Welcome to AfterElton.com!

 
 
Home »
Brent Hartinger

AfterElton.com's 2009 Visibility Awards!

What did the murder of Matthew Shepard mean? In the The Meaning of Matthew, My Son’s Murder in Laramie, and a World Transformed (Hudson Street Press), Matthew’s mother, Judy Shepard, gives her take, not just on her son’s life, but on her own incredible journey from mother to passionate gay activist.

Honorable Mention: Other excellent books this year included The Vast Fields of Ordinary by Nick Burd (yet another entry in the growing genre of gay teen lit), and our own Frank Anthony Polito’s sequel to Band Fags!, Drama Queers! And it must be said: Kathy Griffin’s memoir Official Book Club Selection was much more than just than the book of one-liners we expected.

The musical Hair has always been at least a little “gay” (probably more so than the actual hippie movement, it turns out). But the hit Broadway revival that opened on March 31 engaged in a little welcome historical revisionism, having star newly out star Gavin Creel play up the show’s bisexual love triangle. And the production even shut down so cast members could attend the Equality march in Washington, D.C.!

Honorable Mention: Let’s not forget Neil Patrick Harris’ terrific turn as host of the Tony award ceremonies, a job that included his over-the-closing-credits rendition of these furiously improvised lyrics (written by Marc Shaiman and Scott Wittman): “The night could not be any gayer if Liza was the mayor and Elton John took flight!”

WEBSITE OF THE YEAR: JoeMyGod.com

Like a little whiskey in your coffee and personality in your blog? JoeMyGod.com started out as an ever-changing Manhunt profile of cheeky observations that eventually started developing a following of its own, and became a full-fledged blog in March 2004. Author Joe Jervis, you have many fans among our staff.

Honorable Mention: You know you’re living in screwy times when you’re not sure if even the most bats**t insane rantings are real or satire – which is, of course, exactly the point of Christwire.org, some of the most insightful parody of anti-gay attitudes that we’ve seen in ages. And let’s not forget Andy Towle over at Towleroad.com, especially now that (curse him!) he’s even started blogging on the weekends!

Comments

Jared1080's picture

An Interesting Year

I agree for the most part with all of the selections.  It's been a very interesting year for gay visibility.
TriplicateGuy's picture

Excellent choices!

Not a clunker in the bunch, and wonderful reminders of some of the epic wins of the year. It's nice to remember them at the end of the pretty horrible year of politics and gay bashings so many had to live through.

Just a couple of anal-retentive corrections: It's "hippie" not "hippy." The latter is someone with big hips, no? I think Joe's last name is Jervis, not Jarvis.

Also, I would feel a whole lot better if you had included Frank Valentini, the out executive producer of OLTL, in your Men of the Year citation. He's as responsible as anyone for what gets on the air. Any way you can edit the article to add him in? He deserves to be acknowledged and applauded.

Thanks for a wonderful year! I couldn't get through the day without AE. 

 

Michael Jensen's picture

What? You didn't notice the cast was a little wide in the beam?

Seriously, thanks for the catches. Fixed now!
Paswede's picture

I mostly agree

I too mostly agree on your selections. Especially when it comes to Men of the Year. Thank you Nick, Scott, Brett and Ron for giving us not just fantastic acting, but a real story and real-like lives to follow (even within a soap)

I am however VERY tired of the Torchwood 'controversy'. Characters deaths in movies and on TV don't always have to make sense. Does the timing of death ever make sense? Yes maybe it could have been written better. But to give them a dishonerable mention after all the positives over the seasons? It just ain't right or fair and I am very disappointed.

Just my humble opinions.

Peace!

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
MmmmHmmm's picture

Couldn't agree more Paswede.

Couldn't agree more Paswede.

 

Very disappointed AE. Sure, I understand that you were upset with the ending of TW, but to give it a dishonourable mention, thus putting it in the same category as the Pope? Nice.

