Where are all the out Olympians?
I don't know if you caught the Opening Ceremony for the Beijing Olympics which kicked off Friday night, but they were amazing. However, as I watched the parade of athletes marching into the Bird's Nest, I was again struck by the fact that out of these thousands of athletes there are a total of five out athletes. And only one of them is male, that being Australian diver Matthew Mitcham. Five! Which is less than half of the number out at the last Olympics. Frankly, that pisses me off. This is 2008 and entire countries allow gay marriage as do several U.S. states. Other countires and states allow civil unions and fully protect gay rights which have never been as widespread nor as deeply supported as they are now -- and they didn't get that way because people stayed in the closet. And that includes athletes. Yes, there are reasons anyone, including Olympians, stay closeted. Becoming an Olympic-caliber athlete requires talent and dedication few of us possess and coming out can be a huge distraction. Athletes are often younger people who might not yet have dealt with any questions of sexual orientation Sports are often more homophobic than other fields and there is the issue of possible endorsement deals.
But thanks to the advances of the gay rights movement, gay folks are able to deal with their sexuality earlier than ever and to live more open lives and that includes gay athletes who no doubt enjoy those very benefits. But those advances didn't come without sacrifices from other people including Olympic athletes like Tom Waddell, Greg Louganis and others who have made sacrifices. Sports remains one of the last bastions where gay people are still sorely underrepresented and I think the fact that there are fewer out athletes this Olympics than the last game speaks poorly of these athletes. If twenty-year-old Mitcham has the courage to jump into the deep end, then so should more of his gay fellow athletes. Submitted by on Mon, 2008-08-11 10:07. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
New forum topics
|














Still a big taboo
New numbers
Looks like there's actually 10, 11 if you count a bisexual softball player.
http://www.outsports.com/os/index.php/Olympics/2008/In-Beijing-Olympics-only-5-openly-gay-athletes.html
As the post notes, those are the 11 athletes in sports with enough coverage for both the sport and the athlete to warrant public articles about their sexuality. Lord only knows how many Danish badmitton players are completely open and out, but no one in the media cares.
But it's still a disappointing number.
Self-loathing & homophobia
Sports fans/customers
And this really does get to the heart of it for people in high-visibility businesses. In the case of sports, a lot of sports fans are homophobic. Consequently, a lot of companies that use athletes as spokespeople are very reticient to hire openly gay ones. Thus the decision to remain closeted isn't just about fear, it's about career.
This is no different than the problem we still face in entertainment, an industry where legend claims that gays are ubiquitous. Yet there are very few openly gay celebrities, and most of the male ones are not Americans. A lot of studios are generally unwilling to cast an openly gay man as an action hero or romantic lead in a chick flick.
Thus a lot of these people want to keep quiet so that they can have their careers. Sad but true.
Depends of the sport
I think it's very difficult for someone in a team sport, you must deal with your team mates, your coach and the team fans, and there's more homophobia in teams sports than in indivial sports, because fans feel like a member of a collective.
The spanish national sport is futbol (soccer) and there's a lot of homophobia in some groups of fans, but not so much in the players, but if one soccer player will come out of the closet, there must be a shock (even when its well known that tfere are a buch of gay players)
The ideal sport to come out is tennis, if you are good enought you don't even depend of sponsors or endorsements, and there are a lot of gay tennis fans. I think that a good gay tennis player (specially if he is quite handsome) would do a lot of money with endorsements, because it appeal to a lot of people. But as Martina Navratilova said, if they don't come out of the closet is because they don't want it. In fact we know there are a bunch of gay tennis players because homophobic ones like Tipsarevic or Pashanski said so.
And ther's a thing to avoid pressure (media and own pressure) because everybody knows that ice skaking is pretty gay, almost half of the ice skaters are gay, and the audience is pretty gay too (and gay friendly) but there are very few out ice skaters
But what goes on behind the scenes?
Going back to the example of Hollywood, how many actors do you think are actively encouraged to stay in the closet by studios, agents, etc...?
There are all kinds of complex dynamics in the world of sports. A lot of people managing sports associations are homophobic and do have the capability of keeping gay athletes off teams for global events like the Olympics and otherwise marginalizing them.
