Why Can’t You Just Butch Up? Gay Men, Effeminacy, and Our War with Ourselves
And what about all those studies that show that many gay and bisexual men display some degree of gender non-conformity? That we’re more likely to be androgynous than the typical straight man? In other words, many of us exhibit “gender atypical” behaviors – or we would exhibit them if we hadn’t learned at an early age not to. But at the same time, we believe these behaviors to be deeply unattractive. Holy self-loathing, Batman! In short, as a community, we’re literally at war with each other and, often, ourselves. And if this isn’t about homophobia, it’s hard to imagine what is. “I think it’s really strange what we do,” says Kennedy. “Outside the community, if a straight person attacks someone for being effeminate, we attack them, we’re furious. But within our community, we’re terrible to each other on the very same issue.” No one sat down and mapped this all out as part of an evilly brilliant strategy to keep gay and bisexual men oppressed. For the most part, it’s unconscious. But that’s also part of the problem too, because few people ever stop to question it. Anyway, the end result is the same: we can’t fight for equality when we’re so busy hating on each other. Why can’t effeminate men butch it up? That’s the title of this article, the one question everyone wants to ask. But it’s the wrong one. The right question is: why should they have to? Submitted by on Thu, 2009-06-11 02:33. |
![]() Recent Comments
Recent blog posts
|







Effeminacy
This was a very well written article.
If By Gay You Mean Totally Freaking Awesome, Then Yeah, I Guess It's Pretty Gay
--Des Ark
Thank you Brent!
This article was a great read. I have to agree with you on the whole, "Why bother?" theme in there. Its really frustrating to see other gay men act in such ways, but its what we have to deal with beyond our other struggles. I would, however, have liked to see something said about television's role.
A lot of times I see articles on here that in one way or another denounces a flamboyant gay character as a stereotype. I'm not sure what I'm trying to get at, but there has to be some sort of acceptance of these characters as well. As long as they aren't played for laughs, they should be accepted just like an 'original' character such as Officer Cooper from Southland. Just my opinion, but either way a good article!
Visit my blog: http://darkesaint.wordpress.com/
Take a break and explore the world of hedonism and pleasure-seeking!
Chuckles!
Be Who You Are, Not Who They Want You To Be
I totally agree that there is this internalized hatred of the effiminate male in gay culture. Just like there is internalized segregation. It is one more thing the glbt community needs to work through. I mean, really, as an organized community we are still pretty young, and we have kinks to work through.
When I was younger, especially right around the time I came out of the closet I used to be very anti-femmi, especially when it came to me personally. I would watch everything I did. I'm not extremely feminine, but I have my moments, my little quirks, and when I was younger I was terrified of them. I grew up in a Catholic household, and had a Christian education. Now, as I grow older, as I get to know more people, I have grown to really love men who are just themselves. Men who don't care if people look at them funny because they have an extreme sense of style, a swish in their step, a limpness to their wrist or a lisp to their voice. These guys have the strength and pride to not cover up who they are. I mean, seriously, you have to show mucho respect to someone who says society be damned, I am who am. That is damn sexy, and worthy of respect.
The gay community is constantly saying be who you are, be true to yourself. Why the hell would we then villifiy someone for doing exactly that? I mean, it is one thing to be called a sissy by the jocks in high school, it's another to be insulted and ridiculed by the very people who should be welcoming you with open arms.
Effiminate men don't make gay men look bad, they just make us stand out. They put the spotlight on us, and it makes us squirm, because we've spent so much time trying to hide, to not stand out, to vanish into the crowd. The word pride is thrown around so much, and yet we as gay men want to just blend in. We may be out to our family and friends, but we do so much to not make waves.
If you think about it, the traits that make a man a "man" are pride, strength, determination and a sense of self respect. How manly is someone who tries to hide parts of themselves?
I'm not saying start acting effiminate. Cuz if you're not, then you're not. If you are then you are. I'm just saying that as a community that uses the word pride so much, that attaches that idea that we are proud to be who we are, and we are proud to love who we love, then we need to learn to be proud to be exactly who we are at all times, and we need to support those around us who are trying to do just that, show that they aren't ashamed to be themselves in every situation.
Check out my blog soap at:
soapsudzbybobo.blogspot.com
SPOT ON
"Effiminate men don't make gay men look bad, they just make us stand out. They put the spotlight on us, and it makes us squirm, because we've spent so much time trying to hide, to not stand out, to vanish into the crowd. The word pride is thrown around so much, and yet we as gay men want to just blend in. We may be out to our family and friends, but we do so much to not make waves?
u summed the Reason in One Helluva Eloquent, Str8-To-The-Point paragraphs I'v eva read. That is EXACLY our Problem
Indeed
That's the beating heart of it. But there are other aspects too, having to do with (here it comes) Internatized Homophobia (Your Magic Spell is Everywhere.)
There's someting deeply wrong with menobsessed with "Masculinity" at the exense of their very natural "feminine side" -- which is a complex and multi-faceted thing in and of itself.