Brent Hartinger's picture

To be clear: we gave it an Honorable Mention

We gave it an Dishonorable Mention AND an Honorable Mention. But I stand by my opinion that the last episode, the "conclusion," was some of the laziest, sloppiest writing I've ever seen on television. As much as I loved the first three and a half episodes, having Jack brazenly provoke the aliens, only to be SURPRISED that they immediately fight back, killing Ianto (given that he KNOWS how ruthless and technologically advanced they are), struck me as infuriatingly stupid.

 

 

Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter

Average (5 votes):
see individual ratings
argess's picture

I also agree

The last one and a half episodes was written as an afterthought. How do we finish this that makes Jack look like a dumb post, with Ianto following. Then in the last episode it reminded me of something just thrown together.

I'm not sure what your viewing experience is with television is. But in my 50 plus years of watching TV, I've seen better.

 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
sarah's picture

Not the same category

Not the same category as the Pope at all. Unless the Pope is considered a TV Event, the category in which Torchwood got the, IMO well deserved, DIShonorable mention.

Perez, Fame, Fox Animations and SYTYCD got Dishnorable mentions too.

MmmmHmmm's picture

I'm afraid you didn't

I'm afraid you didn't understand my point.

I was making the observation that both TW and the Pope got dishonorable mentions ('dishonorable' being the category I was referring to, rather than 'tv event' etc).

sarah's picture

I did understand

but I think there is a problem with your point. I'm one glass of champagne too far from being able to call the word, but it's something about logic.

Torchwood, the Pope, SYTYCD, Fox animation shows, the remake of FAME, all got dishonorable mentions, all in different categories that mean entirely different things. Actually, Palpatine's mention is more different than all the others, what with the others being just TV shows/films and the Pope is, sadly, very real and what he and his people do causes very real harm to millions of people around the world, gay and otherwise.

 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
MmmmHmmm's picture

In relation to your last

In relation to your last point, that's what makes TW being lumped in the same category as the Pope all the more unfair.

I'm sure we will never agree on this point (you disagree with my logic, I disagree with yours), so I too will drink champagne and move on!

JC's picture

Misnamed Visability awards

I'm going to have to say your awards are totally misnamed if you give the award to anyone other than Adam. Visibility means to me being out there in your face, while it may have been a banner year in soap opera's for gays... the fact is that it is a fading medium with less and less VISABILITY each year.... I honestly think that it's pandering to your readers more than it is a real accomplishment. Adam is now known worldwide, while the soaps are limited to North America for the most part. Sorry folks as much I enjoy AfterElton... this was an EPIC FAIL!
Average (5 votes):
see individual ratings
rem581's picture

I don't know

I kinda like that these awards are about more than who is the most has the most exposure.  It even says in the first paragraph that these are the projects that they think  "best represented gay and bisexual men".

 

 

Brent, I enjoyed this, but I don't think that the Simpsons should be lumped in with the rest of  

Fox’s Sunday night animation block. It isn't perfect, but it has often been good, and I can't remember ever being offended by it.

 

 

tennis's picture

I Agree Mostly

Although I completely commend OLTL and ATWT and all the actors, they didn't really stir up conversation like Adam did this year. I mean, from the time of the American Idol competition to now, people have been talking about how Adam brought about debate. First, Entertainment Weekly came out with an issue during the competition with Adam on the front cover, the only Idol contestant ever who has graced the front cover of any magazine during the competition. And what was it about? His sexuality and whether it was a factor in the competition. Then you had Bill O'Reilly's show the night of the Idol finale that centered on "The Gay Jew vs. The Straight Christian". Then you had Kris Allen winning and the uproar over Adam's loss, as many claimed it was pure homophobia. Rolling Stone, Out, and Details Magazine followed. But what truly changed everything were the AMA performance and the aftermath - everyone centered on the man-on-man action, not the male-on-female action. Censoring became an issue. By that time it became more than just Adam Lambert vs. ABC, it became the portrayal of gay males in entertainment. The double standard that (gay) men face. How there was not nearly as much uproar over Madonna/Britney because it's supposedly fine for two straight women to kiss but not for a gay man to kiss a straight man. Then ABC had Chris Brown scheduled to go on GMA after Adam's cancellation. That was what made this whole event become international news, even reaching New Zealand, Spain, Singapore, everywhere. CNN online had it as its most popular story for almost a week, even over any report on President Obama. So, even though I applaud OLTL and ATWT, Adam truly carried the visibility banner this year. Whether you liked him or not, he showed everyone who he was and was unapologetic about it.
Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Javi's picture