For men in particular sports is a venue for asserting one's manliness. No greater threat exists than being out-performed by a gay man. A lot of divers hated and resented Greg Louganis. A lot of coaches and organizers would much rather have their sports "untainted" by homosexuality entirely, and have the means to quietly deny known gays access to events.
It's almost a little more forgivable with lesbians because lesbians are perceived as being more "masculine" than regular women and being good at sports is a "masculine" trait in the eyes of many people.
But a successful gay male athlete is problematic on many levels. They trigger knee-jerk homophobia in straight men who feel threatened and emasculated by agay man that can outperform them. Thus I think that there are much larger forces at work here than just individual athletes' willingness to come out.
I think that the force are many and quite potent .....
Homophobia in sports is a given and I can empathize with anyone choosing to remain closeted. On the other hand, while many will make life for difficult for out athletes as they want to maintain the illusion of that even the gayest-perceived sport is fully made of heterosexuals, at times we just have to say "f*ck it" as nothing that can be done to any of us can be as bad as the weight/shame that some of us carry worrying about what will happen if...
I know that gays are bullied and even killed for being brave, but why should it always be about someone else taking the hard steps? I am not saying that it's a necessity, but so much of our collective challenges seem to come from waiting for others lead the way. We are all human and remaining in the closet is generally not directly harming third-parties, but then we may have to be ready to face our continued invisibility and slowly whither away in our underpresented lives.
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
Well said
I agree wholeheartedly with your words, "why should it always be about someone else taking the hard steps". It's taken awhile but I've finally realized that change won't come from some Hollywood actor or big sports hero coming out, but rather by the "average" gay man or lesbian coming out. I'm never going to be on a box of Wheaties or be a gay spokesman a la NPH, but I can be a positive gay example in my tiny accounting practice.
Is our Michael Jensen being held hostage?
I am busting your chops as I actually like seeing a little untempered emotion sneaking out of you. I find that lack of out gay athletes disappointing too. The same applies to almost anyone in the public eye as our fears tend to generally be so much potent than any effects of being forthright about who we are, and I am not just talking about sexual orientation.
While I understand fear too well, how many of these Olympians really have a shot at endorsement deals of magnitude? For every Michael Phelps, there are hundreds/thousands who will not see major windfalls even if they are at the top of the heap in their respective sport. I assume that there is not a pot of riches awaiting most individuals in team sports, individuals in sports that are not ratings/marketing bonanzas, and the vast majority of athletes whose success might be measured in simply qualifying to be in the Olympics.
I think that it's a shame that so many of us limit themselves (self very much included) because of perceived macro realities. No one can tell me that long out actor Guillermo Diaz is not getting work, or that his work is limited to only gay roles. And he's Latin to boot, so talk about other mountains to climb as race is kind of hard to hide. I was surprised last week when some talked about how detrimental it could be for a Michael Urie to come out of the closet IF he were gay. If anything, I would guess that playing the same character week after week and a very fey one at that would be more "limiting" for future jobs than if he were an out gay man. I mention Urie only because someone incorrectly indicated that he was out and when I pointed out that I thought he was not, the thread started to evolve into the widely accepted idea/reality of how being out obviously affects how America sees us.
The above example is not universal, but huge success is so hard to come by, or maintain, irrespectively of sexual orientation. The public and endorsement contracts are fickle mistresses. When it comes sports, marketability is even harder to come by and generally requires a certain authenticity that is undermined when hiding in the shadows.
Come out, come out wherever you are... While, this month's OUT cover boy Neil Patrick Harris was already financially secure when he was forced to come out, has anyone seen that in that past year Neil's career has shot through the roof? The "straights" refer to him as "NPH" too, which I was shocked to see as he's now seen as this cool dude by "America." And he's actually getting mainstream ads that were not available to him before, possibly due to lack of the final push of visibility that made people take notice that the guy is talented as hell and one of them/us. It's not all doom and gloom, except when we fear everything.
