Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

Not so glad about GLAAD's report on gay visibility

I hate to throw a wet blanket over GLAAD's annual report touting that the number of GLBT characters on television has doubled, but in taking a closer look at the numbers I can't quite gin up their level of enthusiasm over the news.

My beef is that this report seems to value quantity over quality. Is a doubling of "barely there" gay characters really something to celebrate? Look at Joe the Bartender on Grey's Anatomy. Sightings of Big Foot at Seattle Grace Hospital occurred more often than did sightings of Joe last season.  GLAAD's report acknowledges this fact, but still includes Joe as recurring in hopes that he'll show up more frequently.

GLAAD's list of gay characters includes a cavalcade of others that are also "barely there" including Oscar on The Office, Eric on Gossip Girl, Chaz on ER, Gay Kenny on My Name is Earl, Roy on Lipstick Jungle, Andrew, Bob and Lee on Desperate Housewives and Cliff on Ugly Betty. As much as I love Desperate Housewives, Andrew is basically background scenery at this point, much less Wisteria Lanes' resident gay couple, Bob and Lee. 

And there is reason to be dubious over the season's new gay characters as well. GLAAD lists Knight Rider as having a lesbian character, but as I reported from the Television Critics Association, that show's creative team wasn't even on the same page as to whether or not the character was even still a lesbian.

Tuc Watkins and Kevin Rahm on Desperate Housewives

Throw in Marco on Privileged who is so far definitely a secondary character (I call him Exposition Marco because so far he's just there so the main character doesn't have to talk to herself) and Larry on the wretched Do Not Disturb (which is unlikely to live long enough to see who our next president is much less survive until the new year) and I'm actually feeling kind of blue about gay representation on scripted broadcast television. Oh, yeah, the numbers of GLBT characters are down on cable as well.

I find it especially disturbing that since Will & Grace ended more than two years ago, we are still lacking a single show that features what I truly consider to be a lead male gay character. GLAAD counts Brothers & Sisters' Kevin Walker (Mathew Rhys) as a lead character and while technically he is (and while I think he is a great character) he is part of a very large ensemble which necessarily limits his screentime. Where is  a show that truly has a gay lead character?

At least GLBT representation on animated shows is doing well, something I find nicely subversive as those shows appeal to a much younger demographic. At least the kids and young adults watching The Simpsons, The Goode Family, American Dad and so forth see a world with plenty of gay visibility. 

And I don't mean to dump unduly on GLAAD. They do much good work and part of that work is giving the networks credit to encourage them to do more. But when they lead off their report stating that the number of GLBT characters is at an all time high, I think they give the networks too much credit, thereby letting the networks (and the journalists covering their report) think that things are better than they are. 

Yes, I know things are better when it comes to reality television which is great. Call me old-fashioned, but I think there is something significantly different about a scripted character who comes into our homes week after week and we get to know intimately as they change over multiple seasons as opposed to reality contestants, the majority of which don't even last an entire season.

Perhaps next year we can cheer that we have the same number of characters, but that they actually show up every episode and have interesting storylines.

David Ehrenstein's picture

What's important to me is quality -- not quantity.

We can demand that now as having gay characters is no longer a novelty. If they're going to just sit there and do next to nothing , like NUKE, they're of considerably less interest than Marc and Cliff on Ugly Betty -- who look and act like a real gay couple.

It would be nice if Gossip Girl got Eric a boyfriend - and integrated his gayness into the show in interesting ways not that the "shock" of his outing is over.  We shall see.

But the bottom line is the "bean counting" aspect of "gay inclusiveness" has pretty much run its course.

 

 

Lyle Masaki's picture

My take...

is that GLAAD judges representation in different ways and to do an objective study, one where you can compare one year's report against previous years, you have to measure quantity over quality. Another way of measuring quantity is the recent study that measures quantity in the form of program hours, which tackles "barely gay characters" -- at least ones like Terri on Men in Trees and Eric on Gossip Girl who only appear once every few episodes.

Beyond those studies, I get impression that the Media Awards is supposed to be where they look at quality over quantity, so they do try to examine both sides.

My reaction to the study was mild optimism, really. It's a good sign considering that the numbers have long been on a downward trend and I'm encouraged that some of those new characters are from shows that already are gay inclusive expanding their gay characters lives, like taking Scotty from recurring to supporting cast status and Marc getting a boyfriend on Ugly Betty. It's not something to celebrate but they are encouraging... and I think talking about barely there gay characters and how frustrating they are (while highlighting the shows that get it right) helps a lot.

As for the cable numbers, after looking at their 2008-2009 count against their 2007-2008 list, things are frustratingly fuzzy. Some of the characters who have disappeared from last year to this year's lists seem to be a matter of the some shows not being officially renewed at the same point (perhaps because of the WGA strike). Some of the missing characters include gays from Reno 911! and Drawn Together (both are still popular from what I read of cable ratings) as well as Captain Jack and Ianto from Torchwood.
Psionycx's picture

Quantity is meaningless...

Quantity is meaningless if the characters don't get screentime.  The mere fact of their existence is unimportant if they're rarely seen.  There are lots of extras on most TV shows but that doesn't make them significant in any way.  In order to really mean something the characters need to actually be involved in the storyline in a meaningful way.

In this regard I agree that GLAAD is showing unwarranted enthusiasm.  Walk-on characters don't really do much for gay visibility if they're so peripheral to the story that a person can TiVo right past their scenes without missing anything about the show's plot. They effectively become decorative backdrop rather than characters in a real sense.

Indeed, I think it's actually threatening because it causes producers to pat themselves on the back for supporting "diversity" and "tolerance" without really taking much of a risk.  This in turn feeds a viscious cycle where prominent gay characters may decline, replaced by a huge abundance of walk-on's.

GaySpouseDotCom's picture

I agree - barely-there gay characters don't cut it

I agree that main characters should only be included in the list, because they are the ones that truly have an impact. A character should at least appear in over 80% of episodes and have more than 10 sentences of dialogue during each episode to count.