Misnamed perhaps only...

...when it come to your personal definition of visibility.  The title might not suffice for your personal (in your face) definition of visibility but that is hardly grounds for naming it an "EPIC FAIL". Soaps are a dying medium but they sure weren't dead in 2009. Now the soaps themselves might be losing viewers but the gay storyline in OLTL still increased visibilty of gay men on television both qualitatively and quantitatively. Just by existing, we had more gay representation on television. But they did much more than that. Overall, I haven't heard too much negative press for their storyline and I may be idealistic but it's being received pretty well all around. That is saying something. By the way, Oliver and Kyle passionately kissing in bed this year is about as in your face as it gets. 

I'm sorry but the OLTL crew really do deserve this merit for some grounbreaking work in a medium where gays are heavily under-represented. That is visibility, representing where you are not being represented or represented appropriately (ahem Luke and Noah).   Oliver and Kyle are gay men who are woven into the OLTL universe just like any other character and still are able to tell a compelling story about gay life. That is visibility. 

Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
Only_Tony's picture

Adam is now known worldwide? Really?

Not here in Britain, and we're full of imported American culture. Apart from the few who watched American Idol on one of the satellite channels, no one knows who he is. The only reason I know of him - or even that he is gay - is because I read AfterElton.

The same applies to the soaps. But for me, personally, being in people's faces doesn't justify winning a visibility award - remember Bruno? Adam will be seen by young people who are into pop culture, the majority of whom are probably already gay-friendly. Soaps on the other hand have a different viewership. Visibility in that area could well change attitudes towards gay relationships.

I really enjoyed the article, and I completely agree with all the winners. Perhaps next year we could have an award for sports? Fingers crossed there might be more potential nominees by then!

Average (4 votes):
see individual ratings
Aussie54's picture

An interesting list

I like that you've chosen the OLtL crew for Men of the Year.  I think they run a very close tie with Adam Lambert, though.  He's really visible, and has certainly worked his way into many people's hearts.

I'm also thrilled that you included Patrik 1.5 as an Honourable Mention in the Best Movie category.  It's my favourite movie ever, straight or gay.  I wish more people had the chance to watch it.

Straight Ally of the year Dishonorable Mention - gosh, there were so many to choose from!  I think your choice of Pope Benedict and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is a good one;  they have so much influence in the world it's not funny.

Thanks for doing this.  I'm looking forward to seeing your choices for the decade. 

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
sarah's picture

Patrik 1.5

I don't know how much it's done in terms of visibility, as it hasn't been released in many places, but I wish it would. It's so positive! Really nice and touching, I honestly think it would help soften some hard hearts.
Karen's picture

Great Choices

Great Choices. I think everyone on the list deserves to be there - though the TV musical category didn't seem to have much competition. I see a repeat in 2010. 

I also like that The United States of Tara is finally recoginized in the Drama category. I don't know why this show keeps getting nominations in the comedy category at award shows. There are some funny moments, but it is a pretty serious show. I wouldn't even consider it a dramedy. 

Markie27's picture

adam for man of the year?!?!

i completely disagree with people saying adam should win the man of the year. It's not enough for an artist to be "visible" in the media. it is not the quantity of your exposure in television but the quality of work you have done to raise positive awareness of the lgbt community and the various issues that we face. One life to live's gay storyline have been setting bars not just for american daytime but for primetime television as well. and various interviews showed the eloquence and moreso the dedication of these fine young men (nick, scott, ron, and even brett) to our cause. they even go to lgbt fundraising events!

what has adam done? - grab some straght guy and liplocked him on national tv?