There are still many rivers to cross as I assume that if NPH were less "straight-acting," less talented and not as Wonder Bread-appealing at the mass level, he would not be getting ads, adulation, nor gotten the opportunity to play his current character on a show that I have to check out sometime. Homophobia is alive and kicking, but one way to challenge it is to try to kick its butt back. So many times those who do the actual challenging wind up being the biggest beneficiaries of all. Again come out, even in baby steps....
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
10 out bisexual/lesbian athletes
There really are 10 out bisexual/lesbian athletes according to afterellen.com. Check out last weeks Best.Lesbian.Week.Ever. for more information: http://www.afterellen.com/blwe/08-08-08
Why is this even a Topic?
I always thought coming out was a personal issue. Just because you may want more out athletes doesn't mean every gay athlete has to announce his or her orientation to the world.
I watch the games for the games - and yes the hot men. I don't care if they are gay, straight or bi. Its none of my business. I'm a 43 year old man and I'm not looking for a role model. In fact when I was a kid I wasn't looking for a gay role model.
And yes I'm out, I couldn't hide it if I tried.
So how about a new topic please.
But what about those 13 year old boys...
...watching at home, who DO need a role model? You know, aside from the homophobia and uber-macho posturing involved with athletics, I might've been more interested in sports as a kid (and, thus, also as an adult) had there been a few out and proud athletes to inspire me.
And, not just that, but even for the str8 folks watching at home, seeing a gay man triumph, or even just participate, in an athletic event can make an impact.
Finally, it's not about sex or some "personal issue." I hate to be so direct, but aren't you making the same error that so many str8 people do? Gay=sex. This is about identity, a person's humanity, who they've fallen in love with, not about who or what they're boinking in the hotel room.
Who's job is it?
I'm in the same boat regarding the love of sports. I realize that I probably would have much more respect for pro athletes and sports in general now if I had had great out and proud athletes as role models for me as a kid. But even if there are 13-year old boys (and no question there are) who DO need a role model, an athlete's biggest aim is to be the best he can be at his or her sport, and the drama that can accompany a coming out can destroy an athlete's ability to focus on the sport.
When did gay athletes suddenly become responsible for being the poster boys for gay youth? They know exactly how some people would react and can end up losing out HUGE because of it. I think this depends in part on the sport... I'm sure the swimmers and basketballers have more problems than say, the gymnasts or divers. And yes, coming out would start to pave the way for future athletes to do so without suffering consequences, but why is it any one athlete's responsibility to take on that first-mover burden?
Also, people often choose to hide for reasons other than career-related ones, so I do think it is a personal issue. Imagine if one of the Chinese athletes came out publicly... not only would the government ditch him, but his family would likely disown him as well. And while I hope that Altpro is not making the same hetero error that gay=sex, unfortunately straight people do indeed make that error, and as they are the majority of the population, their reactions have significant impact on the athlete. I think it's better we encourage athletes to be themselves and to give a LOT of support to the ones who do compete as out, but I don't think we should stress that they have some sort of obligation to be gay role models.
"Coming out" is certainly not an obligation by any stretch of ..
of the imagination.
The many dangers/loss of opportunities of coming out are well documented. Valid fear keeps many of us in so many closets that sometimes it's even hard to keep track of how many are hiding in at any given time in our lives.
To demand that everyone come out (even if well intended) is unreasonable, but I think that many of us are simply trying to expand the myopic view that staying in the closet means and what coming out may imply. It's not unreasonable to suggest that the closet might be hurting some athletes at the personal level, and even preventing them from possible glory and support that they may not factor in when athletes and their multiple stakeholders weigh the pros and cons of being/remaining in the closet.
While coming out might bring drama and unwanted attention, and might hurt future income generating opportunities, I think that it's essential the we continue beating the drum about the possibility that leaving the closet might free some athletes to better focus on the sport.
Coming out just a few months back did not seem to affect Matthew Mitcham's performance as he for the first time beat his all of his peers, and accomplished it in the biggest stage on earth. Would he have taken the gold if he were still in the closet? We'll never know. He very might have, but it certainly did not hurt him as most would theorize. Will his future earnings be affected negatively due to his being gay? In his particular case I doubt it, as his success may trump homophobia as Australia loves its divers.
