Breaking! Naked people "sexy," activism "not so much"It was a crushing blow to find out that while I was researching an important article on gay male sex on television and getting my nails done, the gays got over political activism. First I had to get over my shock at there being a trend among my people that I wasn't already at least aware of, if not on the forefront of. Remembering the early days of ACT-UP, and actually having been at the White Night riots (and if you don't know what those are, seriously, you need to take queer history 101 immediately) - in fact, being one of the few les/gay people who remembers when San Francisco Pride was actually called the Gay Freedom Day Parade - I suppose it's no surprise this news doesn't make me happy.
What makes it even worse is that we're not replacing an interest in politics with an interest in, say, sex. No, we've replaced activism with something called "lifestyle." I thought that was rightwing code for homosexuality, but it also apparently refers to a love of shopping, home decorating, and travel. Now, no one loves to shop more than me. Especially for shoes. And when I'm not out buying shoes, I'm decorating my house. References to HGTV on AfterElton.com have increased by 100 percent since I started writing for the site. And as for travel, this year alone I've already been to Los Angeles to interview Xena and Gabrielle, Austin to interview Alan Cumming, Karen Black, Stephen Kijak, and Gale Harold, and New York to But I wasn't prepared for this, from McClatchy Newspapers:
I am totally freaked out by this. I don't know what to wear to stave off irrelevancy and insolvency in the digital age! And I work for gay media on the internet! Flash over substance is like my middle name! Why have the gays abandoned substance for flash?
That last paragraph was so thick in the dialect of PR-speak I couldn't quite follow it, but fortunately, Debbie Wells, one of the founders of Jane and Jane magazine, put it in simpler terms:
It's a shame that we didn't know that back when we were disrupting the FDA to get new AIDS drugs approved, because, although I prefer Paris, traveling to gay-friendly Reno is much more fun than holding up signs with the names of dead friends on them while government bureaucrats scuttle by, not meeting your eye. I'm just saying. Still, I'm begging you, gay media and people alike, on the Internets and elsewhere: Give me back my activism! I need it like I need food and water and Sally Hansen's Ten-Day Guaranteed Not to Chip nail polish! Because without it, I don't get my gay weddings and gay-friendly travel destinations. Or even my lesbian lifestyle magazines. Submitted by on Wed, 2007-04-25 18:00. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|







Part of the problem is that
Part of the problem is that we, as the younger generation, haven’t had to struggle as much. I think that the apathy this creates (though in and of itself I suppose it’s a sign of accomplishment) is at a very dangerous point. The young GLBT people I meet seem to only care about the GLBT issues that affect them directly. Like the gay guys can’t be bothered with girl stuff and vice versa (I actually think this growing gender divide in the GLBT community is also pretty dangerous, and pretty saddening). It’s going to be hard to get this generation’s attention back because big corporations have figured out that they can make money by advertizing to us without losing their hold on Straight America’s pocket. This can get worse. Look what happened to feminism. It was the same sort of apathy that drove it to the abyss it’s in today. I can’t think of how to fix it. Anyone have any suggestions?
Yeah...
Pre-AIDS, we had a hellish gender divide in the gay community. Men would say "Oh, do you smell fish?" when we'd walk down Castro Street. I had gay male friends and my lesbian friends would say, "Why do you hang out with MEN?" Lesbians just Did. Not. Do. That.
It's not like that as much today. I mean, I blog here, after all. And yet, I see it in the hot young thangs, that they're very segregated on the basis of gender. I didn't expect to see that again.
As to the political apathy, you can't make people care about things they don't care about. They have to care about something on their own. I don't know what will politicize younger gay men and lesbians in the future, but something will.
Or we'll just really become so acceptable and mainstream that we won't need to identify as a community anymore and we can all be post-gay and I'll have a lot more time to shop for shoes.
Or maybe start a lesbian home decorating magazine.
Maybe it's not a bad thing
Perhaps it was easier 20 years ago to scream "your policies are killing me" than it is now to scream "I prefer marriage over civil unions". Especially when instead of "go away, faggot freak" the answer is, "yes, you're right but not this legislative season - come back next year." It may be true that we are still treated unequally, but the field is getting more level all the time and with each step towards equality the drive, the fire, the anger all get a bit less dramatic. I live in California and those of us in the blue states are almost out of things to protest. Maybe it has become time to find out what vacation spot is better. ps. thanks for getting us here.
Yeah but...
I obviously live in California too... I live in SAN FRANCISCO, the bluest place on earth after, of course, Berkeley.
I don't fully agree, because I think that whenever we forget we're queer someone will always remind us. I just think it's different every time ... we had a lot of political presence and power when AIDS first hit, there was a powerful gay movement in many urban areas, and it was crippled when the disease first emerged. The challenge of our government's non-response to AIDS was a politicizing experience to many of us, but prior to AIDS, it was definitely "party in the streets" as a philosophy of liberation for gay men in San Francisco, and most dykes were more subsumed into radical feminism than having a sexual orientation analysis of our own - we identified more, politically, with straight women than gay men.
So, in the 80s, HIV politicized us in relationship to our government and institutions (drug companies, insurance, employment, health care). Then in the 90s, I'd say the murder of Matthew Shephard was profoundly politicizing for young GLBT people, and that was about our relationship to our communities and our place in our families. It was touching on huge and universal issues, like AIDS did, but it was itself smaller in scale.
I think the fight for same sex marriage, somewhat to my surprise, is emerging as a politicizing force today. I have no desire to get married personally, but I'm amazed at how angry I am that I can't. I was overjoyed when Gavin Newsom started handing out marriage licenses down at City Hall. I mean that literally: I felt joy.
So I have no problem with activism looking different with each decade, nor with different causes and issues. I hate it when old politicos hang onto the strategies and language and analysis of the past, and don't realize that each era has to find its own causes and methods.
But it's also worth arguing when we're being described as being APOLITICAL, when I believe that form of our politics has just changed. I truly don't mind having "a Sunset magazine for lesbians," because I really like that idea. What I mind is being told the existence of one means LGBT people are no longer activists, and why.
All that said, obviously, there are periods of political apathy that all movements/groups/communities go through. And it does usually take some kind of negative event - AIDS, the assassination of Harvey Milk, the murder of Matthew Shephard, the ugly fight against our right to marriage equality - to snap us out of it.
Welcome to the Club
Some of my best friends were Lesbians!
Generation Q.
The problem with making
The problem with making grand statements about trends is that there are always exceptions to the rules. I know dozens of young queer people who care passionately about activism. But the rules of activism are different today. Trans inclusion and queer people of color are getting more attention, assimilation and internalized homophobia are targets of many activist agendas, and the red states still have the take-it-to-the-streets-and-make-some-noise issues (trust me, I recently moved out of Utah).
Sure, it seems like magazines and gay media are much more focused on the lifestyle side of the community, but is that really indicative of a changing community? No one has proven that this is a case of causal relationship - that decreased interest in activism caused the change in media focus. It's just speculation on trends.
Can you really say that 20 or 30 years ago there were a lot of people who were simply content to live their lives and blend in? Sure, the difference is that the non-activists were partially or completely closeted in those times, and today they're out and proud and bored by activism, but I'm not convinced that there are proportionally fewer activists. I just think today's activists have different techniques for following their agendas.
Jere
...when two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong.
--Richard Dawkins
tyreseus.livejournal.com
Seclusion Delusion
White Night Riots