Out Mario Cantone hosts ebay's Let's Make A Daily Deal game show at Times Square Studios yesterday in New York City (Pic: Getty)
Following this assortment of carefully-selected news items, interested readers can find a refreshing pic of a hot man in underwear after the jump. Yes, we're serious.
- The Oregon Attorney General has decided there is not enough evidence to pursue charges against Portland mayor Sam Adams.
- The ABBA Museum was scheduled to open in Stockholm this month, but due to "complications" has been delayed indefinitely. Obviously, the wing devoted to Agnetha's blue eye-shadow is at fault.

- Above is a first look at Little Britain star Matt Lucas as Tweedledee and Tweedledum in Tim Burton's upcoming Alice in Wonderland. USA Today has more pics, including Johnny Depp as The Mad Hatter.
And today's Briefs are brought to you by...
This guy!
Bjorn Toby Wilde

Submitted by
on Tue, 2009-06-23 17:59.
Wonderland
OMG Alice i wonderland pics look amazing, i love tim burton and johnny depp sooooooooo much. All the other cast members are great too, helena bonham carter, matt lucas and anne hathaway! Cant wait for that film now! DAMN YOU SNICKS! NOW I HAVE ANOTHER FILM I HAVE TO WAIT MONTHS FOR! lol
My tongue would catch your tongue...were the world mine :-)
The Model's Name...
Bjorn Toby Wilde?
Y'know, snicks, I am beginning to think that maybe...just MAYBE...the names these models have are fake.
Just a little hunch.
LOL
You think so? It took me a while to cotton on, but today's name had me chuckling out loud.
Bjorn
Or maybe Mr. and Mrs. Wilde
Bjorn Toby Wilde...
...that made me giggle.
Though my original thought was Oscar Wilde.
Either way, the boy is hot.
You too can be saved by the blog! www.savedbytheblog14.blogspot.com
I may be straight, but I'm not narrow.
The Gay Generation Gap
It was very interesting.
It was very interesting. We should start a discussion on the forum about this.
-Lior
Alice
The Generation Gap
I don't know why anyone finds this surprising. The generation gap phenomenon is not unique to the gay community by any stretch of the imagination.
Step back for a moment and think about this past election. There were two standout points that a lot of commentators were making. First, was that we had an electorate in which the majority of voters were either small children during Vietnam or had not even been born yet. This resulted in a diminished interest in things like John McCain's war record on the part of many voters for whom it was a historical footnote, not a defining trait for their generation.
Another point surrounded Barack Obama. Although he is black he was born at the tail end of the Civil Rights movement, and thus didn't particpate in it. Unlike people like Jesse Jackson, Obama has no strong tie to those turbulent times, which is why he didn't speak about them as much as many black people, more accustomed to leaders like Jackson, expected him to.
The generational divide within the gay community is little different. Indeed, younger gays often feel a not so subtle resentment when older gays attempt to act as if they were their parents. Unlike most other groups, each generation of gays is not born from the previous in the literal sense. Because the majority of us come from straight parents we emerge into the time we live in, rather than into an ongoing cultural story that our families experienced as well.
Because of this there is a clear break between generation of gays as opposed to most other groups. Fewer younger gays have been summarily cast out by their families. Often they have childhood friends that they did not lose upon coming out. They entered a social world wherein gays and straights socially mingle more freely than in previous times. So they often have a less solidly-developed sense of "us" versus "them" than many older gays.
For example, I come from a large extended Roman Catholic family. Virtually all the cousins of my generation are still practicing Catholics, but they also tend to buck Church doctrine on matters like their support for same-sex marriage. So to me certain tendencies that are often knee-jerk in older gays, such as open hostility to all religion or to people who practice religions, don't make sense. Why would I insult my pro-gay cousins over their belief in God (especially since I believe in Him too) when they actually support my quest for equal rights?
So it's not just that younger gays are different from older ones, the entire culture in which they live is different, and that inevitably changes their viewpoint. If you look at the surveys for example, support for same-sex marriage rights is substantially higher among younger voters than it is among older ones. A gay or lesbian person in their 20's is far more likely to be surrounded by heterosexual age peers who support their equality. To them, it's older people that are the ones trying to hold them down.
