gays just don't have the same kinds of hangups, fears, baggage or expectations when it comes to how celebrities identify sexuality wise.
Even gays who live in rural communities can turn on their television and see gay people (and they don't even need cable).
And despite what folks here say, the number of "stereotypical" gays who regularly appear on tv for the last decade or more is minimal to none.
I still don't accept that David E or The Advocate get's to decide what Chris Colfer meant in that quote and I simply interpreted it differently.
Oh David
Man, you know I love you and respect you. But are you the Alpha Gay? I don't know. The world has changed and the reasons to love you have changed as well. The weird thing is that so many of the things you stood for in the US have been accepted outside your country.
You spoke the truth, but it wasn't heard in your own country. But we've heard it elsewhere in the world and given it credence and lived your truth. But we've done it differently.
If you seriously believe the message you've so wonderfully taught other gay men in the rest of the world, then learn from them and the different ways of doing things.
You're not wrong David. Philosophically you're completely right. But you're not so old that you can't learn new tricks.
Did you just call David Ehrenstein an Old Dog?
I'd never call him an Old Bitch
Oh Sexbomb
If the tricks you want me to learn look like James Franco
In all fairness, while I'm
In all fairness, while I'm sure that things are clear for you where you're coming from, I just want to point out that not everyone was lucky enough to have your clarity with regards their orientation. I didn't KNOW if I was gay at 19. I have always been very outspoken about gay rights and issues and pretty much every job I've had, I've taken my share of crap for being different, for holding a girl's hand in public, for talking about 'queer stuff'. I am a pain in the arse in general and have never hidden in the closet to make my life easier. From the age of about 12, all my friends and my family have heard me make comments to the effect of 'wow, she's beautiful', or 'i'd totally date an (insert eg here) girl', so they have known for a long time that I find other women attractive, but I held back from claiming any label not because I worried about how straight people would react, but because of the pressure I felt from the gay community not to mess around with an important political legacy. What would happen if I later changed my mind? I was just a kid, knowing I liked girls and having sex with a girl are very different things. I worried if I came out as bi and then realised I was lesbian, I would be adding to the myth that there are no bi people and it's just a stop on the way to gay town, or if I came out as lesbian and then realised I still liked guys, that's an always popular move, or god forbid, what if I got older and realised that my feelings for other girls had dissapeared, had been part of my youthful experimentation and ultimately I only wanted to be with men, then I would be an ex-gay, or gay-until-graduation, or Anne Heche, or Melissa Etheridges-ex and we all know those women are the devil incarnate, or at least treated as such.
I would love to have known when I was very young what I was, that would have made my situation a lot easier...honestly...because I have a very accepting family and I already know that plenty people at school already assumed I was gay and I didn't get too much of a hard time for it. Not all of us have the clarity at age 19 to be willing to stand up and apply a label to themselves that they are not 100% sure about, especially where that label carries so much political weight and we don't want to lesson or damage it by wrongly claiming it. And that's without the added worry of being famous and coming out in print for the whole world to know about! He's 19, anything he says or doesn't say on the issue is fine with me, if he wants to creep out in incriments or duck his head back inside cause he gets stage fright, I'll be sad that the young kids miss out on having that particular example of a 19 year old actor coming out, but I wont think of him as any less of a role model if he doesn't come out for sure until he's 29.
And for the people who dont' think that famous people get a lot of crap after coming out. I need only point out the giant rain of turds that landed on Mika when he came out as bi this year. And that wasn't the first time I'd seen that particular reaction. It is unfortunately very common in my experience to see negative reactions to people coming out, not soon enough, not loud enough, not young enough. It's never enough! No wonder some people arse around on the issue. You're damned if you don't, but you're well and truly burned at the stake if you do.
I don't agree with his position on it at all.
Did you actually read this post?
He's 19 years old.
Yes, I get your point that actors are asked about their heterosexuality all the time. You apparently don't get my point that this isn't the same thing. If they ARE the same thing (as you say), then there's no reason why random kids shouldn't be asked if their gay.
And this has nothing to do with my thinking being gay is "shameful." It has to do with being respectful of other people's, especially teenager's, feelings. They're the ones living their lives, not me.
Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
He didn't claim to be out in...
Well...
Firstly I want to ask something that's kind of bugging me, not really about chris but the reasoning behind this, then I'll get to my own opinion on this whole thing.
He's 19, he's 19, he's 19...okay...as someone who is only a few years older, what does that have to do with not asking for a clarification of the interview statement? if he was underage...alright then that's fine, but where is this 21 or over coming from exactly. Even though he looks like he's an uber-15 year old, he's an adult already. He is of the age where he's old enough to vote, smoke, have sex, and appear in porn legally if he wanted to do any of those things. Why does he (or any other over 18 person) have to be the drinking age to clarify something on sexual orientation? If a person is of sound mind to make those other decisions, they can certainly field a simple "hey, we were just wondering what this means?" question. He's already given the interview, he's making the decisions to say the things he says and is old enough to do so on his own, so to get a clarification on whats already said to USAToday isnt prying anywhere he hasnt already gone, you're not asking who he's sleeping with or if he's going to the next pride parade. It doesnt even have to be made to Chris it could just be to the people representing him and, like with Mr. Bomer, they'll give a response one way or the other and he wont have to deal with it at all. Its not like anyone here is demanding to go in, sit him down, and strong arm everything out of him. If he doesnt want to talk about it further with you guys then they will decline to do so.
