Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

Voldemort versus Bill O'Reilly. Which is worse?

One of the things I wonder about Bill O'Reilly (other than whether or not, like Tim Burton's Oogie Boogie, there is nothing but a mass of writhing maggots and worms under his skin) is if he understands the ramifications of what he says. His latest blatherings about the supposed controversy over J.K. Rowling confirming Harry Potter's Albus Dumbledore is gay is just the latest example.

To start with, he accuses Rowling of being a provocateur — a person who provokes trouble, causes dissension, or the like; agitator. How is that for hilarious? Methinks O'Reilly doesn't have the self-awareness of a sea slug. Then he says that Rowling is engaging in indoctrination by having Dumbledore come out now. And, of course, she's doing it all for the publicity because we all know how those Potter books have struggled to get noticed.

O'Reilly has said before he doesn't have a problem with gay people, that we should be tolerated and not gay-bashed. Well, at least those of us who aren't asking for it by being — shudder — activists. But if in O'Reilly's world it's "provocative" and "indoctrination" to have a gay character in a book like Harry Potter (hell, not even "in" since the books make no mention of Dumbledore's being gay) then when does he think it's all right for kids to know about gay people?

Should we be kept secret until a kid turns eighteen and then say, "Oh, by the way, there's this thing called homosexuality that you've never heard of. But don't be afraid of it or anything even though you've probably heard all kinds of anti-gay jokes and heard words like 'fag'. Gay people are fine really as long as they don't talk about it or want any rights."

Gee, Bill, if only we could go back in time to a place where that was how gay people were treated! If only we could see how such an approach would shape the attitudes of straight people toward gay people. Do you think straight men would be hostile toward and afraid of gay men? And do you think keeping gay kids in the dark about their own homosexuality would have an effect on their self-esteem and mental health? Might those kids grow up self-hating and prone to addictions?

Gosh, I guess we'll never know.

BTW, Dennis Miller totally cracked me up when he commented, "I'm bored with people's sexuality. I don't care if Dumbledore is gay." Spoken like a straight man who can go to a movie any day and see straight people, can turn on the TV any night and see straight people, and can kiss his wife anywhere in the world without a second thought. Idiot.

Lyle Masaki's picture

Ugh

I made the mistake of watching a clip of Bill-O's coverage of the controversy over two of the Sisters of Perpetual indulgence receiving communion at a San Francisco church. For someone who feels free to call someone else a provocateur, he had an easy time throwing around all kinds of violent words (invade, attack) to describe the incident that you'd think those Sisters burned the church down.

As for Miller, I stopped paying attention to him when he made all those gay baiting jokes about the Kerry-Edwards campaign.
Lauren's picture

Stunned into silence?

Uh, except not? Every other, you know, reliable source said that the crowd was cheering. (He even pronounced his NAME wrong. It's "Rowling" like "bowling" thank you very much.) 

Brent Hartinger's picture

I thought that was a particularly egregious lie

He also phrased the question as "Is Dumbledore gay?" And of course the real question was, "Has Dumbledore ever fallen in love?"

For someone who claimed to have "researched" the issue, he was pretty clueless.

And how is someone answering a question, as Rowling was, trying to "provoke"? I mean, was she supposed to say, "Sorry, I can't answer that."

If she wanted to be a provocateur, she was pretty ineffecient about it, waiting all this time until she was specifically asked, never putting it in any of the books.

God, Bill is an ***hole. 

Read my books! Explore "Brent's Brain" at http://www.brenthartinger.com

Lauren's picture

Exactly. And he said at one

Exactly. And he said at one point that she should have answered "yes or no"? JKR isn't exactly known for skiving us fans off. She usually gives pretty elaborate answers.

I also think that it would have come out (pun intended, don't worry.) eventually, leaving the gay community pissed, and members of the press would be saying the exact same thing.

John's picture

O'Reilley is a two-faced

O'Reilley is a two-faced hypocrite if ever there was one.   Remember a few years ago when he had Rosie on his show giving him her big "coming out" interview, and pretending to be on her side?    Ever since The View, O'Reilley has been one of Rosie's staunchest opponents.   How quickly he forgets the way he used Rosie for ratings a few years back.
Evan's picture

Bill O'Reilly = Scum

At the end of Thursday's show O'Reilly said "Don't be a Dumbledore."  Which means don't be gay.

O'Reilly throughout Rosie's tenure at The View he called her a provocateur.  He is the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen; I only wish the worst for him.  He's scum.