I was just posting on another blog about the great young Irish actor Cillian Murphy and his phenomenal performance in Breakfast on Pluto. Murphy is heterosexual and quite "butch" in overall phusical disposition. But hs face is gloriously androgynous, and so is his manner whenver he's in the mood.
http://www.lacitybeat.com/cms/story/detail/the_breakfast_club/2908/
pride is the problem
yeah, I do believe that the whole "i'm out and I'm proud" thing is ridiculous! I went to ONE gay pride parade and I promised to myself to NEVER go there again! Why? Because of all the "prideful" aka "insecure" bitches on the podiums, half naked, with fake dicks making a scene of doing each other. There are mothers and little children of beloved gay sons and brothers there, but the "prideful" whores don't give a damn! So what's there to be proud about? If I want the world to accept me, I am not going to show my attitude of "whatever bitches, I'm gonna do what I want"! If I want my family to accept me, I'm going to be who I am, but I'm going to be WHO I AM, NOT WHAT THE GAY SCENE WANTS ME TO BE! This includes the stupid ego-centric, flaming attitude! IT HAS GOT TO GO! I can't take my friends to a gay bar because it's embarrassing what you can encounter there often times. Just because you're gay, doesn't mean you have to completely lose the sense of morality! I am sorry if I am too outspoken, but I think I have the right to voice my opinion on all of this, because those "flaming bitches" seem to think they have the right to ruin my reputation on their own behalf!
And lastly, the word pride in itself, whether it's for "proud to be an american" or "proud to be a single mother", in any case, it is very misleading! The word pride has a root of ego in it. It forces people to IDENTIFY themselves with a certain state or behavior and make a big deal about it for all to see. When you say "I'm proud to be an American", you say several things at the same time. You're saying that to be American is better than to be from any other country, even though in all reality, you are no different from any other person living in Germany or Brazil. We are all one family as human beings. Gay, straight, American, Mexican, etc, etc. When we put a label of "I'm proud to be..." we separate ourselves, boost our egos and lose touch with reality. So therefore, I would not want to be identified as a "proud gay man", I am a human being who happened to be gay! I am secure with my sexual orientation, but I don't shove it up anyone's throat! And I would greatly appretiate if the "flaming whores" on the gay parade stages didn't wear rainbow undies while pretending to be doing each other, because when that flag is hanging on my porch, I don't want people to think that I'm just like those "queens"!
Brent. You Are Officially My Hero For Writing This Piece
Thanks, that means a lot
Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
Cue The Backlash...
I hope the comments section of this article doesn't now become a list of hateful "reasons and justifications" for why fey gays should be told/expected to "butch it up".
Maybe it's just inevitable because the pain/fear of rejection and ridicule is so deep and real and pervasive. But it's still sad to hear what some folks are already saying.
There are and have been for some time more "butch/masculine" gay men on tv and in films to look to for "how gay men might act" since the turn of this century (if not 10 years before) That is a fact. If some straight folks refuse to learn from that then they are willfully ignorant
Gay people (men and women) must recognize the differences of the world we live in currently (with such a diversity of out gay men and lesbians in politics and entertainment). We have to respect and accept the culture changes that have happened over the last 40 years that has created a world in which Adam Lambert and Zac Efron are role models for quirky Emo males (gay and straight) and a sex symbols for straight girl tweens and cougars alike.
So why all the hate about how other gay men chose to express themselves in modern times?
I put it these questions to you Brent (maybe it could be a poll):
1) Do masculine gay men believe that their friends and family and co-workers think all gay men act alike despite what they can see with their own eyes and have probably experienced in their own lives in regards to knowing gay men? (Excluding homophobes from this pool)
2) Do masculine gay me believe that "effeminate" men are actual evil fairies who have the power to magically wish butch gays (and any representations thereof) into the "cornfield" of our cultural landscape merely by swishing themselves into a room or onto a screen?
"That's our job today: to control the extent to which people can publicly manifest antigay sentiment." (Bayard Rustin) ** "Heterosexuality is not normal, it's just common" (Dorothy Parker)
Your answers
1). Yes, there are many people who believe all gay men act like the majority of gay people they see on TV and movies.
2) For better or worse (I vote worse) Society equates feminine with weak. So no, effeminate men (no need to put it in quotes, it is what it is) don't actively or magically marginalize masculine gay men. Straight men do. Straight men rule the world, and they decide what the majority of us see in Hollywood. Feminie gay men are funny. They conform to what straight people already "know" about gays. Ross the Intern need not be taken seriously. It would be as if the only black characters on TV all acted like Flava Flave. Nothing wrong with being effeminate, but it would be great if Hollywood would offer more.
The most important point
The problem isn't the queens; it's the commoners.
Mass media has played a key role in cementing feminine gay men as more authentically gay than any other kind of gay man. Such media offers only two archetypes: the "flamer" and the "blender"--I'm looking at you, "Will and Grace"--and both kinds offer a sort of comfort to ignorant people, gay or otherwise: The "flamer" is recognizable and the "blender" is just like the "normal" people.
Many butch gay men internalize and act upon the heterosexist education to which we've all been exposed. It's disappointing to read so many comments on this article that rationalize that kind of bigotry. At the end of the day, it is a form of homophobia, plain and simple. Indeed, even gay people can hate on--or, just plain hate--gay people.
Lead by Example
this Article is SPOT ON (and another reason why Adam Lambert is Awesome)
How can we demand that society not discriminate against us when the Majority of gay men Descriminate against each other.
we have a Minority within a Minority and that is just Goddman wrong. We Ask for tolerence but we dont exacly practice what we Preach, now do we? (aplogies for those who do)
and to be honest we ALL (every gay/bi guy) have a big effeminate quality that is -> We Love Men.... and have Sex with Men. These are a 100% biological female trait that we all have.
so no1 should give the "Be a str8 actin gay guy like me" cause in the end we all like to kiss Men.
minority within a minority?