To say 'well we're not going to bother with it' after making such a hoopla about it when people *thought* he came out (yes the Advocate started it but you guys jumped on the bandwagon giving him a welcoming post and a nomination as gay of the week, ect.) is leaving readers with major gaps and, as we can see from the other comments, touching on peoples nerves. ...It just doesnt seem like thats the right way to handle this (and I know Brent you want to defend your sweetie and I'm not saying anything here as a mean thing against him personally, so you dont have to be that defensive over it. I mean, its not like we're asking you both to come out or anything ;p)
-------
Anyway as for my own thoughts with this particular incident. I never took the interview exactly as him going back into the closet, to me it just felt as him not wanting his sexuality to be the defining characteristic of all his interviews. In fact his own quote in this isnt really even saying anything that would make me think he'd be trying to hide it, its the part from the interviewer thats making this all so misleading when they wrote:
"Playing an openly gay kid means fielding questions about his own sexuality, which Colfer doesn't address."
That seems to be what the USA interviewer took from what Chris was saying and put their context of opinion on it. Which is all the more reason why a clarification would help. His own quote:
"I try to be private about it. It is what it is"
only seems as though he just doesnt want it to be a big thing that sticks out so much. Although the Wikipedia removal worries me a bit but then any hack can go and change that around, nothing else though makes me personally think he's trying to back-track on it.
On the website http://chris-colfer.com/ where he has facilated interviews in the past there is a little paragraph posted yesterday (the Same day that the USA interview went up) by one of the maintainers that reliterates the things he said in the Advocate interview and also adds the line below "It seems that Chris and his character are very much alike. But unfortunately, as he states life being gay in his hometown isn’t so fun, so is life elsewhere. Chris is glad that he has an outlet to be gay on TV."
They put this up there yesterday and have not, interestingly, put up the USA one. So if anything they're not trying to shun the gay community. In the end I feel its a big to-do about nothing, I mean really...we'd need a pretty big plunger to put most people "back" in the closet. Until he poses with a naked woman for a magazine I wont have any questions for him...and even then, probably not too many... ;)
Closet Games
To quote my all-time favorite movie line --
(from Sunday Bloody Sunday )
"Here come those tired old tits again!"
"I try to keep up a mystery. As much as I give away of my personal life, the less people will believe me as other characters. I try to be private about it. It is what it is,' Colfer says with a shrug."
Translation: "I'm gay, but I know you're so intimidated by the rules laid down by The Heterosexual Dictatorship that you'll lie for me."
Actually, it's more than that.
It's the tired old chestnut "If I come out, the agents won't let me play straight characters."
Which is true to some degree, but you know - I can see SOME justification for it. Some actors ARE just so queeny and/or unable to douse the flames/adopt another acting persona that they wouldn't get casted as straight characters regularly regardless of their true orientation or their attempts to hide it, and in cases like that it's more due to talent than orientation. Just like you wouldn't cast a white guy to play a black man, I wouldn't cast an actor who has a flamboyantly gay persona/mannerism they can't put away for a role as a straight person if it didn't fit the character.
Jon Cryer, I'm looking at you. And yes, I know you're married to a woman.
Well actually, it's a bit different than that
It sounds more like he's saying "if I let my being out become the main point of conversations about me, then casting directors won't let me play OTHER characters. And he's kinda right. But I am curious- are you saying he should just come out (again) becase he's too queeny to get straight parts anyway?? Cus that would so not be the way to get someone to want to be representative of the community.
While we sit around deciding how we can make this kid be yet another gay celebrity role model for our cause, we need to stop and remember while we're considering our lives, he has to consider his life and his own ambitions. He's an actor. This is what he does for a living. And when you look at all those other celebrities who are constantly putting their lives on display for an overindulged public, you'll note that many of them tend to fade away as quickly as they first appeared (that fierce spotlight tends to hasten their burnout). If he's smart he's going to avoid doing anything that would hinder him from getting other parts, because GLEE won't last forever, and two months from now we will have moved on to some new gay celebrity role model.
It's a little late for that
If he wants to avoid typecasting, then he should have never come out in the first place. Or he never should have taken this role. Not talking about sexuality did very little to help Sean Hayes get any major work at W&G. Even the guy who played Will, who loved to talk about his heterosexuality in interviews, said he struggled to get work after the show.
I'm not really all that sure how many other parts Colfer will be getting anyway. This is a big ensemble show probably hired on the cheap and I won't be shocked if most of these people never have another big role.
How can it be a little late- he's only 19
and his show isn't even 12 episodes old yet. And why shouldn't he have taken the role- he's an actor, playing roles is his job.