But what about the many closeted and straight athletes who will come and go without seeing medals or endorsements? Most will go back home to face their families, communities, and known societal homophobia; however those who decide to come out might find that there is support, freedom, and maybe even money somewhere down the line.
Coming out of the closet to me is no different than those people who follow paths that are left of center, as the center loves to beat the crap out of inviduals who threaten it. Society has long made it hard for girls to be accepted if they don't fit a particular role. For those who are overweight, the closet may not be an option any more than for the boy who expresses himself in ways that are seen as "gay." Neither can hide and they are forced to live/suffer/and hopefully prosper openly.
The smart girl who raises her hand when she knows the answer to a tough question has a choice of keeping quiet, but just because it's looked down upon, girls all over the world are deciding that they do not want to usurp their education at the risk of being made fun of/abused by their peers. The same applies to girls who are atheletic. Companies like Nike are seeing that enough girls are leaving their closet and that there is money to be made in fomenting "girl power." Talk about a win/win as the company is able to cash in by helping to broaden what makes a girl/woman.
What about the black guy who chooses an advanced placement literature class over basketball? He'll likely suffer the wrath of being called a wanna-be white by his black and white peers. Love of language is seen as a white thing. It's crazy, but let's call a spade a spade. He could sit back and hide, but like the smart girls, more and more minorities are fighting back thus expanding long-standing definitions.
What about the straight guy who thinks that modern dance is an integral part of who he is? Or the white girl from a "good" family (which of course refers to money in broad societal short-hand) who falls in love with the boy from the barrio? She'll likely get hell from her family, white friends, and might also roughed up by a Latina who is offended that this girl, who might be perceived as having it all, is also wanting to take the little she might see as belonging to her.
We all make "decisions" in life that some are/will be threatened by, and we all pay the price (including death) and hopefully enjoy a greater upside that might serve as the foundation for a lifetime of making choices that feel honest rather than simply reacting to well-founded fears.
For those who can be in the closet, it's not necessary that they come out, but it might be in their best interest to do so and as quickly as possible to enjoy the benefits of the act. A side-effecti might be that the action will help to remold the warped risk/benefit profile that "society" wants to give everything that challenges it. While coming out it's not an obligation in any capacity, this world is changed by people who make personal choices that at times light a fire under the butt of many others.
I think that there are many of us who go to bed at night and feel less than stellar about some of the secrets that we keep. It should be our choice to remain in those prisons, but coming out should not only be framed as a personal choice with uncontested assumed negatives that will come from said action.
I think that it does much good to discuss coming out as more than a personal choice so that we can help one another to possibly develop a more expansive view of what might be waiting at the end of coming out. It might not be a gold medal, but beatings and expected challenges. The beating(s) and ______ might come anyway for any one can't role-play well enough to be in the closet, or simply decide to show their true colors.
While it may not top the list of considerations, any discussion of coming out needs to include the side-effect of serving as a role model for future generations. Each and every single one of us is enjoying rights/opportunities due to the work of others who did not have a choice or made a choice to come out.
To coast on the collective victories of our ancestors may be more than a little selfish. Nothing wrong/illegal about that, but why should we leave all the hard work to others?
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
I understand, but, at the same time...
...I see myself as part of a community, and I don't mean just the gay community, but a global community. Increasingly, I think we owe it to the world to be out, to say: "This is who I am, I am not ashamed of it. It is not me entirely, but it is a pivotal element of my being."
Only by all of us doing that, the famous and the not famous, can we achieve any kind of change. It has start somewhere and sometime, and I'm tired of waiting.
Check out my blog: http://radicalsexy.blogspot.com/
All the more reason to lionize our heroes
In Mitcham's case coming out was something he did spontaneously during an interview. But the consequence has been that we had our very own Jesse Owens in a way. This is significant in that Mitcham did not try to cover his sexual orientation and relationship up until at least after the games.
For this reason he deserves all the praise we can manage. He ought to be on the cover of every gay magazine on the planet, even the ones he's already been on.
(Memo to Speedo Corp: if you want gay men to keep buying Speedos in large numbers I recommend you guys use Matt in lots of advertisements....)