But they still won't eat quiche
afhickman
A lot of straight men use effiminacy as a form of rebellion. I know it's hard to believe today, but "longer hair and other flambouyant affections of appearance" were once considered effiminate. Now the guy most likely to have long hair (where I come from, anyway) is on a construction crew. Today "real" men wear jewelry and shave their chests and pubic hair. Adam Lambert may qualify as "flambuoyant," but does that necessarily read gay? It's been thirty year since the days when straight boys donned fish nets and merry widows and attended midnight showings of Rocky Horror, standing cheek to jowl with their gay compatriots. Even Adam hasn't gone that far. He looks like a prototypical goth to me (at least, based on a rave I once went to), with his dark eye liner and "inky cloak." (He reminded me of Damian Echols the first time I saw him.) The point is effiminacy remains a form of self-expression for young men, even when straight. And it always gets a rise out of the suits (or whoever the attended audience may be) because it leads them to question their own sexuality. Let's face it, lots of straight men are into cross-dressing and being dominated by their wives. Are they effiminate, broad-minded, crazy--or are they just expressing a part of themselves of which society doesn't approve? I used to tell people who accused me of being effiminate (when I was a hippy and not yet "out" as gay) that I was a man, and, therefore, everything I did was by definition masculine. You can't catch me; I'm the gingerbread man! But the truth was, I was experimenting with my sexuality, and tacitly admitting that I had a feminine side. I'm just glad today that I never put a label on it. I may be gay, but I'm so much more! Young people today who are experimenting with their sexuality have a lot to discover about themselves too. Let's not muddy the waters with labels. They tend to come off in the wash anyway.
"The mountain has wings."
Lambert goes beyond "goth"
"All nature is but art unknown to thee" (Pope)
afhickman
I hope you don't think I was being critical of Adam; I think he looks fine, whatever he chooses to wear. It's just that the first few times I saw him, his look reminded me of certain goths I had seen (and found very sexy). But my point was to say that nothing about him "shouted" gay to me. There are lots of straight boys in rock bands who look lots more effeminate than Adam. I'm certainly pleased that he turned out to be gay--and so well adjusted!--but I don't think effeminacy is always a gay marker. In the 17th century, the effeminate men were so-called because they preferred the company of women--especially in the bedroom. They wore tons of make-up and perfume (they didn't bathe but once or twice a year), elaborate wigs, and lace accessories. And this was called the Age of Enlightenment! Maybe they knew something we don't.
A Latent Heterosexual?
"The mountain has wings."
Adam Lambert looks like a
Adam Lambert looks like a prototypical goth/emo to me too. He definitely does not come across as very feminine to me--but flamboyant, yes. I have seen the pictures of him in full on glam garb.
Flamboyant and Feminine do not always go together. For some reason the consistent connection between the two sort of annoys me.
adam has absolutely gone that far
And then some. We have the feathered and fishnetted civil rights anthem to prove it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t0V1YqbRA8
But he would also agree with you (and says in the Rolling Stone article) that how you present youself should not be interpreted as representing your sexuality.
<3.
This is a lovely article. & a very true one. I find that a lot of men are more afraid of effeminate men than gay men, the thing is that they are often found to be the same thing. I have heard a few homophobic remarks, & they had to do with talking like Essences [Dane Cook joke] & the way they walk. I personally have been teased for "walking like a girl" & always liking the pink or female characters in every cartoon or movie.
But i personally find that some complaints about some efffeminate men are founded. One i have is about the ones that,i have seen, tend to be loud & self obsessed. I personally find such people vexing & avoid being near them because i do not knowing what some guy is doing tonight with his "luver" tonight when we are sitting on opposite ends of the bus. Such complaints i have seen with a few other people; they dislike their overly loud "look at me because i so fabulous that you must look at me because i do not have the self confidence to do so my self" attitude. So, i think because of these things, which really have nothing to do with being effeminate, it is just being annoying, that some people dislike effeminate people. I highly doubt everyone on the bus would be given death stares at such people if they would just turn the volume down 1O plus decibels.
& i mean not to imply that it is the way they talk, pronounce their S's, how they walk, wearing pants taht sofficate [sp?] their gentials, etc. is they reason i do not want them on my Top 8, but rahter they loud "look at me" attitude, which i hate in all people, regardless of how fabulously inclined they are.
<3
Yes, but that's exactly the point
Check out my new fantasy website: TheTorchOnline.com. It's like AfterElton.com for fantasy geeks! And I Twitter
But
" I've certainly sat behind plenty of ***hole frat guys at sports events, and dealt with them getting drunk at water parks. But no one would ever attribute their being annoying as having anything to do with their being butch. So why do it with effeminate guys?"
But isn't the a-hole frat dude talking about hot chicks' boobs, and how much they can bench press considered "hyper, or cartoonishly masuline"? Or "butch", as you say? I know I think of it that way. And I find those guys as off putting as gay men who shriek and lisp and talk about hot dude's d*cks. That's cartoonishly feminine. That doesn't mean all feminine gay guys are like this, but it is definitely feminine behavior.
Not just a femme thing.
