Thumbs Down: Roger Ebert Takes on the Brokeback Mountain Controversy
Pulitzer-prize wining columnist Roger Ebert has long been one of America's preeminent film critics. He was also one of the few who predicted Crash would beat Brokeback Mountain for Best Picture at the 78th Annual Academy Awards. Because of this, and because of Ebert's subsequent column entitled “The Fury of the Crash Lash” (in which he criticized those angered by the upset), Ebert soon found himself at the center of a firestorm. He recently spoke with AfterElton.com about the controversy, as well as homophobia in Hollywood and the landscape for gay cinema after the Brokeback Mountain phenomenon.
AfterElton.com: Let's cut to the chase. Do you think homophobia played a part in Brokeback Mountain's upset loss to Crash? I think a lot of people voted for [Crash] because they thought it was the best picture. Some people voted for it because [unlike Brokeback Mountain] it was a Los Angeles production, and in the business, that actually does control votes. And there were probably some people who voted against it because they don't like gay people.
AE: So you don't think Hollywood is terribly homophobic?
AE: But that has been the case for a long time. Lord of the Rings was
all shot in New Zealand, but that didn't stop the Academy from
rewarding it. There have been plenty of other films shot overseas.
AE: So for you, those reasons explain away all of the historical precedents that predicted Brokeback Mountain should
have won? I'm talking about the fact that Brokeback Mountain had a
combination of factors—awards, box office, critical acclaim, Oscars
nods—that no other movie has had and then not won Best Picture.
AE: Has the reaction been bad? I've been told that I am evil. I've been told that I am behind the persecution of millions of Americans. That I have encouraged hate toward gays. I've received both very brief and obscene messages and very long and literate messages that tell me a vote for Crash was vote for homophobia. See, that is what I object to. It is not that I'm saying so much that homophobia didn't have anything to do with it. But I do believe that it is quite possible to prefer Crash and not be a homophobe. I've received a lot of email that doesn't seem to think so. You're either with us or against us. If you are not a homophobe, you will vote for Brokeback Mountain.
AE: I think many gay people would feel better if Crash had been running closer to Brokeback. Its win wouldn't seem so suspect. Even the Las Vegas odds-makers had Brokeback as a sure thing. To then have it lose has been hard for a lot of people to accept.
AE: Not to repeat myself, but for gay people knowledgeable about the Oscars, what came as such a sucker punch—
AE: Yes. Again, looking at all the historical precedents the Academy had used over the years as the guideline.
AE: Even that doesn't explain how Crash could have won.
AE:
Based on all of that, is it not possible that homophobia played a
larger role? And I'm not talking the kind of I-hate-all-gay-people
homophobia, but--
AE: Exactly! Let's back up a second. Of course, the Academy is not exactly the same people who are the Writers, Producers, [and] Directors guild, but they'll vote for it [Brokeback] for Best Director, Best Screenplay, Best Score but they won't vote for it for Pest Picture. Why won't they? Is it because they're afraid people will think Hollywood is now catering to or supports gay people? I suppose that there were some votes cast on that basis. The Oscars are not a very perfect process.
AE: So because Brokeback Mountain won most everything but the Oscar for Best Picture, it proves that Hollywood isn't homophobic?
AE: I guess for a lot of gay people, giving Brokeback Mountain the other awards, but not Best Picture is just what Kenneth Turan said, that it feels like a very safe choice to do.
Submitted by on Thu, 2006-03-16 00:00. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|