That pop culture icons are so important in gay culture doesn't help, simply because, as in straight society, younger people rarely adore the same icons as their elders. Judy, Barbara and Liza may be a big deal to some guys. But to younger gays it's no different than when a straight parent gushes about Frank Sinatra, Elvis Presley or Buddy Holly. Why it is assumed that just because the younger gay is gay that they would share the same icons is unknown given that straights certainly don't operate that way?
Thus the generational divide is often a yawning chasm. We're united by our sexual orientation but by little else. The notion of a monolithic "gay community" is more than a little off, and we should know that. There has, for example, always been a huge divide between gay men and lesbians. We cooperate on political matters for the most part. But very often share little else in common.
It is a fascinating subject.
NY Mag Article
It isn't surprising but it is good to start a conversation culturaly using an article like this as a catalyst. At this time we do need to talk about how our community not only can progress our agenda (for the lack of a better word) but also improve how our own community interacts within. African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans have organizations within themselves that focus on promoting strong families and creating a greater community based on similarity. I see too often that we reject community and institutions because either they have become too extreme or appear out of step or out moded. We need to start a conversation about how are we going to proceed after a marriage, adoption, and job/public accomodation discrimination agenda is finalized in 50 states and at the federal level.
We have to start before all is done because it takes time to solidify and foster groups and community networks. Some places have gay fathers or gay family groups but many do not. What are we going to do about the fading industry of gay entertainment in independent films and literature? The gay book store was a central location for our communities, what will it be in the future? How are we going to make sure our children see their families represented but also respect and represent the need for those not like us and their families. We are a group so diverse in racial, creed, age, and geographic background how are we going to remain unique? How are we going to take care of our senior population?
There are a lot of issues that fall into this gap. We need a leader or leaders and organizations that give us this social and community focus in addition to the lobbying and social action ones. We tend to forget that at the individual level the personal touch is important.
Changing Times
This is why so many lament that our movement doesn't have a Dr. Martin Luther King. From an activist standpoint we're "led" by lobbyist groups that are more insiders in DC culture than public figures. Certainly very few people could identify Joe Solomonese as a major player in the gay community. They'd be more likely to name a celebrity figure like Ellen DeGeneres or Neil Patrick Harris.
Also, there is a divide in demographic behaviors. The old gay ghettos have been dying for some years now. Gay culture, and activism, used to be concentrated in urban areas, especially New York and San Francisco. Gay people tended to live tightly clustered together in places like the Village or the Castro.
That's less true today. More and more gay people live wherever they feel like living. Younger gays don't automatically gravitate to urban gay ghettos, especially because cost-of-living in most of them is prohibitive for young people anyway.
This renders things like the gay bookstore useless. If you don't live in a city then the gay bookstore is often a lenghty journey requiring a special trip, rather than someplace you can just hang out at daily. I certainly don't feel much inclination to trek all the way to NYC or Philly just to go to one. Especially not when gay books are increasingly available in regular stores or online.
The imperative of gay literature has also changed. A lot of the "classic" gay lit is hopelessly depressing, fuelled by the angst of the generations that wrote it. To many younger people it seems too downbeat and unapealling. So the gay bookstore is either a source for a) depressing books nobody wants to read, b) porn which can be gotten online, usually cheaper, or c) a sense of community except they're too far away to make regular hangouts.
I know a fellow who lives in the Castro. He and his partner have been there like 20 years or so. Not long ago he was lamenting in horror that now there are straight people pushing baby strollers around the neighborhood. The gays were victims of their own behavior. They renovated the houses and apartment buildings, died or moved away, and now the area has become "mainstream", at least in liberal culture. This unfortunately means it's no longer a "gay ghetto". Instead of young gays moving into the Castro you have hip, urban hetero yuppies. That breaks the continuity of the gay community in a big way.
Now for me, I would never live in a city. Not my thing. Plus, way too expensive for too few square feet. I'm in a suburban community that was, at one time, a "gay ghetto" (New Hope, PA). But even that has declined. So many gays have partnered up and gone off to buy country homes in the surrounding areas of the county. The townhouses they've vacated are increasingly filled by straights. Housing developments, also filled with breeders, have sprung up all around.
This doesn't mean gays are no longer around. But it does mean that our culture and lifestyle is different. More gay people have parties where straights are invited, and not just fag hags. There's less inclination to gather at the local gay bars and get drunk every night of the week, which was very much the thing when my older (and now deceased) gay cousin lived here a decade ago.
In short, our whole demographic pattern has changed, and the community with it.