Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

Frank Miller and "300"'s Assault on the Gay Past

300 Lost Opportunities To Do Something Different

300 is an unusual comic book in more ways than one. It is told entirely in double-page spreads with a limited but highly effective use of panels. The art is bold, employing strong silhouettes and complementary decorative details. Lynn Varley's painted colors are beautiful, as they provide depth and weight to Miller's deceptively simple lines. Visually, 300 is a complete success. Psychologically and historically, that's another matter.

Several things are cause for concern in the graphic novel and, if included faithfully, the movie.

The first is the way the Persian king Xerxes is portrayed in the graphic novel. Continuing a shameful tradition of Persians as perverts, Miller gives us a king who's all piercings and useless fashion accessories, his head and faced shaved, combining to create an air of effeminacy. In comparison, Leonidas is hypermasculine and appears to be stereotypically straight, with broad shoulders and a full beard and mustache. Except for a predator's tooth strung on a leather thong around his neck, no jewelry adorns his physique, only weapons and a few pieces of armor.

Judging from stills made available from the film, the movie version looks to be every bit as problematic.

As seen in this photo taken from 300 promotional materials, Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) is a jewel-clad effete sporting what appear to be manicured nails and plucked eyebrows. His hands, adorned with gold rings on every finger, lie suggestively on the shoulders of King Leonidas (Gerard Butler), a hirsute, rough-hewn man who looks every bit the opposite of Xerxes.

It is hard to envision how Xerxes could even fight, being so encased in gold bracelets, gold chains and gold collars. No, the real fighting is to be left to men like King Leonidas. Without knowing the first thing about 300, it would be easy to guess who played the hero and who played the villain based on this photo alone.

The few known images of the real King Xerxes show a man with little or no jewelry, a full head of hair and a beard and mustache to match King Leonidas'. This Xerxes looks quite capable of defending himself and isn't the least bit effeminate.

Of course, whiffs of effeminacy in villains are nothing new in Hollywood films. Think of the Peter Lorre character in The Maltese Falcon , for example, or the villains in Rope, Diamonds Are Forever, In Cold Blood and The Passion of the Christ, to name only a few. Xerxes is just another in that shameful line of effete villains.

The second problematic issue in the graphic novel version of 300 occurs in the first part of the story. A Persian envoy comes to Sparta to talk to the king, telling him that a simple token of submission from the Spartans to the Persian king would solve the matter. But Leonidas answers that the problem is that the Athenians have already refused, and he can't do less than "those boy-lovers." According to a recent review in Variety, that line is also in the film.

During the original miniseries, a reader took Miller to task for that remark, and the author gave a rather strange answer: "Being a warrior class, the Spartans almost certainly did practice homosexuality. There's also evidence they tended to lie about it. It's not a big leap to postulate that they ridiculed their hedonistic Athenian rivals for something they themselves did. 'Hypocrisy' is, after all, a word we got from the Greek."

Miller is correct in that Spartan society was a militaristic one. Every free male citizen was considered a soldier for life (the exception being the older men who had been elected to political seats), with plots of land given to him to be cultivated by serfs. It is well-known that the Spartans practiced homosexuality (or more precisely, pederasty) as an educational institution. Indeed, the cohesion of the army depended on the bond between lovers. Thus, like the Athenians, Spartans can also be called "boy-lovers."

That being said, the word "boy" must be considered a generic term. Ancient texts state that Spartan soldiers/lovers were dispersed throughout the battlefield, as opposed to side-by-side in the way of other cities, so these "boys" on the battlefield had to be old enough to fight and defend themselves. The relationships were therefore between two (young or not so young) men, with some age gap between the two. "Youth-loving" would probably be a more correct term, as well as a less charged one for modern readers.

What's Included and What Isn't

The issue isn't really that King Leonidas uses "boy-loving" as an insult toward the Greeks. This is a work of fiction, after all (although Miller claims it is historical fiction). It is not even that Miller didn't include any indication of Spartan same-sex practices amongst the soldiers fighting at Thermopylae. This is an action-adventure comic and movie aimed at young straight men, meant to pile up book sales and box-office cash by piling up dead bodies as graphically and artistically as possible. That is an audience not likely shell out $9 to see even a mere implication of same-sex love.

The real issue is that Miller (and apparently Hollywood, in adapting his work) did include homosexuality, but negatively. If neither the effeminacy of Xerxes nor the insult were included, or if by some miracle they were balanced out with the other half of the historical equation, gay viewers would have less reason to feel insulted by yet again more historical inaccuracies.

There is one small reason to hope for something better from 300. Director Zack Snyder added a gay character to his remake of Dawn of the Dead, although that character's most interesting scene wound up on the cutting room floor. Perhaps Snyder will do something to counteract Miller's less than gay-friendly story line. If not, gay viewers can expect yet another historical epic that flunks the accuracy test.