Already he seems to have quite a bit of coverage in the mainstream Aussie press and it looks positive. I think that the Aussies are more happy that one of their's derailed Chinese dominance and brought home the Gold than they are bothered by his being gay. Their nationalism may override any homophobia in this instance.
I am, however, wondering if the Chinese guy, Zhou, committed ritual suicide yet? Plus God alone knows what of ribbing the Russian is taking over coming in behind a homo. Ditto everyone further down the ranking. I understand a lot of straight divers resented Louganis too (his "secret" having been widely suspected in the sport).
The key here is that being an out gay Olympic Champion should be a positive thing because I think that is what will encourage more guys to come out. I can only expect that the drinks will be free in his preferred gay bars.
I am lionizing Matthew - While I hate empty idolatry....
http://springintoaction.typepad.com/media_guillotine/2008/08/matthew-mitcham-wins-gold-medal-via-the-highest-scoring-dive-in-olympic-history.html
There have certainly been hotter guys during the Beijing Olympic Games, but none who radiated joy like Matthew.
Also, just think of how many gay, gay-friendly, and possibly not so gay-friendly future athletes watched history in the making. Maybe the latter will benefit even more than the others as they are seeing stereotypes tumbling to go along with any demonization or homophobic indoctrination that may be on the menu.
Hope for the future of gay athletics
We'll have to see how things play out Down Under. So far the press looks positive and the latest Aussie TV interview posted to YouTube had the interviewer openly mention how he was supported by his partner. Any negative stuff appears to have been the domain of Imus-type "funny men" whose opinions aren't worth very much. It looks like the medal-counting Aussies are just plain happy he's bringing home the Gold.
Hopefully this will convince other gay male athletes, at least ones from First World nations, to come out. While Matthew might have won without his partner Lachlan in the audience, I think that he would have missed out on some of the joy we saw at the awards ceremony and in his interview in the street with Lachlan's arm around him. The one reward he did get for being out was to have his partner there with him openly and without shame to share in the happiness.
That seems like something worth having to me, and maybe an incentive to others.
AtlPro, why shouldn't it be a topic
Just to make it clear
I'm not sure that that is accurate
What is the line between coming out willingly and being forced out? There are many thick lines to be drawn, of course -- very often by He Who Shall Not Be Named.com. And there was the thick line drawn by Ellen DeGeneres when she came out, very publicly, on the cover of a major magazine and on her television show.
But there are thinner lines as well: the low-key decisions that T.R. and NPH made -- albeit in response to a life-changing (or at least mind-changing) event -- as well as even lower-key decisions that those of us who are not in the public eye make every day. My decision to be out at my job, for instance, wasn't forced on me -- but in a way you could argue that it was, because people were going to wonder (as coworkers always do) and I wanted them not to wonder.
In Olympic gold medalist (I just love being able to write that!) Matthew Mitcham's case, it was a similar response, I think. He's a somewhat high-profile person, being an Olympian and all, so he was being interviewed by a reporter (instead of being wondered about behind his back, as happens to the rest of us). And in response to a question that a reporter would ask anyone, he made the decision to include his life partner Lachlan as part of his family -- as well he should have. He made the only decision he felt right about making.
Thank God we're at least to that point in our evolution, that persons of Matthew's and Lachlan's generation can be more matter-of-fact about who their family is than geezers of my generation felt allowed to be! We have quite a bit of road ahead of us (Hello, Mr. and Mr. Wildmon! Hello, Topeka Phelps wingnuts!), but we have come far enough that our reigning gold medalist is out and proud. Great job, Matthew -- I look forward to watching the replay tonight!
MATTHEW MITCHAM WINS OLYMPIC GOLD!!!
HOLY CRAP... *AMAZING* final dive on a 3.8, the ONLY athlete in the 2008 Games to win a gold medal in diving over the Chinese and the ONLY athlete to prevent an 8-for-8 sweep of Golds for China! MATTHEW MITCHAM YOU ARE MY HERO!!!
Mitcham Nails It!
We had only one openly gay male athlete in Beijing and he snatched the Gold away from the seemingly unbeatable Chinese in the last diving event! He may not want to be a gay hero but I think it's a foregone conclusion that he will be.