NOT THAT I AM COMPLAINING about adam's lack of political activism. he is young. he is just starting out. he needs to build a career first. so to give him the man of the year visibility award is tooo early and really quite undeserving.

it is really not enough to proclaim your gay, glam up your album cover, be sexual (which have backfired) on live tv. you need to REPRESENT. if the gays of today are inspired by what adam has offered so far - then i'm worried for the future of our gay youth.

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
jjose712's picture

Sorry but i don't agree

Adam is a singer, period. I'm not against singers, actors or atlethes express their personal beliefs, but i don't think that's necessary at all. In fact i find kind of annoying when some celebrity mention their religion in every interview even when they are not questioned about it.

Adam is doing something very uncommon in the USA music market, that is being out from the begining of his career, in someone who tried to be a mainstrain succeded singer.

And i don't try to reduced the impact of gay activism, but sometimes is more useful the  simple visibility

Average (3 votes):
see individual ratings
afhickman's picture

Bloody but not bowed

I approve of your choices (I know you've been waiting breathlessly to hear that!) but I have to disagree with your implication that audiences and critics universally disliked "Taking Woodstock."  I found it refreshing, the best movie on the '60s since "Across the Universe" (which was also undervalued).  And I especially liked meeting Ang Lee at the London Film Festival, where he and Imelda Staunton and other principals showed up to promote the film. 

And now, in the interests of shameless self-promotion, I'd like to present--no, I won't go there again.

"The mountain has wings."

jjose712's picture

Kris Allen

According to Adam Lambert, Kris is a christian, but not conservative at all. In fact Adam was questioned about other christian contestants and he said that the only really conservative is Danny Gokey, even Michael Sarver is not that conservative (he said that Michael change a lot his mind during the tour).

And i find AI clips of the Hollywood week (i always watch the performances on youtube or in a blog but i've never watched the hollywood week before) and my gaydar pings a lot of times. To be honest, i find quite strange for a straight male sing songs like And i'm telling you i'm not going (something that did some of the male contestants). I think Adam open a door, and maybe in next editions we'll see an openly gay contestant from the begining

GaySpouseDotCom's picture

Patrik, Age 1.5 not on here!

I get here! and have for a long time and this motion picture never materialized. I have been watching for it ever since After Elton and other sites mentioned it.
GayTVluver's picture

I'd have flipped Joe and Andy.

About 70% of the stuff I read on Joe's blog I'd already seen on Andy's. I make my blog stroll in a pattern.  Plus Andy has contributors who are on the scene for many big moments in gay rights...from the elections in 2008 and 2009, to the votes on gay marriage that took place in several statehouses throughout New England. I like Joe's blog...it was fun reading about his vacation at the famous gay resort...with pics. I just think Andy's is a little ahead.
*****
Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
Addison Dewitt's picture

I agree.

I agree. Towleroad has become more of the CNN of gay news in my mind. Joe.My.Blog and Queerty are more with an edge. The thing about AE is that we have a dialogue here as they do on Towleroad. There is a responsiblity to the community if you will in what is being discussed here and on Andy Towle's site. Some of the other blogs are more about anger instead of reporting the news and letting us form an opinion not read an out and out rant.

------------------------------------------------------------

If I bring out the devil in you, he was there all along!

Legally married Sept 18, 2009. Wedded Oct 10,2009.<

Liz's picture

hey! people die young in torchwood!

hey! people die young in torchwood! that's just how it is! how dare you give them a dishonorable mention! SHAME ON YOU!

 

;-)

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
sarah's picture

!

Brent can't understand good drama, he shouldn't have written this column, he should've stayed home reading a poem and watching Supernatural.