Joe Palmer discovered spandex comics and mythology (at the age of 9) in 1967. This double fascination inspired him to draw and eventually led him to Chicago's Art Institute, where he graduated with a B.F.A. HIV-positive since 1996, Palmer currently divides his time between running Gayleague.com, a website for LGBT comic fans, art, writing, and promoting art-making opportunities for the HIV-positive community.

François Peneaud is a teacher, comics critic and occasional translator who lives in the southwest of France with his partner. He runs the Gaycomicslist.free.fr site, and next spring will see his first published stories in the Best Date Ever anthology from Alyson and in a collection of the Tim Fish-edited Young Bottoms in Love webcomics.

With thanks to Michael Jensen and his uncanny rewriting sixth sense.

nordic balance's picture

Please, don't get distracted by the shiny effects.

If, at first, you found 300 to be another offensive portrayal of homosexual or bisexual behaviour, then you were taking the entire film at face value. You said it yourself, this is a film of a comic - why else are the characters stylised so much? Think about it: Giants, Monsters, Demons, or at least bizarrely deformed psychopaths are hurled at the Spartans, and you didn't pick up on this? In fact, why did you make a reference to historical accuracy? Frank Miller's M.O. is to entertain us, by drawing deep lines in the sand to define good and bad, right and wrong. In Sin City, Hartigan, the heroic cop againt 'Junior', the yellow, deformed paedophile, there is precident for this. In any case, bear in mind that Xerxes viewed himself to be a God, indeed, 'the' God - it would be odd to see a man who didn't reflect that incorruptible, elegant and luxurious lifestyle that he would have maintained for himself. Think along the lines of the cinematic representation of Hell and Satan - Demons are usually portrayed as twisted, bizarre creatures, yet Satan, the Lord of Hell, is frequently depicted as a stunningly beautiful or charasmatic entity. Clear, defined separations between one group and another. To say that there was no real depiction of homosexuality in the Spartan cast obviously wasn't paying attention. the banter between Astinos and Stelios, although limited, is actually light flirting and innuendo. It's a shame that this wasn't picked up on more, but it was there, and frankly, I found it adorable. I'll close by simply saying that this is a comic, and that, frankly, if you let a jumped-up, arrogant baddie (which, I assure you, he is supposed to be) insult you - lighten the hell up, please.
nordic balance's picture

Homosexuality in Greece was Banned!

"It is well-known that the Spartans practiced homosexuality (or more precisely, pederasty) as an educational institution." Well-known? Please name your sources for the above sentence . Also it's time for all you to know what pederasty, lover, homoerotic etc. means in Greek language. Well there were some homoSEXUAL people in Greece because we know that there were a lot of laws at most city-states that penaltised it. Most of the penalties for being homosexual was exilation or (Death at Kaiadas Lakaidaimon-Sparta).
nordic balance's picture

You obviously don't read primary sources

For goodness sake, read Plato's Symposium! Or for a basic introduction, read the wikipedia article on pederasty: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece ...I don't usually recommend people to wikipedia, but it's a free site and you don't seem like the type to go to a library or buy a book. But if you have the chance to be scholarly for once, maybe you could track down Andrew Lear's "The Idealization of Pederasty in Archaic Greek Poetry and Vase-Painting" or even a slightly out-dated source like Greek Homosexuality, by Kenneth J. Dover.
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
nordic balance's picture

An interessting artickle.

An interessting artickle. The remarks concerning the appearance of Xerex at the time , adjoined by the photo of his sculpture is revealing. Thankyou for your conspicious review of the matter. I believe that each civilisation has brought something to humanity and greeks are not privileged in this respect. We do not need to falcify and to distort history in order to prove or to impose falsely that there is only one superior civilisation in the world. And above all we are not here to deny or to demolish any civilisation. As a persian I do respect greeks amongst other civilisations and think that we need respecting each other in order to know the best from each other. It is regrettable that the actual governments are not the ideal representatives of their nations so there may be lots of untruthful prejudices . So please read the history thouroughly from YOUR real historians and see what has persian civilisation gifted to the world. I hope respect and love for humanity ... if not , it would be a pity not to know each other.
Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Michael Jensen's picture

Glad you found it enlightening!

Hopefully, it will help move the discussion in Hollywood slightly forward.
nordic balance's picture

No Gays in Greece, Only Bisexuals

Thanks to the all-consuming influence of the homophobic Greek Orthodox Church, gay Greeks don't exist as such. Most gay Greeks consider themselves to be bisexual, and two unrelated men living together (or two women) are as openly denigrated today as they were in antiquity. Every man has a duty to marry and raise a family in Greece. What they do away from the family is considered unimportant, as long as the family is not disrupted. It's not surprising that no word exists in the Greek language for 'gay' or 'bisexual'. For a language that prides itself on having a word for everything, the omission is all the more glaring, as gay relationships are not recognized.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings