The NY Times: Is the closet door widening in Hollywood?
Is being an out gay actor still an issue in Hollywood? Gay actors like Neil Patrick Harris and TR Knight are currently flourishing on television and testing the boundaries of that age-old argument, but will we ever have an openly gay star on the level of a Tom Cruise or Will Smith? That’s the topic at hand in an article that appeared in Sunday’s edition of the New York Times that takes an in-depth look at the changing landscape for gay actors in Hollywood. Much has been made about the recent GLAAD report that found over 80 LGBT characters on television for the fall season, and even though a great deal of them play second fiddle to the straight leads, their presence still represents a dramatic change in the approach to being an out actor. Gay publicist Howard Brageman is quoted as saying “We’ve gone from the revolution to the evolution”, and while that is in some ways true, Hollywood still has a great deal of evolving to do. Gays in the media now are arguably as visible as we’ve been at any other time in history, but the “revolution” doesn’t seem to extend beyond television. While television stars like Harris and Knight can play straight characters by day and walk the red carpet with their partners at night, that luxury doesn’t seem to extend to their movie-star counterparts. Internet chatter and innuendo on some of our big stars is deafening, yet we’ve still yet to see one take the next step and come out. We are still, in the words of USC media professional Larry Gross, “Waiting for the Jackie Robinson moment”. Whether or not this moment ever truly comes is a question that won’t be answered for some time, but the article also highlights some promising new developments surrounding young actors like Fringe’s Jasika Nicole, who are defying the closet and maintaining successful careers. Out Noah's Arc star Daryl Stephens The question really isn’t whether or not there are gay actors in Hollywood (anyone who has ever had any interaction with theatre geeks knows that it’s nearly impossible for all those ‘mos to get lost in translation on the way to the Walk of Fame), but rather when they will start to take their tentative steps out of the closet. Three of our most well-known out actors (Harris, Knight, and Chad Allen) were outed or nearly outed by some form of tabloid intervention, so their coming out (while honorable and noteworthy) was less bold than, say, an actor who did so with no provocation while promoting a $100 million movie which bore his name above the title. The first steps out of the closet from actors like the aforementioned as well as now officially out Noah’s Arc actor Daryl Stephens serve to show that the closet foundation is rattling, but the movement is still waiting for a big, splashy movie-star pioneer to open the door to the future of openly-gay actors in Hollywood. Of course, we follow this topic rather closely here day-to-day, so the article wasn't much of a bombshell. Did anyone catch the article and have any thoughts? Share in the comments! Submitted by on Tue, 2008-09-30 11:15. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|








The article proves one thing and one thing only--
The closet is a thing of the past and the "maisntream" is desperate to maintain it some fashion. That's why they go on about the "risks" even for those who've sailed clear past them.
I greatl admire Larery Gross but I don't think that "Leading Heterosexual Man" is a bar worth climbing. Parts like that are extremely limited and limiting. And as Paul Newman's career proves (among other things) you can't go anywhere without converting yourself inot a character actor, as he did so successfully. Had he remined a"dreamboat" his career trjectory would have been comparable to that of John Gavin.
Putting his gayness aside, the main reason why Rock Hudson had such a great run was that he was able to ditch "serious leading man" roles for comedy -- whcih he was quite expert at.
Surely NPH can certainly do drama (e. The Paris Letter) but why bother with that now?
The Movie Biz is incestuous anyway
Celebrity culture in America is so built up that more than half an actor or actress's appeal lies in their offscreen persona as much as in their onscreen talent.
Movies only highlight this, with a strong emphasis on who the actors in them are versus how good they actually are. Some big names are way overpaid in relation to the revenue they bring in, and yet they continue to be used because it is hoped that their name will bring in audiences.
In this climate there's an extra barrier for gay and lesbian performers. Since offscreen life is so important they may be considered less marketable regardless of how talented they are.
Television is perhaps a little easier, because a show is not a one-shot like a movie. Plus nowadays shows tend to rely more on multiple characters rather than just one or two leads. Grey's Anatomy does not revolve around T.R. Knight for example, and so there is more latitude. In contrast movies tend to have smaller significant casts and a greater focus on the leads. Plus being one-shot (unless the prequel/sequel thing kicks in) it's harder to warm an audience to an artist or their character.
So while it's slowly getting better, there's still a long way to go.
Gays, in hollywood?
I have worked with many gay actors over the years and find that they are total chameleons. Not in hiding their sexuality, but in disappearing into their roles, afterall, it is part of their job to be someone else. I have yet to sit in a casting session where someone out right asks the question, "Are you gay?" That may come up in discussions afterwards, "Do you think he or she is too gay?" Gossip, being the currency of the realm, they will often state, wiithout proof, "I hear the he or she is queer." Many film and televison executives have always been treated like spoiled brats and could be percieved a gay because they get very prissy about their sense of entitlement. It was loathesome that they would then sit in judgement of who or what is to be the benchmark of sexuality. But there may be a definite shift in that kind of thinking as a new generation of executives are able to enbrace themselves and their own sexuality; taking "sexuality" out of the casting equation.
Today, I can think of several name brand producers (Greg Berlanti, Ryan Murphy, Darren Starr, Michael Patrick King, and Kevin Williamson) with multiple successful TV series that are openly gay and very capable at casting actors without regard to who they are sleeping with at home. No one says, that because they are gay, they can't cast heterosexuals. Many of them are moving into feature fikms these days. The truth of the matter is successful gay and lesbian actors work because they have the talent to perform the role.
The bottom line in Hollywood is always the bottom line. Gay or not, Rock Hudson filled a lot of seats and Universal knew that. And he didn't exist in a vacum--witness recent autobiographies of Tab Hunter, Farley Granger, Richard Chamberlain, and now Raymond Burr. Through out the years Hollywood has employed actors and actresses who went well beyond the circumspect to be openly successful without regard to their sexuality, from the silent films of George O'Brien (Sunrise) and Ramon Navarro (Ben-Hur) to the televison icons of Neil Patrick Harris and Ellen Degeneres today. There is a long list of gay actors and actresss (and technicians) who toiled on the sound stages of Hollywood studios both big and small and past and presesent.
To deny them their due, is to deny them their lives and our history. If you doubt me then read William J. Mann's BEHIND THE SCREEN: HOW GAYS AND LESBIANS SHAPED HOLLYWOOD 1910 - 1969 and AE's very own David Ehrenstein's OPEN SECRET GAY HOLLYWOOD. Both are available on Amazon and great reading.
INSIDEGUY
George O'Brien was gay?!
Didn't know that! He was a hunk!
Check out my blog: http://radicalsexy.blogspot.com/
Wishful thinking