In an interview afterwards he stood with his mother and his partner Lachlan, who had his arm around Mitcham, and expressed how happy he was they were there for his victory. Towards the end of the interview the smiling partners hugged. (now if I could just relocate where I found the damn video in my Internet wanderings tonight...)
It's so awesome to see an out athlete compete and win at the Olympics. But it will be a bitter pill for homophobes Down Under that a gay brought back their first diving Gold in more than 80 years, and set a record for highest score on a single dive.
Matt deserves so many kudos for all he's accomplished!
Going for Gold Reminder: 1 of every 5 gay people IS Chinese
Not to dampen the celebration, but before everyone goes dissin' China accidentally, remember that 1 of every 5 gay people on Earth IS Chinese. In fact, Chinese gay people are the LARGEST ethnic representation of gay human beings on the planet. All the provinces and autonomous regions in China have GLBT (known as Tongzhi) groups. And China has GLBT Sports groups, too. I know the Western press gives little coverage to the gay community on the other side of the world, but they do exist and have organized substantially. Just something to remember whenever heterosexuals create anything (a sports competition, etc.) that purports to pit "West" vs. "East".
www.gaycommunitycenters.org
Why does it speak poorly of
Why does it speak poorly of the athletes? Mine may be an unpopular opinion but why do any of these amateur athletes owe anything to anyone other than themselves and those who helped them get to the podium? If Michael Phelps were gay, do you think that Kelloggs would be chasing after him for endorsements or that the publishing company would pay him big bucks to write his memoirs? Do you think that if someone like Michael Phelps were to come out of the closet that many others would follow? They wouldn't. They'd jump on the opportunity to become the new swimming posterboy and kellogg's sponsor because the fag was knocked off of his throne. I think that you give people too much credit, gays and straights alike.
I swam competitively for 15 years. 2 hours in the morning before school, weight lifting after school and then 3 hours more of practice. I spent weekends traveling hours to swimmeets. I gave up my life for the sport. The rigors of my schedule don't even compare to those of Olympian athletes. If someone like Michael Phelps were gay, I wouldn't fault him in the least for remaining closeted. I wouldn't squander away an estimated 40 million that he's going to make this year because others expect unwarrantedly for me to be their gay role model. His diligence, sacrifice and perserverance are qualities that should be emulated by anyone straight or gay. It's a problem for me that we absolutely need gay role models to emulate. Ideally, we'd emulate the qualities of a quality individual without regards to his sexuality.
I'm not trying to be snippy, but it drives me insane when people call out athletes who are afraid or unwilling to come out of the closet. Beyond the money, the abuse they would suffer, in many cases, would be incredible. I've seen it happen more times than I care to mention. A dedicated athlete's mind and body are taxed beyond their limits daily. I can't imagine dealing with such overwhelming strain and the mental and physical abuse that would come along with being openly gay in the sport. Maybe I'm weak, but that's my perspective.
On the need for out athletes as role models
I have to agree with Michaelangelo for the most part. While it's great that more and more celebrities (entertainment and sport alike) are coming out and showing they're not afraid to be themselves, I still think coming out is a personal decision. Many elite athletes don't make a lot of money, especially those in the less popular sports. Their sacrifice is for their sport, and when they're lucky enough to make it to the Olympics, it's for their country. And as described in some of the above posts, and as in the case of the great Louganis, sponsors will drop athletes simply because, let's face it, there's enough homophobic people out their who don't think gays are man enough for professional sports. Just re-watch the Emmett/Drew Boyd plot in QAF... he lost his fans, his endorsements, and above all, he lost the thing he loved most -- playing football.
Just because they don't wave the rainbow flag for "the good of the community", does not mean it speaks poorly of them. Of course, the REAL heroes are the ones who do choose to show their true colours, like Matthew Mitcham, and who go on to accomplish great things. And even if they don't come out during their prime, which is when everything matters and when the dough rolls in, that doesn't mean they can't come out a few years later when they're transitioning out of their professional career and give everyone the lovely 'And you thought I was straight' schpiel. (And even then, there's a good chance they'll lose out on other endorsements and contracts, case in point Mark Tewksbury.)
