Voldemort versus Bill O'Reilly. Which is worse?
One of the things I wonder about Bill O'Reilly (other than whether or not, like Tim Burton's Oogie Boogie, there is nothing but a mass of writhing maggots and worms under his skin) is if he understands the ramifications of what he says. His latest blatherings about the supposed controversy over J.K. Rowling confirming Harry Potter's Albus Dumbledore is gay is just the latest example.
O'Reilly has said before he doesn't have a problem with gay people, that we should be tolerated and not gay-bashed. Well, at least those of us who aren't asking for it by being — shudder — activists. But if in O'Reilly's world it's "provocative" and "indoctrination" to have a gay character in a book like Harry Potter (hell, not even "in" since the books make no mention of Dumbledore's being gay) then when does he think it's all right for kids to know about gay people? Should we be kept secret until a kid turns eighteen and then say, "Oh, by the way, there's this thing called homosexuality that you've never heard of. But don't be afraid of it or anything even though you've probably heard all kinds of anti-gay jokes and heard words like 'fag'. Gay people are fine really as long as they don't talk about it or want any rights."
Gosh, I guess we'll never know. BTW, Dennis Miller totally cracked me up when he commented, "I'm bored with people's sexuality. I don't care if Dumbledore is gay." Spoken like a straight man who can go to a movie any day and see straight people, can turn on the TV any night and see straight people, and can kiss his wife anywhere in the world without a second thought. Idiot. Submitted by on Fri, 2007-10-26 14:32. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|










Ugh
As for Miller, I stopped paying attention to him when he made all those gay baiting jokes about the Kerry-Edwards campaign.
Stunned into silence?
Uh, except not? Every other, you know, reliable source said that the crowd was cheering. (He even pronounced his NAME wrong. It's "Rowling" like "bowling" thank you very much.)
I thought that was a particularly egregious lie
He also phrased the question as "Is Dumbledore gay?" And of course the real question was, "Has Dumbledore ever fallen in love?"
For someone who claimed to have "researched" the issue, he was pretty clueless.
And how is someone answering a question, as Rowling was, trying to "provoke"? I mean, was she supposed to say, "Sorry, I can't answer that."
If she wanted to be a provocateur, she was pretty ineffecient about it, waiting all this time until she was specifically asked, never putting it in any of the books.
God, Bill is an ***hole.
Read my books! Explore "Brent's Brain" at http://www.brenthartinger.com
Exactly. And he said at one
Exactly. And he said at one point that she should have answered "yes or no"? JKR isn't exactly known for skiving us fans off. She usually gives pretty elaborate answers.
I also think that it would have come out (pun intended, don't worry.) eventually, leaving the gay community pissed, and members of the press would be saying the exact same thing.
O'Reilley is a two-faced
Bill O'Reilly = Scum
At the end of Thursday's show O'Reilly said "Don't be a Dumbledore." Which means don't be gay.
O'Reilly throughout Rosie's tenure at The View he called her a provocateur. He is the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen; I only wish the worst for him. He's scum.