I do agree that there are lots of people that are loud & annoying. My point was that these traits, which are applicatable to a whole host jerks out there, may by why some people dislike effeminate guys. So, they just dislike a wide trait that happens to be found in a effeminate guys, or at least the ones that stand out in public. It also might be because they stand out in public they recieve more attention for such annoying behaviour than the drunks at the waterpark because some drunks guys is more socially accepted or toleratted that efffeminate men. Sad, but most likely true.
However, i do concieve that there are people who dislike effeminate men for a variety of reasons, i just think some dislike them for being annoying rather than being a tad bit more "girly' than "manly".
& while i do think drunk guy at a water park is a no no, i have been at sporting events & found the loud drunk frat boys made things far more enjoyable then if they were not there. But that is most likely just a personal taste kine thing.
<3
Most the Straight boys I grew up with
Did the whole "dressing up" phase, It was the 80's, everyone did. And most grew out of it a few months/years later.
And most kids are still doing just that today....dressing up and pushing boundrys whether its percived or true social ones or ones in there in minds.
Its more to do with trying to be original and not like your parents than sexuality as far as I can see.
Though when it comes to whether or not some men are.... to use a British phrase "Nancy boys" well yes the community does have issues... probably linked to the fact that for decades the only gay representation in the media that we had was the effeminate guy or the drag act, So eventually this created a backlash.
Now we laud programmes for showing us "straight acting" "real" men in roles and mock any other, Some in self hate, some in embarrasment, some just out of ignorance
I understand the lauding totally, Its nice to see people you idenitfy with on tv and frankly it was a long time coming.
But this is now also creating its own backlash, Some of it from those whom think that "straight acting" is just that, And others who feel now marginalized.
Is there no happy medium?
Of course there is, And time will tell... when all versions of us can co exist without people crying foul.
Well I like to live in hope!
I understand the argument
I understand the argument that many of you'll are making. Being a indian guy and gay as well it can be sometimes tricky to decide if one should be oneself or follow the stereotype of a man. But being masculine is just a description that we have concocted to distinguish between the sexes. I believe that if your situation requires you to be masculine you should be masculine regardless of how odd it makes you feel. A parallel example would be if you are a talkative person and thats how you are most comfortable, you would still need to learn to control your tongue when the situation requires it. Part of what being is a responsible human being is self control and consideration, realizing that you are not a community of one but many.
yes the straight guy next to you may be homophobic and may hate that you swish swash around but your rubbing that in his face wont help matters much. I believe most straight or gay men want buds that will hang out with them and do things that they do and build a comaraderie. In my experience gradually easing your true nature to your friends and coworkers seems to work better than thrusting it in their face. I would not be arrogant enough to suggest that others have similar experiences but i have found acceptance in my community in that way.
Imho at some point in our life we will need to be manly and protect our family and partner from those who might want to ruin it whether directly or indirectly. Taking charge is biologically what the male brain is programmed to do.
Well I agree...for the most
You're talking about bad camp
Not camping itself -- which can be a great art, in many different forms. Think of Quentin Crisp for instance.
And today we've got Adam Lambert.
One man's "Authentic" is another man's "Performance"
“Because he embarrasses me and straight folks will think I'm like him and will be mean to and/or think less of me" doesn't cut it in the 2000s (or the last 20 years as far as I'm concerned).
Arguments about authenticity also don't hold a lot of weight.
Just because someone in multifaceted in their manifestation of manliness and can adjust to different situations and act accordingly (or chose not to) doesn’t make them less authentic than any other gay man.
You don't have to be their friend or lover but you should fight like hell for all gay men and lesbians to get to be our selves and live without ridicule even if we annoy the F out of each other in the process.
No one has the right to decide or judge what is a "real" or "authentic" expression of someone else’s personality (particularly if that someone else is a stranger.
If a gay man is butch or traditionally masculine in his presentation, people can see that and know “some gay men are not effeminate”. It's not that deep.
If a straight person chooses to ignore the reality of butch and masculine gay men all around them, in their lives and in popular culture and default to the “queen they saw in a movie one time” every time they see a gay man then they are stupid. End of.
I don't care how sheltered one's life has been or how uneducated someone might be, everyone is most Western Cultures has been exposed to enough mainstream popular culture (esp television) over the last 20 plus years by now to know better.
As gay people, we should know better. It's about divide and conquer. If we spend all of our time judging each other and monitoring each other and trying to figure out the "best" way to be gay, we spend a lot less time fighting The Powers That Be (whomever they are).
Our place in society and our value and worth cannot depend upon personal aesthetic and making gay folks palatable to the "mainstream" ot making sure staight folks don't thing we're freaks.
"That's our job today: to control the extent to which people can publicly manifest antigay sentiment." (Bayard Rustin)
"Heterosexuality is not normal, it's just common" (Dorothy Parker)
Sure we do
"No one has the right to decide or judge what is a "real" or "authentic" expression of someone else’s personality"
Sure we do. Everyone does it. To everyone else. Everyday. It's human nature.
great thought provoking article
Thank you, Brent, for a great read.
These are my "two cents" after-thoughts: I think the phenomena is two parted (an action-reaction pair): man not adjusting to an expected masculine standard by behaving specially femenine, and social rejection as reaction to this alternate behaviour.
I've been reading lots of Richard Dawkins' writings, it's great stuff for the mind. Taking that as inspiration, this is my attempt to an evolutive (genetic) explanation to this subject. After all, humans are still animals although with a concience (some of them, at least).