However, for those who choose not to come out, there are some things I don't respect. Going out of one's way to play straight, i.e. marrying a woman and seeding her with children, is dishonest to the extent that it is more harmful than protective. Let people question your sexuality and simply deny it if necessary -- it just means that you have to go a very long time without sex, or hope you have a very trustworthy partner. But in a world of, yes, countries that allow same-sex marriage and civil unions and laws that protect us from discriminating prosecution, under no circumstance is it acceptable to be so misleading to another person, deceiving them for most or all of their life.
I've competed in stressful competitions, mind you that was in music, but that was just city-wide and for me alone. I can only imagine the pressure build-up for pro athletes who are expected to perform well for corporate sponsors and their entire country. I don't think Michaelangelo is weak for empathizing with in-the-closet athletes, and I agree that we should be able to emulate people for their qualities and not their sexuality.
HUBBA-HUBBA! (and Hooray!)
http://towleroad.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/07/07/mitcham.jpg
Video: Mitcham Celebrates Victory with Partner and Mother
Found it:
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/video/?vxSiteId=6eb02996-d2d9-45cc-bb79-8b5b3340f4f8&vxChannel=Olympics&vxClipId=1383_369770&vxBitrate=300
It's almost unspeakably beautiful because he acts as if there's nothing unusual being interviewed with his partner's arm around him. Which is as it should be.
Couldn't agree more
Thanks for the video
Thanks for the video Psionycx. That was quite cute.
I could not see the competition, but saw some shots at the moment where he was blobbering mess and I almost became one. The happines in his face just got to me, I was so glad for him.
Honestly, the highlight of the Olympics for me. Couldt happen to nicer and genuine guy, whether he was gay or not; but the fact that he was, was just perfect.
Brilliant
The whole world was watching!
afhickman
"The mountain has wings."
Thanks so much, Psionycx. This is a truly spectacular video. It's the sort of thing that vindicates the Internet, at least for me.
He's adorable!
He deserves the gold for sheer adorableness
He Deserves the Gold for Courage
He was clearly comfortable with himself in every way
NBC Finks Out On Its Matt Coverage
While we've all been Phelpsed to death no interviews -- or even shots -- of Matt's Mum and Lachlan
http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/beijing/blog/fourth_place_medal/post/Openly-gay-diver-wins-gold?urn=oly,102974
Mitcham's perfectly right
Being gay and diving are completely separate parts of life, and I totally support the fact that he'd rather be known simply for his diving than expect everyone to make a big deal out of his sexuality. You go Matt! Let us do the publicizing for you, that's OUR job!
As for NBC's decision to not include anything about his partner Lachlan and the support that Lachlan gave him to overcome his past issues, it figures and I'm hardly surprised. NBC shows what will please its audience, and homophobic America is hardly ready for a proud, queer gold medalist.
Mitcham's relationship is in Aussie press though at least
Found this at the Sydney Morning Herald site:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/diving/outandout-champion-celebrates/2008/08/24/1219516264750.html
In one of the pics I found online it looked like he had kissed or was about to kiss Lachlan in the stands but I couldn't tell for sure.
Not surprised that NBC would ignore Mitcham's relationship, although their coverage of non-American athletes is often spotty as it is. But Mitcham is newsworthy because he prevented the Chinese from sweeping the diving events the way Phelps swept the swimming.
This is a tough thing
Honestly I can see both sides. As a teacher I am out to staff and faculty but in a don't ask don't tell situation with students. I have, after a great deal of thought, decided that if asked by a student this year I will say yes. I don't exactly expect the students to faint, I am single, 40, sponser the gay straight alliance, and am known for not tolerating any crap toward gay students. In all fairness, looking at that evidence, I can easily see them concluding I am gay.
In the case of these athletes they have worked their asses off for years to get where they are and coming out would be a huge risk to all of that. That is where I was with teaching. I am glad for Matt and surely proud of him, but can understand reticence on the part of others. It really is a tough, and ultimately irrevocable, decision.
Never underestimate the cumulative imact of all of this
When I was growing up, coming of age in the late 50's and early 60's, no one in public life was out. Finding out who I was through the lives of others was practically an archeological dig. I found Proust, Rimbaud, Lautreamont, William Beckford and others. Moving towards the 20th century -- Jean Genet, James Purdy, Gavin Lambert, Christopher Isherwood and John Rechy. The last three I was lucky enough to meet and come to know as people. But as you can see they're all artists -- living in a very special level on the social scale.