 

;)

 

PS: I love your new avatar, Liz.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Liz's picture

thanks!

its hard to tell, but my sunglasses have christmas trees on them as part of the design. got them to wear on christmas for my niece and nephew. they should be amused. aunt liz is quite the dork. ;-)
sarah's picture

I see them!

I thnk their fabulous and you totally rock those sunglasses, the young ones will love them, you look like a Xmas alien or something ;)
Aaron R's picture

Gotta Disagree...

I don't think it's fair to give Seth M and his animation triple-header a nod of disapproval. While his (at times frat-boy-esque) humor can push the boundaries in term of what is acceptable when making jokes about the LGBT community, his shows are consistently pro-queer and pro-equality.

 Yes, he makes some "gay jokes." So does Kathy Griffin, but her status as an outspoken queer ally gives her more latitude than, lets say, Ann Coulter. Seth's in that same camp. He's a great guy.

Don't believe me? Watch the following 3 episodes and you'll see what I'm talking about. It's only 60 minutes of footage. Only an hour to watch. I would bet serious money, that you'll walk out with a different perspective....

1) Family Guy, Season 4, Episode 25 - "You May Now Kiss the...Uh...Guy Who Recieves" (Subject - Gay Marriage)

2) American Dad, Season 2, Episode 4 - "Lincoln Lover" (Subject - Gay Republicans)

3) American Dad, Season 3, Episode 7 - "Surro-Gate" (Subject - Gay Adoption) 

 

Just my two cents, though.

 BTW, there does seem to be some mild (and I'm sure unintentional) transphobia in the first season of The Cleveland Show. I bet it changes, but it's nothing that we haven't seen on a few Entourage episodes and shows like that. I'm not making excuses for it, but it won't be a reoccurring theme.

Natalie's picture

great choices!

I agree with major of your choices, especially with 'men of the year',they are just an incredibly amazing, i'm totally and hopelessly in love with Nick,Scott and Brett and with the story they are telling us:)

 

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Addison Dewitt's picture

Great choices

I can't really argue with any of these! I am glad that for Men Of The Year you all chose not just Kish but also Nick and the writer!  All four made this story work and that was such a huge splash in gay pop culture. It is not just because this happened at the end of the year but they were the ultimate tidal wave as the year came to the end. 

------------------------------------------------------------

If I bring out the devil in you, he was there all along!

Legally married Sept 18, 2009. Wedded Oct 10,2009.<

Average (2 votes):
see individual ratings
FakeName's picture

Tyler Briggs and The Amazing Race

Tyler Briggs of Trauma certainly deserved a mention somewhere. He had one of the most affecting coming out scenes I can recall and his sexuality has been seamlessly integrated into the series. EMTs apparently hate the show because it supposedly doesn't present the medicine right but I for one don't care about that. I will miss Tyler.

Re The Amazing Race, Kisha, one of the sisters in the same season as Luke and the Whites, is a lesbian but this was never mentioned on the show.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Addison Dewitt's picture

Some press already

Hey! AE got some press on Daytime Confidential for the Men of The Year section!

http://daytimeconfidential.com/tags/one-life-to-live

------------------------------------------------------------

If I bring out the devil in you, he was there all along!

Legally married Sept 18, 2009. Wedded Oct 10,2009.<

dback's picture

Great list of worthy subjects

True, it barely touched on the guy from "Dance Your Ass Off," but he got a shout-out on the Best Gay Year Ever, so what the hell.

This was definitely a mixed bag for the gay community politically--a lot of the time, it was literally two steps forward, 1 1/2 steps back, sometimes see-sawing within 24 hours.  (New York & New Jersey and the gay marriage issue, contrasted with the everything-but-the-name in Washington State and full-on marriage rights in D.C.)  In addition to all these fabulous entertainers who so enriched our lives, I'd like to give a shout out to the politicos who stepped up to the plate and went to bat for our community--not because they were gay themselves, or even had friends or family members who were gay, but simply because they believed it was the right and moral thing to do.

