Welcome to AfterElton.com!

Enter your AfterElton.com username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
News, Reviews & Commentary on Gay and Bisexual Men in Entertainment and the Media

ATWT and its sister P&G soap are in trouble: With these numbers (Nov 10-14), I can't see how they won't be cancelled

With lead ins Y&R and B&B starting to get back on their feet again, cancellation has to be in the horizon for GL, which in my opinion would be the last nail in ATWT's coffin as it would rid P&G of its last non-core asset. I speculate that neither is a candidate for being picked up by another network as neither has ever had "attractive" demos. Even DOOL, which for whatever reason manages to bring in the kids year after year no matter how cruddy it is, apparently had to fire half its star players to get an 18-month renewal.

Numbers are based on Live+Same Day ratings

(Compared to Last Week/Compared to Last Year)

Total Viewers
1. Y&R 4,876,000 (+202,000/-876,000)
2. B&B 3,481,000 (+102,000/-441,000)
3. OLTL 2,912,000 (+219,000/+65,000)
4. GH 2,889,000 (-6,000/-405,000)
5. AMC 2,683,000 (+19,000/+76,000)
6. DAYS 2,670,000 (-16,000/-18,000)
7. ATWT 2,535,000 (-16,000/-668,000)
8. GL 1,950,000 (-115,000/-735,000) <——— new low

HH
1. Y&R 3.6/12 (+.2/-.4)
2. B&B 2.5/8 (same/-.3)
3. GH 2.2/7 (same/-.3)
3. OLTL 2.2/7 (+.2/same)
5. AMC 2.1/7 (+.1/+.1)
6. DAYS 2.0/7 (same/same)
7. ATWT 1.9/6 (same/-.4)
8. GL 1.4/4 (-.1/-.6) <———— new low

Women 18-49 Viewers
1. Y&R 1,070,000 (+31,000/-193,000)
2. GH 993,000 (+12,000/-95,000)
3. OLTL 966,000 (+89,000/+96,000)
4. AMC 859,000 (+55,000/+55,000)
5. DAYS 831,000 (-17,000/-71,000)
6. B&B 819,000 (-29,000/-72,000)
7. ATWT 648,000 (-49,000/-163,000)
8. GL 491,000 (-86,000/-254,000)

Women 18-49 Rating
1. Y&R 1.6/10 (same/-.3)
2. GH 1.5/9 (same/-.2)
2. OLTL 1.5/9 (+.2/+.1)
4. AMC 1.3/8 (+.1/+.1)
4. DAYS 1.3/7 (same/-.1)
6. B&B 1.2/7 (-.1/-.2)
7. ATWT 1.0/6 (-.1/-.2)
8. GL 0.7/4 (-.2/-.4) <———– new low

Girls 12-17 Viewers
1. Y&R 58,000 (+6,000/-17,000)
2. B&B 44,000 (-1,000/+12,000)
3. ATWT 37,000 (same/+22,000)
4. OLTL 36,000 (-4,000/-17,000)
5. AMC 32,000 (+5,000/-19,000)
6. DAYS 31,000 (-12,000/-11,000)
7. GH 24,000 (+3,000/-61,000)
8. GL 18,000 (-7,000/-12,000)

Women 18-34 Rating
1. GH 1.1/6 (+.1/same)
1. DAYS 1.1/6 (same/same)
3. Y&R 0.9/6 (-.1/-.1)
3. OLTL 0.9/6 (+.1/+.2)
3. AMC 0.9/5 (+.2/+.2)
6. B&B 0.7/4 (-.1/same)
7. ATWT 0.6/3 (-.1/same)
8. GL 0.4/3 (-.1/-.2)

Men 18+ Viewers
1. Y&R 1,174,000 (+22,000/-342,000)
2. B&B 755,000 (+31,000/-190,000)
3. DAYS 641,000 (+48,000/+106,000)
4. OLTL 535,000 (+55,000/-71,000)
5. AMC 530,000 (same/-47,000)
6. ATWT 519,000 (-16,000/-209,000)
7. GH 487,000 (-11,000/-181,000)
8. GL 458,000 (-31,000/-142,000)


Anthony D. Langford's picture

Well....

.... there are strong rumors that a certain east coast head writer has been told to get their act together or they will be fired.   I don't think it's AMC, which just got a new head writer who is raising the ratings.  OLTL has had it's as of late, but it too, is doing better.  My feeling is that it's a P&G soap.  While it could be GL, cause Lord knows they could use a new writing team as well, ATWT is a definate candidate.  TPTB's jobs were a risk last year and they were told to raise the ratings or else.  They did so, with the 'Carly is dying -- oh, not really' plot and the Luke/Noah romance, which the show credits for the ratings boost.  But as we all know they squandered every bit of their growth.  They were in a solid third in March, now it's likely they'll never see that again.  A summer of Parker and Liberty, the Holden/Carly affair (which the show is desperate to pretend never happened), treating Luke and Noah like afterthoughts sent all the viewers they gained packing.  For a show to gain viewers and then lose them because of the writers refuse to play what got them there, they should be fired.    Every other soap, except GH (and Guza's got until early next year to get it going or he's history), got rid of their writing team over the past year because the show was suffering in the ratings or creatively.  ATWT is suffering in both.  Bringing back James didn't help, neither did bringing back Dusty.   And it's because bringing them back isn't enough.  You need good stories to go along with that... and ATWT is giving us tired versions of stuff we didn't like the first time.  It's time for fresh blood, seriously.
Nukely's picture

They got it.

P&G has got the exact kind of show that P&G wants. What has really changed in a year? And what will change? New writers might be no better with the same handcuffs. I mean, CBS, P&G and the head writer sit down every week and hammer this garbage out together. They took a huge hit firing Martha. Are they making more money because of that? I doubt it. But letting a high payed actress go in order to cut salary costs is not a writing blunder, nor is that CBS's fault. It's the kind of decision that the producer makes. The viewers that left with Martha are never coming back; who was going to replace them what with the Nuke viewers getting more bored with the stories every day?

The producers and Network are suppose to be the expeditor that prevents the writers from churning out the same old garbage. I mean, they are getting 6 month break downs of the story-lines, It's their fault if they can't see those plot lines and say "um, haven't we done that story like 10 times already?" or "The public are never going to buy that." Instead they are getting the show exactly the way they want it.

But as the ratings prove, that isn't the show the viewers want.

 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Guillermo Serritiello's picture

I think that P&G is guilty of neglect

as their lack of leadership at a critical time has allowed this show to deteriorate to the point that its even managed to bleed the most traditional of fans. I don't think that they are getting the show that they want per se, but dropped the ball by not using the recipe that they'd use with any other of its under-performing consumer goods.

P&G is ultimately responsible for what airs, how they tackle competition, and how they respond (or fail to) to the critical and mass criticism that its remaining 2 shows have been getting in the last 2-3 years. My thinking is that it failed to address critical issues for so long and when it did, it only looked at the cost-side of the equation while continuing to neglect quality and other show elements that once had been handled quite well by Chris Goutman. If Crest started losing market share, P&G would not only reduce costs but it would know to amp up marketing and R&D as even cash cows require additional investments.

What I don't get is their blind faith in Chris Goutman, esp. after his run-ins with the press and being responsible for losing the wildly popular and respected Larry Bryggman and then when he adopted really gutter-worthy tactics in a PR-battle with Martha Byrne to make her look greedy. Head-writer Jean Passanante should have been the first to go while Goutman should have focused on reducing costs and finding the right balance of amazing new actors (who rarely have high price tags) as NYC is a magnet for actors with the whole package, keeping a core set of veterans, and setting the standard on how to address the fan base so that it at least gets the impression that he gives a ____.

By attacking only the cost side, there is a point in which the ratings will (maybe already are) so low that the only reasonable option is to wrap things up. My gut tells me that by choosing to stick with Goutman on ATWT and Ellen Wheeler on GL (who apparently has the wrath of every one in the industry), the company is showing its cards. This is entirely speculative, but my thinking is that P&G has decided to milk the last cent out of these shows with the tacit acceptance that the writing is on the wall. It would take money to replace Goutman and/or Passanante and their respective replacements would need time to turn the current mess around.

I do blame P&G for neglecting to demand creative change or to nurture soap's longest running shows with an eye on the future. For them, the potential death of this show will simply be a revenue source that no longer was worth investing in. To the fans, it will be the death of characters and a genre that still has a place in the broad spectrum of entertainment.

Guillermo's Media Guillotine: Entertainment, journalism, politics, and popular culture.

http://springintoaction.typepad.com

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Nukely's picture

the P&G that matters

P&Gs leadership isn't lacking at this critical time, if that's what you mean, because now isn't the critical time. This is the way they have been operating all along. It's pretty obvious that P&G's leadership began to crumble the day after Luke and Noah first kissed and they have been faltering and stepping from one cow pie onto another ever since. It's comical if you want to look at it that way and ignore the fact that what they've been doing to Nuke was done to try and appease the AFA crowd, and every other misstep was just plane stupid writing and producing. As a matter of fact I think that the writers and producers of the show have gotten a free ride because of Nuke. They can blame every personal error on the limitations that P&G have imposed on the show. I don't know how long that lasts, but the board of directors at P&G certainly owe them a debt of gratitude, not that anyone expects them to pay out.

By skyrocketing in the ratings last fall, ATWT was the envy of every single soap, and perhaps the most remarkable rise of any soap in history because of Nuke. (btw, that can be accredited to Passanante and Goutman) That was the "critical" time. What did ATWT do with that success? They bought new cameras and a new studio facility. I don't think that P&G can handle success because they can't, they certainly can't handle the success of a gay coupling. They looked at Nuke as a short term gain and that's how they wrote their future: they are now in the same rating they were the year before last (maybe even lower), except that they are producing the show on a cheeper budget. That is what Nuke's success has come down to for them.

I think we're on the same page there, Guillermo, and I agree on what you say about Goutman. But I believe that Passanante and Goutman (would that be p&g to the big P&G?) are getting high scores from the board of directors, even while they are getting low scores from viewers. P&G have many subsidiaries, and for what ever reason P&G have done shameful things with their soaps. Why is anybody's guess. I'm saying that it's intentional and not the problem of middle management and the writers (p&g.)

Do you know who I think is calling the shots on this show? Somebody's halfwit, right-leaning maid. I'm serious. The board of P&G (And by board, I mean the twelve or so people who run P&G and it's many, many subsidiaries of which ATWT is only gnat poo) are only interested in being involved in this show as much as it effects P&G, that usually means the bottom line. They look at a sheet of numbers once a month on how the show is doing. If the numbers are up, they do nothing. Pretty easy job. If the numbers fall drastically, they have to work on the 'problem' and try to fix it. They become annoyed and have to get off their ass, or become invigorated and turn into problem solvers who work their magic. I think that's how things ran pretty much prior to Nuke. The board didn't have to do much work for an arm of the organization that didn't produce much revenue (for the investment) and but who's only benefit had more to do with tradition and brand.

Goutman's job is to make sure that the numbers on that monthly report to the board look agreeable, and he needs to be able to explain the drops in the numbers and come up with a plan when there is a drastic drop. I have no doubt that he has been doing his job effectively. You don't fire someone like that.

But since Nuke, there was a new equation in the way things were run, that being the old pebble in the shoe of the P&G board, known as the AFA. A division (ATWT) that could once describe itself as a branding arm of the organization, had suddenly become the worst possible branding iron. Considering the meager revenue produced by ATWT, it wasn't a good enough trade off when they started to piss off the AFA and the board put a quick kabash on any kissing or what have you on the gay couple. Problem solved. Job done. Everybody goes to bed and wakes up the next day to work their magic all over again.

Hard to say that the board didn't want to just ditch the show and kept it alive merely for tradition. That's where the maid comes in. I don't think anyone on the board gives a flying monkey's flip about whether the show survives or not. It successfully brings in market share for advertising in an increasingly unstable and falling segment of the TV audience, namely daytime broadcast. (As I've said before, the breaking point right now seems to be around 2 mil for total views. When a soap falls below that their head is on the block. What has been typical of the ratings for the last two years is that the soap positions from 3-7 aren't that far apart and hover above 2 mil.) The whole genre of "day time" soap is losing ground to "prime time" soap. And losing relevance.