First (action),
- There are genes for "mate with males", and "female behaviour" (whatever signals that have evolved on females to attracks males). Both genes appear in women, which provide half their genes to his child. So, it follows that these two genes might come active together in some males from their mothers. They might even come from their fathers, although theirs may not be active.
This is deep rooted in DNA, and it can't be changed. It's part of what gives an specific identity. This should be accepted as-is. Cultural pressure may force an identity, but this would lead to unhappiness to the individual as his real identity would not be fully expressed.
Moving onto the next part (reaction):
- Rejection from straight males may come from aggressiveness and bad reaction on deception ("false advertising" : It signals like female, but it is not). Even if males are just looking for pleasure, sex is a strong and deep rooted mechanism for promoting reproduction. The grand genetic program is about surviving and making copies, and genes are damn good at this, and ruthless too. (over 1 billion years here and still going on).
The previous point has few possibilities of going fully away, as it's also rooted on genes (aggresiveness). Cultural pressure (through education) may be the only help to moderate the bad reaction.
- Gay males rejecting male in femme behaviour may come from competition for males who would mate with males. Are male in femme behaviour more successful in getting mates than non-femme gay counterparts? Also, they're not compatible sex mates as the femme signals have no effect on gay males. This is no different to the reaction between straight guy and a gay guy.
- There are better chances of survival for gay males (not femme behaved) by mimicking the straight male behaviour. As the rejection usually goes with violence and life threatening situations. Again, damn genes are trying to keeping us alive for their own purposes.
Additionally, there are sociocultural components
- The backlash on male in femme behaviour may be product from a long history of misoginy, as women have been seen and treated as second class humans for a long time in societies around the world, so femme behaviour might be seen as lessening and demeaning in men.
- In western societies, jew and christian religions have traditionally reinforced the previous point with a very specific male/female identity definition with no exception and heavy punishment on deviation from the rule.
I apologize if the tone of this comment was too "cold science", but that way of thinking has permeated deeply on my mind. It offers me rational explanation.
Do you agree? Don't agree?
Let's debate! We might learn something.
Question
Answer
I think it is part of it, but not the only component. Social and cultural factors play too.
Much of what we do started as biological imperatives and responses, that got translated in social constructs. As our minds evolved, we've constructed rationalizations to express and propagate this constructs which are successful enough to get us from the caves to where we are. The problem is that other constructs have permeated (such as religious moral codes) and made everything a "bit" irrational. Maybe they were useful at some point, but today they're simply outdated.
Kindness to others, for example, evolves from the biological survival convenience of being in groups. And groups don't survive if their members are bad (deceiving, violent) to each others.
Debate
The biological imperative to propagate the species no longer serves to justify anyone's inclination towards one gender role or another. We have manifested our earthly destiny, so to speak, to the brink of our own destruction. Hatred of women and, by extension, femininity, now stems almost entirely from deeply engrained social prejudices--heterosexism, for example--upheld primarily by the major world religions: Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and even Buddhism and Judaism.
Dress, language, and affectation are our own choices. Those who exhibit bigotry toward feminine gay men are either unaware of the fact that their is no natural gender attached to one's genitalia, or ashamed of being associated with persons who dare to live out loud, who refuse to disappear into the social fabric out of convenience or a lack of imagination.
RE: Debate
Indeed, we've evolved enought to be able to overcome conciously our animal instinct, but that instinct is still there nonetheless. We're still biological beings, with every advantage and shortcoming associated to such nature. The reproductive imperative might not be there in non-straight people, and that may free us from gender role impositions, but it is present and fully active in almost every straight people.
What I'm saying is that even if dress, language, and affectation are our own choices, the rejection of who is different (or behaves differently) is part of the instinct, as rejection to a "defective" (competing?) copy of the genetic program. Social constructs to reject differences don't help either. We can overcome this through educated conscience, but again, the biological program is still there, with more or less intensity in its execution, dumpened or amplified by current social constructs and interactions.
I wish we could solve animosities to anyone who is different and, even more, celebrate diversity in full extent as example of the richness of life, but it's a long way of change through enlightment before we get there. Luckily, if we somehow mutate into a more empathic species we can get there sooner. Until then, our body/conscience has not evolved enough to feel properly each others' pain or happiness: "We only see shadows at the cave's wall."
RE: Debate
I agree that biology does predispose us to certain behaviors, and that, given that we are social animals, some people fit into the middle, and others are forced to the margins--feminine gay men, in this case.
However, I think heteros display a reproductive assumption, not an imperative, as do many homos, which is evidenced by the many gay persons going to great lengths to secure children.
At the end of the day, feminine gay men make many persons within and without the queer community squirm because their dissent from normality is conspicuous. It's vital that traditionally masculine gay men get over their hang-ups with the handful of annoying, absurd, or obnoxious sissies, queens, or divas they've encountered, and learn to embrace the need for such individuals, because they are leading the charge in shaking up the suffocating standard by which we are all expected to live.
Forget the Femme, it's the
LOL This is great!