He told the interviewer that the more he gives OF HIS PERSONAL LIFE, the harder it is for casting directors to see him in other parts. And he's right; frankly it seems like the fans tend to lose focus too. Let's consider some of our previous "out, high profile & always in the headline" gays:
- When was the last time you read about someone going on about the acting chops on TR Knight?(and wasn't he was just last year's out gay posterboy?)
- Does anybody even remember that Lance Bass can sing? When he was on Dancing With the Stars, he came in 3rd place, but the only thing ppl cared about was whether he was gonna dance with a man).
- Remember Mitchell Anderson?
- When we talk about George Michael, do we talk about the music (b/c he can still sing his heart out). Nope- we talk about his drugs , his poor driving and the tearoom habit.
So it's not taking a gay role that Colfer thinks will work against him. It's the fear that if ppl are only talking about his offscreen life, then they won't be able to perceive him in other onscreen roles. and if he can't play other roles, then what's the point- his career is shot.
At this point, this is something that he can control that by declining to answer the questions, especially since he's going to get it over and over. He didn't deny being gay, he never said he was going back into the closet. But he very diplomatically drew a line in the sand and said hey, I'm gonna focus on the work, and you should too. Some of the press, the web gossips and people looking for heroes probably won't like it, but they will get over it.
Not A Heterosexual Dictator
Poor Chris...
It's the gays in the US who make the closet, not the straights
This is a thing about America that I don't understand. You seem to insist on a ritual. To me it seemed pretty clear that Colfer said he was gay in his Advocate interview. He didn't say 'I am gay' but he gave every indication that this was the case. In the USA Today he didn't deny being gay, he just - effectively - told them to sod off because he didn't want to discuss his sexuality.
It's like Adam Lambert. When the legal locks were off his personal networking sites, it became apparent that on his personal networking sites he was was clearly gay. Similarly with Michael Urie. He's said he's gay as well. But in America, you're not allowed to be openly gay unless you do an interview with a major magazine proclaiming the fact. And if you do another interview in which you want to be known as an actor rather than as a gay actor, you're somehow going back into the closet. Again with Matt Bomer, he hasn't denied being gay. He's just said he's not going to comment on it.
The hurdle on being gay and any kind of public figure seems to be set so high - especially in the gay community. Gays and lesbians seem to have ignored the essential aspect of attaining equality - basically changing the political climate so arguments of equality are discussed seriously - and replaced it with a dubious concept that every celebrity gay man should be a role model.
That is such a false concept. You're not fighting for acceptance in the US - you're fighting for equality. Every lisping, anorexic drag queen in high heels and a bad attitude is equal to any lumberjack gay man who 'hasn't found the right woman' or a mixed-race lawyer with ambition or frumpy overweight woman with a concept of marriage or pudgy white guy who wears a pillowcase on his head and sets fire to crosses on lawns.
Look, THERE'S NO RIGHT WAY OF BEING GAY. None of us get a handbook on how to handle it - we all muddle through as best we can. We all know that the process of coming out can hurt. And we all make different decisions on how and when we decide to do it and how we handle the aftermath.
And frankly, any man over 20 on this site who wants to criticise a 19-year-old about his coming-out process is a moron.
Give the guy a break and get back to the real issues.
That must feel awkward
That must be awkward acting; I can hardly imagine a more awkward fit for a young-man working on a musical-theater tv show going in to the closet than playing a younger-man working on a musical-theater show coming out of the closet.
I mean how many stirring out & proud speeches are going to be written for Kurt over the character's lifespan? How many times is Kurt going to face sexuality-motivated adversity and triumph? How many times is Kurt going to get an open boyfriend? (OK; the answer to that one may be nil).
It would have seemed kinder just to cast a straight actor or an out actor.
Chris Colfer is not Matthew Bomer
Watching him on the Bonnie Hunt show, it occured to me how young Chris Colfer is and he seems a "young 19", rather than a "worldly" 19. Even if he was the latter, it wouldn't matter.
I think AE's "Not under 21" policy on the sexuality question is admirable.
Also, I wonder the age range of people criticising him on this matter. Is it weighted towards people of his own generation to whom coming out was no big deal? Or perhaps people of 40+ whose memories of their turbulent teens have dimmed somewhat?
It's the Sean Hayes/Michael Urie dance
Anyone who is seen as having any type of career will be pressured to say they are straight or say nothing at all. Because if they're seen as gay...someone might be offended, and they might not get those huge acting jobs! And we know what a huge career Sean Hayes has had right, outside of playing a bad camp figure?
It's up to Colfer whether he comes out. I think he's one of the weaker parts of Glee anyway, from what I've seen, and my opinion of that wouldn't change whether he was married to a girl or marching at the front of a pride parade.
He wants to unring a bell. Can't be done.
And this notion that "It's up to [insert name here] whether he comes out" is ridiculous. If you're gay and you're in show busness everyone will know.
So live with it.
The public won't know; that's what counts
The public WILL know. It ALWAYS knows
As I have said many times before I found out that Rock Hudson was gay before I found out that I was!
The notion that "no one knew" until he died of AIDS is a lie. The "word on street" was out from Day One. That's why the marriage to his gay agent's lesbian secretary was arranged -- to "quiet the rumors."
"Rumors" that were true.
Hollywood disagrees
I think