I feel like what is really keeping this show alive is the opinion of a maid. Someone who has the ear of a member of the board of directors. It may be a metaphorical maid. But I imagine a board member sitting on the head and reading an ATWT spread sheet in the men's room just before he goes into the board meeting and he calls over the stall to the man who hands out towels (the maid, because I don't know what you call that attendant) and asks what he thinks about ATWT. And that is the only opinion that matters, as far as viewers goes. And that maid happens to be a gay republican.

Goutman made his biggest mistake in blood letting, that is letting too much blood, to the point of making his shows anemic. When blood letting shows up on the bottom line is when he risks losing his job. He should be fired for cutting Martha, if that was his decision, but not for the way he did it, as despicable as that was. He should be fired for cutting Martha because that was a very stupid thing to do -it's the main reason we're seeing the low numbers posted above. The show has never recovered from it, and probably won't.

As fans of the genre, you're seeing a huge dearth. Like a chasm. Where soaps were always outrageous, they were also relevant, exciting and challenging even while they worked your nerves. What happened? Because I am yearning for a show like that again. Believe me, the first outrageous soap to do that is going to break TIVO records, whether they have a gay character or not, but it would be hard without. ATWT should be unconcerned with the AFA crowd and start paying attention to YouTube.

 

Joseph's picture

Wow, ATWT even dropped male viewers!

The show used to be solidly in 3rd place among male viewers, now it's losing even those viewers. Personally, I think both Goutman and Passanante need to go--their "vision" for the show is hackneyed and boring, regurgitating the same silly storylines over and over and over, and then doing so with little skill. Again, I'd love to see CBS/P&G take a chance on a writer from outside the soap world, like Night Shift did with Sri Rao, or Another World did back in the '70s with Harding Lemay--the results in both cases were solid scripts, gripping storylines and boffo ratings.

Check out my blog: http://radicalsexy.blogspot.com/

daniel82's picture

Goutman and Passanante

It is a rarity in modern soaps to have one head writer and one EP in their posts for nine and one-half years.  Head Writer Jean Passanante seems like an okay gal, but even the most imaginative HW would have to hit a burnout point sometime. As for Chris Goutman, he was actually doing a good job turning around Another World in its final year, and ATWT in the early 2000's was really enjoyable.  From the bits of interviews I've read with him, he even sounds like he's tired of ATWT at this point. 

So yes, I think both Passanante and Goutman are past their sell-by date.  Not that they should be put out to pasture entirely--another soap in need of experienced help might benefit from them (yeah, I'm looking at you, GL), but I agree that ATWT might benefit from a fresh set of eyes and ears. 

 

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Psionycx's picture

The Soaps are Dying

I've been saying this for while, and apparently I am not the only one who thinks this to be the case:

http://tv.yahoo.com/blog/are-daytime-soaps-doomed--43

From my point of view the soaps need to start reestablishing themselves in this era of internet and mobile media.  They have the ability to crank out content far faster than any other programming out let and it may be that their best possible future is in download and/or streaming distribution rather than fighting for a vanishing demographic. 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Rich's picture

How The Hell.....

is DAYS 3rd in the ratings among male viewers 18+? I haven't had the guts to watch an episode all the way through since 1990. Ditto "GH" ever since it began focusing more on crime and less on the....you know...hospital. Thank god for "GH:Night Shift".

It's all about the storylines. Luke/Noah had potential but TPTB,whether it be P&G or CBS,screwed it up big time. As have TPTB on the above shows.

Sure AMC & OLTL have had corny storylines,(a tornado on AMC and,yet another,baby switching story OLTL are two recent examples)but at least it brings out some kick ass performances(OLTL's Bree Williamson as Jessica and her alters,Tess and Bess is paticularly Emmy worthy,even if her storyline isn't) And,however awkward they are,they're not as poorly written as most of the others.

I'm glad to see more men watching OLTL. Especially with all hot beefcake on that show thanks hunky characters like the Vega Brothers,Antonio & Cristian,Jared Banks...i even hear rumors of Tuc Watkins returning as David Vickers. :)