A great article - I'd love
A great article - I'd love to read more in the same vein on AfterElton.com! (Just a nudge, not a threat. *g*)
I have a good friend who's gay (I'm a straight female myself, mind - not a stereotypical faghag, but I do like gay fiction, so that makes me probably a fagbookhag *g*) who came out only six years ago, but I've known him for about 15 years now. Looking back, I realize that he tried to be as masculine as the other boys in his class, tried to "fit in", but his hobbies (gardening, baking, painting etc.) and his preference to hang around us girls and not playing footie in the breaks made him a bit of a scapegoat for the other boys to tease. When he then came out, he changed his behaviour also over time and is now more feminine than he was back then, but he's also much more at ease with himself and carries himself with way more self-confidence. I wish that he could have been this way back then when he was still in the closet, but as long as society - male society for the most part - sees feminine behavior in men as something despicable and weak, the call for "butching it up" will still be there, which is a great pity.
This article is a great start and I wish it could be publicized in more avenues open to everyone, not just in gay media so that it could kickstart a discussion about preconceived notions of masculinity and feminity.
Just my two cents! :-)
"Heterosexuality isn't normal, it's just common." - Dorothy Parker
Being "more at ease with himself" is the whole point
There are many aspects to out personalities. We shoudl be able to move about them all, and realize them all, wiothout constantly thinking "Am I giving myself away?" which is just another way of saying "Am I too effeminate? "
It takes a Real Man to be a Big Queen.
But what about the severly oppressed miserable fems?
While i totally understand this article and feel that none of us should be villified for living a life we have chosen that does not have any negative effect on the next person.However i have something else to talk about.Something that goes along with why many straight identified heterosexual men who sleep with men,along with gay and bisexual men generally do not prefer effeminate men.
Largely its due to the oppression many effeminate gay men have encountered throughout there life which leads to subconscious unawareness forms of being miserable.How many times have we seen effeminate men attempt to pigeonhole masculine gay and bisexual men as to being effeminate such as themselves?.It is actually very common amongst alot of them.The consistent insults toward masculine men as being queens when the fem is totally unaware there is not a lick of effeminity in the masculine male.The consistent attempts to pigeonhole all men who have sexual attractions to men as being one big happy family,when being sexually attracted to a male does not mean you identify with the GLBT community,nor obligated to conform to it.Not all gay and bisexual men encounter the same issues,experiences and many are not subject to criticism from heterosexuals(particularly masculine).In my experience this has angered many effeminate/flamboyant men to the point they become outraged and attempt to pigeonhole these masculine men as being as effeminate as they are out of misery.The severely oppressed individual tends to be very miserable and not aware of it.Misery in alot of ways loves company and will do anything in its power to drag others down to its level.Using ""pride""as a facade to many things.I find many of these masculine gay and bisexual men are not acting,they are naturally masculine as a result of growing up around heterosexual men.How could they be acting,when its something that occured as a result of assimilation and acclaimation to there heterosexual peers?.Some of you act as if all gay and bisexual men are supressing there effeminate natures to act masculine.This alone is enough to piss many masculine gay and bisexual men off and further fuels thge divide between them.
The consistent insults attempts to claim we are one big family that is obligated to take up for each other is something i find ridiculous and constructed by the stereotypical homosexuals who desire for this to be true.Plenty of heterosexual identified men sleep with other men(whether gay,bi or heterosexual identified)and have no cohesions with the GLBT community.So,its ridiculous to claim they should be welcoming effeminate men into open arms all based on having similar or same sexual attractions.No,he should not bash or hold a form of prejudice toward the effeminate male.Yet,to claim he should open him to welcome arms as if the masculine gay,bi or straight identified male has/is experiencing homophobia is absurd to the highest point.
Plenty of masculine gay,straight identified heterosexuals,bisexuals are disgusted by effeminate gay men because they develop the mentality that most or all are miserable,self loathing queens who fiend for every male that has sexual desires for other men to be just like them.Unfortunately this is not true,being that there are plenty of informed effeminate men out there who do not behave this way.
So please do me a favor and lets not project effeminate men as being some saints,because the truth is there are many oppressed individuals who are effeminate that are among the biggest shit starters that insist on attempting to pigeonhole all men with sexual desires to men as being just like them.Many of these guys totally have hatred for DOWNLOW MEN and use women as a crutch to why they hate these men,yet cannot admit the hatred exist simply because many of these men have found themselves content with very little to no prejudice from heterosexual men due to having similar or the same masculine mannerisms.
"We're All Individuals!" "I'm Not!"
If some bitchy, loud-talking club kid walks in to your local coffee house post rave, wearing spandex pants, platform boots and a baby-t humming "Believe" by Cher and lispingly orders a whip-creamed infused latte concoction (while you at the corner table calmly slurps a black coffee with no sugar) it has no actual effect on your freedom to rock the cotton oxford look, listen to Dave Mathews and watch Sports Center (and who knows, the club kid might want to join you).
If someone is a bitchy person, they are a bitchy person. It has nothing to do with masculinity or feminity or being gay or straight. Some of the most self-proclaimed "straight-acting" men on this very site can fling shade at anyone who comes within a few feet and spew nasty snark like nobody's business (apparently without the help of glitter and rhinestones).
That's their right to speak as they want, but let's not pretend that "bitchy" is reserved for the fey fellas.
Even if you were wearing a tee shirt that said "I'm Gay Too" in that coffee house scenario, there is no way that anyone would mistake one of you for the other because thinking human beings with the ability to reason recognize that not all Itallians act alike, not all folks from Arkansas are farmers and not all gays are "prancy".
