Interview with Survivor: Micronesia’s Chet Welch
AE: You were interviewed in a very interesting article in the Chicago-Sun Tribune about how many gay
men are involved in pageants, but that it's not talked about too much because
the event is so much part of Middle America. You've mentioned several times
that you're out in your life and in your local area, but are you also out in
the business?
AE: Really. Why is that, do you think? They're much more responsive to men. They don't consider them a personal threat. They feel a female is trying to change them to look like them, but a gay man is telling them how to look their best. I think that's why men are more successful in the beauty pageant world because the contestants are just more receptive to them — especially gay guys. A pageant girl never feels threatened by them sexually in any way. They feel very comfortable with them. They know the gay guys are very driven and they want to win as well. Some of my most serious decisions I've made with contestants have been made at happy hour in gay bars. [laughs] That's where I always take my contestants. They feel very comfortable there, the guys love to talk to them, and the ideas that can come out of a group of gay guys about a girl's gown or hair is just incredible.
AE: Have you ever experienced or witnessed any homophobia in the
business?
AE: Then why do you think it's not more open or talked about?
AE: Did you see Miss America:
Reality Check, Michael Urie's new show on TLC where they're revamping the
Miss America pageant?
AE: What did you think of it? I did not like the show. I will not watch it again. Miss Pennsylvania, Rachel Brooks, was one of the girls I worked with. She's better than they're portraying her on the show.
AE: There's been so much talk the last few years about how Miss America needs to
be modernized or revamped in some way. Do you think it does need that and this
just isn't the way or do you think it's fine as it is? They've tried to make Miss America too relevant. The thing is pageants, and especially the Miss America pageant, shouldn't be relevant. Miss America was always a true Cinderella story, where the American public could watch a girl next door become an idol overnight. It doesn't have to be relevant to today's society. They do not have to have a cause. They shouldn't have to have a handicap to win. They shouldn't have to fight in Iraq to win. They should win because they won. They're trying to make it too relevant. They need to back off and go pull a script from 1983, use these girls, and do the same everything from then.
AE: So you think they need to get back to that element of fantasy that
we all remember from our childhood?
AE: Chet, thanks so much for talking to us. Good luck on Survivor. Maybe we can talk to you again
after the show.
AE: Thanks again, we'll be rooting for you. Submitted by on Wed, 2008-02-20 22:32. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|






Oh, come on, now
Being that my ex is something of a pageant queen himself (his best friend was Top Six at the 1980 Miss America), I would ask Chet this: How is Miss America going to stay in business if they don't become relevant? Dollars and cents is what we're talking about here. The pageant got bumped from broadcast television because it wasn't getting ratings. If there's no television revenue, there's not a lot of money for the pageant system to stay afloat aside from what the promoters are putting in to it themselves. Miss USA has something of a guaranteed television home because it's part-owned by whichever network is broadcasting it for Donald Trump.
If people wanted to see the "Cinderella Story" played out on television the way Chet suggests, they wouldn't be fleeing the broadcasts in droves (which, by the way, began happening before the powers that be tried to make things over).
At this rate, the Miss America Organization may have to go the way of American figure skating and give up broadcast rights fees in order to land a network, then go out fishing for their own advertisers for the revenue-sharing.