New Article on Nuke on MSN: Don't Read If You Have High Blood Pressure
Well said, Straight is right. Source: http://tv.msn.com/tv/article.aspx?news=303601>1=7703 This is the kind of ridiculous nonsense that's being posted on a mainstream posting board. Now, I know why P&G will never relent in their censoring of Luke and Noah. If this kind of comment represents even 15-25% of soap's mainstream, then P&G would be fools to take the financial risk of losing bigoted, idiotic those viewers. But according to the article, their viewership has had less of a slip in ratings than other soaps, and god knows that ATWT is one of the shittiest soaps on the air. P&G knows that the gay 'ship is bringing in new "diverse" viewers, but by not having them do anything sexual, they are not losing their homophobic viewers. It's a delicate dance of bullshit and corporate sponsored hate. What I don't understand is why the writers cannot adapt to the censorship. Look at the films of the 40s--censored, yet the dialogue was risque to compensate for what they couldn't show. The ATWT writers did this once, in the infamous fod = sex conversation, and they can continue to do this. Write some sexy dialogue, have them put their arms around each other's waists, close the door and fade to black. There you have it: sex. The next day, they're making eyes at each other and exchanging innuendo: post-sex. This kind of coded communication can be even hotter than people making out in elevators and such. As proof, watch Bogie and Bacall in The Big Sleep. One of the hottest coded conversations of all time starts at 1:30. Submitted by Sizequeen (71 points) (14 posts) on Sun, 2008-03-02 20:48. |
User login![]() Recent comments
Recent blog posts
|






uhhhh...WHAT?
" I don't hate gay people, and God doesn't hate them either...but it's up to them to follow what the Bible says instead of their own selfish desires"
^ this line has me so confused. so this person does not have a problem with gay people.....but feels that they have selfish desires??? WHAT???
To paraphrase Jon Stewart...
It's a different viewpoint
He doesn't have a problem with (gay) people. For him, it's about the selfishness of the sex acts that won't result in children within a marriage. In that sense he judges gays as little different from straight shack ups, one night stands or probably even contraceptive use. He believes those are about the self, the orgasm, and not any higher purpose. For him, extra-marital (or gay sex) impulses are challenges and temptations to be managed in life as part of living out his faith.
This is why lots of gays have disdain for many Christian churches. They feel they have no place there because they feel they're taught to be "living a lie," live life alone and celibate or to be condemned as willfully living a sinful life if they embrace their gay sexual desires.
As long as we stone people
I posted a comment there to
As long as people....
...are basing their values and morality on that piece of crap literature, there is no hope. Words written by a bunch of self loathing, repressed old men thousands of years ago that tell everyone to hate their genitals, hate gays, women, and anything else that is not part of the patriarchal power structure cannot be upheld as "the whole truth" by any sane person in this day and age. Sorry to all the Christians out there that aren't full of hate but your book was meant to be the whole package. Take it or leave it but don't preach your hypocritical views to me. When people take responsibility for their own right and wrong by thinking for themselves, then there is hope. This includes all the organized religions of the world.
Rant over.
I say we take the warning labels off everything and let nature take it's course.
Christian
The first theing said in the new testament is that those were the laws for that time, and now these are the new ones. there is nothing about being gay, dancing, wearing jewelry, etc etc etc, most of the new testament is open to interpation, you see it the way you read it, not the way the churc teels you what it say's.
Rant over, lol
P>S> I keep adding my own image because I have uploade the blasted thing 10 times and it won't take.
Dennis
The Bible is a Giant Steaming Pile of Crap
There, I said it.
Religion is nothing more than the worship of Death, turning an inability to deal with the finiteness of life into a sick cult..
Sad
Sorry Dennis....
....that I sounded so heavy handed. But all of the fundy wing nuts I've ever encountered are thumping on the new testament not the old. The nit wit holding a "hate" sign as my town pride parade goes by is clutching a new testament to his chest. If it's all open for interpretation then what the heck's the point? Make up your own code of ethics and then live a good life, is what I say.
I say we take the warning labels off everything and let nature take it's course.
A Number
According to the makers of the Implicit Association Test the percent of Americans that have a prejudice against gay people is 68%. That's approximately the same number that voted for state constitutional amendments banning same-sex couples marriage rights. Coincidence? The makers of the test also said that people with implicit prejudice against gay people are much more likely to say it openly and act on it than for any other group (blacks, Jews, women etc.).
You can take the sexuality version of the Implicit Association Test as well as a number of other bias tests here.
Dismissing religion as an
Dismissing religion as an entity of complete worthlessness is both foolhardy and impractical. All of our ancient literature, our original moral systems, our philosophical tracts are, essentially or in one way after another, religious texts. Religion is like any given tool in this world, or any given thing, really. It's a system of belief, and taken to an extreme, it is damaging. Not taking it all can be damaging as wel, but using it in moderation can create a better world and enrich the lives of billions of people.