People’s opinions about other people change as a result of familiarity. So the truth is the more different men who come out as gay, the more diverse the palate becomes and the less likely any one kind of gay man will be seen as "the prototype gay"
Honest, smart, non-homophobic straight folks are not so mesmerized by the glam (fabulous at it is) that seeing one gay man (or 100) in wings and feathers will lead them to spend the rest of their day/life waiting for all their gay friends to whip out a boa and start critiquing things based on a SNAPS scale.
"That's our job today: to control the extent to which people can publicly manifest antigay sentiment." (Bayard Rustin) ** "Heterosexuality is not normal, it's just common" (Dorothy Parker)
Great article!!!
I for one am a semi-femme guy who happens to LOVE effeminate men! I see a stigma against effeminate men in our community. More often than not people say they want "straight- acting". What exactly does that mean anyway? I really don't know. I am not straight and I do not want a straight man. I love sports, am an accomplished athelete, drink beer.. is that not straight enough for you? Can I help it that I get excited over Stevie Nicks and soap operas? SHOULD I have to help it? I think not. I have no qualms about being myself and I expect my friends and partners to be the same way. If you really are butch, then be butch! But if you happen to love the glitter, that is fine with me too! Too long has it been accepted to bash the "gay acting" gays and say things like "It's ok, you're not femme". Even within the gay community this happens. It is time to end all that. I don't need to assert my masculinity in any way other than I see fit.
Gay and lesbian rights are not special rights in any way. It isn't "special" to be free from discrimination. It is an ordinary, universal entitlement of citizenship."
Good stuff
I liked the article too.
As somebody who does not act stereotypically feminine all the time (although I am getting into Broadway musicals a lot more as of late), I've been told by guys that I liked that I wasn't "gay enough" and that I should quit "pretending." It's not like I'm an NRA Republican football-watcher, either. So the prejudice can definitely go both ways, and I really think we shouldn't care about it as much as we currently do. Why wouldn't we want a skillset that encompasses everything--let's try to be good at everything under the sun, from interior decorating to construction :)
Better Question: Why don't butch men femme it up?
A better way to get at this topic is to question those who march to the beat of the gender mainstream. Those are the people who never question gender roles, and, consequently, abuse others for walking outside the lines. Feminine men and masculine women, regardless of their sexuality, are discriminated against for the same reason: No matter how queer you are, everyone's more comfortable if you don't look and act like it.
We still live in a world where queer teens are killing themselves because of the harassment they encounter. It's more important to protect and encourage those who offer dissents from normality--the sissies, studs, and queens--than to ask, even rhetorically, that they answer for themselves.
wow...
wow, great article. very interesting
Does anyone even think the term 'effeminate' is fair? i personally cant stand it. i'm sitting here trying to word this in my head, as to not offend, but here goes....I've seen gay men who are...more outgoing in nature, but i dont see them as acting like a woman. fine, some are louder, and may say sentences a certain way and walk a certain way....BUT...not all women walk with a 'swish' and not all women talk the same way...it's all stereotypical. comparing certain gay men to how women behave. uh, not all women behave the same way. that, to me, is stereotypical.
I'm not a gay man, but i think when a group of people are so easily teased or mocked, then i think it's bound to happen that people within that group will want to steer clear. I don't think it's malicious intent....and ugh i am trying to think of something to compare it to...but i can't. nobody wants to be shunned. nobody wants to be teased and mocked. we all just want to be ourselves, but when society tears a portion of us down, we associate those people with failure in a sense...."oh, they wont get far...people are staring and pointing at them....people think he's weird, i can't be seen with him"
we all have to help each other, but i think society as whole needs to stop saying "women act this way, you act like this, so you're like them, you're wrong, blah blah blah"
hope that made sense..i'm sure someone said it or will say it better than I did.
IMHO
I think this article continues to expand upon what have discussed in other posts and the debate we had about LGBT/GLBT last week. Humans in general are continually debating who they are, their purpose in the world, and their own beliefs. As gay men our part of this quilt seems to be mainly about who are we as men. Society has dictated how a man should act through popular culture and we are a casulty at times.
In my own experience, I know I swish at the hips a bit and my voice is characterized as being a little too focused on over annuciation but I enjoy sports; don't have a particular natural ability at fashion; I celebrate the chick much more often than I should; I am not a hand holder; I have an occasional hissy fit; I am not afraid to venture into a sports bar; i do love an occasional trance thump dance beat; I am known for my eye roll and one-liners; I love a good beer but at the right time a fancy cocktail is a fun thing; I am not crazy about cars; and I am certainly not a neat freak. But all this makes me "me." The fact that I have the prerequisite body parts makes me a member of the male gender, but being myself is so much more.
My partner and I are thinking about adoption lately and my one fear about being a gay man though is that I may make my son (if we have one) gay. I KNOW that is not possible and a silly thing to think of course, but many of the men in our adoption support group Maybe Baby agreed with me. It isn't the fear of "making" our sons gay, its about having them copy or emulate our physical behavior I fear that has me worried in the back of my mind, because it was that behavior that led us to the pain of teasing by others in my own background. Again, it is not a bad thing to be gay - and don't I know it and am happy to be it - but I fear that as a starting point I fear that any son of mine's masculinity may be on my own mind once he ventures into the world. I don't worry about myself butching up and am quite open about who I am amongst my peers, but I fear I might be a "butcher upper" father when the time comes and have to train myself not to push it out of my own fears.
What I wonder is, as generations progress will this butching up feeling really matter since the generations coming up seem to have a more tolerant and open view about sexuality, homosexuality in particular.