Every day, folks, we get closer to full equality in this country.  It will happen.  It is happening.  The Right wouldn't be screaming as loudly as they are if we weren't slowly making progress.  And if you are part of that progress--by making calls, by donating money, by creating art, by just being "OUT" in the world--then a big hip-hooray for YOU!!! 

(Hey, it's my birthday, I'm feeling very celebratory.)

Chris's picture

A SINGLE MAN should not have been included

If they don't want to admit and advertise that their film is a gay themed movie about a man mourning the death of his lover, why should the gay press give it any attention? The filmmakers and studio know the gay press will cover it so they turn their backs on them and try to lure the mainstram, heterosexual press into covering the story of a movie where they imply the relationship is between Firth and Moore's characters.

They degay the trailer, the poster, and the actors and directors say it's a "universal story." No one in the mainstream media questions them. No one asks Matthew Goode, "How do you play a universal character? Were you shocked that your character had to kiss a man since you were playing a universal character?" No one asks Tom Ford, "If this isn't a gay love story, why is George mourning the death of his male lover? If this is a universal love story, why would you need to explain the gender of his lover?"

I am tired of filmmakers and studios degaying their material (TAKING WOODSTOCK is another example) because they know that gay audiences will accept any crumbs offered to them. We shouldn't support such homophobic behaviour.

Brent Hartinger's picture

As we clearly said, this gave us pause

But the fact is, the movie itself is not only pretty good, it's extremely openly "gay." We're judging the movie, not the marketers, who clearly feel they need to "sell" their movie with a particular strategy. Regarding Ford's statements, if we did not cover any project where the filmmakes said some variation on, "This isn't a gay story!" we would have nothing to cover, because they pretty much ALL say this at some point.

 

 

Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter

Chris's picture

the gay audiences/the gay press need to say, "Enough is enough!"

Mr. Hartinger, I understand what you're saying, and it's not an easy situation especially since you're a journalist, but I don't think anything is going to change until gay audiences/the gay press say, "Enough is enough!" If our dollars aren't good enough for them, we shouldn't give them the time of day. They treat us this way because they know they can get away with it. The gay press will still cover the films, and a majority of gay men will see the films. Why should they treat us with respect when we don't demand it?

Obviously, I'm in an easier position than you are since I can refuse to see a film, but the way this site wrote about FAME is a perfect illustration of what I'd like to see. Instead of reviewing or praising these types of films, AE should consider just speaking out against them until changes are made in how these films are made and advertised.

 

Brent Hartinger's picture

I think that would be a disservice to our readers

I think ignoring a movie such as A SINGLE MAN would be a disservice to our readers, since it IS one of the best gay movies of the year. But we try to pressure them by pointing out and keeping you aware of the tactics they're using to sell the film. We're trying to find a balance -- difficult, you and I both agree.

 

 

Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter

lowdown's picture

There are some great choices

There are some great choices on this list.

 

But one correction - Kris Allen is NOT a conservative Christian. He himself has described himself as anything BUT conservative.

Darrien's picture

Dear Nigel...

I wasn't sure that Nigel Lythgoe was personally or deliberately homophobic when I saw that SYTYCD clip.

Howerver, last week he was on TV giving his opinion on Strictly Come Dancing (parent to Dancing with the Stars) along with Bruno Tonioli. Bruno had been one of Nigel's dancers back in the day and Bruno seems to have the measure of the man. Nigel was visibily aggitated by Bruno's 'flamboyance'. So Bruno upped the ante and became increasingly queeny and gay, much to the distress of Lythgoe. It culminated in Bruno dumping himself down on Nigel's lap, which led Nigel to squeal with horror like a little girl. 

I was having a hard time laughing and cheering at the same time. I think Bruno Toniolo is now - officially - a hero.

Average (1 vote):
see individual ratings
Home » AfterElton.com's 2009 Visibility Awards!

ACTIVE FORUM TOPICS