One of the reasons I am so fond of my own religion, Judaism, is that part of our shtick is to question God's will. The heart and soul of the Torah (old testament) is a philosophy of life, one that is based on love and law. I think Rabbi Hillel said it best, "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. Go and study it." I mean, there is this thing called the Golden Rule, and it shows up in nearly every religion on the planet, and that's basically it, do unto others as you want done unto you. All the other crap has been added by haters, and should be ignored. Bigotry can still be alive and well without religion. Racism was originally justified by religion (and proto-anthropology like Cecil Rhodes idea that Africans have less brain space than Europeans) but it's still thriving in places without any religious justification, at least in America. I know there are places where racism is still religious motivated, or at least benefits from persecution, but over all, if people want to hate, they will hate with whatever tools they have at their disposal, and ignore anything that stands in the way of their hate.
Religions have their rules because of how life was back when they were created. What's important now is to move forward with a modern sensibility in regards to religion, to take what is applicable and what is not to leave behind. Dismissing religion as an entire entity cannot be done, and doing so is counter-productive. You attract more flies with honey than vinegar, or somesuch. And religion has a great deal to offer us, it's through religion that most of our greatest and beautiful art came about (and just how much of it was created by gay men we may never know, but the contributions we have made historically are massive in this realm) and even if we no longer need religious dogma to survive the next wave of Caananite attacks, or something, dismissing so callously something that billions cling to with fervor just doesn't make sense to me.
My belief in God is pretty ontological. I believe that the idea of God exists, and while that does not mean that God exists per se, I think it's undeniable that the idea of God does, and how powerful are ideas? They seem fairly omnipotent to me, and to a certain degree ineffable because how well can we truly know each other's concept of a deity? Ideas can shake the world, and the ideas of religion have more than once. I would not give up the Torah, the gospels, the Bagahvad Gita, the Ramayana, the Tao te Ching, the Illiad etc... for anything. It's part of our history, and part of us, and it's going to be part of our future. Learning to work with religion and to have respect for it is important, because it's not going away. As always, feel free to disagree with me.
The older I get the less
The older I get the less I believe in, magic, ghosts, UFO's ~ God! I miss that not believing! And I used to be Agnostic but I am slowly moving towards being an Atheist. Seems like, since the menopause hit, I have a much lower threshold for BS. AH, the many prices of getting old!
"You bit the hand, Marty, You bit the hand!"
I find this absolutely funny and sad. . .
. . .or has Proctor & Gamble totally forgotten that it was these conservatives types that accused them of their moon-and-three-stars logo was the mark of Satan back in the 1980's???
I remember that brouhaha well. . .
*sigh!*
Been there, done that, bought the soundtrack!
Thank you Jacob...
...for your thoughful post on religion. I do, however, feel compelled to disagree with you. At this time in history, millions of people are breaking free of the mind and thought control attributed to organized religion with intelligent and rational free thinking. The deceit of the institution by influencing all aspects of peoples lives with hypocrisy, doctrine corrupted by centuries of translation, murder for any who choose free thinking and domineering patriarchy is being exposed for what it really is. The destruction of indigenous religions alone is an example of the horrific atrocities committed by those in the name of their god. The Inquisition continues in different and more insidious ways but still continues. Christianity used any means to convert the common folk by hijacking their own festivals and traditions and weaving them into the christian dogma and when they couldn't convince them, they resorted to the sword, the gun, the bomb. The worst wars of this planet have been fought over "god's word" and are still being fought every day on every corner of the planet. The Hindus and Sikhs, the Catholics and Protestants, the Jews and Muslims, (Muslims and just about everyone) are only a few examples. You can argue that it's only the extremists but the fact that millions upon millions of people cling to their religion with fear based reasoning, using the bible as their only tool of understanding, as opposed to intellectual investigation and discernment of the natural world is not enrichment of those lives. It's terrorism.
Now this is not spirituality. I am not dismissing spirituality as an important facet of human existance. When all people evolve to understand the thread of energy that connects all things animal, plant, mineral on this planet and beyond, when they can feel that intense connection and realise that for every thought and action is reflected back at them, then there is hope. Each person can welcome deity into themselves in whatever form they envision, god/goddess or the creator. Each must come to understand the balance of light and dark, that for each incident of the rot of death comes the fecundity of birth. Night for day, sorrow for joy, ignorance for enlightenment.
The hope for our future is true individual spirituality where each person recognises that God is only *their own* god, and not anyone elses. In this enlightenment, bigotry will cease to have power.
I expect many to disagree with me, this debate will rage on and on. But that in itself is part of the evolution of the human species.
I say we take the warning labels off everything and let nature take it's course.
Very well reasoned and thought out
I was raised Catholic and went through the usual catechism, communion, confirmation routes, though interestingly, the parents chose to put me into the public school system rather than Catholic school. As I got older and saw all the injustices in the world being perpetrated in the name of God, basically using religion as a means of denigrating those who believe differently, I began to question church teachings more and more. All the Catholic church sex abuse scandals and subsequent cover-ups certainly did not help its credibility in my mind.
SF Chronicle's...
....Mark Morford says this from today's blog. He says these things quite well...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/03/05/notes030508.DTL&nl=fix
I say we take the warning labels off everything and let nature take it's course.
Thank you
Thank you Janet.
Really enjoyed that blog and agree that he covers the topic quite well.