If you have a son and if he
Actually...
no one ever told any minority group not to have familites because of racism or anti-semitism or whatever, nor did they ever tell them, "Don't act too black/Jewish (or female!)."
Actually, they did. It may be hard to imagine in this day and age, where you've got menorahs next to Christmas trees in every store window, but once upon a time, Jews were expected to "fit in." My Jewish grandparents had a Christmas tree and hid eggs on Easter, just because they wanted to be "normal," and they especially wanted their kids to be "normal." (i.e., not Jewish.) That expectation of "fitting in" that the majority Christian culture enforced on Jews for so many generations is a big reason why there are so many secular Jews today.
This whole dicussion we're having right now (btw, wonderful article, Brent) is the exact same discussion previous generations of racial minorities had about "passing." For a long time, some lighter-skinned black people thought themselves superior to darker-skinned black people (and this still exists, albeit not in as blatant a form as it once did). At the same time, though, our situation is kind of unique, as misogyny is very much tied into homophobia. You can't really separate the two.
I guess I'm in the minority in that I actually find effeminate men more attractive for being effeminate. I don't know, something about a neat, clean guy who carries himself with confidence and pride and who isn't too afraid to be kind or nurturing or witty... that's seriously sexy to me. Of course, loud, self-absorbed people who give way too much information about their sex lives are obnoxious, but that's not a function of being feminine. It's a function of being a dick.
One last thing that kind of bugs me, as an anthro nerd: I'm really sick of people justifying strict gender roles by appealing to evolution. We know how modern hunter-gatherers relate to one another, and from studying them, we can make some reasonable assumptions about our own hunter-gatherer ancestors. One thing we know for sure is that homophobia is pretty rare. (As Marvin Harris said, rather than asking why some people are gay, it makes more sense to ask the question, "Why are some societies anti-gay?") Virtually every hunter-gatherer society has some accepted role for a "third gender/two spirit" type - usually several. This makes sense - H/G cultures are nomadic. They can't be carrying around a bunch of kids all the time. So they naturally have to restrict the number of children they have. Many scientists now believe that homosexuality came about as a method of population control, as well as a way to ensure that each kid had a number of adults looking after him or her, not just two. It was only after the invention of agriculture that having more and more children became a virtue, as you needed more people to till the fields. That's also when not having children - for any reason - started to be considered anti-social, and women were reduced to babymaking machines. In other words, blame agriculture. ;-)
Try to look beyond the fear
Fear of influencing children the wrong way (not that it would in fact be the wrong way if they were gay or acted a bit more sensitively) is something that all new parents tend to have, in some ways because your planning on having the child those thoughts are worse on you and your partner because you can dwell on that fear longer than a couple who is pregnant and has to come to grips with it right away. But you really dont have to worry as much as it seems.
If you or your partner is a bit feminine you need to look back and ask yourselves how that came to be, was your own father feminine-acting? chances are that would be no, and yet those aspects still came through, in the end that was the person who you were already. There's a very early memory I have that has stayed with me since I was 4 years old, I remember driving with my mother in the car going to pre-school and I crossed my legs in a womanly way while sitting in the car, even letting my ankle move up a down a bit, and my mother was sort of amused and said "where did you learn that?" and I remember my answer being "no one, I just like it." It was very innocent and it was the truth, my mother rarely ever sat that way and my dad never did, it just felt natural for me to sit that way one day and so I did. Now days I would consider myself with an 'average' guy personality overall, every now and then I have more 'masculine' or 'feminine' moments simply depending on my mood. And I still cross my legs a lot when sitting because its something I've done for a long time regardless of my mood, my parents meanwhile, still dont sit that way.
Your children will certainly take queues in life and behavior from the both of you throughout their own life but very often it will not be anything beyond what they already felt was right for them. In most cases they will act a certain way you never did or would have even dreamed of simply because thats how they feel. They will need your guidance but in the end it cant be forgotten that they are separate human beings and will often begin showing bits of their own individual-selves from the moment they start walking and talking. And by the time your children get to their teens their generation will be more evened out when it comes to the issue of how a person acts, every 10 years things move forward in one way or the other and masc/fem personalities are slowly becoming a non-issue to the new generations. Sensitive kids, artistic kids, things that were once considered 'sissy' matter less and less to younger people who are living in a world with less strict gender defining roles on both sides. Of course some, straight and gay, still cling to old conservative gender roles and gross generalizations (as seen even in some of the comments from people) but they are in a loosing battle, those views are increasingly viewed as close-minded and wont have much attention payed to them as time goes on.
Try not to over think it too much, you'll need to look beyond any fear of influencing them personality-wise, so that you dont miss out on what would/will be a very meaningful thing to the life of you, your partner, and the child......until they become teenagers, then the meaningfulness will have to wade through some rough times, but in the end the meaningfulness will surely return ;P
Great Article
One of the best articles I've ever read on the subject.
Here is my 2 cents worth. I'm one of those gay men who are attacted to the macho man. Those who are not are not my cup of tea personally. It's not whom I'm attracted to. That being said. I've had many less than macho friends over the years. I'll be one of the first to stand up and defend them if necessary. I came to realize that as a gay man, there are all types of "types", we've got the drag queens, the bears, the metro-sexual, the effiminates, the macho man, the closeted, the transexual's, the bisexuals. Everyone has a preference (even no preference is a preference). The reality is that we need to refer back to that golden rule we were all taught. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.