Kids today have all sorts of major out people to see every day of the week: Ellen, John Barrowman, NPH and now Matthew Micham.
I was never interested in sports. The macho ethic and sublimation of homoeroticism repelled me. But I know any number of brave gays fought their way in and tried to hang on as best they could. People like Greg Louganis, Rudy Galindo, Billy Bean and Dave Kopay were trailblazers who shouldn't be forgotten. Matthew Mitcham turns a new page in sport and social history. His gayness cannot be ignored. It's central to what makes him glow in the dark.
A great point
Especially significant
This is especially significant because Mitcham will be going home this week as a hero with his homosexuality a matter of common knowledge. In the past it has usually been the case that an athlete's sexuality becomes known after the fact. But Mitcham went into the Olympics already out and goes home in triumph with everyone knowing who he really is. That he was willing to be interviewed with his partner at his side, and freely admitting that Lachlan is his partner, is such a statement of pride.
To me that makes all the difference. Mitcham, whether he intended it it originally or not, is such a great hero for his own country and our community globally.
msnbc sucks
What makes it reprehensible is that there was gigantic press coverage (in au at least) over Matt looking for a sponsor so that he could bring his partner to cheer him at the games. Every article I've read on his coming out has mentioned that Matthew was worried about that.
So, showing his partner and mentioning that would be newsworthy in it's self. There was doubt that Lachlan would be able to make it. I never heard reports, or follow up as to whether he was going or not. Did Johnson and Johnson pay, or did folks donate money? Matthew ran up into the stands to embrace him soon after his final score was announced. What happened to that coverage?
But if NBC sports made a conscience decision not to show this newsworthy bit, like a simple pan to Lachlan with a comment or subtext, well, that's typical. MSNBC is homophobic. What else is new. And in that case they really shouldn't be granted coverage of events like this, that are suppose to represent everyone.
Matthew Mitcham talks with partner and mother out side of the hall with his gold. YouTube Link.
I'd like to see an gold medel olympic athlete come out at the height of the endorsements, when his face is on every Wheaties box and ad for Nike.
.
How Matthew's mom and Lachlan got to Beijing
I can't remember where I originally read this, but I understand that Lachlan's way was provided by Johnson & Johnson's Athlete Family Support Program. (Actually, I just went to Wikipedia and "verified" it -- as much as you can verify something on Wikipedia! At least it confirmed what I had read on some Google search or similar Internet site.) And I believe that his mother's way was paid by a donor or group of donors (probably from the gay community) -- I don't know whether the donation was anonymous or not.
Another great thing...
...in the article that Psioncyx linked to above:
She proudly said her son was a man of "firsts".
"Coming out publicly, that was a first," said Vivien. "The highest score awarded to an Olympic dive ever, another first. How many more firsts can this child get? Can you find something else to be first in? He's just done so well. He deserves it."
I'm mean, that's just wonderful and beautiful, and so important as a message to send out, how supporting and loving and accepting she is.
Check out my blog: http://radicalsexy.blogspot.com/
According to The Advocate J&J paid for Lachlan and at the ....
Interestingly (or not) MSNBC is replacing Dan Abrams with Rachel Maddow. Cosmetics or a real attempt to address their critics? I know it's all about ratings so maybe neither of the above.
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com
You know what the "American Family Association" would say --
Who can keep track of all the boycotts?
The AFA has me on their email list (under my M4M chatroom screen name -- hehe), so I get emails from them just about every day. ("Dear SuckMe69 ...") It's great -- sometimes it makes my skin crawl, sometimes the stupidity of their language just makes me shake my head, and sometimes they make me laugh. But it keeps me in the know about what Satan and his son Tim the anti-Christ are up to. And it lets me know what companies I should support, to counteract their "boycotting" efforts.
So I guess I should expect an email telling me not to buy Johnson & Johnson products and to stay away from the evils of Wheaties.
Even your "lifestyle" may even hurt credit score.....
Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.
http://springintoaction.typepad.com